scholarly journals The effects of several postoperative adjuvant therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion after curative resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiarui Yang ◽  
Hao Liang ◽  
Kunpeng Hu ◽  
Zhiyong Xiong ◽  
Mingbo Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Microvascular Invasion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Conservative Group ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background For patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with microvascular invasion (MVI) after curative resection, the effects of various postoperative adjuvant therapies are not summarized in detail, and the comparison between the effects of various adjuvant therapies is still unclear. Thus, we collected existing studies on postoperative adjuvant therapies for patients with HCC with MVI after curative resection and analyzed the effects of various adjuvant therapies. Method We collected all studies on postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with HCC with MVI after curative resection from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and SinoMed ending on May 1, 2019. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free/recurrence-free survival (RFS) between each group were compared in these studies by calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). All statistical analyses were assessed by two authors independently. Result A total of 13 studies were included in this study, including 824 postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (pa-TACE) patients, 90 postoperative radiotherapy patients, 57 radiofrequency ablation (RFA)/re-resection patients, 16 sorafenib patients and 886 postoperative conservative treatment patients. The results showed that pa-TACE significantly improved OS and RFS compared with postoperative conservative treatment in patients with HCC with MVI after curative resection (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.55–0.74, p < 0.001; HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.62–0.78, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in OS between pa-TACE and radiotherapy in patients with HCC with MVI (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 0.92–3.32, p = 0.087). RFS in patients with HCC with MVI after pa-TACE was worse than that after postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (HR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.43–3.65, p < 0.001). The prognosis of pa-TACE and RFA/re-resection in patients with MVI with recurrent HCC had no significant differences (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.09–4.89, p = 0.671). Adjuvant treatments significantly improved the OS and RFS of patients compared with the postoperative conservative group (HR: 0.580, 95% CI: 0.480–0.710, p < 0.001; HR: 0.630, 95% CI: 0.540–0.740, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Compared with postoperative conservative treatment, pa-TACE, postoperative radiotherapy and sorafenib can improve the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with microvascular invasion after curative resection. Postoperative radiotherapy can reduce the recurrence of patients with HCC with MVI after curative resection compared with pa-TACE.

Comparison of conservative treatment with appendectomy for acute uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 767-780
Author(s):  
Le-wee Bi ◽  
Bei-lei Yan ◽  
Qian-yu Yang ◽  
Hua-lei Cui
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Aim: We aimed to compare conservative treatment with surgery for uncomplicated pediatric appendicitis to estimate effectiveness and safety. Methods: Data recorded until September 2018 were searched, and relevant academic articles from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and other libraries were selected. STATA version 13.0 (Stata Corporation, TX, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Results: We identified nine eligible papers. The study reported a significant difference in the success rate of treatment in 1 month and in 1 year, and no difference in the incidence of complications. The patients with fecaliths showed low treatment efficacy in conservative treatment group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Standardized conservative treatment as inpatients for pediatric appendicitis is safe and feasible. Appendectomy was the better choice for patients with fecaliths.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daopeng Yang ◽  
Bowen Zhuang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Xiaoyan Xie ◽  
Xiaohua Xie
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background The clinical benefits of treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and repeat hepatic resection (RHR) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) remain controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes and major complications of RFA versus RHR in patients with early-stage RHCC. Methods PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for comparative studies on the evaluation of RHR versus RFA for RHCC. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and major complications. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was tested by the Cochran Q statistic. Results Ten studies with 1612 patients (RHR = 654, RFA = 958) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that RHR had superior OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI =0.65–0.92, P = 0.004) and PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI =0.67–0.98, P = 0.027) compared to RFA, whereas major complications may be less frequent in the RFA group (OR 0.15, 95% CI = 0.06–0.39, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with single RHCC ≤3 cm, OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI =0.69–1.52, P = 0.897) and PFS (HR 0.99, 95% CI = 0.71–1.37, P = 0.929) showed no significant differences in the comparison of RHR and RFA. In single RHCC> 3 cm and ≤ 5 cm, RFA showed an increased mortality in terms of OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37–0.89, P = 0.014). Conclusion RHR offers a longer OS and PFS than RFA for patients with RHCC, but no statistically significant difference was observed for single RHCC ≤3 cm. The advantages of fewer major complications may render RFA an alternative treatment option for selected patients.

Impact of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma rupture on surgical outcome after liver resection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Yong Huang ◽  
Chang Shu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Tumor Rupture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Spontaneous tumor rupture is a rare but life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The impact of spontaneous ruptured HCC on long-term survival after liver resection (LR) remains unclear. Our aim was to compare the surgical outcome in patients who underwent LR with ruptured and non-ruptured HCC . Methods A comprehensive search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index Expanded databases was performed. The primary outcomes were the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival ( OS) and disease free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes included morbidity, hospital mortality and recurrence rate . Results Ten retrospective studies including 3222 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis revealed a significantly poorer OS and DFS for patients with ruptured HCC compared to patients with non-ruptured HCC (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.61-2.54; P< 0.00001 and HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.56-2.35; P<0.00001, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, both the propensity score matching (PSM) and non-PSM studies demonstrated a significantly poorer OS in the ruptured HCC group (P=0.02 and P<0.00001, respectively). However, meta-analysis of two PSM studies showed that there was not significant difference in the DFS between the two groups (P=0.50). Patients in the ruptured HCC group had a higher mortality and recurrence rate than the non-ruptured HCC group, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.05 and P = 0.06, respectively) Conclusions Surgical outcomes of the patients with the ruptured or non-ruptured HCC undergoing LR were not only affected by tumor rupture itself, but also by the tumor characteristics and liver functional status. Therefore, classifying all ruptured but resectable HCC as T4 stage is unable to accurately represent their true prognosis.

scholarly journals Impact of spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma rupture on surgical outcome after liver resection: a systemic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Zhi-Yong Huang ◽  
Chang Shu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Tumor Rupture ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Spontaneous tumor rupture is a rare but life-threatening complication of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The impact of spontaneous ruptured HCC on long-term survival after liver resection (LR) remains unclear. Our aim was to compare the surgical outcome in patients who underwent LR with ruptured and non-ruptured HCC . Methods A comprehensive search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index Expanded databases was performed. The primary outcomes were the hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival ( OS) and disease free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes included morbidity, hospital mortality and recurrence rate . Results Ten retrospective studies including 3222 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis revealed a significantly poorer OS and DFS for patients with ruptured HCC compared to patients with non-ruptured HCC (HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.61-2.54; P< 0.00001 and HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.56-2.35; P<0.00001, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, both the propensity score matching (PSM) and non-PSM studies demonstrated a significantly poorer OS in the ruptured HCC group (P=0.02 and P<0.00001, respectively). However, meta-analysis of two PSM studies showed that there was not significant difference in the DFS between the two groups (P=0.50). Patients in the ruptured HCC group had a higher mortality and recurrence rate than the non-ruptured HCC group, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.05 and P = 0.06, respectively) Conclusions Surgical outcomes of the patients with the ruptured or non-ruptured HCC undergoing LR were not only affected by tumor rupture itself, but also by the tumor characteristics and liver functional status. Therefore, classifying all ruptured but resectable HCC as T4 stage is unable to accurately represent their true prognosis.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Chemotherapy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiani Zhao ◽  
Lianli Zeng ◽  
Qian Wu ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Jun Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Line ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Background: The superiority of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared to SBRT alone as the first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficiency and safety of SBRT combined with TACE (ST group) and SBRT alone (SA group). Methods: We searched PubMed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for related studies. We analyzed overall survival (OS), local control survival (LCS), progression-free survival (PFS), the response rate and adverse effects (AEs) between the 2 groups. Results: Ten articles were included, with a total of 980 patients. The results showed that the ST (SBRT + TACE) group had a longer OS (95% CIs 0.60–0.85, p = 0.0002), a higher 5-year OS rate (95% CI 1.01–2.04, p = 0.04), a higher rate of complete response (95% CI 1.08–1.90, p = 0.01), and a higher disease control rate (95% CI 1.02–1.16, p = 0.02) than the SA (SBRT alone) group. No significant difference was found in LCS, PFS and total AEs of all grades and grades 3–5 AEs between the 2 groups. In the subgroup analysis, the patients with HCC + PVTT or treated with SBRT followed by TACE in the ST group had the same OS as those in the SA group, and the patients in the ST group had a higher incidence rate of leukopenia and fever than those in the SA group. Conclusion: SBRT + TACE appears to be more effective than SBRT alone in treating unresectable HCC. However, its higher incidence rate of leukopenia and fever need to be monitored.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of Percutaneous vs. Surgical Approaches Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaozhun Huang ◽  
Yibin Liu ◽  
Lin Xu ◽  
Teng Ma ◽  
Xin Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a curative modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who are not suitable for resection. It remains controversial whether a surgical or percutaneous approach is more appropriate for HCC.Method: A search was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from the date of database inception until April 17, 2021. Studies reporting outcomes of comparisons between surgical RFA (SRFA) and percutaneous RFA (PRFA) were included in this study. The meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software.Result: A total of 10 retrospective studies containing 12 cohorts, involving 740 patients in the PRFA group and 512 patients in the SRFA group, were selected. Although the tumor size in PRFA group was smaller than the SRFA group (p = 0.007), there was no significant difference in complete ablation rate between the SRFA and PRFA groups (95.63% and 97.33%, respectively; Odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.26–1.24; p = 0.15). However, the SRFA group showed a significantly lower local tumor recurrence than the PRFA group in the sensitivity analysis (28.7% in the PRFA group and 21.79% in the SRFA group, respectively; OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.14–2.95; p = 0.01). Pooled analysis data showed that the rate of severe perioperative complications did not differ significantly between the PRFA and SRFA groups (14.28% and 12.11%, respectively; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.67-2.53; p = 0.44). There was no significant difference in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates, as well as the 1- and 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) between the PRFA and SRFA groups. The 5-year DFS of the PRFA group was significantly lower than the SRFA group (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% CI 0.54–0.99).Conclusion: Based on our meta-analysis, the surgical route was superior to PRFA in terms of local control rate. Furthermore, the surgical approach did not increase the risk of major complications.

scholarly journals Sorafenib in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and microvascular infiltration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052094687
Author(s):  
Wang Gu ◽  
Zhong Tong
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Microvascular Invasion ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Rate Versus ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

Objective Microvascular invasion is shown to be an independent risk factor for liver cancer recurrence. Timely treatment may reduce the recurrence rate and prolong total survival time. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of sorafenib in treating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and microvascular invasion Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, web of science and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to December 2019. Two researchers independently reviewed and cross-checked independent reports with sufficient information. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of sorafenib on mortality in patients with HCC and microvascular involvement. Results Four studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, comprising 955 cancer events and 505 cancer deaths. Meta-analyses showed that sorafenib treatment was associated with an improved survival rate versus no sorafenib treatment in patients with HCC and microvascular invasion (relative risk 1.369, 95% confidence interval 1.193, 1.570). Conclusions Sorafenib treatment may improve survival in patients with HCC and microvascular invasion. However, due to the potential for residual confounding, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib better than chemoembolization plus placebo in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162094502
Author(s):  
Yong Xie ◽  
Huan Tian ◽  
Hua Xiang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with TACE plus placebo for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using meta-analytical techniques. Methods: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were done from inception to December 27, 2019. Published trials including a treatment group receiving TACE + sorafenib and a control group receiving TACE + placebo with data for at least 1-year survival or tumor response or time to progression were included. Results: Our study suggested that there was no evidence that TACE plus sorafenib was associated with a lower risk of disease progression compared with TACE plus placebo for treatment of HCC (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84–1.05]), and no significant difference for treatment of HCC compared with TACE plus placebo in terms of 0.5-, 1-, 1.5-, and 2-year survival rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.01 [95% CI, 0.97–1.05]; RR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.92–1.08], RR 1.04 [95% CI, 0.89–1.23], RR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.72–1.34], respectively). The meta-analysis also showed that TACE + sorafenib seemed to have no significant difference for treatment of HCC compared with TACE + placebo in terms of complete response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease, overall response rate, and disease control rate. There was an increased incidence of fatigue of grade 3/4 and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase of grade 3/4 in patients receiving TACE plus sorafenib compared with those receiving TACE plus placebo. Conclusions: There is no additive benefit of TACE plus sorafenib compared to TACE plus placebo for HCC.

scholarly journals Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Hepatic Resection for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daopeng Yang ◽  
Bowen Zhuang ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Xiaoyan Xie ◽  
Xiaohua Xie
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Hepatic Resection ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Alternative Treatment Option ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background:The clinical benefits of treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and repeat hepatic resection (RHR) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) remain controversial. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the outcomes and major complications of RFA versus RHR in patients with early-stage RHCC.Methods:PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for comparative studies on the evaluation of RHR versus RFA for RHCC. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and major complications. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was tested by the Cochran Q statistic. Results:Ten studies with 1612 patients (RHR = 654, RFA = 958) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that RHR had superior OS (HR 0.77, 95% CI =0.65-0.92, P=0.004) and PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI =0.67-0.98, P=0.027) compared to RFA, whereas major complications may be less frequent in the RFA group (OR 0.15, 95% CI = 0.06-0.39, P<0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with single RHCC ≤ 3 cm, OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI =0.69-1.52, P=0.897) and PFS (HR 0.99, 95% CI=0.71-1.37, P=0.929) showed no significant differences in the comparison of RHR and RFA. In single RHCC>3 cm and ≤5 cm, RFA showed an increased mortality in terms of OS (HR 0.57, 95% CI=0.37-0.89, P=0.014).Conclusion:RHR offers a longer OS and PFS than RFA for patients with RHCC, but no statistically significant difference was observed for single RHCC ≤ 3 cm. The advantages of fewer major complications may render RFA an alternative treatment option for selected patients.

Laser Influence on Dental Sensitivity Compared to Other Light Sources Used During In-office Dental Bleaching: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 589-597
Author(s):  
BGS Casado ◽  
EP Pellizzer ◽  
JR Souto Maior ◽  
CAA Lemos ◽  
BCE Vasconcelos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Present Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Light Sources ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Tooth Color ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Analyses

Clinical Relevance The use of laser light during bleaching will not reduce the incidence or severity of sensitivity and will not increase the degree of color change compared with nonlaser light sources. SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate whether the use of laser during in-office bleaching promotes a reduction in dental sensitivity after bleaching compared with other light sources. Methods: The present review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and is registered with PROSPERO (CDR42018096591). Searches were conducted in the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published up to August 2018. Only randomized clinical trials among adults that compared the use of laser during in-office whitening and other light sources were considered eligible. Results: After analysis of the texts retrieved during the database search, six articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected for the present review. For the outcome dental sensitivity, no significant difference was found favoring any type of light either for intensity (mean difference [MD]: −1.60; confidence interval [CI]: −3.42 to 0.22; p=0.09) or incidence (MD: 1.00; CI: 0.755 to 1.33; p=1.00). Regarding change in tooth color, no significant differences were found between the use of the laser and other light sources (MD: −2.22; CI: −6.36 to 1.93; p=0.29). Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, laser exerts no influence on tooth sensitivity compared with other light sources when used during in-office bleaching. The included studies demonstrated that laser use during in-office bleaching may have no influence on tooth color change.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document