scholarly journals Acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients: outcome and clinical features according to neutropenia status

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Djamel Mokart ◽  
◽  
Michael Darmon ◽  
Peter Schellongowski ◽  
Peter Pickkers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Neutropenic Patients ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background The impact of neutropenia in critically ill immunocompromised patients admitted in a context of acute respiratory failure (ARF) remains uncertain. The primary objective was to assess the prognostic impact of neutropenia on outcomes of these patients. Secondary objective was to assess etiology of ARF according to neutropenia. Methods We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter multinational study from 23 ICUs belonging to the Nine-I network. Between November 2015 and July 2016, all adult immunocompromised patients with ARF admitted to the ICU were included in the study. Adjusted analyses included: (1) a hierarchical model with center as random effect; (2) propensity score (PS) matched cohort; and (3) adjusted analysis in the matched cohort. Results Overall, 1481 patients were included in this study of which 165 had neutropenia at ICU admission (11%). ARF etiologies distribution was significantly different between neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, main etiologies being bacterial pneumonia (48% vs 27% in neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients, respectively). Initial oxygenation strategy was standard supplemental oxygen in 755 patients (51%), high-flow nasal oxygen in 165 (11%), non-invasive ventilation in 202 (14%) and invasive mechanical ventilation in 359 (24%). Before adjustment, hospital mortality was significantly higher in neutropenic patients (54% vs 42%; p = 0.006). After adjustment for confounder and center effect, neutropenia was no longer associated with outcome (OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.93–2.11). Similar results were observed after matching (52% vs 46%, respectively; p = 0.35) and after adjustment in the matched cohort (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.63–1.72). Conclusion Neutropenia at ICU admission is not associated with hospital mortality in this cohort of critically ill immunocompromised patients admitted for ARF. In neutropenic patients, main ARF etiologies are bacterial and fungal infections.

scholarly journals Oxygenation Strategy During Acute Respiratory Failure in Critically-Ill Immunocompromised Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginie Lemiale ◽  
Audrey De Jong ◽  
Guillaume Dumas ◽  
Alexandre Demoule ◽  
Djamel Mokart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients

Outcomes of Critically Ill Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Prospective Multicenter Data From France and Belgium—A Groupe de Recherche Respiratoire en Réanimation Onco-Hématologique Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (22) ◽  
pp. 2810-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elie Azoulay ◽  
Djamel Mokart ◽  
Frédéric Pène ◽  
Jérôme Lambert ◽  
Achille Kouatchet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Good Survival ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Icu Admission

Purpose Patients with hematologic malignancies are increasingly admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) when life-threatening events occur. We sought to report outcomes and prognostic factors in these patients. Patients and Methods Ours was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and disease status were collected after 3 to 6 months. Results Of the 1,011 patients, 38.2% had newly diagnosed malignancies, 23.1% were in remission, and 24.9% had received hematopoietic stem-cell transplantations (HSCT, including 145 allogeneic). ICU admission was mostly required for acute respiratory failure (62.5%) and/or shock (42.3%). On day1, 733 patients (72.5%) received life-supporting interventions. Hospital, day-90, and 1-year survival rates were 60.7%, 52.5%, and 43.3%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, cancer remission and time to ICU admission less than 24 hours were associated with better hospital survival. Poor performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, allogeneic HSCT, organ dysfunction score, cardiac arrest, acute respiratory failure, malignant organ infiltration, and invasive aspergillosis were associated with higher hospital mortality. Mechanical ventilation (47.9% of patients), vasoactive drugs (51.2%), and dialysis (25.9%) were associated with mortality rates of 60.5%, 57.5%, and 59.2%, respectively. On day 90, 80% of survivors had no HRQOL alterations (physical and mental health similar to that of the overall cancer population). After 6 months, 80% of survivors had no change in treatment intensity compared with similar patients not admitted to the ICU, and 80% were in remission. Conclusion Critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies have good survival, disease control, and post-ICU HRQOL. Earlier ICU admission is associated with better survival.

scholarly journals Bacterial and viral co-infections in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia admitted to a French ICU

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Contou ◽  
Aurore Claudinon ◽  
Olivier Pajot ◽  
Maïté Micaëlo ◽  
Pascale Longuet Flandre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Haemophilus Influenzae ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Pathogenic Bacteria ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Icu Admission

Abstract Background Data on the prevalence of bacterial and viral co-infections among patients admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory failure related to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia are lacking. We aimed to assess the rate of bacterial and viral co-infections, as well as to report the most common micro-organisms involved in patients admitted to the ICU for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Patients and methods In this monocenter retrospective study, we reviewed all the respiratory microbiological investigations performed within the first 48 h of ICU admission of COVID-19 patients (RT-PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2) admitted for acute respiratory failure. Results From March 13th to April 16th 2020, a total of 92 adult patients (median age: 61 years, 1st–3rd quartiles [55–70]; males: n = 73/92, 79%; baseline SOFA: 4 [3–7] and SAPS II: 31 [21–40]; invasive mechanical ventilation: n = 83/92, 90%; ICU mortality: n = 45/92, 49%) were admitted to our 40-bed ICU for acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Among them, 26 (28%) were considered as co-infected with a pathogenic bacterium at ICU admission with no co-infection related to atypical bacteria or viruses. The distribution of the 32 bacteria isolated from culture and/or respiratory PCRs was as follows: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10/32, 31%), Haemophilus influenzae (n = 7/32, 22%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 6/32, 19%), Enterobacteriaceae (n = 5/32, 16%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 2/32, 6%), Moraxella catarrhalis (n = 1/32, 3%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (n = 1/32, 3%). Among the 24 pathogenic bacteria isolated from culture, 2 (8%) and 5 (21%) were resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporin and to amoxicillin–clavulanate combination, respectively. Conclusions We report on a 28% rate of bacterial co-infection at ICU admission of patients with severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia, mostly related to Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterobacteriaceae. In French patients with confirmed severe SARSCoV-2 pneumonia requiring ICU admission, our results encourage the systematic administration of an empiric antibiotic monotherapy with a 3rd generation cephalosporin, with a prompt de-escalation as soon as possible. Further larger studies are needed to assess the real prevalence and the predictors of co-infection together with its prognostic impact on critically ill patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and outcome of acute respiratory failure in immunocompromised patients after bronchoscopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 1802442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe R. Bauer ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Hemang Yadav ◽  
Sangeeta Mehta ◽  
Peter Pickkers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Propensity Score Matching ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Noninvasive Testing ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

ObjectiveWe wished to explore the use, diagnostic capability and outcomes of bronchoscopy added to noninvasive testing in immunocompromised patients. In this setting, an inability to identify the cause of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure is associated with worse outcome. Every effort should be made to obtain a diagnosis, either with noninvasive testing alone or combined with bronchoscopy. However, our understanding of the risks and benefits of bronchoscopy remains uncertain.Patients and methodsThis was a pre-planned secondary analysis of Efraim, a prospective, multinational, observational study of 1611 immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We compared patients with noninvasive testing only to those who had also received bronchoscopy by bivariate analysis and after propensity score matching.ResultsBronchoscopy was performed in 618 (39%) patients who were more likely to have haematological malignancy and a higher severity of illness score. Bronchoscopy alone achieved a diagnosis in 165 patients (27% adjusted diagnostic yield). Bronchoscopy resulted in a management change in 236 patients (38% therapeutic yield). Bronchoscopy was associated with worsening of respiratory status in 69 (11%) patients. Bronchoscopy was associated with higher ICU (40%versus28%; p<0.0001) and hospital mortality (49%versus41%; p=0.003). The overall rate of undiagnosed causes was 13%. After propensity score matching, bronchoscopy remained associated with increased risk of hospital mortality (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.08–1.81).ConclusionsBronchoscopy was associated with improved diagnosis and changes in management, but also increased hospital mortality. Balancing risk and benefit in individualised cases should be investigated further.

scholarly journals High Flow Nasal Cannula as Support in Immunocompromised Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Claudia Giugliano-Jaramillo ◽  
Josefina León ◽  
Cristobal Enriquez ◽  
Juan E. Keymer ◽  
Rodrigo Pérez-Araos
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Work Of Breathing ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

Introduction: High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) is a novel technique for respiratory support that improves oxygenation. In some patients, it may reduce the work of breathing. In immunocompromised patients with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF), Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is the main support recommended strategy, since invasive mechanical ventilation could increase mortality rates. NIV used for more than 48 hours may be associated with increased in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay. Therefore HFNC seems like a respiratory support alternative. Objective: To describe clinical outcomes of immunocompromised patients with ARF HFNC-supported. Methods: Retrospective study in patients admitted with ARF and HFNC-supported. 25 adult patients were included, 21 pharmacologically and 4 non- pharmacologically immunosuppressed. Median age of the patients was 64 [60-76] years, APACHE II 15 [11-19], and PaO2:FiO2 218 [165-248]. Demographic information, origin of immunosuppression, Respiratory Rate (RR), Heart Rate (HR), Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and PaO2:FiO2 ratio were extracted from clinical records of our HFNC local protocol. Data acquisition was performed before and after the first 24 hours of connection. In addition, the need for greater ventilatory support after HFNC, orotracheal intubation, in-hospital mortality and 90 days out-patients’ mortality was recorded. Results: Mean RR before the connection was 25±22 breaths/min and 22±4 breaths/min after the first 24 hours of HFNC use (95% CI; p=0.02). HR mean before connection to HFNC was 96±22 beats/min, and after, it was 86±15 beats/min (95%CI; p=0.008). Previous mean MAP was 86±15 mmHg, and after HFNC, it was 80±12 mmHg (95%CI; p=0.09); mean SpO2 after was 93±5% and before it was 95±4% (95% CI; p=0.13); and previous PaO2:FiO2 mean was 219±66, and after it was 324±110 (95%CI; p=0.52). In-hospital mortality was 28% and 90 days out-patients’ mortality was 32%. Conclusion: HFNC in immunosuppressed ARF subjects significantly decreases HR and RR, being apparently an effective alternative to decrease work of breathing. In-hospital mortality in ARF immunosuppressed patients was high even though respiratory support was used. Better studies are needed to define the role of HFNC-support in ARF.

scholarly journals Impact of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibition on Mortality in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients with Pre-Existing Hypertension: A Prospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Sato ◽  
Nicole White ◽  
Jonathon P. Fanning ◽  
Nchafatso Obonyo ◽  
Michael H. Yamashita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System ◽  
Renin Angiotensin ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundThe influence of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors on the critically ill COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension remains uncertain. This study examined the impact of previous use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on the critically ill COVID-19 patients.MethodsData from an international, prospective, observational cohort study involving 354 hospitals spanning 54 countries were included. A cohort of 746 COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) in 2020 were targeted. Multi-state survival analysis was performed to evaluate in-hospital mortality and hospital length of stay up to 90 days following ICU admission.ResultsA total of 746 patients were included - 543 (73%) with pre-existing hypertension had received ACEi/ARBs before ICU admission, while 203 (27%) had not. Cox proportional hazards model showed that previous ACEi/ARB use was associated with a decreased hazard of in-hospital death (HR, 0.73, 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93). Sensitivity analysis adjusted for propensity scores showed similar results for hazards of death. The average length of hospital stay was longer in ACEi/ARB group with 21.4 days (95% CI: 19.9 to 23.0 days) in ICU and 6.7 days (5.9 to 7.6 days) in general ward compared to non-ACEi/ARB group with 16.2 days (14.1 to 18.5 days) and 6.3 days (5.0 to 7.7 days), respectively. When analysed separately, there was insufficient evidence of differential effects between ACEi and ARB use on the hazards of death and discharge.ConclusionsIn critically ill COVID-19 patients with comorbid hypertension, use of ACEi/ARBs prior to ICU admission was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality following adjustment for baseline characteristics although patients with ACEi/ARB showed longer length of hospital stay.

scholarly journals 3541 The association of corticosteroid use with inpatient mortality in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (s1) ◽  
pp. 127-128
Author(s):  
Erica Farrand ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
Brett Ley ◽  
Harold Collard
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Corticosteroid Therapy ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Icu Admission

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: Objective: To assess the impact of corticosteroid therapy on in-hospital mortality in IPF patients admitted with acute respiratory failure. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Methods: Patients with IPF were retrospectively identified in the University of California San Francisco medical center’s electronic health records from January 1, 2010 to June 1, 2018. Cases with IPF were defined as age 50 years or older, having at least two codes one month apart for idiopathic fibrosing alveolitis or post-inflammatory fibrosis (ICD-9 516.3, 516.31 or 515.0 or ICD-10 codes J84.9, J84.10, J84.111 or J84.112), and a subsequent hospitalization for acute respiratory failure or acute respiratory symptoms. The prevalence of pre-selected co-morbidities, clinical events (ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, lung transplantation) and clinical outcomes were assessed. A propensity score model for corticosteroid use was constructed using a multivariable logistic regression with inclusion of corticosteroid-associated demographic and baseline variables (univariate p-value < 0.25). A marginal structural model (MSM) was used to address time-dependent confounding and mediating effects of ICU admission and mechanical ventilation by applying inverse probability weighting for receipt of corticosteroid treatment. Secondary outcome analysis was performed on patients who survived hospital admission. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Results: A total of 132 patients with IPF and an acute respiratory admission were identified. 48 patients (36%) received corticosteroids during their admission. Applying inverse weighting to time-dependent co-variates (ICU admission and invasive mechanical ventilation) in a MSM, corticosteroid therapy was not associated with risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.82; 95% CI, 0.47-6.99; p = 0.39). After adjusting for corticosteroid therapy using a propensity score, corticosteroid therapy remained unassociated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37, 6.29; p = 0.55). There was no difference in discharge disposition or time to hospital readmission by corticosteroid treatment. There was a possible increase in time to death following discharge in patients receiving corticosteroids (Figure). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Conclusions: This study suggests that treatment of acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease with corticosteroids does not improve short-term outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, all-cause non-elective re-hospitalization or death within 6 months of discharge. Further research in larger cohorts is needed to more definitively assess this relationship.

scholarly journals Prognostic impact of elevated lactate levels on mortality in critically ill patients with and without preadmission metformin treatment: a Danish registry-based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rene A. Posma ◽  
Trine Frøslev ◽  
Bente Jespersen ◽  
Iwan C. C. van der Horst ◽  
Daan J. Touw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Lactate Levels ◽  
Restricted Cubic Splines

Abstract Background Lactate is a robust prognostic marker for the outcome of critically ill patients. Several small studies reported that metformin users have higher lactate levels at ICU admission without a concomitant increase in mortality. However, this has not been investigated in a larger cohort. We aimed to determine whether the association between lactate levels around ICU admission and mortality is different in metformin users compared to metformin nonusers. Methods This cohort study included patients admitted to ICUs in northern Denmark between January 2010 and August 2017 with any circulating lactate measured around ICU admission, which was defined as 12 h before until 6 h after admission. The association between the mean of the lactate levels measured during this period and 30-day mortality was determined for metformin users and nonusers by modelling restricted cubic splines obtained from a Cox regression model. Results Of 37,293 included patients, 3183 (9%) used metformin. The median (interquartile range) lactate level was 1.8 (1.2–3.2) in metformin users and 1.6 (1.0–2.7) mmol/L in metformin nonusers. Lactate levels were strongly associated with mortality for both metformin users and nonusers. However, the association of lactate with mortality was different for metformin users, with a lower mortality rate in metformin users than in nonusers when admitted with similar lactate levels. This was observed over the whole range of lactate levels, and consequently, the relation of lactate with mortality was shifted rightwards for metformin users. Conclusion In this large observational cohort of critically ill patients, early lactate levels were strongly associated with mortality. Irrespective of the degree of hyperlactataemia, similar lactate levels were associated with a lower mortality rate in metformin users compared with metformin nonusers. Therefore, lactate levels around ICU admission should be interpreted according to metformin use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document