scholarly journals Risk factors of frailty and death or only frailty after intensive care in non-frail elderly patients: a prospective non-interventional study

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoann Launey ◽  
Hervé Jacquet ◽  
Matthieu Arnouat ◽  
Chloe Rousseau ◽  
Nicolas Nesseler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Interventional Study ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Ventilation Duration ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration

Abstract Background Frailty status is recognized as an important parameter in critically ill elderly patients, but nothing is known about outcomes in non-frail patients regarding the development of frailty or frailty and death after intensive care. The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for frailty and death or only frailty 6 months after intensive care unit (ICU) admission in non-frail patients ≥ 65 years. Methods A prospective non-interventional study performed in an academic ICU from February 2015 to February 2016 included non-frail ≥ 65-year-old patients hospitalized for > 24 h in the ICU. Frailty was assessed by calculating the frailty index (FI) at admission and 6 months later. Patients who remained non-frail (FI < 0.2) were compared to patients who presented frailty (FI ≥ 0.2) and those who presented frailty and death at 6 months. Results Among 974 admissions, 136 patients were eligible for the study and 88 patients were analysed at 6 months (non-frail n = 34, frail n = 29, death n = 25). Multivariable analysis showed that mechanical ventilation duration was an independent risk factor for frailty/death at 6 months (per day of mechanical ventilation, odds ratio [OR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04–1.19, p = 0.002). When excluding patients who died, mechanical ventilation duration remained the sole risk factor for frailty at 6 months (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.07–1.33, p = 0.001). Conclusion Mechanical ventilation duration was the sole predictive factor of frailty and death or only frailty 6 months after ICU hospitalization in initially non-frail patients.

The impact of time to tracheostomy on mechanical ventilation duration, length of stay, and mortality in intensive care unit patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaseen M. Arabi ◽  
Jamal A. Alhashemi ◽  
Hani M. Tamim ◽  
Andres Esteban ◽  
Samir H. Haddad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Ventilation Duration ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Risk factors for severity of COVID-19: a rapid review to inform vaccine prioritisation in Canada

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e044684
Author(s):  
Aireen Wingert ◽  
Jennifer Pillay ◽  
Michelle Gates ◽  
Samantha Guitard ◽  
Sholeh Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Male Gender ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Class Iii

ObjectivesRapid review to determine the magnitude of association between potential risk factors and severity of COVID-19, to inform vaccine prioritisation in Canada.SettingOvid MEDLINE(R) ALL, Epistemonikos COVID-19 in L·OVE Platform, McMaster COVID-19 Evidence Alerts and websites were searched to 15 June 2020. Eligible studies were conducted in high-income countries and used multivariate analyses.ParticipantsAfter piloting, screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by a single experienced reviewer. Of 3740 unique records identified, 34 were included that reported on median 596 (range 44–418 794) participants, aged 42–84 years. 19/34 (56%) were good quality.OutcomesHospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, length of stay in hospital or intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, severe disease, mortality.ResultsAuthors synthesised findings narratively and appraised the certainty of the evidence for each risk factor–outcome association. There was low or moderate certainty evidence for a large (≥2-fold) magnitude of association between hospitalisation in people with COVID-19, and: obesity class III, heart failure, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, dementia, age >45 years, male gender, black race/ethnicity (vs non-Hispanic white), homelessness and low income. Age >60 and >70 years may be associated with large increases in mechanical ventilation and severe disease, respectively. For mortality, a large magnitude of association may exist with liver disease, Bangladeshi ethnicity (vs British white), age >45 years, age >80 years (vs 65–69 years) and male gender among 20–64 years (but not older). Associations with hospitalisation and mortality may be very large (≥5-fold) for those aged ≥60 years.ConclusionsIncreasing age (especially >60 years) may be the most important risk factor for severe outcomes. High-quality primary research accounting for multiple confounders is needed to better understand the magnitude of associations for severity of COVID-19 with several other factors.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020198001.

scholarly journals Optimal Nutritional Factors Influencing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Among Adult Patients with Critical Illnesses in an Intensive Care Unit

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apinya Koontalay ◽  
Wanich Suksatan ◽  
Jonaid M Sadang ◽  
Kantapong Prabsangob
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Nutritional Factors ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Ventilation Duration ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration ◽  
Critical Patients ◽  
The Impact

Objective: This study aims to identify the impact of nutritional factors on mechanical ventilation duration for critical patients. Patients and Methods: The current study was a single-center, prospective observational design which enrolled one-hundred critically ill patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). It demonstrates purposive sampling and also performs the descriptive nutritional factors influencing the mechanical ventilation duration. Daily calories target requirement scale (DCRS), subjective global assessment form (SGA), dyspnea assessment form, and APACHE II have been used as methods in the study along with time to initial enteral nutrition (EN) after 24-hour admission and daily calories target requirement over 7 days to assess patients. Data is analyzed using the multiple regressions. Results: As a result, nutritional status monitoring, time to initial EN, calories and target requirements are statistically positive significance associated with the mechanical ventilation duration respectively (R = 0.54, R = 0.30, R= 0.40, p &lt; 0.05). However, age, illness severity, and dyspnea scales are not associated with the mechanical ventilation duration (p&gt; 0.05). Therefore, the nutritional status, malnutrition scores and calorie target requirements can be used to significantly predict the mechanical ventilation duration. The predictive power is 58 and 28.0% of variance. The most proper influencer to predict the mechanical ventilation duration is nutritional status or malnutrition scores. Conclusion: The research findings show that the nutritional status, time to initial EN, and calorie target requirement within 7 days of admission are associated with the mechanical ventilation duration in the critical patients. Therefore, it can be used to develop guidelines reducing the mechanical ventilation duration and to promote the ventilator halting for critical patients.

scholarly journals Incidence, risk factors and outcome of nosocomial pneumonia in patients with central nervous system infections

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 476-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olgica Gajovic ◽  
Zoran Todorovic ◽  
Zeljko Mijailovic ◽  
Predrag Canovic ◽  
Ljiljana Nesic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Nosocomial Pneumonia ◽  
Central Nervous System Infections ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration ◽  
Gcs Score

Introduction. Pneumonia is the most frequent nosocomial infection in intensive care units. The reported frequency varies with definition, the type of hospital or intensive care units and the population of patients. The incidence ranges from 6.8-27%. Objective. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency, risk factors and mortality of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care patients. Methods. We analyzed retrospectively and prospectively the collected data of 180 patients with central nervous system infections who needed to stay in the intensive care unit for more than 48 hours. This study was conducted from 2003 to 2009 at the Clinical Centre of Kragujevac. Results. During the study period, 54 (30%) patients developed nosocomial pneumonia. The time to develop pneumonia was 10?6 days. We found that the following risk factors for the development of nosocomial pneumonia were statistically significant: age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <9, mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, presence of nasogastric tube and enteral feeding. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Klebsiella-Enterobacter spp. (33.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (24.1%), Acinetobacter spp. (16.6%) and Staphylococcus aureus (25.9%). Conclusion. Nosocomial pneumonia is the major cause of morbidity and mortality of patients with central nervous system infections. Patients on mechanical ventilation are particularly at a high risk. The mortality rate of patients with nosocomial pneumonia was 54.4% and it was five times higher than in patients without pneumonia.

scholarly journals Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Outcome of Patients Admitted in Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Shiwani Rai ◽  
Prasansa Sharma ◽  
Sofiya Makajoo ◽  
Balgopal Karmacharya ◽  
Nikunja Yogi
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Early Tracheostomy ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Ventilation Duration ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Neurosurgical Intensive Care

 Background: Tracheostomy is a commonly performed procedure in neurosurgical Intensive Care Units (ICU) performed to secure airway, aid in pulmonary toileting, and minimize ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in cases requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Although early tracheostomy has been advocated rampantly in recent days, its benefit over late tracheostomy and the timing itself has been very controversial. In this study, we tried to study the effect of timing of tracheostomy in the outcome of patients in our ICU. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study carried out over a period of one and a half years in a tertiary care center in western Nepal. Early tracheostomy was defined as those done within 4 days of endotracheal intubation and late were those done thereafter. Outcomes were studied in terms of length of ICU stay, hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, duration of tracheostomy in situ, VAP and mortality and complication over 90 days. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 20.0. Results: There were 67 cases included in the study, out of which 27(40.3%) underwent early and 40 (59.7%) underwent late tracheostomy. The Mean duration of ICU stay, tracheostomy in situ duration, mechanical ventilation duration, and VAP were the parameters showing a significant difference between the two groups. There were 13 (19.4%) cases having complications in our series of which 6 (9%) of cases were from the early tracheostomy group and 7 (10.4%) of the cases were from the late tracheostomy group (p=0.63). Conclusion: Early tracheostomy is beneficial in a neurosurgical patient in terms of a decrease in ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of tracheostomy in situ, and VAP.

scholarly journals Less fentanyl requirement by enteral methadone decreases mechanical ventilation duration and intensive care unit length of stay

Critical Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. P67 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Wanzuita ◽  
GA Westphal ◽  
ARR Gonçalves ◽  
F Pfuetzenreiter ◽  
AV Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Length ◽  
Ventilation Duration ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation Duration

scholarly journals Prognosis and risk factors of ERCP pancreatitis in elderly

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erhan Ergin ◽  
Nevin Oruç ◽  
Galip Ersöz ◽  
Oktay Tekeşin ◽  
Ömer Özütemiz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Biochemical Analysis ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Sphincter Oddi ◽  
Oddi Dysfunction

AbstractPost Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis is one of the most serious complications of ERCP. Our study aims to investigate the risk, predisposing factors and prognosis of pancreatitis after ERCP in elderly patients. Patients referred to the ERCP unit between April 2008 and 2012 and admitted to the hospital at least 1 day after the ERCP procedure were included to the study. Information including patient’s demographics, diagnosis, imaging findings, biochemical analysis, details of the ERCP procedure and complications were recorded. The severity of post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was determined by revised Atlanta Criteria as well as APACHE II and Ranson scores. A total of 2902 ERCP patients were evaluated and 988 were included to the study. Patients were divided into two groups as ≥ 65 years old (494 patients, 259 F, 235 M) and < 65 years old (494 patients, 274 F, 220 M). PEP was diagnosed in 4.3% of patients aged 65 years and older. The female gender was risk factors in elderly for PEP. The Sphincter Oddi Dysfunction (SOD) and Juxta papillary diverticula (JPD) were higher in elderly patients with PEP. Age did not increase the risk of PEP development. The most important post ERCP pancreatitis risk factor in the elderly is the female gender, while the risk is enhanced slightly by SOD and JPD.

scholarly journals POS1252 COVID-19 IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES ON CHRONIC USE OF HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE IN A LARGE BRAZILIAN COHORT – A 24-WEEK PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 909-910
Author(s):  
G. Salviato Pileggi ◽  
G. Ferreira ◽  
A. P. Gomides ◽  
E. Reis Neto ◽  
M. Abreu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Disease ◽  
Rheumatic Diseases ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Phone Calls ◽  
Chronic Use

Background:The role of chronic use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in rheumatic disease (RD) patients during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is still subject of discussion.Objectives:To compare the occurrence of COVID-19 and its outcomes between RD patients on HCQ use with individuals from the same household not taking the drug during community viral transmission in an observational prospective multicenter study in Brazil.Methods:Participants were enrolled and monitored through 24-week (From March 29th to Sep 30th, 2020) regularly scheduled phone calls performed by trained medical professionals. Epidemiological and demographic data, as well as RD disease activity status and current treatment data, specific information about COVID-19, hospitalization, need for intensive care, and death was recorded in both groups and stored in the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) database. COVID-19 was defined according to the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMH) criteria. The statistical analysis was performed using IBM-SPSS v.20.0 software. Group comparisons were made using the Man-Whitney, Chi-Square and Fisher Exact Test, as well as multivariate regression models adjusted to confounders. Survival curves were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.Results:A total of 10,427 participants mean age (SD) of 44.04 (14.98) years were enrolled, including 6004 (57.6%) rheumatic disease patients, of whom 70.8% had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 6.7% rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 4% primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS), 1.8% mixed connective tissue disease (DMTC), 1% systemic sclerosis (SSc) and others (15.9), including overlap syndromes. In total, 1,132 (10.8%) participants fulfilled criteria for COVID-19, being 6.7% RD patients and 4.1% controls (p=0.002). A recent influenza vaccination had a protective role (p<0.001). Moderate and severe COVID-19 included the need for hospitalization, intensive care, mechanical ventilation or death. Infection severity was not different between groups (p=0.391) (Table 1). After adjustments for multiple confounders, the main risk factors significantly associated with COVID-19 were higher education level (OR=1.29 95%CI 1.05-1.59), being healthcare professionals (OR=1.91; 95%CI 1.45-2.53), presence of two comorbidities (OR=1.31; 95%CI 1.01-1.66) and three or more comorbidities associated (OR=1.69; 95%CI 1.23-2.32). Interestingly, age >=65 years (OR=0.20; 95%CI 0.11-0.34) was negatively associated. Regarding RD, the risk factors associated with COVID-19 diagnosys were SLE (OR= 2.37; 95%CI 1.92-293), SSc (OR=2.25; 95%CI 1.05-4.83) and rituximab use (OR=1.92; 95%CI 1.13-3.26). In addition, age >=65 years (OR=5.47; 95%CI 1.7-19.4) and heart disease (OR=2.60; 95%CI 1.06-6.38) were associated with hospitalization. Seven female RD patients died, six with SLE and one with pSS, and the presence of two or more comorbidities were associated with higher mortality rate.Conclusion:Chronic HCQ use did not prevent COVID-19 in RD compared to their household cohabitants. Health care profession, presence of comorbidities LES, SSc and rituximab were identified as main risk factors for COVID-19 and aging and heart disease as higher risk for hospitalization. Our data suggest these outcomes could be considered to manage them in clinical practice.Table 1.Frequency and severity of COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases on chronic use of hydroxychloroquine compared to their household controlsCOVID-19 outcomesTotal(%)GroupsPPatients(%)Controls (%)DiagnosisNo9256 (89.1)5300 (88.3)3956 (90.2)0.002Yes1132 (10.9)704 (11.7)428 (9.8)SeverityMild1059 (93.6)662 (94.0)397 (92.8)0.391Moderate52 (4.6)32 (4.5)20 (4.7)Severe21 (1.9)10 (1.4)11 (2.6)HCQ: hydroxychloroquine.Moderate and severe COVID-19 included the need for any of the following: hospitalization, intensive care, mechanical ventilation or death.Acknowledgements:To the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for technical support and rapid nationwide mobilization.To all the 395 interviewers (medical students and physicians) who collaborated in the study and the participantsTo CNPq (Number 403442/2020-6)Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Analysis of diagnostic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia: a cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Gonçalves Pustiglione Campos ◽  
Aline Pacheco ◽  
Maria Dagmar da Rocha Gaspar ◽  
Guilherme Arcaro ◽  
Péricles Martim Reche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

ABSTRACT Objectives: to analyze the diagnostic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia recommended by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency and the National Healthcare Safety Network/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as its risk factors. Methods: retrospective cohort study carried out in an intensive care unit throughout 12 months, in 2017. Analyses included chi-square, simple linear regression, and Kappa statistical tests and were conducted using Stata 12 software. Results: the sample was 543 patients who were in the intensive care unit and under mechanical ventilation, of whom 330 (60.9%) were men and 213 (39.1%) were women. Variables such as gender, age, time under mechanical ventilation, and oral hygiene proved to be significant risk factors for the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Conclusions: patients submitted to mechanical ventilation need to be constantly evaluated so the used diagnostic methods can be accurate and applied in an objective and standardized way in Brazilian hospitals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document