Out-Of-Plane Behavior of Confined Masonry Walls Subjected to Concentrated Loads (One-Way Bending)

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 2317-2335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dante Navarrete-Macias ◽  
Jorge Varela-Rivera ◽  
Luis Fernandez-Baqueiro

This paper presents the results of a study on the out-of-plane seismic behavior of confined masonry walls. Five confined walls were tested under reverse cyclic loads. The variables studied were the axial stress and the wall aspect ratio. Analytical out-of-plane strength of walls was calculated considering the strengths of the wall panel and the concrete confining elements. The former was determined using the unidirectional strut method and the latter using a plastic analysis. It was observed that for walls with the same aspect ratio, as the axial stress increases, the out-of-plane strength increases. For walls with the same axial stress, as the aspect ratio increases, the strength decreases. Based on comparisons between analytical and experimental results, it was concluded that the models developed in this work predict accurately the out-of-plane strength of the walls.

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Jorge Varela-Rivera ◽  
Joel Moreno-Herrera ◽  
Luis Fernandez-Baqueiro ◽  
Juan Cacep-Rodriguez ◽  
Cesar Freyre-Pinto

An experimental study on the out-of-plane behavior of confined masonry walls is presented. Four confined walls with aspect ratios greater than one were tested in the laboratory. Walls were subjected to combined axial and out-of-plane uniform loads. The variables studied were the aspect ratio and the axial compressive stress of walls. It was observed that the out-of-plane strength of walls increased as the aspect ratio or the axial compressive stress increased. Failure of walls was associated with crushing of masonry. Analytical out-of-plane strength of walls was determined using the yielding line, failure line, modified yielding line, compressive strut and bidirectional strut methods. It was concluded that the experimental out-of-plane strength of walls was best predicted with the bidirectional strut method.


2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 945-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Perez Gavilan ◽  
L. E. Flores ◽  
S. M. Alcocer

Results from an experimental series of seven full-scale confined masonry walls with height-to-length aspect ratios ( H/L) from 0.3 up to 2.2 are summarized. Results show that neither the level of axial stress nor the aspect ratio had a significant effect on lateral stiffness. Inelastic behavior of the walls, characterized by normalized stiffness degradation with ductility demand, can be estimated with good accuracy with a bilinear function for a ductility demand up to 4.5. A substantial increase in normalized shear strength was observed for walls with decreasing aspect ratio. A correction factor to the nominal cracking strength was deduced based on differences of the flexural deformations for squat and square walls. The factor was then compared to the experimental normalized strength with good agreement. A new expression for inclined cracking shear that can be used for a wide range of wall aspect ratios is proposed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Moreno-Herrera ◽  
Jorge Varela-Rivera ◽  
Luis Fernandez-Baqueiro

An analytical method to determine the out-of-plane strength of confined masonry walls is developed. The method is called the “bidirectional strut method.” Walls with and without openings subjected to combined out-of-plane and axial loads are considered. The method is based on two-way arching action. Masonry compressive strut forces are transferred eccentrically to the concrete confining elements. Flexural and torsional effects, together with the variation of displacements along these elements, are considered. Analytical strengths of confined walls are determined using this method. These strengths are compared with experimental and other analytical strengths. A sensitivity analysis of the strength is carried out considering different variables. It is concluded that the bidirectional strut method accurately predicts the strength of the walls studied. The main variables that affect the strength are the wall aspect ratio, wall slenderness ratio, and the stiffness of the confining elements.


2017 ◽  
Vol 747 ◽  
pp. 594-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hu Xu ◽  
Hao Wu ◽  
Cristina Gentilini ◽  
Qi Wang Su ◽  
Shi Chun Zhao

In this study, confined masonry specimens with regular arranged openings are tested in order to study the influence of different enhancements of the columns on seismic failure modes. In particular, five brick masonry walls and three half-scale two-storey masonry structures are tested under quasi-static loads. The experimental results show that increasing column ratio improves the seismic behavior of the wall specimens to some extent, but an excessive reinforcement ratio of the columns decreases the ductility. The global failure mode of the two-storey masonry structures is modified by inserting iron wires in the mortar bed joints, improving the structural collapse resistant capacity effectively.


Author(s):  
Klaus Medeiros ◽  
Kyle Chavez ◽  
Fernando S. Fonseca ◽  
Guilherme Parsekian ◽  
Nigel G. Shrive

Finite element models were developed to assess the influence of several parameters on the load capacity, deflection, and initial stiffness of multi-story, partially grouted masonry walls with openings. The base model was validated with experimental data from three walls. The analyses indicated that the load capacity of masonry walls was considerably sensitive to the ungrouted and grouted masonry strengths and mortar shear strength; moderately sensitive to the vertical reinforcement ratio and aspect ratio; slightly sensitive to the axial stress; and almost insensitive to the opening size, reinforcement spacing, and horizontal reinforcement ratio. The deflection of the walls had well-defined correlations with the masonry strength, vertical reinforcement, axial stress and aspect ratio. The initial stiffness was especially sensitive to the axial stress and the aspect ratio, but weakly correlated with the opening size, and the spacing and size of the reinforcement.


2016 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 04015126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Moreno-Herrera ◽  
Jorge Varela-Rivera ◽  
Luis Fernandez-Baqueiro

2017 ◽  
Vol 747 ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Monni ◽  
Enrico Quagliarini ◽  
Stefano Lenci

This paper presents the results of an experimental campaign aimed at improving the innovative technique of continuos basalt fiber (BF) stitching in order to repair the masonry panels damaged by seismic events or to enhance the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry walls. The masonry panels were tested under out-of-plane actions, one of the common way of failure for masonry walls during an earthquake. The most significant change introduced respect to the system already tested in previous studies, is the presence of pre-tensioned elements and mechanical anchorage of the BF ropes, always with the end of proposing a dry retrofitting system. The results indicate the effectiveness of this, increasing the performance of masonry wall specimens under out-of-plane actions respect to the damaged and unreinforced conditions. Besides, this technique potentially appears fully sustainable, because it is cheap, compatible, reversible, fire, and chemical resistant, it improves but not replaces original materials and, finally, it does not substantially use synthetic adhesives. All these reasons make this novel application of BF ropes fully sustainable and specialized to architectural heritage restoration.


2014 ◽  
Vol 624 ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Como

Analysis of force transmission through the various structural components is needed to the full understanding of the seismic behavior of masonry buildings. It is in fact necessary to identify the weak links of the chain and define the essential reinforcements to insert in the structure. In this context the Paper analyzes the strengths of masonry walls under the action of out of plane and in plane horizontal forces and compares the systems of reinforcement of the walls that can use steel or Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document