scholarly journals History of Diabetes and Survival Outcome Among Participants 65 Years or Older in SWOG Clinical Trials

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn L. Hershman ◽  
Cathee Till ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Scott Ramsey ◽  
William E. Barlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Global Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Medicare Claims ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Clinical Records

Purpose Diabetes is common, increases with age, and may affect outcomes among people with cancer. Understanding the association between diabetes and cancer outcome is challenging, because patients with diabetes have increased all-cause mortality compared with patients without diabetes. Methods We systematically examined the phase III trial database of SWOG to identify patients enrolled in trials during the period from 1999 to 2011. We linked the SWOG clinical records to Medicare claims data according to Social Security number, sex, and date of birth. Medicare claims were used to identify diabetes with at least 6 months of continuous Medicare coverage immediately before registration. Multivariable Cox regression was used to compare survival outcomes between patients with and without diabetes for each of 10 tumor cohorts. The primary outcome was overall survival. We also examined progression-free survival and cancer-free survival. Results In total, 6,422 patients from 15 trials were ≥ 65.5 years of age, of whom 3,173 patients (49%) met the criteria for linkage to Medicare claims. Thirty percent (n = 952) had claims for diabetes before registration. Patients with diabetes were more likely to be black ( P < .001), but no other differences in demographic characteristics were observed. In multivariable Cox regression, no association was found between baseline diabetes and overall or progression-free survival; in one case, patients with diabetes had marginally worse cancer-free survival (advanced non–small-cell lung cancer; P = .05). A global test found that baseline diabetes was associated with worse overall survival ( P = .03) across the entire panel of analyses. Conclusion Diabetes is common among elderly patients enrolled in clinical trials. Unlike prior observational studies, among patients treated with uniform treatment regimens, and controlling for known prognostic factors, we did not observe an association between diabetes and progression-free or cancer-free survival.

Hyaluronan heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, primary tumors, and sites of metastasis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16231-e16231
Author(s):  
Veronica Placencio-Hickok ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Natalie Moshayedi ◽  
Michelle Guan ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Regression Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
High Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Pdac Tissue ◽  
Treatment Naïve

e16231 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with an estimated five-year survival rate of 10%. The dense desmoplastic stroma in PDAC contributes to its aggressive nature and treatment resistance. Among the components comprising the stroma, hyaluronan (HA) has been demonstrated to play a critical role in tumor progression and survival. Previous preliminary studies have suggested differences in HA expression in primary and metastatic foci in PDAC. However, the effects of treatment and location of HA expression as well as the role of CD44, a known receptor for HA, on HA as a biomarker signature remain unknown. Thus, we investigated the potential of HA as a biomarker in primary PDAC and metastases. Methods: PDAC tissue from primary (n = 43) and metastatic (n = 66) sites were obtained from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center along with associated clinical data. Tissue slides were stained with H&E, HA using a histochemical assay, and CD44 by immunohistochemistry. HA staining was scored according to the proportion of stromal staining at an intensity greater than the background stroma. HA status was defined as ≥ 50% staining being HA high and < 50% as being HA low. CD44 staining was recorded as an H-score (percentage of tumor cells staining multiplied by intensity of staining on a scale from 0 to 3). Associations between HA levels and the requested variables were examined with t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, or Cox regression model where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to assess progression free survival and overall survival. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 with two-sided tests and a significance level of 0.05. Results: HA score was significantly higher in primary PDAC tissue compared to sites of metastases (p = 0.0148). Within the metastases, HA score was significantly higher in liver metastasis compared to other sites of metastasis (p = 0.0478). In the liver metastasis tissue, HA score trended lower in patients with previously treated tissue compared to treatment naïve tissue (p = 0.0622). In the treatment naive liver metastasis cohort, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status (p = 0.0032 and p = 0.0478, respectively). Using HA score and CD44 in a Cox regression model demonstrated that for every one unit increase in HA score, the risk for recurrence/progression increased by 4.4% at any fixed point in time, adjusting for CD44 score (p = 0.0049). Conclusions: HA score is variable between primary PDAC, PDAC metastatic to the liver, and PDAC metastatic to other sites. Within liver metastases, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status. HA levels can serve as a potential biomarker to guide pancreatic cancer treatments and trial design for agents targeting the stroma.

Once-a-Week Versus Once-Every-3-Weeks Cisplatin Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1064-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Jaiprakash Agarwal ◽  
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Adjuvant Setting ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m2, and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

scholarly journals Blinded Independent Central Review of Progression-Free Survival in Phase III Clinical Trials: Important Design Element or Unnecessary Expense?

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 3791-3796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori E. Dodd ◽  
Edward L. Korn ◽  
Boris Freidlin ◽  
C. Carl Jaffe ◽  
Lawrence V. Rubinstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Informative Censoring ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
General Strategy ◽  
Design Element ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Using Data

Progression-free survival is an important end point in advanced disease settings. Blinded independent central review (BICR) of progression in randomized clinical trials has been advocated to control bias that might result from errors in progression assessments. However, although BICR lessens some potential biases, it does not remove all biases from evaluations of treatment effectiveness. In fact, as typically conducted, BICRs may introduce bias because of informative censoring, which results from having to censor unconfirmed locally determined progressions. In this article, we discuss the rationale for BICR and different ways of implementing independent review. We discuss the limitations of these approaches and review published trials that report implementing BICR. We demonstrate the existence of informative censoring using data from a randomized phase II trial. We conclude that double-blinded trials with consistent application of measurement criteria are the best means of ensuring unbiased trial results. When such designs are not practical, BICR is not recommended as a general strategy for reducing bias. However, BICR may be useful as an auditing tool to assess the reliability of marginally positive results.

Therapeutic efficacy of specific immunotherapy for glioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Hanaei ◽  
Khashayar Afshari ◽  
Armin Hirbod-Mobarakeh ◽  
Bahram Mohajer ◽  
Delara Amir Dastmalchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Specific Immunotherapy ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Median Difference

Abstract Although different immunotherapeutic approaches have been developed for the treatment of glioma, there is a discrepancy between clinical trials limiting their approval as common treatment. So, the current systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess survival and clinical response of specific immunotherapy in patients with glioma. Generally, seven databases were searched to find eligible studies. Controlled clinical trials investigating the efficacy of specific immunotherapy in glioma were found eligible. After data extraction and risk of bias assessment, the data were analyzed based on the level of heterogeneity. Overall, 25 articles with 2964 patients were included. Generally, mean overall survival did not statistically improve in immunotherapy [median difference=1.51; 95% confidence interval (CI)=−0.16–3.17; p=0.08]; however, it was 11.16 months higher in passive immunotherapy (95% CI=5.69–16.64; p<0.0001). One-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy groups [hazard ratio (HR)=0.69; 95% CI=0.52–0.92; p=0.01]. As the hazard rate in the immunotherapy approach was 0.83 of the control group, 2-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (HR=0.83; 95% CI=0.69–0.99; p=0.04). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy as well (HR=0.67; 95% CI=0.48–0.92; p=0.01). Overall, median progression-free survival was significantly higher in immunotherapy (standard median difference=0.323; 95% CI=0.110–0.536; p=0.003). However, 1-year progression-free survival was not remarkably different between immunotherapy and control groups (HR=0.94; 95% CI=0.74–1.18; p=0.59). Specific immunotherapy demonstrated remarkable improvement in survival of patients with glioma and could be a considerable choice of treatment in the future. Despite the current promising results, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to approve immunotherapeutic approaches as the standard of care and the front-line treatment for glioma.

scholarly journals Final Results of the IELSG-19 Randomized Trial of Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue Lymphoma: Improved Event-Free and Progression-Free Survival With Rituximab Plus Chlorambucil Versus Either Chlorambucil or Rituximab Monotherapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 1905-1912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Zucca ◽  
Annarita Conconi ◽  
Giovanni Martinelli ◽  
Reda Bouabdallah ◽  
Alessandra Tucci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Lymphoid Tissue ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Final Sample ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
To Receive

Purpose There is no consensus on the optimal systemic treatment of patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. The IELSG-19 phase III study, to our knowledge, was the first such study to address the question of first-line treatment in a randomized trial. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either chlorambucil monotherapy (6 mg/m2/d orally on weeks 1 to 6, 9 to 10, 13 to 14, 17 to 18, and 21 to 22) or a combination of chlorambucil (same schedule as above) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 17, and 21). After the planned enrollment of 252 patients, the protocol was amended to continue with a three-arm design (1:1:6 ratio), with a new arm that included rituximab alone (same schedule as the combination arm) and with a final sample size of 454 patients. The main end point was event-free survival (EFS). Analysis of chlorambucil versus the combination arm was performed and reported separately before any analysis of the third arm. Results At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, addition of rituximab to chlorambucil led to significantly better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.77). EFS at 5 years was 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with chlorambucil alone, 50% (95% CI, 42 to 59) with rituximab alone, and 68% (95% CI, 60 to 76) with the combination ( P = .0009). Progression-free survival was also significantly better with the combination ( P = .0119). Five-year overall survival was approximately 90% in each arm. All treatments were well tolerated. No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Conclusion Rituximab in combination with chlorambucil demonstrated superior efficacy in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; however, improvements in EFS and progression-free survival did not translate into longer overall survival.

Progression-free survival and overall survival in phase III trials of molecular-targeted agents in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Lung Cancer ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Hotta ◽  
Etsuji Suzuki ◽  
Massimo Di Maio ◽  
Paolo Chiodini ◽  
Yoshiro Fujiwara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Trials
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document