A novel intermediate endpoint for predicting overall survival in men with metastatic castration-recurrent prostate cancer (CRPC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5113-5113 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Halabi ◽  
S. Ou ◽  
N. J. Vogelzang ◽  
H. Scher ◽  
E. J. Small
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Opioid Analgesic ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Androgen Ablation ◽  
Three Components

5113 Background: In this proposed study, we developed and validated a novel composite clinical benefit endpoint constructed from symptoms that have intrinsic clinical importance in 800 men with CRPC who were treated with front-line chemotherapy. Methods: Data from nine multimember trials (five phase II and four randomized phase III studies) conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) from 1992–2004 were combined. Eligible patients had progressive adenocarcinoma of the prostate during androgen ablation (despite castrate testosterone levels), an ECOG performance status of 0–2, adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic functions. The tripartite composite clinical benefit endpoint (TCCBE) had three components: one based on disease progression (whether it be PSA, bone, or soft tissue progression), and the second based on weight loss (defined as at least 10% decline from baseline) or on performance status (PS) decline (by at least one level) to capture clinical deterioration. The third component was based on pain control and opioid analgesic use (no or yes). For a person to fall in the TCCBE “yes” category, at least two of the three components had to be recorded as no. For instance, if a patient at 3 months had no progression, no change in weight and did not use opioid analgesic, then he will be classified in the “yes” group and for the purpose of this analysis was considered as someone who achieved “clinical benefit”. The sample was randomly split into 526 (67%) and 274 (33%) men in the training and testing datasets, respectively. Results: From the training dataset, the median survival times in men who had and did not have clinical benefit were 20.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI) = 18.5–22.8) and 11.1 months (95% = 8.79–12.6, p- value<0.001). In the testing dataset, the median survival times in men with and without clinical benefit were 21.7 months (95% CI= 19.1–26.1) and 8.8 months (95% CI= 7.8–11.6) and in men. The hazard ratio (HR) for men with a clinical benefit compared to men without was 0.52 (95% CI= 0.43–0.62, P<0.001). Conclusions: The TCCBE is a statistically significant intermediate endpoint for predicting overall survival. Prospective validation of this endpoint is needed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Radiotherapy and Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Recursive Partitioning Analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 Phase III Randomized Trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (16) ◽  
pp. 2563-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
René-Olivier Mirimanoff ◽  
Thierry Gorlia ◽  
Warren Mason ◽  
Martin J. Van den Bent ◽  
Rolf-Dieter Kortmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Recursive Partitioning Analysis ◽  
Survival Advantage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
European Organisation

Purpose The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and National Cancer Institute of Canada trial on temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) in glioblastoma (GBM) has demonstrated that the combination of TMZ and RT conferred a significant and meaningful survival advantage compared with RT alone. We evaluated in this trial whether the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) retains its overall prognostic value and what the benefit of the combined modality is in each RPA class. Patients and Methods Five hundred seventy-three patients with newly diagnosed GBM were randomly assigned to standard postoperative RT or to the same RT with concomitant TMZ followed by adjuvant TMZ. The primary end point was overall survival. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer RPA used accounts for age, WHO performance status, extent of surgery, and the Mini-Mental Status Examination. Results Overall survival was statistically different among RPA classes III, IV, and V, with median survival times of 17, 15, and 10 months, respectively, and 2-year survival rates of 32%, 19%, and 11%, respectively (P < .0001). Survival with combined TMZ/RT was higher in RPA class III, with 21 months median survival time and a 43% 2-year survival rate, versus 15 months and 20% for RT alone (P = .006). In RPA class IV, the survival advantage remained significant, with median survival times of 16 v 13 months, respectively, and 2-year survival rates of 28% v 11%, respectively (P = .0001). In RPA class V, however, the survival advantage of RT/TMZ was of borderline significance (P = .054). Conclusion RPA retains its prognostic significance overall as well as in patients receiving RT with or without TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM, particularly in classes III and IV.

Phase III study of gemcitabine [G] plus cetuximab [C] versus gemcitabine in patients [pts] with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma [PC]: SWOG S0205 study

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4509-LBA4509 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Philip ◽  
J. Benedetti ◽  
C. Fenoglio-Preiser ◽  
M. Zalupski ◽  
H. Lenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Clinically Significant

LBA4509 Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] pathway is a rational target for therapeutic intervention. This study tested the efficacy of an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody and gemcitabine [G] combination in the Phase III setting in patients with advanced PC. Methods: Eligibility included locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PC; adequacy of organ function; performance status (PS) 0- 2; no prior EGFR therapy; no prior systemic chemotherapy except for adjuvant chemotherapy; and submission of tumor for EGFR immunostaining. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included objective response, time to progression, pain control, and quality of life. Assuming 6 months median survival, the study was designed to detect a median improvement to 8 months (1.33 hazard ratio) with 90% power, based on a one-sided 0.0125 test, and 704 eligible patients. Primary analyses used a Cox regression model, stratified for factors used in the randomization. Patients were stratified by PS, stageand prior pancreatectomy, and randomized to either G alone or G plus C. G was given at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2/wk for seven weeks out of 8, then 3 weeks on and one week off. C was given as a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 on week 1 and then 250 mg/m2 weekly. Results: 766 pts (735 eligible) with a median age of 64 (30–91) were enrolled by SWOG and CTSU between January 2004 and April 2006. Of those, 51% were males, 21.5% had locally advanced disease, and 13% had PS of 2. The study closed with full accrual. The median survival was 6 months in the G arm and 6.5 months in the G plus C arm for an overall HR of 1.09 (95% CI 0.93–1.27, p= 0.14) . The corresponding PFS was 3 months and 3.5 months, for G and G+C arms, respectively (HR =1.13, 95%CI .97–1.3, p=.058). The confirmed response probabilities were 7 % in each arm, and inclusion of unconfirmed responses yielded 14% in the G arm and 12% in the G + C arm.702 pts were evaluable for toxicity. 90 pts experienced at least one grade 4 toxicity; 14% on the G plus C, 11% on G alone. Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate a clinically significant advantage of the addition of cetuximab to gemcitabine for overall survival, PFS and response in advanced PC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Prospective randomized phase III trial of triplet chemotherapy with paclitaxel + gemcitabine + cisplatin compared to standard doublet chemotherapy with vinorelbine + cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8034-8034
Author(s):  
J. Sorensen ◽  
O. Hansen ◽  
A. Vilmar ◽  
H. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Type 1 Error ◽  
Stage Iv Disease ◽  
One Year

8034 Background: Paclitaxel + gemcitabine + cisplatin showed promising results in phase II with 59% response rate and 48 weeks median survival. Hence, it was compared to a standard doublet regimen to examine for superiority. Methods: Histologically verified inoperable NSCLC patients (pts) aged 18–75 years, performance status 0–2 and normal organ function were randomized to regimen A (paclitaxel 180 mg/m2 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or regimen B (cisplatin 100 mg/m2 day 1 and weekly i.v. vinorelbine every 4 weeks) for maximum 6 cycles. Totally 428 pts were needed to detect a 30% median survival increase with 80% power and two-sided type 1-error of 5%. Results: 221 pts.received reg. A and 222 reg. B. Overall, median age was 62 years (range 38–75 yrs), 58% were males, 11% had performance status 2, 62% stage IV disease, 46% adenocarcinoma, and 28% squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), equally distributed between the regimens. Median no. of treatment courses were 4 in both regimens. Frequencies of CTC grade 4 leucocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, or grade 3+4 nausea, neurotoxicity, or nephrotoxicity were 15%, 17%, 19%, 8%, and 8% in reg. A, and 18%, 5% (p=0.001), 17%, 11%(p=0.014), and 7% in reg. B, respectively. Febrile leucopenia episodes were 14% and 10% in reg. A and B, while thrombocytopenic bleedings occurred in 12% and 4% of pts (p=0.008), respectively, with two toxic deaths due to bleeding in reg. A and none in reg. B. Response rates were 52% and 49% in reg. A and reg. B, median response durations were 263 and 217 days (not significant), median times to progressions (TTP) 6.7 and 5.8 months (p=0.453), and median survival times 11.4 and 10.8 months (p=0.415), respectively. In SCC subtype, TTP was higher in reg. A than reg. B (medians 7.0 mths vs. 4.1 mths, p=0.001) and survival was increased (medians 13.5 mths vs 9.7 mths, p=0.020). Conclusions: The triplet regimen A had significantly higher activity in SCC, both with respect to TTP and to survival with median survival in excess of one year and may be preferred in this histologic subtype. [Table: see text]

Bortezomib + gemcitabine (Gem)/carboplatin (Carbo) results in encouraging survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results of a phase II Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) trial (S0339)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7017-7017 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Davies ◽  
J. McCoy ◽  
P. N. Lara ◽  
P. H. Gumerlock ◽  
J. Crowley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times

7017 Background: Bortezomib (PS-341), a small molecule proteasome inhibitor, has single agent activity in NSCLC and potentiates Gem/Carbo in pre-clinical models in a sequence-specific manner (Mortensen, Cancer Chem Pharm, 2004). A phase I trial of Gem/Carbo + PS-341 in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC yielded an encouraging response rate of 48%. Here we describe the results of a SWOG phase II study of this regimen in advanced NSCLC. Methods: 114 eligible chemonaive stage IV and selected stage IIIB (pleural effusion) NSCLC pts received Gem 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and Carbo AUC 5 on day 1, followed 1 hour later by PS-341 1.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. Non-progressing pts could continue PS-341 alone after 4 cycles. Results: Pt characteristics: Median age: 64 years; Sex M/F = 68/46; Performance status 0/1 = 50/64; stage IIIB/IV = 13/101. Response rate: 20% (95% CI 13–29%); 66% (95% CI 56–75%) had stable disease. At a median follow-up of 13 months, progression free and median survival times were 5 months (95% CI 3.5–5.3) and 11 months (95% CI 8.2–12.5). One-year survival was 46% (95% C.I. 37–55%). Most common grade 3/4 toxicities: neutropenia (52%), thrombocytopenia (63%), and fatigue (13%). Ongoing correlative studies are examining markers of proteasome inhibition (Bcl2 family, NFKB, IKB) and hypoxia (PAI-1, VEGF, OPN, HIF-1) in tumor tissue and surrogate specimens. Conclusions: The 11 month median survival achieved with the addition of PS-341 to Gem/Carbo in this phase II study is unprecedented in prior SWOG trials in advanced NSCLC, and does not appear to be explained by altered patient characteristics. The toxicity profile of this regimen is favorable. A phase III trial of Gem/Carbo ± Bortezomib in advanced stage NSCLC is under development. Supported by CA38926, CA32102. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals 312 Female sex independently predicts adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefit from CTLA4 immune checkpoint inhibition

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A339-A339
Author(s):  
Ahmad Tarhini ◽  
Ni Kang ◽  
Sandra Lee ◽  
F Stephen Hodi ◽  
Gary Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
List Type ◽  
Female Sex ◽  
Interaction Term

BackgroundSex differences in tumor immunity and response to immunotherapy were shown in murine models and descriptive analyses from recent clinical trials. Female sex hormones have been implicated in melanoma development and response to systemic therapy. We hypothesized a gender difference in response to adjuvant immunotherapy with ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg; ipi3 or ipi10) versus high dose IFNα (HDI) as tested in the E1609 trial.MethodsE1609 demonstrated significant overall survival (OS) benefit with ipi3 versus HDI.1 We investigated treatment efficacy between ipi and HDI in the subgroups by sex (female, male), age (< 55 or ≥55), stage at study entry (IIIB, IIIC, M1a/1b), ECOG performance status (PS 0, 1), ulceration (yes, no), primary tumor (known, unknown), number of lymph nodes involved (0, 1, 2–3, 4+). Forest plots were created to compare OS and RFS with ipi3 vs. HDI and ipi10 vs. HDI using the concurrently randomized ITT populations. For the estimated HRs, 95% confidence intervals were created for all subgroups.ResultsThe subgroups of female, stage IIIC, PS=1, ulcerated, in-transit without lymph node involvement demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and/or relapse free survival (RFS) with ipi3 versus HDI as summarized in table 1. Female sex was significant for both OS and RFS and was further explored. In investigating RFS with ipi3 versus HDI, a multivariate Cox regression model including sex, treatment and interaction term of sex*treatment, indicated a significant interaction between sex and treatment (P = 0.026). Including sex, PS (0 vs. 1), age (<55 vs. 55+), ulceration (yes vs. no), stage (IIIB, IIIC, M1a, M1b), treatment and interaction term of sex*treatment, indicated a significant interaction between sex and treatment (P = 0.024). While similar trends were seen, no significant interactions between sex and treatment effect were found in the OS multivariate analysis or in the comparison of ipi10 versus HDI. When exploring age, in the univariate analyses in the ipi3 versus HDI comparison older women appeared to drive most of the difference (age ≥55: OS, P=0.02 and RFS, P=0.08; differences non-significant for women <55). Table 1.Abstract 312 Table 1Treatment efficacy between ipi3 and HDI by subgroupConclusionsFemale sex was independently associated with RFS adjuvant immunotherapeutic benefit from ipi3, supporting a potentially important role for female related factors in the immune response against melanoma, and these warrant further investigation.Trial RegistrationNCT01274338Ethics ApprovalThe study protocol was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of each participating institution and conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation. This study was monitored by the ECOG-ACRIN DataSafety Monitoring Committee and the NCI.ConsentAll patients provided IRB-approved written informed consent.ReferenceTarhini AA, Lee SJ, Hodi FS, Rao UNM, Cohen GI, Hamid O, Hutchins LF, Sosman JA, Kluger HM, Eroglu Z, Koon HB, Lawrence DP, Kendra KL, Minor DR, Lee CB, Albertini MR, Flaherty LE, Petrella TM, Streicher H, Sondak VK, Kirkwood JM. Phase III Study of Adjuvant Ipilimumab (3 or 10 mg/kg) Versus High-Dose Interferon Alfa-2b for Resected High-Risk Melanoma: North American Intergroup E1609. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):567–575. PMID: 31880964.

Addition of Aflibercept to Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Improves Survival in a Phase III Randomized Trial in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With an Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3499-3506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Radek Lakomy ◽  
Hans Prenen ◽  
Jana Prausová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Previously Treated

Purpose Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) commonly involves a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen such as infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, often combined with bevacizumab or an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. We studied the effect of adding the novel antiangiogenic agent aflibercept (also known as ziv-aflibercept in the United States) to FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin, including patients who received prior bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive aflibercept (4 mg/kg intravenously; 612 patients) or placebo (614 patients) every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI significantly improved overall survival relative to placebo plus FOLFIRI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.817; 95.34% CI, 0.713 to 0.937; P = .0032) with median survival times of 13.50 versus 12.06 months, respectively. Aflibercept also significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.661 to 0.869; P < .0001), with median PFS times of 6.90 versus 4.67 months, respectively. The effects on overall survival and PFS exhibited a consistent trend across prespecified subgroup analyses, including bevacizumab pretreated patients. Response rate was 19.8% (95% CI, 16.4% to 23.2%) with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI compared with 11.1% (95% CI, 8.5% to 13.8%) with placebo plus FOLFIRI (P = .0001). Adverse effects reported with aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI included the characteristic anti–vascular endothelial growth factor effects and also reflected an increased incidence of some chemotherapy-related toxicities. Conclusion Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI conferred a statistically significant survival benefit over FOLFIRI combined with placebo in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin.

Phase III Study of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor Prinomastat in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Bissett ◽  
Ken J. O’Byrne ◽  
J. von Pawel ◽  
Ulrich Gatzemeier ◽  
Allan Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Extracellular Proteins ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Study Results

Purpose Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) degrade extracellular proteins and facilitate tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis. This trial was undertaken to determine the effect of prinomastat, an inhibitor of selected MMPs, on the survival of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), when given in combination with gemcitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomly assigned to receive prinomastat 15 mg or placebo twice daily orally continuously, in combination with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, every 21 days for up to six cycles. The planned sample size was 420 patients. Results Study results at an interim analysis and lack of efficacy in another phase III trial prompted early closure of this study. There were 362 patients randomized (181 on prinomastat and 181 on placebo). One hundred thirty-four patients had stage IIIB disease with T4 primary tumor, 193 had stage IV disease, and 34 had recurrent disease (one enrolled patient was ineligible with stage IIIA disease). Overall response rates for the two treatment arms were similar (27% for prinomastat v 26% for placebo; P = .81). There was no difference in overall survival or time to progression; for prinomastat versus placebo patients, the median overall survival times were 11.5 versus 10.8 months (P = .82), 1-year survival rates were 43% v 38% (P = .45), and progression-free survival times were 6.1 v 5.5 months (P = .11), respectively. The toxicities of prinomastat were arthralgia, stiffness, and joint swelling. Treatment interruption was required in 38% of prinomastat patients and 12% of placebo patients. Conclusion Prinomastat does not improve the outcome of chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC.

scholarly journals Overall Survival of Black and White Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated With Docetaxel

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Sandipan Dutta ◽  
Catherine M. Tangen ◽  
Mark Rosenthal ◽  
Daniel P. Petrylak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Black Men ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
White Men ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Castration Resistant

Purpose Several studies have reported that among patients with localized prostate cancer, black men have a shorter overall survival (OS) time than white men, but few data exist for men with advanced prostate cancer. The primary goal of this analysis was to compare the OS in black and white men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated in phase III clinical trials with docetaxel plus prednisone (DP) or a DP-containing regimen. Methods Individual participant data from 8,820 men with mCRPC randomly assigned in nine phase III trials to DP or a DP-containing regimen were combined. Race was based on self-report. The primary end point was OS. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to assess the prognostic importance of race (black v white) adjusted for established risk factors common across the trials (age, prostate-specific antigen, performance status, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and sites of metastases). Results Of 8,820 men, 7,528 (85%) were white, 500 (6%) were black, 424 (5%) were Asian, and 368 (4%) were of unknown race. Black men were younger and had worse performance status, higher testosterone and prostate-specific antigen, and lower hemoglobin than white men. Despite these differences, the median OS was 21.0 months (95% CI, 19.4 to 22.5 months) versus 21.2 months (95% CI, 20.8 to 21.7 months) in black and white men, respectively. The pooled multivariable hazard ratio of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91) demonstrates that overall, black men have a statistically significant decreased risk of death compared with white men ( P < .001). Conclusion When adjusted for known prognostic factors, we observed a statistically significant increased OS in black versus white men with mCRPC who were enrolled in these clinical trials. The mechanism for these differences is not known.

A randomized comparison of carboplatin/vinorelbine versus carboplatin/gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7033-7033
Author(s):  
N. Helbekkmo ◽  
S. H. Sundtroem ◽  
U. Aaseboe ◽  
P. F. Brunsvig ◽  
C. L. Von Plessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

7033 Background: Carboplatin/vinorelbine (CV) and carboplatin/gemcitabine (CG) are novel 2-drug combinations in the treatment of NSCLC. In a randomized national multicenter phase III study in stage IIIB and IV patients (pts), we compared these regimens with respect to efficacy, toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Methods: Chemonaive pts with histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC, stage IIIB or IV and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2 were eligible. There was no upper age limit. Pts received vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, both administered on day 1 and 8, in combination with carboplatin (Chatelut AUC 4) at day 1. Three courses were administered in 3-week cycles. QoL questionnaires were completed at baseline, before each cycle and then every 8 weeks up to one year. Primary endpoints were survival and QoL and secondary endpoints toxicity and time to progression (TTP). Stratification was done for age, stage and PS, and the planned sample size per arm was minimum 200. The analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis Results: From Oct 2003 through Dec 2004, 433 pts from 33 institutions were randomized to CV (n=218) or CG (n=215). Follow-up was minimum one year. There was no difference in overall survival between the two arms (p=0.89). Median survival was 7.3 vs. 6.5 months and 1-year survival 28% and 31% in the CV and CG arm respectively. TTP was significantly longer in the CG arm (p=0.006) with median TTP 4.2 vs. 3.9 months. There was significantly more grade 3–4 anemia and thrombocytopenia in the CG arm (p<0.001) and more grade 3–4 leucopenia in the CV arm (p= 0.001). More pts in the CG arm needed transfusions of blood (p=0.003) or platelets (p=0.001). There was no difference between the arms with respect to neutropenic infections (p=0.87). QoL data are still being analyzed and will be presented at ASCO. Conclusions: Overall survival was similar in the two treatment arms. In the CG arm, the median TTP was longer, but grade 3–4 toxicity requiring interventions, was more frequent when compared to the VC arm. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R&M SCCHN) (EXTREME)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5537-5537 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Vermorken ◽  
R. Mesia ◽  
M. E. Vega-Villegas ◽  
E. Remenar ◽  
R. Hitt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Safety Analysis ◽  
Data Safety Monitoring Board ◽  
Phase Iii

5537 Background: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in nearly all SCCHN and carries a strong prognostic significance, providing the rationale for using EGFR-targeted agents, such as cetuximab, in this indication. This study assesses the efficacy and safety of cetuximab in combination with chemotherapy commonly used in the treatment of R&M SCCHN. Methods: Patients (pts) were enrolled into this phase III trial from December 2004 to December 2005 and randomized either to Group A: cetuximab (first dose 400 mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus a maximum of 6 three-weekly cycles of cisplatin (100 mg/m2 IV on day 1) or carboplatin (AUC 5, day 1) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion for the first 4 days of each cycle) or to Group B: cisplatin or carboplatin with 5-FU as before. Cetuximab was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is overall survival time; secondary endpoints are progression-free-survival, response rate, disease control rate, safety, and Quality of Life. It was planned to randomize a total number of 420 pts in order to detect a difference in improvement in overall survival of 2.5 months. Results: At the end of the recruitment,440 pts have been randomized, to date 320 pts are under treatment, 21 have withdrawn from the study and 99 have completed the study. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) has performed an independent preplanned safety analysis from the first 140 pts, 138 pts of whom were treated. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks: M/F122/16, median age57 years [range, 38–79],median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 80 [range, 70–100]. In this safety analysis, there were 14 deaths, none of which were treatment related. The most frequent drug related grade 3–4 toxicity was mainly represented by neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia. Conclusions: The DSMB evaluated baseline and safety data, found no reason to stop the trial and recommended continuation of the study. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document