Does severity of underlying chronic liver disease (CLD) affect treatment outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients undergoing systemic chemotherapy (CT)?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15513-e15513
Author(s):  
W. Yeo ◽  
F. K. Mo ◽  
E. P. Hui ◽  
K. C. Lam ◽  
W. M. Ho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Natl Cancer Inst ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Lower Response Rate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Underlying Chronic Liver Disease

e15513 Background: HCC is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. CT has been one of the treatments offered to patients (pts) who are not candidate of curative surgery. Treatment of HCC could be complicated by underlying CLD. In this study, we aimed to assess pre-CT severity of CLD on treatment outcome of HCC pts who were entered into our previously reported phase III prospective randomized CT study (J Natl Cancer Inst 2005). Methods: The severity of CLD for each pt was arbitrary assessed by adopting the Child-Pugh's classification. Patients’ characteristics were compared. Treatment outcomes in terms of responses, survival and treatment-related toxicities (NCI CTC) were compared. Results: 160 were Child's A; 28 were Child's B. Proportion of pts with cirrhosis (45% vs 71%, P=0.01) and pre-CT bilirubin level (11 vs. 15 umol/l, p=0.02) were significantly higher, while age (52 vs 45 yrs, p=0.05) and albumin level (35 vs 30 g/l, p<0.0001) were significantly lower among Child's B pts. For Child's A and B pts: the median no. of CT cycles received were 4.0 vs 2.5 (p=0.01), the response rates were 17% vs 8.3% (p=0.28), the median survival were 21 vs 10.7 months (p= 0.002). When toxicity during CT were compared, Child's B pts had significantly higher rate of grade 3/4 neutropenia (0.6% vs. 7.1%, p=0.05), hyperbilirubinaemia (11.9% vs. 28.6%, p=0.02), hyponatremia (3.1% vs. 3.6%, p=0.001) and gastrointestinal bleeding (3.1% vs. 17.9%, p=0.001). Conclusions: Child's B HCC pts experienced increased treatment-related toxicities during CT. This has probably led to a shorter duration of CT and a lower response rate to CT. Their shorter survival could also be attributed to the severity of underlying CLD. Future trials on systemic therapy in HCC patients may need to consider stratifying patients according to severity of CLD. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized Phase III Study of Gemcitabine-Cisplatin Versus Etoposide-Cisplatin in the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Cardenal ◽  
M. Paz López-Cabrerizo ◽  
Antonio Antón ◽  
Vicente Alberola ◽  
Bartomeu Massuti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized trial to compare gemcitabine-cisplatin with etoposide-cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary end point of the comparison was response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 135 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8 or etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 3 along with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IV day 1. Both treatments were administered in 21-day cycles. One hundred thirty-three patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis of response. RESULTS: The response rate (externally validated) for patients given gemcitabine-cisplatin was superior to that for patients given etoposide-cisplatin (40.6% v 21.9%; P = .02). This superior response rate was associated with a significant delay in time to disease progression (6.9 months v 4.3 months; P = .01) without an impairment in quality of life (QOL). There was no statistically significant difference in survival time between both arms (8.7 months for gemcitabine-cisplatin v 7.2 months for etoposide-cisplatin; P = .18). The overall toxicity profile for both combinations of drugs was similar. Nausea and vomiting were reported more frequently in the gemcitabine arm than in the etoposide arm. However, the difference was not significant. Gemcitabine-cisplatin produced less grade 3 alopecia (13% v 51%) and less grade 4 neutropenia (28% v 56% ) but more grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia (56% v 13%) than did etoposide-cisplatin. However, there were no thrombocytopenia-related complications in the gemcitabine arm. CONCLUSION: Compared with etoposide-cisplatin, gemcitabine-cisplatin provides a significantly higher response rate and a delay in disease progression without impairing QOL in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Combination of irinotecan and etoposide for treatment of refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 3329-3334 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Masuda ◽  
K Matsui ◽  
S Negoro ◽  
N Takifuji ◽  
K Takeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To determine the response rate, survival, and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, combined with etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor, in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-five patients with refractory or relapsed SCLC were entered onto the trial. All 25 patients had been pretreated with some form of cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and had also received previous etoposide- or anthracyclinecontaining chemotherapy. The median time off chemotherapy was 6.7 months (range, 0.9 to 23.5). Patients were treated at 4-week intervals using CPT-11 (a starting dose of 70 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15) plus etoposide (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 to 3), with a subsequent dose based on toxicity. In addition, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF; 2 microg/kg/d) was given from day 4 to day 21, except on the days of CPT-11 administration. RESULTS All patients were assessable for toxicity and survival. Twenty-four patients were assessable for response. There were 14 partial responses (PRs) and three complete responses (CRs), for an overall response rate of 71% (95% confidence interval, 53% to 89%). The median response duration was 4.6 months. Median survival was 271 days. Major toxicities were myelosuppression (predominantly leukopenia) and diarrhea. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 56% and 20% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 to 4 diarrhea was observed in 4%. There was one treatment-related death due to severe myelosuppression. CONCLUSION A combination of CPT-11 and etoposide with rhG-CSF support is an active therapy against refractory or relapsed SCLC and deserves to be studied more extensively in a phase III trial.

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study of Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 55-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Antonietta Falcone ◽  
Anna Marina Liberati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Psychiatric Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Several trials have shown the superior impact of high-dose melphalan (usually 200 mg/m2, MEL200) versus standard therapy in myeloma patients. Intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m2, MEL100) was also superior to the standard dose, but MEL100 has not been clinically compared with MEL200 in a randomized study. In a case-matched study, response rate and event-free survival of MEL200 were superior to MEL100, but overall survival (OS) was similar. In this prospective, randomized, phase III trial, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of MEL200 and MEL100. Between January 2002 and July 2006, 299 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were previously untreated myeloma, aged < 65 and Durie and Salmon stage II or III. Exclusion criteria were abnormal cardiac function, respiratory disease, abnormal liver function, abnormal renal function, HBV, HCV, or HIV positivity, concomitant cancer or psychiatric disease. The institutional review board approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients received: 2 dexamethasone-doxorubicin-vincristine debulking courses (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine 1 mg day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 2, 3, 4, each course repeated every 28 days), 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2, day 1) plus G-CSF followed by stem cell harvest. The MEL200 group was conditioned with 2 cycles of melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by stem cell reinfusion; the MEL100 group was conditioned with 2 courses of melphalan 100 mg/m2 followed by stem cell reinfusion. At the present, 246 patients, median age 57 (range 32–65), completed the assigned therapy and were evaluated for response, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. One-hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to MEL200 and 122 to MEL100. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Abnormal cytogenetics (13q deletion, t(4;14), t(11;14), p53) were 75% in MEL200 patients and 56% in MEL100 patients (p=0.05). Forty-six patients did not complete tandem MEL200; 36 patients did not complete tandem MEL100. The near complete response rate of MEL200 was superior to MEL100 (32% versus 18%, p=0.011), but partial response was 80% versus 71%, respectively (p=0.079). The median follow-up for censored patients was 26.5 months. The 3 years PFS was 51% in the MEL200 arm and 33% in the MEL100 arm (HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.21, p=0.31). The 3 years OS was 86% in the MEL200 group and 71% in the MEL100 group (HR=0.82, 95 CI 0.45–1.48, p=0.51). Duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was comparable in two arms, but MEL200 patients required more platelet transfusions (p=0.03). Grade 3–4 non-hematological adverse events were reported in 49% of the MEL200 patients and in 38% of the MEL100 patients (P=0.07). The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were infections (54% of MEL200 patients versus 45% of MEL100 patients, p=0.25), mucositis (31% of MEL200 patients versus 7% of MEL100 patients, p=0.002) and gastrointestinal toxicities (20% of MEL200 patients versus 14% of MEL100 patients, p=0.3). In conclusion, MEL200 resulted in a significantly higher near complete response rate but this did not translate in a superior PFS and OS.

A randomized phase III trial of 1 month versus 1 year adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b in patients with resected high risk melanoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8505-8505 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Gogas ◽  
U. Dafni ◽  
D. Bafaloukos ◽  
A. Polyzos ◽  
G. Kokkalis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Risk Melanoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Group B

8505 Background: High dose IFNa regimen as reported in E1684 was unique for the incorporation of an induction phase of maximally-tolerated dosages of IV therapy for the initial 4 weeks. This is the only trial that has shown prolongation of overall survival and disease-free survival in comparison to observation. Analysis of the hazard curves for DFS and OS in E1684 reveal early and durable separation of the high-dose and observation arms suggesting that the induction phase may represent a critical component of the high-dose regimen, although this has not been tested prospectively. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized study of IV induction therapy vs a full year of high-dose IFN with primary endpoints of DFS and OS for stage IIB, IIC and III melanoma patients within 56 days of curative surgery. Patients were randomized to receive IFN alfa-2b 15×106 U/m2 IV × 5/7 days weekly × 4 weeks (arm A) versus the same regimen followed by 10×106 U(flat dose) SC 3 times a week for 48 weeks (arm B). The proposed treatment would be considered at least as good as the conventional treatment, if the relapse rate at 3 years from study entry is at most 15% higher in the former arm (power 85%, one-sided test a=0.05, required sample size: 340). Results: Between 1998 and 2004, 364 patients were enrolled (355 eligible: 178 arm A and 177 arm B). Patients′ and tumor characteristics were well balanced between the two arms. At a median follow up of 51 months (95% CI 46–55), the median DFS is 32 months vs 31 months (p=0.836) and the median OS is 61 months vs 63 months (p=0.444). Eleven patients discontinued treatment in arm A and 54 in arm B. The discontinuation rate is significantly higher in group B (p<0.001), possibly due to the longer duration. Reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (69%) and toxicity (19%). Patients in arm B had more grade 3–4 hematologic, constitutional and neurologic toxicity. Conclusions: There are no significant differences in OS and DFS between the regimen of 1 month and 1 year treatment tested. [Table: see text]

Increased incidence of adverse events after concomitant hepatic arterial infusion plus systemic chemotherapy and bevacizumab for colorectal cancer with liver metastasis.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 591-591
Author(s):  
S. Sadahiro ◽  
T. Suzuki ◽  
Y. Maeda ◽  
A. Tanaka ◽  
K. Okada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Systemic Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Hepatic Arterial Infusion ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Arterial Infusion ◽  
Grade 3

591 Background: FOLFOX+bevacizumab (BEV) is the standard systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated the combination of FOLFOX4 and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) in patients who had isolated liver metastasis from CRC. We also compared efficacy and safety between this combination therapy and its concomitant use with BEV. Methods: Twenty-five patients entered a phase I/II trial of HAI (5-FU 250 mg/d, leucovorin 25 mg/d; d1-7, q2w) combined with FOLFOX4. Fourteen other patients with a similar background received HAI + FOLFOX4 combined with BEV and the two regimens were compared. Results: In the phase I/II study, the recommended doses for FOLFOX were as follows: L-OHP, 85 mg/m2; l-LV, 100 mg/m2; 5-FU (bolus), 400 mg/m2; and 5-FU (infusion), 600 mg/m2. Sixteen patients who received this regimen showed a response rate of 93.8% (2 CR and 13 PR), a median progression-free survival of 323 days, and a one-year survival rate of 93.7%. In the subsequent phase II trial of HAI + FOLFOX4 with BEV, 14 patients were enrolled and the response rate was 78.6% (2 CR and 9 PR). The outcome was inferior when BEV was used concomitantly. The median numbers of doses were 10 (range: 1-27) for FOLFOX4 and 9 (1-27) for HAI without BEV, whereas the corresponding numbers with BEV were 8 (1-12) and 2 (0-9), respectively. There was a marked decrease in the number of HAI procedures when BEV was used. Thrombosis occurred in 8 patients who received concomitant BEV, which was the most common reason for cessation of HAI. Other adverse events (≥Grade 3) were neutropenia (n=7; 43.8%) and thrombocytopenia (n=2; 12.5%) without BEV or neutropenia (n=7; 43.8%) and diarrhea (n=1; 7.1%) with BEV, and no marked difference was seen between the two regimens. Both regimens were well tolerated. Severe neuropathy was only observed in 1 patient (6.3%; Grade 3) who received concomitant BEV. Conclusions: In the present study, HAI + FOLFOX combined with BEV caused thrombosis and disturbance of wound healing, thereby increasing the incidence of complications and making it difficult to continue treatment. These findings suggest that BEV should not be administered with HAI therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with S-1 plus cisplatin for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis: SP + IP PTX trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4529-4529
Author(s):  
Daisuke Kobayashi ◽  
Ryoji Fukushima ◽  
Mitsuhiko Ota ◽  
Sachio Fushida ◽  
Naoyuki Yamashita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peritoneal Cytology ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

4529 Background: Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Although a phase III study failed to show a statistically significant superiority of IP paclitaxel (PTX) combined with S-1 and intravenous PTX over S-1/cisplatin (SP), the standard of care as a first-line treatment in Japan, the sensitivity analysis suggested clinical efficacy of the IP PTX. Thus, attempts to combine IP PTX with other systemic therapies with higher efficacy have been warranted. After a dose-finding study, we sought to explore efficacy of a new regimen that combined IP PTX with SP. Methods: Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis confirmed by diagnostic imaging, laparoscopy or laparotomy were enrolled in the phase II multi-institutional prospective trial. In addition to the established SP regimen (S-1 administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m2 bid for 21 days followed by a 14-day rest and cisplatin administered intravenously at a dose of 60 mg/m2 on day 8), IP PTX was administered on days 1, 8 and 22 at a dose of 20 mg/m2. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) rate at one year after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints are progression free survival (PFS), response rate and toxicity. Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled and fully evaluated for OS and toxicity. The median number of courses was 7 (range 1-20). The 1-year OS rate was 74% (95% CI, 60-83%). The median survival time was 19.4 months (95% CI, 16.7 months-). The 1-year PFS rate was 57% (95% CI, 42-69%). The overall response rate was 20% (95% CI, 1-72%) in 5 patients with target lesions. Cancer cells ceased to be detected by peritoneal cytology in 23 (64%) of 36 patients. Fourteen (26%) patients underwent gastrectomy after response to chemotherapy. The incidences of grade 3/4 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were 43% and 47%, respectively. The frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (23%), anemia (29%), diarrhea (13%) and anorexia (17%). Intraperitoneal catheter and implanted port-related complications were observed in 4 patients. There was 1 treatment-related death. Conclusions: IP PTX combined with SP is well tolerated and active in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. Clinical trial information: UMIN000023000 .

Bortezomib Added to R-CVP Is Safe and Effective for Previously Untreated Advanced-Stage Follicular Lymphoma: A Phase II Study by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (25) ◽  
pp. 3396-3401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurie H. Sehn ◽  
David MacDonald ◽  
Sheldon Rubin ◽  
Guy Cantin ◽  
Morel Rubinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Bortezomib has demonstrated promising activity in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib added to rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) in previously untreated advanced-stage FL. Patients and Methods This is a phase II multicenter trial adding bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 8) to standard-dose R-CVP (BR-CVP) for up to eight cycles in patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV FL requiring therapy. Two co-primary end points, complete response rate (complete response [CR]/CR unconfirmed [CRu]) and incidence of grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity, were assessed. Results Between December 2006 and March 2009, 94 patients were treated with BR-CVP. Median patient age was 57 years (range, 29 to 84 years), and the majority had a high (47%) or intermediate (43%) Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score. BR-CVP was extremely well tolerated, with 90% of patients completing the intended eight cycles. No patients developed grade 4 neurotoxicity, and only five of 94 patients (5%; 95% CI, 0.8% to 9.9%) developed grade 3 neurotoxicity, which was largely reversible. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis, 46 of 94 patients (49%; 95% CI, 38.8% to 59.0%) achieved a CR/CRu, and 32 of 94 patients (34%) achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 83% (95% CI, 75.4% to 90.6%). Conclusion The addition of bortezomib to standard-dose R-CVP for advanced-stage FL is feasible and well tolerated with minimal additional toxicity. The complete response rate in this high-risk population compares favorably to historical results of patients receiving R-CVP. Given these results, a phase III trial comparing BR-CVP with R-CVP is planned.

scholarly journals Randomized Phase II Study of Pulse Erlotinib Before or After Carboplatin and Paclitaxel in Current or Former Smokers With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Naiyer A. Rizvi ◽  
Mark G. Kris ◽  
Daniel T. Milton ◽  
David B. Solit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Improve Response Rate ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeA prior study demonstrated that addition of continuous daily erlotinib fails to improve response rate or survival in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel. However, preclinical data support the hypothesis that intermittent administration of erlotinib before or after chemotherapy may improve efficacy. We tested this hypothesis in patients with advanced NSCLC.Patients and MethodsEligible patients were former or current smokers with chemotherapy-naive stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. All patients received up to six cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2), with random assignment to one of the following three erlotinib treatments: erlotinib 150 mg on days 1 and 2 with chemotherapy on day 3 (150 PRE); erlotinib 1,500 mg on days 1 and 2 with chemotherapy on day 3 (1,500 PRE); or chemotherapy on day 1 with erlotinib 1,500 mg on days 2 and 3 (1,500 POST). The primary end point was response rate.ResultsEighty-six patients received treatment. The response rates for the 150 PRE, 1,500 PRE, and 1,500 POST arms were 18% (five of 28 patients), 34% (10 of 29 patients), and 28% (eight of 29 patients), respectively. The median overall survival times were 10, 15, and 10 months for the 150 PRE, 1,500 PRE, and 1,500 POST arms, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia (39%), fatigue (15%), and anemia (12%). Grade 3 and 4 rash and diarrhea were uncommon.ConclusionPatients treated on the 1,500 PRE arm had the highest response rate and longest survival, with ranges similar to those reported for carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in a more restricted population. Further evaluation of this strategy in a phase III trial is proposed.

scholarly journals Bendamustine Plus Rituximab Versus Fludarabine Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed Follicular, Indolent, or Mantle Cell Lymphomas – 8-Year Follow-up Results of the Randomized Phase III Study NHL 2-2003 on Behalf of the StiL (Study Group Indolent Lymphomas, Germany)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 145-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias J. Rummel ◽  
Christina Balser ◽  
Ulrich Kaiser ◽  
Hans Peter Böck ◽  
Martina Beate Stauch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Indolent Lymphomas

Abstract Introduction: Fludarabine plus rituximab (F-R) is an established treatment option for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL), other indolent lymphoma, or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). To further improve the treatment in this setting we initiated in 2003 a multicenter, randomized phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) versus F-R for pts with relapsed FL, other indolent lymphomas or MCL. Patients and Methods: 230 pts in need of treatment were randomized to rituximab 375 mg/m² (day 1) plus either bendamustine 90 mg/m² (days 1+2) or fludarabine 25 mg/m² (days 1–3) q 28 days for a maximum of 6 cycles. Prophylactic use of antibiotics or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not generally recommended; however, in case of severe granulocytopenia, G-CSF use was permitted. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and complete response rate (CR). The protocol was amended in 2006 to allow rituximab maintenance therapy (rituximab 375 mg/m2 q 3 months for up to 2 years) in both arms, following regulatory approvals in this setting. Results: A total of 219 pts were evaluable for the analysis (114 B-R; 105 F-R). There were no significant differences between arms for patient characteristics, including age, stage, LDH, IPI, FLIPI, bone marrow infiltration, and extranodal involvement. Most pts had stage IV (71.6% B-R; 60.6% F-R) or stage III disease (21.1% B-R; 25.3% F-R). Median patient age was 68 yrs (range 38–87). Patients had received a median of 1 prior therapy (range 1–7). Histological subtypes were distributed equally between the B-R and F-R arms: follicular, 45.9% and 47.5%, respectively; Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia, 11.9% and 11.1%; MCL, 20.2% and 21.2%; other indolent lymphomas, 23% and 20.2%. A median of 6 cycles were given in both treatment arms, with 75.2% and 53.4% of B-R and F-R pts receiving 6 cycles, respectively. At the time of this analysis (June 2014), the median observation time was 96 months. The ORR was significantly higher with B-R than with F-R (83.5% vs. 52.5%, respectively; p< 0.0001). The CR rate with B-R was also significantly higher than that with F-R (38.5% vs. 16.2%; p=0.0004). Median PFS was significantly prolonged with B-R compared with F-R (34 vs. 12 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38–0.72; p<0.0001). The longer PFS translated into a survival benefit with a significantly longer median overall survival in the B-R group than in the F-R group (110 vs. 49 months; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.45–0.91; p=0.0125) comprising 55 and 71 deaths in the B-R and F-R groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of alopecia, stomatitis, erythema, allergic reactions, peripheral neuropathy, or infectious episodes between groups. Hematologic toxicities were also similar between arms: 8.9% grade 3/4 neutropenia with B-R vs. 9.1% with F-R; 11.8% grade 3/4 leukocytopenia with B-R vs. 12.4% with F-R. The overall incidence of serious adverse events was similar for the B-R and F-R groups (17.4% and 22.2%, respectively). 17 pts (14.9%) developed a secondary neoplasia after B-R compared with 16 pts (15.2%) after F-R. Of these, 5 pts in the B-R group, and 3 pts in the F-R group developed a secondary hematological neoplasia (2 AML [1 AML M4], 1 CML, 1 DLBCL, and 1 HD after B-R; and 2 AML M4, and 1 MDS after F-R). An unplanned subanalysis showed that rituximab maintenance therapy significantly prolonged overall survival (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.32-0.71; p=0.0003) and PFS (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.31-0.62; p< 0.0001) in the small group of 40 pts who received this treatment (23 B-R, 17 F-R) compared with those who did not. Although the numbers are too small in this non-randomized comparison to draw validated conclusions, these results appear to confirm the favorable role of rituximab maintenance. Conclusions: B-R was more effective than F-R in this setting of relapsed FL, other indolent lymphomas and MCL due to higher overall and complete response rates, a longer PFS, and an improved OS. These data confirm the high anti-lymphoma activity of B-R. Disclosures Off Label Use: Indication and dosage of bendamustine.

Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone provides improved overall survival compared to high-dose dexamethasone alone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM): Results of a North American phase III study (MM-009)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7521-7521 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Weber ◽  
C. Chen ◽  
R. Niesvizky ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
A. Belch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Grade 3

7521 Background: Lenalidomide is a novel, orally administered, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) that has single-agent activity against MM and additive effects when combined with dexamethasone (Dex). Methods: In this phase 3, multicenter, double-blind trial, 354 patients (pts)with relapsed or refractory MM were treated with Dex 40 mg daily on days 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 every 28 days and were randomized to receive either lenalidomide (Len) 25 mg daily orally on days 1–21 every 28 days or placebo. Beginning with cycle 5, Dex was reduced to 40 mg daily on days 1–4 only, every 28 days. Patients were stratified with respect to B2M (≤ 2.5 vs. > 2.5 mg/mL), prior stem cell transplant (none vs. ≥ 1), and number of prior regimens (1 vs > 1). The treatment arms were well balanced for prognostic features. Results: The overall response rate was greater with Len-Dex than with Dex-placebo (59.4% vs. 21.1%; p < 0.001). Complete responses were achieved in 12.9% of pts treated with Len-Dex and 0.6% of pts treated with Dex-placebo. The median time to progression (TTP) for pts treated with Len-Dex was 11.1 months compared to 4.7 months for pts treated with Dex-placebo (p < 0.000001). Median overall survival was higher with Len-Dex (not reached) compared to Dex-placebo (24 months) (hazard ratio 1.76, p = .0125). Grade 3–4 neutropenia was more frequent with combination therapy than with Dex-placebo (24% vs. 3.5%), however ≥ grade 3 infections were similar in both groups. Thromboembolic events occurred in 15% of pts treated with Len-Dex and in 3.5% of pts treated with Dex-placebo. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 8 pts and CHF developed in 4 pts treated with Len-Dex. Conclusions: Considering the ease of oral administration, higher response rate, longer time to progression and overall survival benefit, the combination of lenalidomide-dexamethasone may very well represent the treatment of choice for early refractory or relapsing multiple myeloma. The relatively infrequent side effects should not detract from these improvements, but the use of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy should be considered for patients treated with the combination of lenalidomide and dexamethasone. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document