Characterization of DNA methylation of the promoters CTCF and BORIS (CTCFL) in breast and ovarian cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22151-e22151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernesto Soto Reyes Solis ◽  
Daniela Morales-Espinosa ◽  
David Cantu ◽  
Gabriela Alvarado-luna ◽  
Dan Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Dna Hypomethylation ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoplastic Tissue ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Over Expression

e22151 Background: Genetic and epigenetic alterations may promote the initiation or development of cancer. Global DNA hypomethylation and local hypermethylation have been observed, particularly in cell cycle control-associated genes, such as tumor suppressor genes like CTCF. The dissociation of CTCF is associated with hypermethylation of several promoters; its paralogue gene (BORIS) is normally expressed in testicular tissue during spermatogenesis. BORIS over-expression has been identified in multiple neoplasms such as melanoma, gynecological cancer, glioblastoma and – recently – breast cancer. The aim of this study was to characterize the methylation status of the promoter regions of CTCF and BORIS in samples from breast and ovarian cancer compared to non-neoplastic tissue, and correlate it to its expression. Methods: Tissue samples from breast and ovarian cancer, as well as healthy controls were analyzed by MS-PCR for CTCF and BORIS. BorismRNA expression was also analyzed by RT-PCR. Results: A total of 8 ovarian and 16 breast tumors, as well as 10 tumor-adjacent breast tissue samples were prospectively obtained. In non-neoplastic tissue, BORIS was found to be hypermethylated, while in ovarian tumors a loss of methylation was identified in 75% of the samples. The same phenomenon was observed in 68% of breast cancer samples when compared to non-neoplastic tissue. A correlation between loss of DNA methylation of the promoter and gene over-expression was found by RT-PCR, thus suggesting that methylation is an epigenetic phenomenon associated to the over-expression of the oncogene BORIS. The methylation analysis of CTCF did not show any differences between neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissue, suggesting that epigenetic changes mainly affect BORIS. Conclusions: Loss of methylation of the promoter region of BORIS is associated with the over-expression of the gene. No differences were found in the methylation status between healthy and neoplastic tissue for CTCF.

Down-regulation of MDR1 by epigenetic alteration in human epithelial ovarian cancer cells

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16556-e16556
Author(s):  
Y. Kawakami ◽  
K. Miyamoto ◽  
K. Takehara ◽  
M. Kumagai ◽  
O. Samura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Cell ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Mdr1 Gene ◽  
Human Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Specific Pcr ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines

e16556 Background: Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies in women. Despite recent studies of many oncogenes and tumor-suppressor genes concerning about its progression, the details of ovarian cancer biology still remains to be unclear. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) encoded by the MDR1 gene is a membrane protein that can export many kinds of antineoplastic agents from cells, and overexpression of P-gp has been reported to be implicated in treatment failure in cancer. DNA methylation, a major epigenetic process, can affect every step in carcinogenesis as well as genetic alterations. The contribution of such epigenetic alteration to the expression of MDR1 remains largely unexplored in human ovarian cancer. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the DNA methylation status of the MDR1 gene by methylation-specific PCR. Then, the expression of MDR-1 mRNA and protein in primary epithelial ovarian cancer specimens were evaluated by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry using anti-mouse P-gp F4 monoclonal antibody, respectively. The correlation between these results and clinicopathological features was examined. Results: MDR1 was hypermethylated in 12 of 12 (100%) ovarian cancer cell lines, and 5 of 13 (38%) primary ovarian cancers by methylation-specific PCR analysis. MDR1 mRNA expression was subsequently found to be lost in ovarian cancer cell lines with methylation by both real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Thus, MDR1expression was associated with the DNA methylation status of the MDR1 gene. Conclusions: In conclusion, MDR1 was frequently hypermethylated in human ovarian cancers. Our results suggest that epigenetic regulation might play a role in the expression of MDR1 and clinical treatment outcomes in human ovarian cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals A Case Report of Germline Compound Heterozygous Mutations in the BRCA1 Gene of an Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 889
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Cecilia Y. S. Ho ◽  
Vivian Y. Shin ◽  
Chun Hang Au ◽  
Tsun Leung Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 Gene ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Compound Heterozygous ◽  
Strong Family History ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

The germline carrier of the BRCA1 pathogenic mutation has been well proven to confer an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Despite BRCA1 biallelic pathogenic mutations being extremely rare, they have been reported to be embryonically lethal or to cause Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we describe a patient who was a 48-year-old female identified with biallelic pathogenic mutations of the BRCA1 gene, with no or very subtle FA-features. She was diagnosed with ovarian cancer and breast cancer at the ages of 43 and 44 and had a strong family history of breast and gynecological cancers.

scholarly journals DNA Methylation Based Molecular Subtypes Predict Prognosis in Breast Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 107327482098851
Author(s):  
Zeng-Hong Wu ◽  
Yun Tang ◽  
Yan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Training Dataset ◽  
Consensus Clustering ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Novel Biomarkers

Background: Epigenetic changes are tightly linked to tumorigenesis development and malignant transformation’ However, DNA methylation occurs earlier and is constant during tumorigenesis. It plays an important role in controlling gene expression in cancer cells. Methods: In this study, we determining the prognostic value of molecular subtypes based on DNA methylation status in breast cancer samples obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database (TCGA). Results: Seven clusters and 204 corresponding promoter genes were identified based on consensus clustering using 166 CpG sites that significantly influenced survival outcomes. The overall survival (OS) analysis showed a significant prognostic difference among the 7 groups (p<0.05). Finally, a prognostic model was used to estimate the results of patients on the testing set based on the classification findings of a training dataset DNA methylation subgroups. Conclusions: The model was found to be important in the identification of novel biomarkers and could be of help to patients with different breast cancer subtypes when predicting prognosis, clinical diagnosis and management.

scholarly journals Epigenetic Contribution and Genomic Imprinting Dlk1-Dio3 miRNAs in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 680
Author(s):  
Rujuan Dai ◽  
Zhuang Wang ◽  
S. Ansar Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Methylation Status ◽  
Transcriptional Level ◽  
Dna Hypomethylation ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Multiple Organs ◽  
Genetic Imprinting

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multifactorial autoimmune disease that afflicts multiple organs, especially kidneys and joints. In addition to genetic predisposition, it is now evident that DNA methylation and microRNAs (miRNAs), the two major epigenetic modifications, are critically involved in the pathogenesis of SLE. DNA methylation regulates promoter accessibility and gene expression at the transcriptional level by adding a methyl group to 5′ cytosine within a CpG dinucleotide. Extensive evidence now supports the importance of DNA hypomethylation in SLE etiology. miRNAs are small, non-protein coding RNAs that play a critical role in the regulation of genome expression. Various studies have identified the signature lupus-related miRNAs and their functional contribution to lupus incidence and progression. In this review, the mutual interaction between DNA methylation and miRNAs regulation in SLE is discussed. Some lupus-associated miRNAs regulate DNA methylation status by targeting the DNA methylation enzymes or methylation pathway-related proteins. On the other hand, DNA hyper- and hypo-methylation are linked with dysregulated miRNAs expression in lupus. Further, we specifically discuss the genetic imprinting Dlk1-Dio3 miRNAs that are subjected to DNA methylation regulation and are dysregulated in several autoimmune diseases, including SLE.

scholarly journals A Collaborative Model to Implement Flexible, Accessible and Efficient Oncogenetic Services for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: The C-MOnGene Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2729
Author(s):  
Julie Lapointe ◽  
Michel Dorval ◽  
Jocelyne Chiquette ◽  
Yann Joly ◽  
Jason Robert Guertin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Collaborative Model ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Number Of Patients

Medical genetic services are facing an unprecedented demand for counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in a context of limited resources. To help resolve this issue, a collaborative oncogenetic model was recently developed and implemented at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval; Quebec; Canada. Here, we present the protocol of the C-MOnGene (Collaborative Model in OncoGenetics) study, funded to examine the context in which the model was implemented and document the lessons that can be learned to optimize the delivery of oncogenetic services. Within three years of implementation, the model allowed researchers to double the annual number of patients seen in genetic counseling. The average number of days between genetic counseling and disclosure of test results significantly decreased. Group counseling sessions improved participants’ understanding of breast cancer risk and increased knowledge of breast cancer and genetics and a large majority of them reported to be overwhelmingly satisfied with the process. These quality and performance indicators suggest this oncogenetic model offers a flexible, patient-centered and efficient genetic counseling and testing for HBOC. By identifying the critical facilitating factors and barriers, our study will provide an evidence base for organizations interested in transitioning to an oncogenetic model integrated into oncology care; including teams that are not specialized but are trained in genetics.

scholarly journals Case series: Breast and ovarian cancer syndrome

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Carcinomas ◽  
Increased Risk

Aims and Objectives: To report a series of cases with breast and ovarian carcinomas either in same patient or in a family and identifying the importance of BRCA 1,2 genetic testing in such individuals. Materials and Methods: The medical records of breast and ovarian cancer patients operated over past 3 years at a single institute were reviewed retrospectively and their clinical profile, family history, final pathological reports and follow up data was collected. Results: 8 patients were found to have breast and ovarian malignancies, out of which 3 had synchronous breast and ovarian cancers, 4 had metachronous and 1 patient with ovarian cancer had history of breast cancer in family. Median age of presentation to the hospital was 47 years and median time interval in metachronous disease patients was 5.5 years. Conclusion: About 5% of people who have breast cancer and about 10% of women who have ovarian cancer have HBOC, caused by germline mutation in BRCA1, 2 gene. These individuals have increased risk of developing breast cancer at younger age, TNBC, or developing a second primary in breast or ovary plus an overall risk of breast/ovarian/prostate/pancreatic malignancies in other family members due to inheritable mutation. Identification of BRCA mutation in such individuals can help family members to undergo genetic counseling and follow different screening and prevention guidelines from general population thus reducing the cancer risks.

scholarly journals The Cost-Effectiveness of Multigene Panel Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Norway

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 238146831882110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Asphaug ◽  
Hans Olav Melberg
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Early Onset Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life ◽  
Multigene Panel

Background. Expansion of routine genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer from conventional BRCA testing to a multigene test could improve diagnostic yield and increase the opportunity for cancer prevention in both identified carriers and their relatives. We use an economic decision model to assess whether the current knowledge on non- BRCA mutation prevalence, cancer risk, and patient preferences justifies switching to a multigene panel for testing of early-onset breast cancer patients. Methods. We evaluated routine testing by BRCA testing, a 7-gene panel, and a 14-gene panel using individual-level simulations of annual health state transitions over a lifetime perspective. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence is reduced and posttreatment survival is improved when high-risk mutations are detected and risk-reducing treatment offered. Most model inputs were synthesized from published literature. Intermediate health outcomes included breast and ovarian cancer incidence rates, along with organ-specific cancer mortality. Cost-effectiveness outcomes were health sector costs and quality-adjusted life years. Results. Intermediate health outcomes improved by testing with multigene panels. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of $77,000, a 7-gene panel test with five non- BRCA genes was the optimal strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53,310 per quality-adjusted life year compared to BRCA-only testing. Limitations. Unable to stratify carriers to specific mutations within genes, we can only make predictions on the gene level, with combined risk estimates for known variants. As mutation prevalence is the absolute upper bound of returns to more expansive testing, the rarity of modelled mutations makes analysis outcomes sensitive to model implementation. Conclusions. A 7-gene panel to diagnose hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in early-onset breast cancer patients can be a cost-effective alternative to current BRCA-only testing in Norway.

scholarly journals Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kathleen Ladd ◽  
Beth N Peshkin ◽  
Leigha Senter ◽  
Shari Baldinger ◽  
Claudine Isaacs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Affective Factors ◽  
Risk Reducing

Abstract Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) are increasingly used to reduce breast and ovarian cancer risk following BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. However, little is known about how genetic counseling influences decisions about these surgeries. Although previous studies have examined intentions prior to counseling, few have examined RRM and RRSO intentions in the critical window between genetic counseling and test result disclosure. Previous research has indicated that intentions at this time point predict subsequent uptake of surgery, suggesting that much decision-making has taken place prior to result disclosure. This period may be a critical time to better understand the drivers of prophylactic surgery intentions. The aim of this study was to examine predictors of RRM and RRSO intentions. We hypothesized that variables from the Health Belief Model would predict intentions, and we also examined the role of affective factors. Participants were 187 women, age 21–75, who received genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. We utilized multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of intentions. 49.2% and 61.3% of participants reported intentions for RRM and RRSO, respectively. Variables associated with RRM intentions include: newly diagnosed with breast cancer (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 1.20–11.04), perceived breast cancer risk (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.17–1.81), perceived pros (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.38–2.32) and cons of RRM (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.65–0.996), and decision conflict (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98). Variables associated with RRSO intentions include: proband status (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09–0.89), perceived pros (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.11–1.63) and cons of RRSO (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59–0.89), and ambiguity aversion (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65–0.95). These data provide support for the role of genetic counseling in fostering informed decisions about risk management, and suggest that the role of uncertainty should be explored further.

scholarly journals Artificial Light at Night of Different Spectral Compositions Differentially Affects Tumor Growth in Mice: Interaction With Melatonin and Epigenetic Pathways

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327481881290 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Zubidat ◽  
B. Fares ◽  
F. Fares ◽  
A. Haim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Short Wavelength ◽  
Global Dna Methylation ◽  
Artificial Light ◽  
Dna Hypomethylation ◽  
Light At Night ◽  
Cancer Burden ◽  
Melatonin Suppression

Lighting technology is rapidly advancing toward shorter wavelength illuminations that offer energy-efficient properties. Along with this advantage, the increased use of such illuminations also poses some health challenges, particularly breast cancer progression. Here, we evaluated the effects of artificial light at night (ALAN) of 4 different spectral compositions (500-595 nm) at 350 Lux on melatonin suppression by measuring its urine metabolite 6-sulfatoxymelatonin, global DNA methylation, tumor growth, metastases formation, and urinary corticosterone levels in 4T1 breast cancer cell-inoculated female BALB/c mice. The results revealed an inverse dose-dependent relationship between wavelength and melatonin suppression. Short wavelength increased tumor growth, promoted lung metastases formation, and advanced DNA hypomethylation, while long wavelength lessened these effects. Melatonin treatment counteracted these effects and resulted in reduced cancer burden. The wavelength suppression threshold for melatonin-induced tumor growth was 500 nm. These results suggest that short wavelength increases cancer burden by inducing aberrant DNA methylation mediated by the suppression of melatonin. Additionally, melatonin suppression and global DNA methylation are suggested as promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer. Finally, ALAN may manifest other physiological responses such as stress responses that may challenge the survival fitness of the animal under natural environments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document