Invasive micropapillary breast cancer: Single-institution experience in the modern era.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 150-150
Author(s):  
Amy E. Voci ◽  
Camilla Boafo ◽  
Anne Eaton ◽  
Michelle Stempel ◽  
Jorge Reis- Filho ◽  
...  

150 Background: Invasive micropapillary breast cancer (IMPC) is a rare special histologic type of breast cancer with a propensity for nodal metastases. Molecularly, IMPCs have been classified as luminal B; however, clinical outcome data in the era of targeted therapy are limited. Here we report our institutional experience with IMPC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our prospective database from 1995-2009 to identify patients who had surgery for IMPC. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were abstracted from the medical record. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Factors associated with OS and trends over time were assessed using the log-rank test and Cox regression. Results: We identified 258 patients with IMPC. Median patient age 56yrs (range 26-91), 157(61%) postmenopausal, 147(57%) presented with a palpable mass. The majority of IMPCs were grade 3 (83%), estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (86%) and HER2-neg (81%) with LVI (60%) and nodal metastasis (62%). 194 (75%) patients received chemotherapy (CTX), 204 (81%) hormonal therapy and 37/48 (77%) HER2-pos patients received trastuzumab. At a median follow-up of 55 months (range 1-173mos), 5yr OS is 89.5% with a trend towards improved survival in later yrs; 5 year OS 1995-2005 vs 2006-2009, 85% vs 91%, respectively (p=0.06) Clinical factors associated with OS are shown (Table). Among ER-pos/HER2-neg patients, progesterone receptor (PR) status was strongly associated with 5yr OS. Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with IMPC treated at a single center, OS was associated with tumor size, PR status, use of CTX and trastuzumab but not with ER or hormonal therapy. These clinical data support the molecular classification of IMPC as luminal B cancers which have a more aggressive clinical behavior than other ER+ cancers. The trend towards improved survival in later years likely reflects the benefits of targeted therapy. [Table: see text]

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 515-515
Author(s):  
William Fraser Symmans ◽  
Eleni Andreopoulou ◽  
Daniel J. Booser ◽  
Christos Hatzis ◽  
Michael J. Wallace ◽  
...  

515 Background: Biological progression of ER+ breast cancer accelerates clinical progression and resistance to treatments. Methods: One laboratory used Affymetrix U133A gene expression microarrays to profile 588 biopsy samples from patients with ER+ breast cancer: 74 AJCC Stage I, 155 Stage IIA, 105 Stage IIB, 127 Stage III, 127 Stage IV (27 at presentation, 100 relapsed). We evaluated stage dependence of ER [ESR1, PGR, sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET) index], proliferation [MKI67, AURKA, genomic grade index (GGI)], invasion [PLAU (uPA)], PI3-kinase (PIK3CA-GS), VEGF, genomic subtype [PAM50, 3-gene classifier (ESR1, ERBB2, AURKA)], and housekeeper control genes. Significance was evaluated through ordinal median regression (P < 0.002, for multiple testing) after adjusting for staging method (clinical or pathologic). Exploratory Cox regression analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed when treatment was hormonal therapy (HT, N=58) or chemotherapy (CT, N=27) after biopsy of metastatic ER+ breast cancer (MBC). Results: Stage progression was associated with reduced SET index and increased proliferation (GGI, MKI67, AURKA) and metabolism (GAPDH). These changes occurred between Stages IIB and III, and Stages III and IV. Luminal B and proliferation subtypes were more prevalent in Stage IV and less in Stage I. Interestingly, invasion (PLAU) genes were lower in MBC. Only SET index demonstrated a significant interaction with treatment (HT or CT) for MBC (PFS: p=0.018). SET was predictive of PFS and OS following HT, as a continuous score (PFS: HR=0.69, 95%CI 0.49 to 0.97, p=0.035; OS: HR=0.61, 95%CI 0.40 to 0.94, p=0.025) or dichotomized at median value (PFS: HR=0.43, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.76, p=0.003; OS: HR=0.37, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.77, p=0.006). Genomic subtype was prognostic for PFS irrespective of treatment type. High PIK3CA-GS expression predicted OS in the HT subset. Conclusions: Stage progression was associated with decreased ER-related transcription (SET) and increased proliferation, grade, higher risk subtype, and metabolism. In MBC samples, only SET index was predictive of PFS and OS with palliative hormonal therapy.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Chen ◽  
Juanjuan Li ◽  
Qi Wu ◽  
Hanqing Liu ◽  
Jingping Yuan ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: Previous studies have revealed a potential link between breast cancer (BC) and thyroid cancer (TC). This study aimed to estimate the clinical characteristics of BC patients who also had primary TC, and to determine the effect of the sequence of the two malignancies on survival. Methods: We selected female patients with BC or TC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000 to 2012), and classified them as four cohorts, BC patients with a second TC (BC2TC cohort), TC patients with a second BC (TC2BC cohort), BC patients without TC (BC cohort) and TC patients without BC (TC cohort). Differences in clinical characteristics were analyzed using the chi-square test. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was performed to balance the baseline characteristics. The survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: After PSM, 1,260 pairs of patients with or without second primary TC were included in the survival analysis. The patients in BC2TC cohort had better OS (HR: 0.511(0.421-0.620), P<0.001) and DSS (HR: 0.458(0.346-0.606), P<0.001) than those in BC cohort. The subgroup analysis showed that OS was better in the BC2TC cohort in Luminal A and Luminal B subtypes (P<0.05). Conclusion: We found a second primary TC may improve the prognosis of BC patients, especially in women with Luminal breast cancer, while there was no such trend in TC patients with second BC.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abby B. Statler ◽  
Brian P. Hobbs ◽  
Wei Wei ◽  
Annie Gupta ◽  
Cassann N. Blake ◽  
...  

AbstractTreatment patterns and outcomes are unclear for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2-positive (HER2+) disease. This study aimed to: (1) examine the utilization of first-line therapy among HR+/HER2+/MBC patients and (2) compare overall survival (OS) between the identified regimens. We analyzed National Cancer Database patients (HR+/HER2+/MBC) who were treated between 2010 and 2015. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression were used to: (1) identify independent predictors of treatment receipt and (2) determine significant prognostic factors for OS. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate and evaluate OS, respectively. Propensity scores were added to all multivariate OS models, thereby accounting for bias in treatment receipt. Of 6,234 patients analyzed, 3770 (60.5%) received hormonal therapy and 2464 (39.5%) received chemotherapy. Receipt of hormonal therapy was associated with older age, grade 1/grade 2 disease, no visceral involvement, higher comorbidity scores, and being white. Multivariate analysis suggest patients receiving hormonal therapy + anti-HER2 experienced improved OS, when compared to chemotherapy + anti-HER2 (HR: 0.74, p = 0.004). Overall, the cohort receiving hormonal therapy + anti-HER2 reported the highest 5-year OS (hormonal + anti-HER2: 47.5% vs. chemotherapy + anti-HER2: 39.8% vs. hormonal: 38.5% vs. chemotherapy: 36.3%, p < 0.001). Our findings suggest de-escalated therapy may be the preferred and potentially more effective care path for HR+/HER2+/MBC patients, signaling a need for randomized studies.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117822341774585
Author(s):  
Lakmini Mudduwa ◽  
Harshini Peiris ◽  
Shania Gunasekara ◽  
Deepthika Abeysiriwardhana ◽  
Thusharie Liyanage

Aim: To study the prognostic value of immunohistochemically detected low Claudin3 expression in breast cancers. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with breast cancer who were investigated at our unit from 2006 to 2015. Tissue microarrays were constructed, and immunohistochemical staining was done to assess the Claudin3 expression and to classify breast cancers according to the immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular classification. Kaplan-Meier model and log-rank test were used for recurrence-free survival and breast cancer–specific survival analysis. Results: Of the 853 patients, overall low expression of Claudin3 was seen in 18.4%. Recurrence-free survival of patients with overall low Claudin3 breast cancers was poor in luminal A ( P = .006) and luminal B (Her2−) ( P = .009) subtypes compared with those who had Claudin3 expression in each group. Conclusions: Assessment of Claudin3 expression by immunohistochemistry is suggested for luminal A and luminal B (Her2−) subtypes to identify patients with poor prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-159
Author(s):  
M Alcaide Lucena ◽  
CJ Rodríguez González ◽  
S de Reyes Lartategui ◽  
R Gallart Aragón ◽  
MT Sánchez Barrón ◽  
...  

Resumen Los avances recientes en el campo de la biología molecular y la secuenciación del genoma se han traducido en una nueva clasificación del cáncer de mama, que busca mayor precisión y se correlaciona mejor con el riesgo de recaída de la enfermedad y la respuesta al tratamiento. Establece cuatro subtipos de cáncer de mama: luminal A, luminal B, HER 2 positivo y triple negativo, siendo el subtipo luminal A el de mejor pronóstico, y el triple negativo, el de peor pronóstico. Si combinamos la clasificación clásica histológica con la nueva molecular, nos permite encuadrar a estas pacientes de una forma más precisa en función del riesgo, definiendo así un manejo terapéutico adaptado.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoyi Wu ◽  
Xiaoben Pan ◽  
Baohua Wang ◽  
Xiaolei Zhu ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Estimates of the incidence and prognosis of developing liver metastases at the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) diagnosis are lacking.Methods In this study, we analyzed the association of liver metastases and the PDAC patients outcome. The risk factors associated with liver metastases in PDAC patients were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Cox regression was performed to identify factors associated with OS.Results Patients with primary PDAC in the tail of the pancreas had a higher incidence of liver metastases (62.2%) than those with PDAC in the head (28.6%). Female gender, younger age, primary PDAC in the body or tail of the pancreas, and larger primary PDAC tumor size were positively associated with the occurrence of liver metastases. The median survival of patients with liver metastases was significantly shorter than that of patients without liver metastases. Older age, unmarried status, primary PDAC in the tail of the pancreas, and tumor size ≥4 cm were risk factors for OS in the liver metastases cohort.Conclusions Population-based estimates of the incidence and prognosis of PDAC with liver metastases may help decide whether diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging should be performed in patients with primary PDAC in the tail or body of the pancreas. The location of primary PDAC should be considered during the diagnosis and treatment of primary PDAC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1052-1052
Author(s):  
Kelvin K H Bao ◽  
Leone Sutanto ◽  
Shirley S W Tse ◽  
Ka Man Cheung ◽  
Jeffrey C H Chan

1052 Background: Markers for the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer are limited. The bidirectional crosstalks that exist between ER and HER2 pathways contribute to endocrine resistance. We investigated the association between low levels of HER2 expression and the clinical outcome of patients with ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Methods: We identified consecutive patients with ER+ HER2- MBC who received CDK4/6 inhibitor plus either letrozole or fulvestrant between Mar 2017 - Jun 2020 from an institutional cancer registry. HER2-low expression was defined as IHC score 1+, or 2+ with a negative ISH. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the initiation of CDK4/6 inhibitor to the date of radiological or clinical progression, or death. The relationship between HER2 expression levels and PFS was evaluated using log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression modelling. Results: 106 women with MBC were eligible for analysis. Median age at treatment was 58 (23.0-91.4). The majority received palbociclib (84%) while the rest received ribociclib. CDK4/6 inhibitor was used as first-line treatment in 50.9% of cases. Most tumors were of ductal histology (83%) and progesterone receptor (PgR) positive (84.9%), and 22.6% of the patients had bone-only disease. 77.3% of cases were considered HER2-low expressing. HER2-low expression was associated with a significantly shorter PFS compared with HER2 IHC 0 counterpart (median, 8.9 vs 18.8 months, p= 0.014). In multivariate analysis, HER-2 low expression remained significantly associated with an inferior PFS (HR 1.96, 95%CI 1.03-3.75, p= 0.041) after adjusting for the line of treatment, PgR status and disease extent (bone only vs extra-osseous disease). Conclusions: In patients with ER+ HER2- MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, HER2-low expression was associated with an inferior PFS, and may serve as a potential marker candidate for CDK4/6 inhibitor efficacy. As novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates demonstrated efficacy in HER2-low expressing MBC, coupled with the emerging evidence for the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with anti-HER2 agents, this HER2-low expression subgroup warrants prospective evaluations in future trials.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21040-21040
Author(s):  
R. Trujillo ◽  
E. Gallego ◽  
A. Márquez ◽  
N. Ribelles ◽  
J. Trigo ◽  
...  

21040 Background: Gene expression arrays and IP studies classified breast cancer in three distinct subtypes: basal, HER2/neu and luminal that are associated with different clinical outcomes. Methods: In 141 pts with operable breast cancer, included in phase III trials of adjuvant therapy in our center, immunohistochemical staining was performed on 3μm sections of paraffin blocks, containing tissue-arrays of tumour tissue.A basal phenotype (BP) was defined by negative estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and positive cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 or EGFR immunoreactivity. HER2/neu phenotype as positive c-erb B2 by HercepTest™ and luminal phenotype (LP) by positive ER, PR and CK 7/8 and negative HER-2. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The differences between survivals were estimated using the log rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate any independent prognostic effect of the variables on disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Complete clinical follow-up information was available for 141 pts. The median follow-up period was 52 months (range 1–103 months). During this period, 13.8% pts died from breast cancer and 27.7% pts relapsed. At the time of the primary diagnosis 10.4% of the pts had lymph node negative disease and 89.6% had positive lymph nodes. 50.8% pts received taxane chemotherapy, 7.7% Trastuzumab, 62.3% radiotherapy and 61% pts received hormonotherapy. Positivity for LP was 65.2%, BP 9.9% and Her-2 phenotype 8.5%. 16.3% didn't fit for any of the three subtypes. Median DFS for BP: 24 moths, for LP and Her-2 phenotypes median DFS was not reached. 5 years DFS were; BP: 19%, LP: 63% and Her-2: 56%. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses demonstrated that the presence of a detectable BP was highly significantly associated with a worse DFS compared with the presence of a LP, log rank test (p= 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses estimated that the prognostic effect of BP in relation to DFS was independent of lymph node, stage and tumor size, HR: 0.12 95% CI (0.05–0.2). Conclusions: We found that expression of BP was associated with poor prognostic in the context of randomized phase III trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11599-11599
Author(s):  
Sherry X. Yang ◽  
Eric Polley

11599 Background: It is unclear whether survival varies among breast cancer molecular subtypes without systemic and locoregional therapy. This study aims to evaluate the survival profile by molecular subtypes after surgery. Methods: In total, we evaluated 301 women with invasive breast cancer with stage I, II or III disease. Patients were classified into four major breast cancer subtypes by immunohistochemistry/FISH classifiers: luminal-A (ER+ and/or PR+/HER2-), luminal-B (ER+ and/or PR+/HER2+), HER2-enriched (HER2+/ER-/PR-) or basal-like (ER-/PR-/HER2-; triple-negative). Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and log-rank test for differences. Association between clinical outcome and subtype adjusting for breast cancer prognostic factors was assessed by multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results: All patients did not receive systemic chemotherapy and hormone therapy as well as radiation therapy. Luminal A was the most common subtype (N = 224), followed by basal-like (N = 43), luminal B (N = 21) and HER2-enriched (N = 13). Median follow-up for OS was 197 months (range: 1 – 273 months). Age at diagnosis was statistically different among the subtypes, with basal-like and luminal B having high proportions less than 50 years (P = 0.047). Patients with basal-like and HER2-enriched had more high grade tumors (P < 0.001). Notably, there was no difference in OS among the four subtypes (log-rank P = 0.983). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.1 for luminal A vs. luminal B (P = 0.781), 0.62 in luminal A vs. HER2-enriched (P = 0.273), or 0.67 in luminal A vs. basal-like (P = 0.158). In contrast, the adjusted HR were 2.2 in age less than 50 years (P = 0.0017), and 1.1 for number of positive nodes (P = 0.00074). Conclusions: OS, through long-term clinical follow-up, is not significantly different among molecular subtypes if not controlling for other prognostic factors in patients who only received surgery. Age and number of positive nodes are independent prognostic factors in patients with no systemic and locoregional treatments.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23173-e23173
Author(s):  
Omar Peña-Curiel ◽  
Diddiera Prada ◽  
Miguel Otero ◽  
José Díaz-Chávez ◽  
Cynthia Villarreal-Garza ◽  
...  

e23173 Background: Breast cancer is one of the top causes of cancer death worldwide. In Mexico, locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) comprises the majority of the breast cancer stages at diagnosis. Recent studies have suggested that 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), could be a prognostic marker in breast cancer. However, the role of 5hmC on clinical and histopathologic characteristics in LABC has not been explored. Methods: From a cohort of locally advanced and advanced breast cancer patients treated at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico City with a 3-year follow-up, we measured 5hmC levels by immunodetection from fresh frozen tissue samples taken from the initial biopsy (N = 193). We determined the association between 5hmC levels and the most relevant clinical and histopathological characteristics. Results: From the full cohort analyzed; 42% were luminal A (n = 82), 33% were luminal B (N = 63), 9% were HER2-positive (N = 18), and 15% were triple-negative tumors. We found higher levels of global 5hmC in HER2 positive tumors vs. all other subtypes (p = 0.028, Kruskal-Wallis test). In luminal B tumors, 5hmC levels were associated with Ki67 (β = -0.04, 95%CI: -0.08, -0.01, p = 0.01 from multivariable model) but not in luminal A. Furthermore, we found that low 5hmC levels were associated with higher histological grade in HER2-positive tumors (p = 0.03, Kruskal-Wallis test). In subgroup analysis of LABC patients, we found higher 5hmC levels in non-ductal vs. ductal invasive tumors (β = 1.38, 95%CI: 0.049, 2.911, p = 0.043 from multivariable model). Also, lower 5hmC levels were associated with Ki67 (β = -2.53, 95%CI: -4.32, -0.74; p = 0.009 from multivariable model) and with histological type (p = 0.028, Kruskal-Wallis test) in LABC luminal B tumors. A borderline association with OS (p = 0.07, log-rank test) and RFS (p = 0.071, log-rank test) was observed in luminal A tumors in the LABC group. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that 5hmC levels are differentially associated with distinct clinical and histopathological characteristics in breast cancer, especially those linked to aggressiveness, including Ki67, histological type, and grade.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document