Relationship between biomarkers and everolimus efficacy in the phase III RECORD-1 trial of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 352-352
Author(s):  
Stephane Oudard ◽  
Bernard J. Escudier ◽  
John A. Thompson ◽  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Cristina Masini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Day Treatment ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Baseline Levels

352 Background: Compared with placebo, everolimus provided significant improvement in median PFS in the RECORD-1 study of VEGFr-TKI-refractory mRCC. To investigate the role of angiogenesis pathway molecules as potential biomarkers of everolimus efficacy in RECORD-1, plasma levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were estimated. Methods: In addition to best supportive care, patients received everolimus 10 mg/day (n = 277) or placebo (n = 139). Placebo patients who progressed were offered everolimus. Predose blood samples were collected on day 1 of the first four 28-day treatment cycles. Plasma levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were assessed by ELISA. Effect of treatment over time on each biomarker was assessed by a mixed effects model. Hazard ratios (HR) for prognostic effects were obtained using log baseline biomarker values as continuous variables in a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Plasma levels of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were available for 45%, 45%, and 39% of everolimus patients and 50%, 50%, and 45% of placebo patients. Patients with biomarker data had baseline characteristics similar to those of the overall population. Mean baseline levels (pg/mL) of sVEGFR-2, VEGF-A, and bFGF were similar for everolimus (8945, 245, and 8, respectively) and placebo (8985, 253, and 13, respectively). Everolimus significantly improved median PFS over placebo irrespective of baseline levels of the analyzed biomarkers (p < 0.001), indicating they are not predictive of everolimus efficacy. Prolonged PFS in the biomarker population was associated with lower VEGF-A baseline level (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.57; p = 0.028), suggesting VEGF-A may be prognostic for mRCC. Compared with placebo, everolimus significantly reduced bFGF (p = 0.0095) and sVEGFR-2 (p< 0.001) levels over the time course of the study; no effect on VEGF-A levels was observed. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly improved PFS compared with placebo, regardless of baseline biomarker levels. Lower VEGF-A levels may be a potential prognostic factor for longer PFS. Everolimus treatment significantly downregulated plasma levels of bFGF and sVEGFR-2 from baseline. Clinical trial information: NCT00410124.

Final results of the randomized phase III trial of sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma: Survival and biomarker analysis

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5023-5023 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. M. Bukowski ◽  
T. Eisen ◽  
C. Szczylik ◽  
W. M. Stadler ◽  
R. Simantov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Secondary Analysis ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Vegf Signaling ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Biomarker Analysis ◽  
Tumor Biopsies

5023 Background: Based on the significant PFS benefit of sorafenib (SOR) vs placebo (P) in a Phase III advanced RCC trial, P patients were unblinded and crossed over to SOR in May 2005. Final OS and biomarker data are reported. Methods: Final OS analysis was planned at ∼540 events (a=0.037 after adjusting for previous analyses). To minimize effect of crossover on OS, a secondary analysis was planned censoring P data on June 30, 2005 (a=0.037). Plasma VEGF and sVEGFR2 were measured by ELISA at baseline (BL), cycle (C) 1 day (D) 21, and C3D1. pERK was assayed by IHC. Results: 903 patients were randomized (SOR, 451; P, 452). The only OS analysis before crossover (May 2005) showed an estimated 39% OS improvement for SOR vs P (HR=0.72; p=0.018) (ECCO 2005); 216 P patients had crossed to SOR. OS analysis 6 months after crossover (Nov 2005) showed a 30% improvement in OS for SOR vs P (HR=0.77, p=0.015) (ASCO 2006). These OS differences did not reach prespecified O’Brien-Fleming statistical boundaries. Final OS (Sep 2006) at 561 deaths showed an improvement of 13.5% for SOR vs P and was not significant (median 17.8 vs 15.2 months; HR=0.88; p=0.146; a=0.037). Secondary analysis censoring P data (June 2005) showed a significant OS benefit for SOR vs P (HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.97; p=0.0287; a=0.037), suggesting crossover had confounded OS. Changes in VEGF (n=712) and sVEGFR2 (n=717) were observed after SOR treatment (AACR 2006); VEGF increased 32% (n=279) at C1D21 and 47% (n=203) at C3D1, and sVEGFR2 decreased 18% (n=282) and 24% (n=206). Using a COX proportional hazards model, BL VEGF was an independent prognostic factor (p=0.014); patients with high BL VEGF (>131 pg/ml) had poorer prognosis and a trend towards greater PFS benefit with SOR (SOR vs P, HR=0.48 vs 0.64 for high vs low VEGF, p=0.096). BL sVEGFR2, changes in VEGF or sVEGFR2 at C1D21, and pERK levels in limited diagnostic tumor biopsies were not predictive of SOR response. Conclusion: SOR demonstrated a PFS benefit in advanced RCC, although ITT final OS analysis showed a confounding effect of crossover. Significant OS benefit of SOR was seen in a planned secondary analysis adjusting for crossover. VEGF levels have prognostic importance, and SOR-associated changes in VEGF and sVEGFR2 are consistent with inhibition of VEGF signaling. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

CA19-9 decrease at 8 weeks as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in a randomized phase III trial (MPACT) of weekly nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) plus gemcitabine (G) versus G alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4058-4058 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Daniel D. Von Hoff ◽  
Thomas J. Ervin ◽  
Francis P. Arena ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Hazards Model ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
To Receive ◽  
The Relationship

4058^ Background: nab-P + G showed promising efficacy in a phase I/II study in MPC, and decreases in CA19-9 correlated with OS. In MPACT, patients (pts) who received nab-P + G vs G had improved median OS (8.5 vs 6.7 mo; HR 0.72; p = 0.000015), PFS (5.5 vs 3.7 mo; HR 0.69; p = 0.000024) and ORR (23% vs 7%; p = 1.1 × 10−10). Here we present a prespecified exploratory analysis of CA19-9 from the MPACT trial. Methods: 861 previously untreated pts with MPC were randomized 1:1 to receive nab-P 125 mg/m2 + G 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks or G alone 1000 mg/m2 weekly for 7 weeks followed by a week of rest (cycle 1) and then days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks (cycle ≥ 2). CA19-9 was evaluated at baseline and then every 8 weeks. OS comparisons at different CA19-9 criteria were performed by stratified Cox proportional hazards model (P by stratified log-rank test using randomization criteria). Results: 750 pts had an evaluable CA19-9 at baseline. More pts in the nab-P + G arm vs the G arm demonstrated a best CA19-9 decrease from baseline of ≥ 20% and ≥ 90% (61% vs 44% and 31% vs 14%, respectively; Table). At the first postbaseline assessment (week 8), greater proportions of pts in the nab-P + G arm vs the G arm had CA19-9 decreases of ≥ 20% and ≥ 90% (Table). At that time point, for pts with a decrease of ≥ 20% in CA19-9, nab-P + G demonstrated a significantly longer OS vs G. The risk reduction for pts with a ≥ 90% decrease was greater than in pts with a ≥ 20% decrease. In pts with an 8-week CA19-9 decrease < 20%, median OS for nab-P + G vs G was 8.3 vs 8.0 mo (HR 0.92; p = 0.705). The relationship of CA19-9 kinetics with OS will also be examined. Conclusions: Higher proportions of pts in the nab-P + G arm had CA 19-9 responses of ≥ 20% and ≥ 90% vs the G arm. Pts who achieved a CA19-9 decrease at 8 weeks of ≥ 20% or ≥ 90% had significantly longer OS with nab-P + G than with G. Clinical trial information: NCT00844649. [Table: see text]

Early carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) dynamics to predict fruquintinib efficacy in FRESCO, a 3+ line metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) phase III trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16001-e16001
Author(s):  
Yuxian Bai ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Yanhong Deng ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Radiological Evaluation

e16001 Background: The FRESCO phase 3 trial demonstrated a significant survival benefit with fruquintinib vs. placebo in the third-line or later therapy of mCRC patients. CEA levels are widely used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in patients with mCRC. Herein, we undertook post-hoc analyses of FRESCO patient data to investigate the early changes in CEA during treatment, as well as potential relationships with efficacy parameters. Methods: Patients were included if baseline CEA was abnormal according to local lab reference range. Serum CEA levels were measured at baseline and Day 1 of each cycle (except for Cycle 1). Early CEA change was analyzed at first radiological evaluation (C3D1, Week 8), CEA response was defined as ≥ 50% decrease from baseline, and CEA progression was defined as ≥ 100% increase from baseline. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method; hazard ratio (HR) was estimated through Cox proportional hazards model; p-value was generated from log rank test. Results: 88.4% (245/277) and 94.9% (130/137) of patients had an abnormal baseline CEA in the fruquintinib group and placebo group, respectively. Median baseline CEA values were similar between treatment groups. After 2 cycles of treatment, the proportion of patients had CEA response was significantly higher in the fruquintinib group than placebo group (30.0% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). In the fruquintinib group, patients with early CEA response (n = 63) had longer median OS (12.8 vs. 7.8 months, HR = 0.45, p < 0.001) and median PFS (5.6 vs. 3.7 months, HR = 0.49, p < 0.001) than patients without (n = 147). 66.7% (140/210) of patients in fruquintinib group had stable disease (SD), and fruquintinib in those patients with concomitant CEA response exhibited a significantly greater OS benefit than with CEA progression (14.4 vs. 8.7 months, HR = 0.38, p = 0.004). Conclusions: Fruquintinib increased early CEA response. CEA response at first radiological evaluation after cycle 2 could be considered as a predictor for better OS and PFS. Among patients with SD at first evaluation, those with CEA response seems benefit more from fruquintinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02314819 .

Comparison of outcomes with pembrolizumab monotherapy (P) versus combination with chemotherapy (P+C) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21579-e21579
Author(s):  
Kartik Sehgal ◽  
Ritu R. Gill ◽  
Poorva Bindal ◽  
Anita Geevarghese Koshy ◽  
Danielle C McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

e21579 Background: P and P+C are standard-of-care (SOC) treatment options for advanced NSCLC. However, they have not yet been directly compared in clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC who initiated treatment with SOC P±C at our center from 2/11/16 to 10/15/19 (data cutoff 1/15/20). Patient demographic, clinicopathologic, therapeutic and outcomes data were extracted. All radiographic scans were independently evaluated by a thoracic radiologist using iRECIST. Survival time was defined from the start of P±C. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model were utilized. Results: Of 103 patients with median follow up of 17.7 months, 74 (71.8%) had received P, while 29 (28.2%) had received P+C. In PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) unselected population, there were no significant differences in age, sex, smoking status, driver mutation, tumor mutational burden (TMB), line of therapy, ECOG performance status (PS) or immune-related adverse events (irAE) between P and P+C groups. 71.6% in P vs 13.8% in P+C had PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), unadjusted progression-free survival (PFS) or unadjusted overall survival (OS) (Table). Multivariable adjustment for confounding factors between P+C vs P revealed no differences in OS [hazard ratio (HR) for death, 1.53, 95% CI 0.55 – 4.25] or PFS [HR for progression/death, 1.75, 95% CI 0.63 – 4.91]. Further stratification into PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and < 50% showed no significant differences between P+C vs. P in adjusted OS [HR for death, TPS < 50%- 1.54 (95% CI 0.59 – 4.03); TPS ≥50%- 0.71 (95% CI 0.11 – 4.52)] or PFS [HR for progression/death, TPS < 50%- 1.58 (95% CI 0.72 – 3.48); TPS ≥50%- 0.64 (95% CI 0.06 – 6.93)]. ECOG PS and development of irAE influenced OS in all groups, while TMB was relevant in PD-L1 ≥50% only. Conclusions: Our study shows no significant differences in outcomes with P vs P+C in advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting, albeit with limitations of single-center design, limited sample size, different line settings and lack of disease burden stratification. Ongoing phase III trials comparing front line P vs P+C will definitively address the long-term clinical benefits -if any- of combining cytotoxic chemotherapy with anti-PD-1 drugs. [Table: see text]

Effects of Azacitidine (AZA) Vs Conventional Care Regimens (CCR) in Elderly (≥75 years) Patients (Pts) with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) from the AZA-001 Survival Trial

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3629-3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F Seymour ◽  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Lewis B. Silverman ◽  
Ghulam J Mufti ◽  
Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Treatment ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background. A recent phase III trial (AZA-001) showed AZA is the first treatment to significantly extend overall survival (OS) in higher-risk MDS patients (pts) (Blood2007;110:817). MDS incidence increases with age resulting in limited treatment options, particularly for those ≥75 years of age, given the poor tolerability and ineffectiveness of cytotoxic therapies. This subgroup analysis compared the effects of AZA vs CCR on OS, hematologic improvement (HI), transfusion independence (TI), and tolerability in pts ≥75 yrs of age. Methods. Higher-risk MDS (FAB: RAEB, RAEB-T, CMML and IPSS: Int-2 or High) pts were enrolled. All pts were pre-selected by site investigators – based on age, performance status, and comorbidities – to receive 1 of 3 CCR: best supportive care only (BSC); lowdose ara-C (LDAC), or intensive chemotherapy (IC). Pts were then randomized to AZA (75 mg/m2/d SC × 7d q 28d), or to CCR. Those randomized to AZA received AZA; those randomized to CCR received their pre-selected treatment. Randomization was stratified based on FAB subtype (RAEB and RAEB-T) and IPSS (Int-2 or High). Erythropoiesis stimulating agents were disallowed. OS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods and HI and TI were assessed per IWG 2000. To adjust for baseline imbalances, a Cox proportional hazards model was used, with ECOG status, LDH, number of RBC transfusions, Hgb, and presence or absence of -7/del(7q) at baseline as variables in the final model. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using NCI-CTC v. 2.0. Results. Of all enrolled pts (N=358, median age 69 yrs), 87 pts (24%) were ≥75 yrs of age (AZA n=38, CCR n=49 [BSC, n=33; LDAC, n=14; IC, n=2]). The majority of pts randomized to CCR received BSC only, suggesting clinicians are generally reticent to use active treatment in this population. Similar to the overall AZA-001 results, treatment with AZA was associated with prolonged survival in pts ≥75 yrs of age, with KM median OS in the AZA group not reached at 17.7 months of follow-up, vs KM median OS for CCR at 10.8 months (HR: 0.48 [95%CI: 0.26, 0.89]; p=0.0193). In these pts, OS rates at 2 years were significantly higher in the AZA group vs CCR: 55% vs 15% (p=0.0003). Two-fold more RBC transfusion-dependent pts at baseline in the AZA group achieved TI vs CCR: 10/23 (44%) vs 7/32 (22%), p=0.1386, respectively. Similarly, more pts in the AZA group achieved HI (major + minor) vs CCR: 58% vs 39%, (p=0.0875), respectively. As previously reported, AZA was generally well tolerated. Anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were seen in 42%, 66%, and 71% of pts in the AZA group, respectively, vs 47%, 26%, and 40% in the CCR group, who were predominately receiving BSC only. Infections were reported by 79% and 60% of AZA and CCR pts, respectively. Discontinuations due to an AE occurred in 13% of AZA and 8% of CCR pts ≥75 yrs of age. Conclusion. Data from this subgroup analysis indicate pts ≥75 yrs of age with higher-risk MDS receiving active treatment with AZA experience significantly prolonged 2-year OS and reduced risk of death. AZA is generally well tolerated in this elderly patient population.

scholarly journals NCOG-33. HEMATOLOGIC PREDICTORS OF OUTCOMES IN GLIOBLASTOMA TREATED WITH SURGERY AND CHEMORADIATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii136-ii136
Author(s):  
Nicholas Damico ◽  
Theresa Elder ◽  
Michael Kharouta ◽  
Anthony Sloan ◽  
Amber Kerstetter-Fogle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Surgical Biopsy ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Time Point

Abstract BACKGROUND There are conflicting reports regarding the prognostic value of platelet and other blood counts in glioblastoma. However, few series have looked at all hematologic parameters simultaneously. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with supratentorial glioblastoma from 2014-2019 who started conventional chemoradiation following initial surgical biopsy and/or resection. Hematologic parameters were collected at baseline, in the preoperative and postoperative periods and at the initiation and completion of chemoradiation. This included platelet counts, hemoglobin levels, white blood cell counts (WBC), neutrophil and lymphocyte counts with neutrophil:lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet:lymphocyte ratios (PLR) calculated at each time point. Cox regression was performed to assess the association between each hematologic parameter and both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for all hematologic parameters, age, sex, race and KPS was generated for each time point. All hematologic parameters were modeled as continuous variables. RESULTS A total of 58 patients met inclusion criteria. 18 were female and 40 male. The median age was 59.5 (range 43-82). Median follow up for all patients was 15.3 months. A total of 52 patients completed radiation therapy and 18 completed 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Hemoglobin and neutrophil counts at the conclusion of chemoradiation were associated with OS and PFS on univariate and multivariate analyses. The HR for OS were 0.74 (95% CI 0.5807-0.9313) and 1.28 (1.143-1.441) respectively. The HR for PFS were 0.70 (0.5531-0.8881) and 1.16 (1.05-1.271) respectively. Postoperative lymphocyte and platelet counts at initiation of chemoradiation were both associated with OS with unadjusted HR of 3.2 (1.037-9.960) and HR of 0.99 (0.9898-0.9999) respectively, which remained significant on multivariate analysis. However, neither were associated with PFS. CONCLUSION Several hematologic parameters are associated with glioblastoma outcomes in these initial analyses. Further analyses with additional patients are ongoing.

Azacitidine Prolongs Overall Survival (OS) and Reduces Infections and Hospitalizations in Patients (Pts) with WHO-Defined Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Compared with Conventional Care Regimens (CCR)

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3636-3636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Fenaux ◽  
Ghulam J Mufti ◽  
Eva Hellström-Lindberg ◽  
Valeria Santini ◽  
Norbert Gattermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

Abstract Background. Azacitidine (AZA), as demonstrated in the phase III trial (AZA-001), is the first MDS treatment to significantly prolong OS in higher-risk MDS pts (Blood2007; 110:817). Approximately one third of the pts enrolled in AZA-001 were FAB RAEB-T (≥20%–30% blasts) and now meet the WHO criteria for AML (Blood1999;17:3835). Considering the poor prognosis (median survival <1 year) and the poor response to chemotherapy in these pts, this subgroup analysis evaluated the effects of AZA vs CCR on OS and on response rates in pts with WHO AML. Methods. The AZA-001 trial enrolled higher-risk MDS pts (FAB: RAEB, RAEB-T, CMML and IPSS: Int-2 or High). Prior to randomization, site investigators preselected (based on age, performance status, and comorbidities) 1 of 3 CCR: best supportive care only (BSC); low-dose ara-C (LDAC), or intensive chemotherapy (IC). Pts were subsequently randomized 1:1 to AZA (75 mg/m2/d SC × 7d q 28d) or CCR; pts randomized to CCR received their investigator preselected treatment. Karyotypes were reclassified using AML standards: favorable {inv 16, t(8;21)}, unfavorable (−7/7q- or complex) and intermediate (all others including normal). OS was assessed by Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods and Cox proportional hazards model; and IWG AML criteria (J Clin Oncol2003;214642–9) were used to assess morphologic complete remissions (CR). Efficacy analyses included all WHO AML pts randomized. All pts were followed until death or study closure. Results. Of 358 enrolled pts, 113 met the definition for WHO AML (median: 23% blasts) of whom 86% were considered unfit for IC and were preselected by investigators to receive a low intensity regimen (BSC or LDAC). 55 of the 113 pts were randomized to AZA and 58 pts to CCR. AZA and CCR groups had comparable baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Of the 58 pts randomized to CCR, 5 withdrew without receiving treatment and 53 were treated with their investigator preselected treatment as follows: IC (19%;10/53), LDAC (34%; 18/53) and BSC (47 %; 25/53). Of the 55 pts randomized to AZA, 2 withdrew without receiving treatment. Median age was 70 years; 24% had an unfavorable karyotype, 72% had an intermediate karyotype (including 46% normal); no pts had a favorable karyotype. Median follow-up for OS was 20.1 months. Median (min–max) number of treatment cycles was 8 (1–39) for AZA, 2.5 (1–3) for IC; 5.5 (1–14) for LDAC; and 6 months (2 – 19) for BSC. KM median OS was 24.5 vs. 16.0 months, respectively, in the AZA and CCR groups, hazard ratio (HR)=0.47, 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.79, p=0.004, Figure. OS rates at 2 yrs were 50% and 16%, respectively, in the AZA and CCR groups, p=0.0007. There was no statistical difference in the morphologic CR rate between the AZA (18%, 10/55) and CCR groups (16%, 9/58; p=0.80). OS results in cytogenetic intermediate pts showed a significant HR favoring the AZA group (N=38) over CCR (N=43, HR= 0.47 [95% CI: 0.24, 0.91], p=0.024) but not in pts with unfavorable cytogenetics: AZA (N=14) vs CCR (N=13, HR=0.66 [95% CI: 0.26, 1.68], p=0.381); however, pt numbers were low. WHO AML pt outcome measures showed significant benefits with AZA: fewer infections requiring IV antibiotics per pt-year in the AZA group (0.58) vs CCR (1.14, HR=0.51 [95% CI 0.29, 0.78], p=0.003); and reduced rates of hospitalization in the AZA group (3.4 per pt-year) vs CCR (4.3 per pt-year, HR=0.79 [95% CI 0.62, 1.00], p=0.028). AZA was generally well tolerated. Conclusion. AZA significantly prolongs OS with significant improvements in important pt outcomes in elderly WHO AML pts with low marrow blast counts, who currently have limited therapeutic options. Trials are ongoing to confirm the effect of AZA in elderly AML pts with more proliferative disease. Figure. Figure.

Quality of life (QOL) predicts for progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with sunitinib compared to interferon-alpha (IFN-α)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6594-6594 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Cella ◽  
J. Z. Li ◽  
J. C. Cappelleri ◽  
A. Bushmakin ◽  
C. Charbonneau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Health State ◽  
Eq Vas

6594 Background: In a recent international, randomized phase III trial, sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET and FLT3 with both antitumor and antiangiogenic effects, was associated with statistically superior clinical efficacy and superior health-related QOL vs. IFN-a as first-line therapy in patients with mRCC (Motzer et al, Proc ASCO 2006;24:2s [Abstract LBA3]). Here we report a substudy of baseline QOL variables predicting PFS. Methods: 750 mRCC patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily in repeated 6-week cycles (4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off) or IFN-a (9 MU via subcutaneous injection 3 times weekly). QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), the FACT-Kidney Symptom Index's Disease-Related Symptoms subscale (FKSI-DRS), and the patient self-rated overall health state (EQ-VAS) from the EuroQol Group's EQ-5D self-report questionnaire. For all QOL endpoints, higher scores indicated better outcomes (better QOL or fewer symptoms). Cox proportional-hazards model was used to test which baseline QOL variables predict PFS while controlling for other baseline demographic and clinical factors as well as treatment. Because the three QOL scores are correlated (r=0.61–0.69), three separate univariate models were fitted. Results and Conclusions: All three baseline QOL variables were predictive of PFS: better baseline FACT-G, FKSI-DRS and EQ-VAS scores were associated with longer PFS. When QOL and other baseline variables were controlled in the models, the superior treatment effect of sunitinib on PFS remained robust and large (See the table below). [Table: see text]

Tumor-specific circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to predict clinical outcome in BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma patients (pts) treated with the MEK inhibitor trametinib (T) or chemotherapy (C).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9020-9020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Schadendorf ◽  
Keith Flaherty ◽  
Peter Hersey ◽  
Paul D. Nathan ◽  
Claus Garbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Alternative Source

9020 Background: Tumor-derived cfDNA in the blood is a potential alternative source to derive tumor mutation (mut) status and could be a useful biomarker of therapeutic response. Data from METRIC (NCT01245062), an open-label randomized Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of T vs C, were used to assess: correlation between baseline tumor and cfDNA BRAF muts; correlation between baseline cfDNA levels and tumor burden (i.e., the sum of target lesion diameters); and efficacy based on baseline cfDNA BRAF mut status. Methods: BRAF mut status was established for 322 pts using an allele-specific PCR assay in tumor samples. Baseline plasma samples were available for 305/322 pts. cfDNA BRAF mut status was evaluated by Inostics GmBH using BEAMing technology. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to determine the association between cfDNA fraction (mut DNA molecules > 0.01%) and baseline tumor burden. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association between cfDNA mut status and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The overall agreement between tumor and cfDNA BRAF V600E and V600K mut status was 77%, and 96% respectively. V600E or V600K cfDNA mut fraction did not correlate with baseline tumor burden (R=0.38 and 0.23, respectively). Benefit of T vs C was observed regardless of cfDNA BRAF mut status (HR= 0.42, 0.41, 0.47 for V600E, V600K, and not detectable (cfDNA ND) subgroups). Interestingly, cfDNA ND pts had longer PFS vs cfDNA V600E/K pts, independent of treatment (HR=0.37 for cfDNA ND vs V600E/K, p=<0.0001). For T cfDNA ND median PFS was not reached (n=52), however the first quartile was 4.5 months; for V600E (n=127) and V600K (n=21) median PFS was 3.5 and 4.4 months, respectively. For C median PFS was 3.5, 1.4, and 1.5 months for cfDNA ND (n=28), V600E (n=69), and V600K (n=7), respectively. Similarly, higher response rates were seen in cfDNA ND pts vs cfDNA V600E/K pts across both treatment arms. Conclusions: Free circulating DNA can be used to detect BRAF V600 muts. cfDNA mut fraction was not linked to tumor burden. The absence of circulating BRAF mut DNA in BRAF V600 pts may be a marker of a better outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT01245062.

Relationship of time to testosterone (T) and PSA rises during the first “off treatment” interval (1OFF) of intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) with time to castration resistance (CRPC) and prostate cancer mortality (PCM) in men with biochemical relapse (BR).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
Kevin F Kuo ◽  
Rachel Hunter-Merrill ◽  
Roman Gulati ◽  
Suzanne P Hall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistance ◽  
Treatment Interval ◽  
Potential Factors

99 Background: A recent phase III trial of intermittent vs. continuous AD supports IAD as standard of care for men treated with AD for BR. To identify potential factors during 1OFF prognostic for time to CRPC or PCM, relationships with times to T and PSA rises from our prospective trial of IAD in men with BR were analyzed. Methods: 72 patients were treated with IAD, each cycle consisting of 9 months of leuprolide and flutamide followed by a variable “off treatment” interval. T and PSA were followed monthly; AD was resumed when PSA reached a pre-specified value. Cycles repeated until CRPC, defined as ≥2 PSA rises with T<50 ng/dL. We evaluated patients who completed 1OFF and reached T>50 with a Cox proportional hazards model, controlling for age at study entry, to quantify association of time to first T>50 with time from this point to CRPC or PCM. Similarly we quantified association of PSA rise during 1OFF and after first T>50 with these endpoints. Results: A longer time to PSA rise during 1OFF or after T>50 was associated with longer time to CRPC, while longer time to first T>50 was marginally associated with shorter time to PCM. Specifically, a 30-day increase in time to PSA rise during 1OFF or after T>50 was associated with a 21% or 27% reduction in the risk of CRPC, while a 30-day increase in time to first T>50 was associated with a 39% increase in the risk of PCM. Conclusions: That longer time to PSA rise during 1OFF was associated with longer time to CRPC is not surprising, but the association between longer time to first T>50 and time to PCM has not been reported. To validate these findings, an extended analysis is underway and will be presented. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document