scholarly journals Outcomes by Tumor Subtype and Treatment Pattern in Women With Small, Node-Negative Breast Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (20) ◽  
pp. 2142-2150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines Vaz-Luis ◽  
Rebecca A. Ottesen ◽  
Melissa E. Hughes ◽  
Rizvan Mamet ◽  
Harold J. Burstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Tumor Subtype ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Distant Relapse ◽  
Node Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose Treatment decisions for patients with T1a,bN0M0 breast cancer are challenging. We studied the time trends in use of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes among these patients. Patients and Methods This was a prospective cohort study within the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Database that included 4,113 women with T1a,bN0M0 breast cancer treated between 2000 and 2009. Tumors were grouped by size (T1a, T1b), biologic subtype defined by hormone receptor (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, and receipt of chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab. Results Median follow-up time was 5.5 years. Eight percent of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors were treated with chemotherapy. Fifty-two percent of those with HER2-positive or HR-negative/HER2-negative breast cancers received chemotherapy, with an increase over the last decade. Survival outcomes diverged by subtype and size, but the 5-year distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) did not exceed 10% in any subgroup. The 5-year DRFS for patients with T1a tumors untreated with chemotherapy ranged from 93% to 98% (n = 49 to 972), and for patients with T1b tumors, it ranged from 90% to 96% (n = 17 to 2,005). Patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative disease had the best DRFS estimates, and patients with HR-negative/HER2-negative tumors had the lowest. In this observational, nonrandomized cohort study, the 5-year DRFS for treated patients with T1a tumors was 100% for all subgroups (n = 12 to 33), and for patients with T1b tumors, it ranged from 94% to 96% (n = 88 to 241). Conclusion Women with T1a,b tumors have an excellent prognosis without chemotherapy. Size and tumor subtype may identify patients in whom the rate of recurrence justifies consideration of chemotherapy. These patients represent an optimal group for evaluating less toxic adjuvant regimens to maintain efficacy while minimizing short- and long-term risks.

scholarly journals Classical Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy Is More Effective in Triple-Negative, Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Results From Two Randomized Trials of Adjuvant Chemoendocrine Therapy for Node-Negative Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 2966-2973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Colleoni ◽  
Bernard F. Cole ◽  
Giuseppe Viale ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Karen N. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Alkylating Agents ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Tumor Subtypes ◽  
Node Negative Breast Cancer

Purpose Retrospective studies suggest that primary breast cancers lacking estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and not overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; triple-negative tumors) are particularly sensitive to DNA-damaging chemotherapy with alkylating agents. Patients and Methods Patients enrolled in International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX with node-negative, operable breast cancer and centrally assessed ER, PR, and HER2 were included (n = 2,257). The trials compared three or six courses of adjuvant classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) with or without endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone. We explored patterns of recurrence by treatment according to three immunohistochemically defined tumor subtypes: triple negative, HER2 positive and endocrine receptor absent, and endocrine receptor present. Results Patients with triple-negative tumors (303 patients; 13%) were significantly more likely to have tumors > 2 cm and grade 3 compared with those in the HER2-positive, endocrine receptor–absent, and endocrine receptor–present subtypes. No clear chemotherapy benefit was observed in endocrine receptor–present disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.11). A statistically significantly greater benefit for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy was observed in triple-negative breast cancer (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; interaction P = .009 v endocrine receptor–present disease). The magnitude of the chemotherapy effect was lower in HER2-positive endocrine receptor–absent disease (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.17; interaction P = .24 v endocrine receptor–present disease). Conclusion The magnitude of benefit of CMF chemotherapy is largest in patients with triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer.

scholarly journals CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: beyond hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 175883591881834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Matutino ◽  
Carla Amaro ◽  
Sunil Verma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

The development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors has been more prominent in hormone receptor (HR)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancers, with a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in first and later lines of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests that there is activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in nonluminal cell lines. Here, we present a review of the current preclinical and clinical data on the use of CDK inhibitors in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

scholarly journals Current Approaches and Emerging Directions in HER2-resistant Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. BCBCR.S9453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam M. Brufsky
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
Her2 Positive

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is overexpressed in up to 30% of breast cancers; HER2 overexpression is indicative of poor prognosis. Trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, has led to improved outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, including improved overall survival in adjuvant and first-line settings. However, a large proportion of patients with breast cancer have intrinsic resistance to HER2-targeted therapies, and nearly all become resistant to therapy after initial response. Elucidation of underlying mechanisms contributing to HER2 resistance has led to development of novel therapeutic strategies, including those targeting HER2 and downstream pathways, heat shock protein 90, telomerase, and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Numerous clinical trials are ongoing or completed, including phase 3 data for the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with HER2-resistant breast cancer. This review considers the molecular mechanisms associated with HER2 resistance and evaluates the evidence for use of evolving strategies in patients with HER2-resistant breast cancer.

Breast cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): receptor status and treatment

Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Chan ◽  
A E Clarke ◽  
R Ramsey-Goldman ◽  
W Foulkes ◽  
B Tessier Cloutier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
General Population ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Receptor Status

Objective There is a decreased risk of breast cancer in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) versus the general population; little is known regarding the receptor status of breast cancers in SLE, or treatment. Methods Breast cancer cases occurring after SLE diagnosis were ascertained through linkage with tumor registries. We determined breast cancer positivity for estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), and/or Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), as well as cancer treatment. Results We obtained information on ER, PR, and/or HER2 status for 63 SLE patients with breast cancer. Fifty-three had information on ER and/or PR status; 36 of these (69%) were ER positive. Thirty-six of the 63 had information on HER2 status; of these, 26 had complete information on all three receptors. Twenty-one of these 26 (81%) were HER2 negative; seven of 26(27%) were triple negative. All but one patient underwent surgery; 11.5% received both non-tamoxifen chemotherapy and radiotherapy, 16.4% radiotherapy without non-tamoxifen chemotherapy, and 14.7% received non-tamoxifen chemotherapy without radiotherapy. Conclusion ER positivity was similar to historical general population figures, with a trend toward a higher proportion of triple-negative breast cancers in SLE (possibly reflecting the relatively young age of our SLE patients).

Impact of delaying initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1022-1022
Author(s):  
Debora De Melo Gagliato ◽  
Ana M. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
Xiudong Lei ◽  
Sharon Hermes Giordano ◽  
Richard L. Theriault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Distant Relapse ◽  
Time To Initiation ◽  
Increase Risk ◽  
Definitive Surgery

1022 Background: The survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is well established. However, the optimal timing to initiation of chemotherapy after definitive surgery is unknown. We evaluated the association between time to initiation of chemotherapy and survival outcomes according to breast cancer subtype and stage at diagnosis. Methods: Women diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer between 1997-2011 who received adjuvant chemotherapy at our institution were included. Patients were categorized according to time from definitive surgery to adjuvant chemotherapy into one of three groups: ≤ 30 days, 31–60 days and more than 60 days. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results: Among the 6,827 patients included, the 5-year Overall Survival (OS), Relapse-Free Survival (RFS) and Distant Relapse-Free Survival (DRFS) estimates were similar for the different time-to-chemotherapy categories. Among patients with stage I, there was no association between outcome and time to initiation of chemotherapy. Patients with stage II disease experienced an 18% and 22% increase in risk of RFS (HR 1.18; p=0.038) and DRFS (HR 1.22; p=0.02), when systemic treatment was started >60 days from surgery. Patients with stage III disease that started adjuvant chemotherapy >60 days after surgery had a 70% increase in the risk of death (HR 1.7; p=0.002), a 32% increase risk of relapse (HR 1.32; p=0.046) and a 34% increase risk of distant relapse (HR 1.34; p=0.044). Time to chemotherapy did not have a significant effect on outcome among Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive patients. Patients with triple negative (TNBC) and HER2-positive tumors treated with trastuzumab who started chemotherapy >60 days after surgery had lower 5 year-OS estimates (HR 1.52; p=0.016 and HR 2.62; p=0.005, respectively). Conclusions: Time to chemotherapy did not influence survival outcomes in the overall population. However, patients with stage III, TNBC and HER2-positive tumors treated with trastuzumab, experienced worse outcomes when chemotherapy was delayed. Among patients with tumors with aggressive biology and more advanced stages at diagnosis, early initiation of therapy should be favored.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Overexpression As a Prognostic Factor in a Large Tissue Microarray Series of Node-Negative Breast Cancers

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (35) ◽  
pp. 5697-5704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Chia ◽  
Brian Norris ◽  
Caroline Speers ◽  
Maggie Cheang ◽  
Blake Gilks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) is associated with a poorer outcome in node-positive breast cancer, but the results are conflicting in node-negative disease. This study assessed the prognostic impact of HER2 overexpression/amplification in a large series of node-negative breast cancers. Patients and Methods A tissue microarray (TMA) series was constructed consisting of 4,444 invasive breast cancers diagnosed in British Columbia from 1986 to 1992. Within this series, 2,026 patients were node negative, of whom 70% did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. The TMA series was assessed for estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2. Logistic regression modeling was used to estimate odds ratios at the 10-year follow-up. Results HER2 was positive in 10.2% of the node-negative cohort. In this cohort, an inferior outcome was seen in patients with HER2-positive tumors compared with HER2-negative tumors for 10-year relapse-free survival (RFS; 65.9% v 75.5%, respectively; P = .01), distant RFS (71.2% v 81.8%, respectively; P = .004), and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS; 75.5% v 86.3%, respectively; P = .001). A trend for a worse overall survival was also seen (P = .06). HER2 was an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS and BCSS at 10 years, with odds ratios of 1.71 (P = .01) and 2.03 (P = .003), respectively. The number of HER2-positive tumors that were ≤ 1 cm was small, but there was a trend for a worse outcome in T1b tumors. Conclusion HER2 overexpression/amplification is correlated with a poorer outcome in node-negative breast cancer. Larger studies are needed to more clearly define the prognostic impact of HER2 in tumors ≤ 1 cm, particularly within the separate hormone receptor subgroups.

Reagent-saving immunohistochemistry for HER2 using non-contact alternating current electric field mixing

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iku Hoshino ◽  
Kazuhiro Imai ◽  
Hiroshi Nanjo ◽  
Ryuta Nakamura ◽  
Yoshitaro Saito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Alternating Current ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Specific Staining ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Current Electric Field

AimsHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents are an effective approach to treating patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. However, the lack of survival benefit in HER2-negative patients, as well as the toxic effects and high cost of the drugs, highlight the need for accurate and prompt assessment of HER2 status. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of a novel reagent-saving immunohistochemistry method (AC-IHC) that saves HER2 antibody by taking advantage of the non-contact mixing effect in microdroplets subjected to an alternating current electric field.MethodsNinety-five specimens were used from patients diagnosed with primary breast cancers identified immunohistochemically as HER2 0/1+, 2+ or 3+ using ASCO/CAP guideline-certified standard IHC. The specimens were all tested using the conventional IHC method (1:50 antibody dilution) as well as AC-IHC (1:50 dilution) and reagent-saving AC-IHC (1:100 dilution).ResultsThe reagent-saving AC-IHC produced stable results with less non-specific staining using smaller amounts of labelled antibody. Moreover, the staining and accuracy of HER2 status evaluated with the reagent-saving AC-IHC method was equal to that achieved with standard IHC.ConclusionsThese results suggest reagent-saving AC-IHC could be used as a clinical tool for accurate and stable HER2 IHC, even when reagent concentrations vary.

scholarly journals Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241775
Author(s):  
James Crespo ◽  
Hongxia Sun ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Qing-Qing Ding ◽  
Guilin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Primary Disease ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guideline on HER2 testing in breast cancer permits reclassification of cases with HER2-equivocal results by FISH. The impact of such reclassification is unclear. We sought to determine the proportion of HER2-equivocal cases that are reclassified as HER2-negative and the impact of anti-HER2 therapy on survival in HER2-equivocal cases. Methods We reviewed medical records of breast cancer patients who had HER2 testing by fluorescence in stitu hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed or verified at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center during April 2014 through March 2018 and had equivocal results according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline. The population was divided into 2 cohorts according to whether the biopsy specimen analyzed came from primary or from recurrent or metastatic disease. HER2 status was reclassified according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between anti-HER2 therapy and clinical outcomes was assessed. Results We identified 139 cases with HER2-equivocal results according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline: 90 cases of primary disease and 49 cases of recurrent/metastatic disease. Per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, these cases were classified as follows: overall, HER2-negative 112 cases (80%), HER2-positive 1 (1%), and unknown 26 (19%); primary cohort, HER2-negative 85 (94%), HER2-positive 1 (1%), unknown 4 (4%); and recurrent/metastatic, HER2-negative 27 (55%) and unknown 22 (45%). Five patients in the primary-disease cohort and 1 patient in the recurrent/metastatic-disease cohort received anti-HER2 therapy. There was no significant association between anti-HER2 therapy and OS or EFS in either cohort (primary disease: OS, p = 0.67; EFS, p = 0.49; recurrent/metastatic-disease, OS, p = 0.61; EFS, p = 0.78. Conclusions The majority of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases were reclassified as HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. No association between anti-HER2 therapy and OS or EFS was observed. HER2-equivocal cases seem to have clinical behavior similar to that of HER2-negative breast cancers.

scholarly journals Nanotechnology approaches to addressing HER2-positive breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan E. White ◽  
Molly K. White ◽  
Het Adhvaryu ◽  
Issam Makhoul ◽  
Zeid A. Nima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
The United States ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Specific Design ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Abstract Breast cancer is a major cause of cancer-associated deaths in the United States. It was estimated that 12% of women in the U.S. will develop invasive breast cancer in their lifetime. The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2/neu) is a growth-promoting protein that is overexpressed in 15–20% of breast cancers (HER2-positive breast cancer). HER2-positive breast cancer generally grows and spreads more quickly than other breast cancers, but it can be targeted therapeutically. Targeting drugs have been developed with a specific design to stop the growth and even the spread of cancer. These drugs include trastuzumab (Herceptin), pertuzumab (Perjeta), ado-trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla, or TDM-1), fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan, lapatinib, neratinib and tucatinib. However, the need for better targeted therapy and efficacy still exists. Nanotechnology could have major advantages in terms of detection, targeting, drug delivery, and destruction of cancer cells and tumors. Although a great deal of progress has been accomplished major challenges still need to be addressed. In this review, we examine the major areas of research in the area of nanotechnology and HER2-positive breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document