The role of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in octogenarians: A population-based analysis.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 202-202
Author(s):  
Takintope Akinbiyi ◽  
Atuhani S. Burnett ◽  
Philip Ernst ◽  
Marisa Cevasco ◽  
Donald A. McCain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Stages ◽  
The Impact

202 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality amongst the elderly population. In appropriately selected patients, surgery is known to confer a survival advantage. Octagenarians, however, given their remaining life expectancy may receive limited benefit from surgery. Nevertheless, insufficient information is available in the literature on the survival benefit of surgery in octagenarians with HCC. Methods: Octogenarians with HCC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1998 and 2009. We evaluated patients who underwent surgical resection and those that declined to assess the impact surgery has on overall survival in this population. Results: A total of 8,614 with HCC were identified in the SEER database, of which surgery was recommended for 3,529 (41%). A total of 1,002 patients (28%) underwent surgery and 2,497 (71%) declined. Although there was a trend towards improved survival in the surgery group (7.91 months) vs the non-surgical group (7.03 months), there was no statistically significant difference in survival between the two groups (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that octagenarians as a whole do not experience a survival benefit from surgical resection for HCC. Subgroup analysis, however, may ultimately identify benefit in specific disease stages or patients with fewer comorbidities.

Effect of older age and comorbitities on outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17101-e17101
Author(s):  
Zhaomin Xu ◽  
Carla Francesca Justiniano ◽  
Adan Z Becerra ◽  
Christopher Thomas Aquina ◽  
Francis P. Boscoe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Elderly Women ◽  
New York State ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Age ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
The Impact

e17101 Background: Although a survival benefit for NAC has not been shown in the overall population of EOC, some patients may benefit from NAC. This analysis evaluates the role of age and comorbidities on the effect of NAC compared to upfront surgery on survival among EOC patients in New York. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for stage II-IV EOC from 2006-2013 were included from the New York State Cancer Registry and the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. Elderly age was defined as >70 years. Comorbidity burden was defined with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Cox models were used to examine the effect of NAC on 5 year overall survival. The analysis was then stratified by age and comorbidity score to evaluate the role of NAC in specific subgroups. Results: 4617 patients met inclusion criteria of which 25% were elderly and 11% received NAC. Factors associated with receipt of NAC included age > 70, advanced stage, serous histology and high hospital volume (p<0.01). After adjustment for patient, hospital, and surgeon characteristics, NAC was associated with a 27% (p<0.01) increase in 5 year overall mortality in all EOC patients. Among the elderly, NAC did not have a significant effect on overall (p=0.47) or EOC-specific survival (p=0.24). Elderly and non-elderly women without comorbidities had a higher risk of death with NAC than primary surgery. There was a trend towards improved survival among elderly patients with higher comorbidity scores. (Table) Conclusions: The impact of NAC on EOC survival differs dependent on age and comorbidities. Patients with no comorbidities may have better prognosis with upfront surgery. Counterintuitively, those with more comorbidities, particularly the elderly, may derive survival benefit from upfront neoadjuvant therapy. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Does Social Support Affect the Health of the Elderly in Rural China? A Meta-Analysis Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (18) ◽  
pp. 3471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natuya Zhuori ◽  
Yu Cai ◽  
Yan Yan ◽  
Yu Cui ◽  
Minjuan Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Rural China ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
The Impact

As the trend of aging in rural China has intensified, research on the factors affecting the health of the elderly in rural areas has become a hot issue. However, the conclusions of existing studies are inconsistent and even contradictory, making it difficult to form constructive policies with practical value. To explore the reasons for the inconsistent conclusions drawn by relevant research, in this paper we constructed a meta-regression database based on 65 pieces of relevant literature published in the past 25 years. For more valid samples to reduce publication bias, we also set the statistical significance of social support to the health of the elderly in rural areas as a dependent variable. Finally, combined with multi-dimensional social support and its implications for the health of the elderly, meta-regression analysis was carried out on the results of 171 empirical studies. The results show that (1) subjective support rather than objective support can have a significant impact on the health of the elderly in rural areas, and there is no significant difference between other dimensions of social support and objective support; (2) the health status of the elderly in rural areas in samples involving western regions is more sensitive to social support than that in samples not involving the western regions; (3) among the elderly in rural areas, social support for the older male elderly is more likely to improve their health than that for the younger female elderly; and (4) besides this, both data sources and econometric models greatly affect the heterogeneity of the effect of social support on the health of the elderly in rural areas, but neither the published year nor the journal is significant. Finally, relevant policies and follow-up studies on the impact of social support on the health of the elderly in rural areas are discussed.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture 30-day mortality

Trauma ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146040862094972
Author(s):  
Ahmed Fadulelmola ◽  
Rob Gregory ◽  
Gavin Gordon ◽  
Fiona Smith ◽  
Andrew Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time

Introduction: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with comorbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality. Method: Data related to 75 adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 were reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65–98 years), and most (53, 70.7%) were women. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection. Results: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in the COVID-19-positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to the COVID-19-negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval: 17.0–22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 h and 38.3 h, in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19-positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all 10 cases who died were hypoxic. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent of viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% ( n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community, and 70% ( n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission. Conclusion: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest X-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures help in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allow counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.

scholarly journals Effect of timing of surgical resection of primary hepatocellular carcinoma on survival outcomes in elderly patients and prediction of clinical models

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongfei He ◽  
Tianyi Liang ◽  
Shutian Mo ◽  
Zijun Chen ◽  
Shuqi Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Influencing Factors ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Timing ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Abstract Background The effect of time delay from diagnosis to surgery on the prognosis of elderly patients with liver cancer is not well known. We investigated the effect of surgical timing on the prognosis of elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing surgical resection and constructed a Nomogram model to predict the overall survival of patients. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on elderly patients with primary liver cancer after hepatectomy from 2012 to 2018. The effect of surgical timing on the prognosis of elderly patients with liver cancer was analyzed using the cut-off times of 18 days, 30 days, and 60 days. Cox was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of overall survival in patients, and a prognostic model was constructed. Results A total of 232 elderly hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this study. The cut-off times of 18, 30, and 60 days were used. The duration of surgery had no significant effect on overall survival. Body Mass Index, Child-Pugh classification, Tumor size Max, and Length of stay were independent influencing factors for overall survival in the elderly Liver cancer patients after surgery. These factors combined with Liver cirrhosis and Venous tumor emboli were incorporated into a Nomogram. The nomogram was validated using the clinical data of the study patients, and exhibited better prediction for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival. Conclusions We demonstrated that the operative time has no significant effect on delayed operation in the elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and a moderate delay may benefit some patients. The constructed Nomogram model is a good predictor of overall survival in elderly patients with hepatectomy.

scholarly journals The Impact of Geography in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Population Based Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 396-404
Author(s):  
Irene S. Yu ◽  
Shiru L. Liu ◽  
Valeriya Zaborska ◽  
Tyler Raycraft ◽  
Sharlene Gill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Treatment Center ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Therapeutic Modalities ◽  
Quaternary Center ◽  
Statistics Canada ◽  
The Impact

Background: The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes different therapeutic modalities and multidisciplinary tumor board reviews. The impact of geography and treatment center type (quaternary vs. non-quaternary) on access to care is unclear. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on HCC patients who received sorafenib in British Columbia from 2008 to 2016. Patients were grouped by Statistics Canada population center (PC) size criteria: large PC (LPC), medium PC (MPC), and small PC (SPC). Access to specialists, receipt of liver-directed therapies, and survival outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: Of 286 patients, the geographical distribution was: LPC: 75%; MPC: 16%; and SPC: 9%. A higher proportion of Asians (51% vs. 9% vs. 4%; p < 0.001), Child–Pugh A (94% vs. 83% vs. 80%; p = 0.022), and hepatitis B (37% vs. 15% vs. 4%; p < 0.001) was observed in LPC vs. MPC vs. SPC, respectively. LPC patients were more likely referred to a hepatologist (62% vs. 48% vs. 40%; p = 0.031) and undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (43% vs. 24% vs. 24%; p = 0.018). Sixty percent were treated at a quaternary center, and the median overall survival (OS) was higher for patients treated at a quaternary vs. non-quaternary center (28.0 vs. 14.6 months, respectively; p < 0.001) but similar when compared by PC size. Treatment at a quaternary center predicted an improved survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR): 0.652; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.503–0.844; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Geography did not appear to impact OS but patients from LPC were more likely to be referred to hepatology and undergo TACE. Treatment at a quaternary center was associated with an improved survival.

scholarly journals Impact of Extrahepatic Metastases on Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Liver Dominant Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subanalysis of the SORAMIC Trial

Liver Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 771-786
Author(s):  
Kerstin Schütte ◽  
Regina Schinner ◽  
Mathias P. Fabritius ◽  
Melina Möller ◽  
Christiane Kuhl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Study Entry ◽  
Extrahepatic Disease ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Distant Organ ◽  
Extrahepatic Metastases ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Extrahepatic spread is reported as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving systemic therapy. However, clinical studies have reported conflicting results for the clinical impact of the pattern of tumor progression during treatment and the role of new extrahepatic metastases in length of survival. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the impact of extrahepatic metastases on survival in patients with HCC treated with sorafenib or with a combination of sorafenib and selective internal radiation treatment (SIRT). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> SORAMIC is a randomized, controlled trial comprising diagnostic, local ablation, and palliative cohorts. In the palliative cohort, patients not eligible for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) were randomized 11:10 to SIRT plus sorafenib (SIRT + sorafenib) or sorafenib alone. This exploratory subanalysis evaluated the impact of extrahepatic metastases on survival. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the intent-to-treat cohort, 216 patients were randomized to SIRT + sorafenib and 208 to sorafenib alone. Seventeen patients with distant organ metastases (bone, <i>n</i> = 11; adrenal glands, <i>n</i> = 5; peritoneum, <i>n</i> = 1) and 262 without distant metastases at study entry were analyzed in this substudy. Patients with (Group A) and without (Group B) distant organ metastases at study entry presented with a median survival of 11.3 and 14.8 months, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.2807). During follow-up of patients with no organ metastases at baseline, extrahepatic disease progression occurred in 50 patients (19.1%). No statistically significant difference in survival was observed between patients without extrahepatic progression and those with new extrahepatic disease during treatment (14.8 vs. 14.9 months; <i>p</i> = 0.6483). Development of new pulmonary metastases during treatment significantly shortened median survival (7.6 vs. 15.0 months, <i>p</i> = 0.0060). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This subanalysis of the SORAMIC trial suggests that in patients with liver-dominant advanced HCC, metastases to distant organs with the exception of pulmonary metastases do not in general exert a negative impact on patient prognosis. The choice of palliative treatment should incorporate a personalized analysis of the pattern of tumor distribution.

The Impact of In-group Favoritism on Trade Preferences

2017 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana C. Mutz ◽  
Eunji Kim
Keyword(s):  
Well Being ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Trading Partner ◽  
Relative Advantage ◽  
Trade Policies ◽  
Partner Country ◽  
The Us ◽  
Trade Preferences ◽  
The Impact

AbstractUsing a population-based survey experiment, this study evaluates the role of in-group favoritism in influencing American attitudes toward international trade. By systematically altering which countries gain or lose from a given trade policy (Americans and/or people in trading partner countries), we vary the role that in-group favoritism should play in influencing preferences.Our results provide evidence of two distinct forms of in-group favoritism. The first, and least surprising, is that Americans value the well-being of other Americans more than that of people outside their own country. Rather than maximize total gains, Americans choose policies that maximize in-group well-being. This tendency is exacerbated by a sense of national superiority; Americans favor their national in-group to a greater extent if they perceive Americans to be more deserving.Second, high levels of perceived intergroup competition lead some Americans to prefer trade policies that benefit the in-group and hurt the out-group over policies that help both their own country and the trading partner country. For a policy to elicit support, it is important not only that the US benefits, but also that the trading partner country loses so that the US achieves a greater relative advantage. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding bipartisan public opposition to trade.

Role of surgical resection for pulmonary metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Lung Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kook Nam Han ◽  
Young Tae Kim ◽  
Jung-Hwan Yoon ◽  
Kyung-Suk Suh ◽  
Ji Yeon Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Pulmonary Metastasis

Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients of Advanced Age

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110493
Author(s):  
Mitri K. Khoury ◽  
Micah A. Thornton ◽  
Christopher A. Heid ◽  
Jacqueline Babb ◽  
Bala Ramanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Current Data ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Advanced Age ◽  
The Impact

Purpose: Treatment decisions for the elderly with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are challenging. With advancing age, the risk of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) increases while life expectancy decreases, which may nullify the benefit of EVAR. The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of EVAR on 1-year mortality in patients of advanced age. Materials and Methods: The 2003–2020 Vascular Quality Initiative Database was utilized to identify patients who underwent EVAR for AAAs. Patients were included if they were 80 years of age or older. Exclusions included non-elective surgery or missing aortic diameter data. Predicted 1-year mortality of untreated AAAs was calculated based on a validated comorbidity score that predicts 1-year mortality (Gagne Index, excluding the component associated with AAAs) plus the 1-year aneurysm-related mortality without repair. The primary outcome for the study was 1-year mortality. Results: A total of 11 829 patients met study criteria. The median age was 84 years [81, 86] with 9014 (76.2%) being male. Maximal AAA diameters were apportioned as follows: 39.6% were <5.5 cm, 28.6% were 5.5–5.9 cm, 21.3% were 6.0–6.9 cm, and 10.6% were ≥7.0 cm. The predicted 1-year mortality rate without EVAR was 11.9%, which was significantly higher than the actual 1-year mortality rate with EVAR (8.2%; p<0.001). The overall rate of perioperative MACE was 4.4% (n = 516). Patients with an aneurysm diameter <5.5cm had worse actual 1-year mortality rates with EVAR compared to predicted 1-year mortality rates without EVAR. In contrast, those with larger aneurysms (≥5.5cm) had better actual 1-year mortality rates with EVAR. The benefit from EVAR for those with Gagne Indices 2–5 was largely restricted to those with AAAs ≥ 7.0cm; whereas those with Gagne Indices 0–1 experience a survival benefit for AAAs larger than 5.5 cm. Conclusion: The current data suggest that EVAR decreases 1-year mortality rates for patients of advanced age compared to non-operative management in the elderly. However, the survival benefit is largely limited to those with Gagne Indices 0–1 with AAAs ≥ 5.5 cm and Gagne Indices 2–5 with AAAs ≥ 7.0 cm. Those of advanced age may benefit from EVAR, but realizing this benefit requires careful patient selection.

Does an impaired capacity for self-care impact the prevalence of social and emotional loneliness among elderly people?

2018 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Canjuga ◽  
Danica Železnik ◽  
Marijana Neuberg ◽  
Marija Božicevic ◽  
Tina Cikac
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Elderly People ◽  
Age Distribution ◽  
Self Care ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
The Self ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Care Assessment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of self-care on the prevalence of loneliness among elderly people living in retirement homes and older people living in their homes/communities. Design/methodology/approach The research was conducted through standardized SELSA-L assessment loneliness questionnaires and the Self Care Assessment Worksheet for self-care assessment. The results were processed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Findings The obtained results have shown that impaired self-care ability affects the prevalence of loneliness among the elderly almost the same in both groups of participants. However, regarding the relationship between the state of health and self-care, only a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of loneliness is found in the case of the participants living in their homes, with the worst health condition affecting the poorer psychological care. Research limitations/implications It is necessary to point out the limitations of the research, primarily sample limitations and the selected design of the study. The sample consisted of two different and relatively small groups of participants which could adversely affect the representativeness of the sample and reduce the possibility of generalising the results. The next limiting factor is the age distribution the authors used in the research, where the age of the participants as a very important variable was collected by age range and not precisely which consequently resulted in inequality in subgroup sizes. Thus, the middle age (75–85) covers up to ten years, which is a huge range at an older age and can mean major differences in functional ability, and can impact the self-care assessment. Practical implications Nurses are indispensable in care for the elderly and they need to promote and encourage self-care of the elderly through health care. Elderly people living in retirement homes should be allowed to participate equally in health care in order to preserve their own autonomy and dignity. However, to benefit those who live in their homes, nurses should be connected to the local community and thus stimulate various forms of preventative (testing blood sugar levels, blood pressure and educating on the importance of preventive examinations) or recreational activities in the environment of elderly people with the goal of preserving their functional abilities. Originality/value The impact of self-care on loneliness was not sufficiently researched, and this paper contributed to understanding the complexity of loneliness phenomena among the elderly with the aim of developing a model of prevention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document