Evaluating PSA nadir drift in high-risk and metastatic prostate cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 310-310
Author(s):  
Eric Tyler Miller ◽  
Lorna Kwan ◽  
Sandy Liu ◽  
Isla Garraway
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Tumor Resistance ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Gleason Pattern ◽  
Psa Nadir

310 Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is a heterogeneous, clinically disparate, and often unpredictable disease whereby nearly 3% of patients present with bone metastatic PC (BMPC). Virtually all patients diagnosed with stage M1 disease fail to achieve complete remission and rapidly progress to castration-resistant PC (CRPC) and death (28% 5-year survival). Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the current standard of care for M1 disease, does not induce durable remissions. Improved understanding of tumor biology associated with lethal progression is desperately needed to guide clinical trials. Methods: We assembled a diverse, clinically annotated biorepository with diagnostic biopsy tissue from 428 patients with high-risk M0 and M1 disease. Retrospective analysis was performed on M0 (n = 157) and M1 (n = 112) patients stratified by treatment sequence. Clinical and pathological variables analyzed included age at diagnosis, race, primary Gleason sum, tumor burden, initial treatment received, PSA at time of biopsy, PSA velocity and length of follow-up. Primary endpoints included PSA nadir per treatment round, time from biopsy to CRPC, and death. Results: Compared to M0 cases, M1 patients were older, displayed significantly higher PSAs at the time of biopsy, and were more likely to display primary Gleason pattern 5. Patients with stage M1 disease had significantly worse survival, shorter time to CRPC, and median PSA nadir following each treatment round never fell below 2ng/ml. Median PSA nadirs associated with each treatment round demonstrated marked upward drift in the M1 cohort when compared to the M0 cohort. Conclusions: The presence of distant metastases is a major obstacle in achieving durable remissions for very high-risk PC. Our data confirms that ADT has limited effect on controlling cancer progression in M1 patients. PSA nadir drift in M1 compared to M0 patients may indicate intrinsic tumor resistance to currently available therapies. Multimodal profiling of M1 primary tumors may reveal actionable targets for initiation of combination treatment regimens at diagnosis.

scholarly journals Resolution of the Expert Council on the New Approach to Drug Therapy for Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Dilyara Kaidarova ◽  
Oxana Shatkovskaya ◽  
Zaure Dushimova ◽  
Bakytzhan Ongarbayev
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Doubling Time ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Doubling Time

Relevance: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in the male population. The widespread introduction of modern diagnostic methods and the determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have increased the number of detected cases of localized and locally advanced PC forms. However, in some patients treated with radical methods and long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the disease continues to progress in the form of an increase in PSA levels with castration testosterone values and with no distant metastases. Such a course of the disease is referred to as non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Purpose: The article reports the results of a meeting of the Expert Council arranged by the Kazakh Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology on December 25, 2020, on non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer diagnostics and treatment. Results: Large clinical studies highlight the critical importance of controlling the PSA doubling time as the main prognostic factor for an unfavorable outcome to increase patient survival and prevent the development of distant metastases. Based on the results of large randomized studies, experts recommended using new-generation androgen receptor antagonists in combination with ongoing ADT to improve the clinical outcomes in nmCRPC patients at high risk of metastatic progression. The Expert Council was presented with the data of a registration clinical study on darolutamide efficacy and safety. The advantages of introducing this drug into clinical practice to expand the choice of therapeutic options were identified. Personalized adjustment of a treatment regimen will increase the treatment efficacy and ensure higher survival in this category of patients. Conclusion: Increasing survival as the main objective in treating nmCRPC patients requires improved diagnostics through regular controlling of testosterone and PSA levels, calculation of PSA doubling time, and the use of radiological diagnostic methods to rule out distant metastases. The choice of therapy in patients at high risk of metastasis shall consider the patient’s status and the treatment efficacy and safety balance.

scholarly journals Neurotensin Receptor-1 Expression in Human Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study on Primary Tumors and Lymph Node Metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Morgat ◽  
Adrien Chastel ◽  
Vincent Molinie ◽  
Romain Schollhammer ◽  
Gaétan Macgrogan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Human Prostate ◽  
Normal Prostate ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Prostate Cancers

Neurotensin and its high-affinity receptor, NTR1, are involved in the growth of various tumors. Few data are available regarding NTR1 expression in normal and tumoral human prostate tissue samples. NTR1 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry in 12 normal prostate tissues, 11 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 44 prostate cancers, and 15 related metastatic lymph nodes (one per patient, when available). NTR1-staining was negative in normal prostate and BPH samples. NTR1 was overexpressed in four out of 44 (9.1%) primary tumors. There was no clear association between NTR1 overexpression and age, PSA-values, Gleason score, pT-status, nodal-status, or margin. NTR1 was expressed at a high level of five out of 15 (33.3%) metastatic lymph nodes. NTR1 overexpression was thus more frequent in metastatic lymph nodes than in primary tumors (p = 0.038). In this limited series of samples, NTR1 overexpression was observed in few primary prostate cancers. Upregulation was more frequent in related lymph nodes. The presence of this target in metastatic lymph nodes may open new perspectives for imaging and radionuclide therapy of prostate cancer. Factors driving NTR1 expression in primary prostate cancer and in nodal and distant metastases still need to be characterized.

A phase III protocol of androgen suppression (AS) and 3DCRT/IMRT versus AS and 3DCRT/IMRT followed by chemotherapy (CT) with docetaxel and prednisone for localized, high-risk prostate cancer (RTOG 0521).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA5002-LBA5002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard M. Sandler ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Seth A. Rosenthal ◽  
Oliver Sartor ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
T Stage

LBA5002 Background: High-risk, localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients have a relatively poor prognosis. We hypothesized that the addition of adjuvant docetaxel and prednisone to long-term (24 month) AS and radiation therapy (RT) would improve overall survival (OS). Methods: RTOG 0521 opened December 2005 and closed August 2009 with targeted accrual of 600 cases. It was designed to detect improvement in 4-year OS from 86% to 93% with a 51% hazard reduction (HR = 0.49). Under a 0.05 1-sided type I error and 90% power, at least 78 deaths were required to analyze the OS endpoint. Patients had 1) Gleason (Gl) 7-8, any T-stage, and PSA > 20, or 2) Gl 8, ≥ T2, any PSA, or 3) Gl 9-10, any T-stage, any PSA. All had PSA ≤ 150. RT dose was 75.6 Gy. CT consisted of 6, 21-day cycles of docetaxel + prednisone starting 28 days after RT. Results: Of 612 enrolled, 50 were excluded for eligibility issues, leaving 562 evaluable. Median age = 66, median PSA = 15.1, 53% had Gl 9-10, 27% had cT3-4. Median follow-up = 5.5 yrs. 4-yr OS rates were 89% [95% CI: 84-92%] for the AS+RT arm and 93% [95% CI: 90-96%] for the AS+RT+CT arm (1-sided p = 0.03, HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.44, 1.03]). There were 52 centrally-reviewed deaths in the AS+RT arm and 36 in the AS+RT+CT arm, with fewer deaths both due to PCa/treatment (20 vs 16) and due to other causes/unknown (32 vs 20) in the AS+RT+CT arm. 5-yr disease-free survival rates were 66% for AS+RT and 73% for AS+RT+CT (2-sided p = 0.05, HR = 0.76 [95% CI: 0.57, 1.00]). There was 1, Gr 5 unlikely-related adverse event (AE) in the AS+RT arm and 2, Gr 5 possibly/probably-related AEs with AS+RT+CT. Conclusions: For high-risk, localized PCa, adjuvant CT improved the OS from 89% to 93% at 4 years. Toxicity was acceptable. This trial was designed with a short OS assessment period and additional follow-up is warranted to determine the long-term benefit of CT to the current standard of care of long-term AS+RT. This project was supported by grants U10CA21661, U10CA180868, U10CA180822, from the National Cancer Institute and Sanofi with additional support from AstraZeneca for Australian site participation. Clinical trial information: NCT00288080.

Contemporary treatment patterns and short-term outcomes in men with very high-risk prostate cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Tosoian ◽  
Debasish Sundi ◽  
Brian Francis Chapin ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Meera Chappidi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Gleason Pattern ◽  
Very High

103 Background: Beginning in 2014, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recognized very high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer (cT3b-T4, or primary Gleason pattern 5, or more than 4 biopsy cores with Gleason score 8-10, or multiple HR features) as a classification distinct from high-risk (HR) disease. Using prospectively collected institutional data, we describe contemporary treatment patterns and short-term outcomes in the VHR population. Methods: Men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) between January 2010 and June 2015 were identified using the Johns Hopkins RP database, and trends in management were compared across the study period. Pathological and short-term clinical outcomes were assessed in men with VHR cancer. Non organ-confined disease (NOCD) was defined as ≥ pT3 disease or lymph node positivity, persistent postoperative PSA as ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) as a PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL following an initial undetectable postoperative PSA. Results: During the study period, 4,954 men underwent RP, of which 161 (3.2%) men had VHR cancer at diagnosis. The annual proportion of men who underwent RP with VHR cancer increased over the study period (chronologically 1.8%, 1.0%, 3.3%, 4.1%, 5.6%, and 5.2%; p<0.001). Sixteen percent of men with VHR disease were enrolled in pre-surgical clinical trials, with an increase from 0% of men in 2010 to 19.1% in 2015 (p=0.11). At RP, 39% of the VHR cohort had seminal vesicle invasion, 26% had lymph node involvement, and a total of 74% had NOCD. Following surgery, 33% of men had PSA persistence, and 40% experienced either PSA persistence or BCR during follow-up (median 13.4 months). Of 136 men with at least one follow-up assessment, 15 (11.0%) developed metastasis; 33% of the cohort was treated with radiation therapy, 42% with androgen deprivation, and 15% with docetaxel. Conclusions: The VHR population carries the greatest risk of clinical progression following local treatment. Over the past five years, we have observed increasing surgical treatment and clinical trial enrollment at our institution. Continued assessment of post-operative interventions and outcomes will help to facilitate counseling and establish point estimates from which to power clinical trials.

Optimal timing of post-prostatectomy radiotherapy for prostate cancer with high-risk pathologic features: A multi-institutional analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
William L. Hwang ◽  
Rahul D. Tendulkar ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
Shree Agrawal ◽  
Kevin L. Stephans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Pathologic Features

24 Background: The use of radical prostatectomy (RP) as initial treatment of high-risk/locally-advanced prostate cancer is increasing but patients (pts) with adverse pathologic features such as positive surgical margins or T3 disease have up to 70% recurrence risk. These high-risk pts may be managed with adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) or early salvage radiotherapy (ESRT). The optimal timing of post-operative radiotherapy is unclear. Methods: Individual data from 1566 consecutive pts with pT2N0M0/R1 or pT3N0M0/R0-1 disease who underwent post-prostatectomy ART or ESRT (1987-2013) at 10 academic centers were pooled. Post-irradiation freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), prostate-cancer specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate competing-risks regression (MVA) analyses. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to account for covariates potentially associated with treatment allocation. All outcomes were measured from the date of surgery to address lead time bias. Results: After PS-matching, median follow-up after surgery was 66 vs. 73 months for the ART and ESRT groups, respectively, and baseline characteristics were well-matched. ART was associated with higher FFBF (12-yr: 69% vs. 43%; log-rank P < 0.0001), FFDM (12-yr: 95% vs. 85%; log-rank P = 0.03), PCSS (12-yr: 99% vs. 94%; log-rank P = 0.048), and OS (12-yr: 91% vs. 79%; log-rank P = 0.01). ART, lower Gleason score, lower T-stage, nodal irradiation, and postoperative androgen deprivation therapy were favorable prognostic features on MVA for BF. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the decreased risk of BF associated with ART remained significant unless more than 56% of ART pts were cured by surgery alone. This threshold is greater than the estimated 12-yr FFBF of 46% after RP alone as determined by a contemporary nomogram. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this represents the largest multi-institutional study to date comparing ART to ESRT. ART was associated with reduced biochemical recurrence, distant metastases, and death compared to ESRT for high-risk pts, pending prospective validation.

CDK12 upregulation and adverse correlation with tumor-associated immune cell infiltrates in prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 181-181
Author(s):  
Marie C. Hupe ◽  
Anne Offermann ◽  
Cleopatra Schreiber ◽  
Axel Stuart Merseburger ◽  
Sven Perner
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Locally Advanced Tumors ◽  
Advanced Tumors

181 Background: Biallelic loss of CDK12 has recently been identified as a novel subtype of prostate cancer (PCa). CDK12 altered PCa associates with elevated neoantigen burden and thus may be suitable for checkpoint inhibition. Up to now, data about CDK12 refer to its genetic alterations in PCa while its characterization on protein level and its association with tumor infiltrating T-cells are lacking. Methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CDK12 was performed on a PCa cohort including 74 benigns, 391 primary tumors from 222 patients, 63 locally advanced tumors, 92 lymph node (LN) metastases, and 56 distant metastases. CDK12 was categorized into negative, weak, moderate and high expression. Density of tumor associated T-cells per tumor area was assessed by IHC for CD3 and graduated into negative (<1%), slight (1-5%), weak (5-10%), moderate (10-50%) and high (>50%). Results: CDK12 significantly increases during PCa progression showing highest levels in LN and distant metastases while benign samples harbor no or weak CDK12 expression (ANOVA p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier curve reveals 5-year-biochemical recurrence free survival rates of 89.5%, 69.1%, 59.1% and 20.0% for primary tumors expressing no, weak, moderate and high CDK12 (log-rank p=0.05). High CDK12 expression significantly associates with attenuated tumor associated T-cells (p=0.009) revealing CD3 negativity in 64.7% of CDK12 high expressing tumors. Intratumoral CDK12 and density of CD3 positive T-cells correlates adversely in particular in locally advanced tumors (p=0.007). Overall, tumor associated T-cells are significantly reduced in distant metastases compared to local PCa (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our study highlights the prognostic potential of CDK12 for PCa and its overexpression in advanced tumors. Of note, CDK12 overexpressing tumors can be designated as immunologic “cold” tumors which is in line with their more aggressive phenotype. Concordantly, distant metastases show attenuated tumor associated T-cells supporting the poor response to immunotherapy.

A randomized phase II study of adjuvant sunitinib or valproic acid in high-risk patients with uveal melanoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22059-e22059
Author(s):  
Takami Sato ◽  
Marlana M. Orloff ◽  
Matias Emanuel Valsecchi ◽  
Ayako Shimada ◽  
Inna Chervoneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Toxicity Assessment ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Systemic Metastasis ◽  
Melanoma Patients

e22059 Background: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer in adults. Despite successful treatment of primary tumors, up to 50% of patients later die of distant metastases. Currently, no effective adjuvant treatment is available. Presence of both monosomy 3 and 8q amplification (M3 + 8q amp) or DecisionDx-UM Class 2 in the primary uveal melanoma characterizes a group of patients with high metastatic death rates with reported 2-year survival rates ranging from 50% to 78%. This study aims to decrease or delay the death from metastatic uveal melanoma. Methods: Uveal melanoma patients with high risk for systemic metastasis defined as any of the following were eligible: A) M3 + 8q amp; B) Class 2. Patients must show no evidence of systemic metastasis and they need to be enrolled within 6 months of initial treatment of primary uveal melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive either sunitinib 25 mg daily or valproic acid (VPA) 750 mg daily as adjuvant treatment for 6 consecutive months. Improvement of 2-year overall survival (OS) rate from historical reference (70%) to 85% was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included 1) systemic relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 18 months, 2) ability to complete adjuvant treatment and, 3) toxicity assessment. The study was not powered to compare the efficacy between each arm. Results: A total of 90 patients were enrolled in this study. Two patients were excluded from the study including one in the sunitinib arm (did not start treatment after randomization) and one in the VPA arm (refused to stop VPA at 6 months). Nine of 45 patients in the sunitinib arm and 4 of 43 patients in the VPA arm could not complete the 6-month treatment due to toxicity (sunitinib n = 6, VPA n = 2) or systemic progression (sunitinib n = 3, VPA n = 2). The rest of patients completed the 6-month course of study treatments and all patients were followed at least for 2 years. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months, the 2-year OS rates of the sunitinib and VPA group were 95.6% (90% CI 86.5-98.6) and 90.7% (90% CI 80.1 - 95.8), respectively. The 18-month RFS rates of the sunitinib and VPA group were 75.6% (90% CI 63.1 - 84.3) and 62.8% (90% CI 49.4 - 73.5), respectively. Conclusions: Although the study is still ongoing, adjuvant sunitinib and VPA were considered to be safe and tolerable treatments for high-risk uveal melanoma. Sunitinib showed a tendency for a better outcome, thus a Cohort 2 was created to investigate the safety and potential improvement of 18-month RFS rate with 12 months of treatment with sunitinib. Clinical trial information: NCT02068586.

Determinants of biochemical failure and distant metastases-free survival in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Avinash Pilar ◽  
Andrew Bayley ◽  
Danny Shehata ◽  
Zhihui (Amy) Liu ◽  
Alejandro Berlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Biochemical Failure ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

371 Background: Objectives were to1) identify predictors of biochemical failure(BCF) -free survival (FFS) & distant metastases free-survival (DMFS) in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); 2) assess the impact of nodal irradiation & escalation of dose to the nodal volumes in HRPC. Methods: Between Feb 2000 & May 2011, 462 patients with HRPC were treated with EBRT +/- ADT. This spanned an era of technical development; prior to 2002 conventional dose radiotherapy was routinely delivered, between 2002-2008, dose escalation to the prostate & pelvic lymph nodes was undertaken in a phase II trial & subsequently all patients were treated with a dose-escalated protocol. The disease characteristics included, a median PSA of 20ng/ml (range: 1-563), T3-T4 in 33% (n=158), & Gleason grade group (GGG) 3-5 in 72% (n=331). The majority (n=405, 88%) received ADT with EBRT & median duration of ADT was 36 months (range: 0-197). Dose escalated EBRT was utilized in 52% (n=241) & nodal irradiation in 69% (n=317); escalation of dose to nodal volumes was performed in 20% (n=93). Results: The median follow-up was 8.7yrs (range: 0.9-18.9). Median nadir PSA was < 0.05ng/ml (range: <0.05-5.78) with median time to nadir (TTN) of 11 months (range: 2-130). Cumulative incidence rates of BCF at 5 and 10-yrs were 23% & 45%; corresponding rates for DM were 6.6% & 14%, respectively. The 5 & 10-yr FFS rates were 75% & 51%; corresponding DMFS rates were 91.5% & 80%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, T stage (p<0.001), GGG (p<0.001), ADT (p=0.002), dose escalation to prostate (P=0.012) & median nadir PSA (p<0.001) were independent predictors of FFS. The GGG (p=0.007), median nadir PSA (p=<0.001) & Nodal RT (p=0.03) were independent predictors of DMFS. PSA of 20 & TTN predicted neither FFS nor DMFS. Conclusions: Nadir PSA level was an independent predictor of FFS & DMFS. Undetectable PSA level was associated with prolonged FFS & DMFS. Dose escalation to prostate resulted in an improved FFS & Nodal irradiation in an improved DMFS. Further studies are required to identify subgroups that may benefit the most from nodal irradiation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document