Comparative effectiveness of combination TACE/ablation vs. monotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma.
350 Background: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Loco-regional treatment modalities for HCC include Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Radiofrequency/Microwave Ablation (RFA/MWA). Studies have shown that dual therapy with both TACE and ablation is beneficial, though data is limited. We retrospectively studied all HCC patients treated with either TACE, ablation, or dual therapy at a tertiary referral public hospital to determine differences in survival. Methods: Following IRB approval, all patients diagnosed with HCC (1998-2013) at our institution were retrospectively analyzed for date of diagnosis, treatment-type, length of follow-up, and survival. Patients were excluded if they did not undergo TACE or RFA/MWA, or underwent other treatments, such as surgery. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 5 years after diagnosis. Kaplan Meier curves were created and statistics with Log-rank testing and hazard ratios (HR) were performed. Results: Of 509 patients diagnosed with HCC, 109 (21.4%) met inclusion criteria. 60 were treated with TACE alone, 30 with ablation alone, and 19 were treated with both, either concomitantly or in sequence. Median follow-up and overall median survival was 15.5, 19, and 52 months for TACE, ablation, and dual therapy, respectively. Survival at 5 years was 11.9%, 13.3% and 42.1% for TACE, ablation, and combination groups respectively. Kaplan Meier analysis revealed a significant increase in survival in the combination therapy group vs. RFA or TACE alone at 5 years (p = 0.0006). However, there was no significant difference in survival when comparing TACE vs. RFA/MWA at 5 years (HR = 1.18, p = 0.48). Conclusions: Our study suggests a greater survival benefit for patients treated with TACE and RFA/MWA versus either modality alone.