Outcomes after resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 757-757
Author(s):  
Kaihong Mi ◽  
Michael J. McNamara ◽  
Xuefei Jia ◽  
Yazeed Sawalha ◽  
Katherine Glass ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Colorectal Lung Metastases ◽  
Study Population

757 Background: Surgical resection of liver metastases provides a significant survival benefit, and potential for cure, in selected patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. There are very limited data on resection of lung metastases in patients with colorectal lung metastases. We evaluated outcomes after resection of lung metastases in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients who underwent resection of pulmonary metastases between 2/2006 and 6/2013 at Cleveland Clinic. Clinical, pathologic, and outcome data were collected by electronic medical records review. Overall survival (OS) as the primary endpoint was summarized by Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by log-rank tests. Results: The study population comprised 32 patients. Overall, 20 patients were male and median age at diagnosis of lung metastasis was 60.0 years (range 30.4-81.9). All patients had resection of primary tumor. Eleven patients had preoperative chemotherapy and 12 had adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with unilateral metastases comprised the majority of patients (N = 22, 68.8%); 59% (N = 19) had a solitary metastasis. The median diameter of lung metastases was 20.5 mm (range 7.0 -50.0). Ten patients had concurrent liver metastases, eight of whom had liver resection as well. Overall, 31% (10/32) of patients recurred, with 50% (16/32) of recurrences in the lung, and 28% died. Estimated median OS was 55.0 months. Estimated 5-year OS was 32% ± 17%. Higher CEA level ( ≥ 4.5 ng/mL) at the time of diagnosis of lung metastasis was associated with worsened OS (p = 0.026). Other potential prognostic factors, such as laterality, number of lung metastases, and extrapulmonary lesions, were not associated with overall survival in this study population. Conclusions: Our study showed resection of lung metastases in select patients with colorectal cancer can be associated with prolonged survival in the range seen with resection of liver metastases. Higher CEA level at time of diagnosis of lung metastasis is associated with poorer prognosis. More data are necessary to identify approaches to patient selection in the metastatic colorectal setting.

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of inoperable pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3502-3502
Author(s):  
T. D. Yan ◽  
J. King ◽  
D. Glenn ◽  
K. Steinke ◽  
D. L. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Parameters ◽  
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation

3502 Background: This current study was an open, prospective and nonrandomized phase II study, which critically evaluated the prognostic parameters for local disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for inoperable colorectal pulmonary metastases (CRPM). Methods: The inclusion criteria were patients who had inoperable CRPM, due to number, distribution, poor performance status or patients’ refusal to accept surgery. The exclusion criteria were lesions > 6 per hemithorax; diameter of metastases > 5 cm; bleeding diathesis; and/or significantly compromised lung function. All patients underwent percutaneous RFA with a radiological clear margin of at least 2 cm. The end-points of this study were local DFS and OS, determined from the time of RFA intervention. Ten clinical and six treatment-related prognostic parameters were assessed in univariate and multivariate analyses. All patients were reviewed at one week, one month and every three months thereafter with chest CT. Fifty-five patients entered into the study. The follow-up was complete and the median follow-up was 24 months (6 to 40). Results: The median local DFS was not reached and 2-year local DFS was 57%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that largest size of lung metastasis, location of lung metastases, post-RFA CEA at 1 month and 3 months were significant for local DFS. In multivariate analysis, largest size of lung metastasis of ≤ 3 cm and post-RFA CEA of ≤ 5 ng/ml at 1 month were independently associated with an improved local DFS. The median OS was 33 months (4 to 40), with 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival of 85%, 64% and 46%, respectively. Univariate analysis demonstrated that interval between the diagnoses of colorectal cancer and pulmonary metastasis; largest size of lung metastasis and location of lung metastases were significant for OS. In multivariate analysis, only size of lung metastasis of ≤ 3 cm was independently associated with an improved OS. Conclusions: Percutaneous RFA of inoperable CRPM may have a useful role in patients with a lesion of ≤ 3 cm. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Role of Thermal Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Lung Metastases

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 908
Author(s):  
Alexandre Delpla ◽  
Thierry de Baere ◽  
Eloi Varin ◽  
Frederic Deschamps ◽  
Charles Roux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Medical Oncology ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy ◽  
Chest Drainage ◽  
Results Of Surgery

Background: Consensus guidelines of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) (2016) provided recommendations for the management of lung metastases. Thermal ablation appears as a tool in the management of these secondary pulmonary lesions, in the same manner as surgical resection or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). Methods: Indications, technical considerations, oncological outcomes such as survival (OS) or local control (LC), prognostic factors and complications of thermal ablation in colorectal cancer lung metastases were reviewed and put into perspective with results of surgery and SABR. Results: LC rates varied from 62 to 91%, with size of the metastasis (<2 cm), proximity to the bronchi or vessels, and size of ablation margins (>5 mm) as predictive factors of LC. Median OS varied between 33 and 68 months. Pulmonary free disease interval <12 months, positive carcinoembryonic antigen, absence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and uncontrolled extra-pulmonary metastases were poor prognostic factors for OS. While chest drainage for less than 48 h was required in 13 to 47% of treatments, major complications were rare. Conclusions: Thermal ablation of a selected subpopulation of patients with colorectal cancer lung metastases is safe and can provide excellent LC and delay systemic chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Case Report: Bilateral Pneumothoraces Due To Targeted Tumor Therapy With Regorafenib in a Young Woman With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Rachow ◽  
Tim Sandhaus ◽  
Thomas Ernst ◽  
Helmut Schiffl ◽  
Susanne M. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Tumor Therapy ◽  
Tension Pneumothorax ◽  
Cancer Case ◽  
Pretreated Patient ◽  
Breath Sounds ◽  
The Right

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer types, frequently metastasizing into the lungs. Treatment options have been vastly improved over the last years. With the increasing use of targeted therapies novel and rare adverse effects can be seen. In this report, we present the case of recurrent spontaneous bilateral pneumothorax due to fulminant tumor necrosis during the administration of regorafenib in a heavily pretreated patient with multiple lung metastases from colorectal cancer. Case presentation: A 43-year-old woman presented in our oncology department with chest pain and dyspnea. The patient was diagnosed with colorectal cancer seven years earlier and had received chemoradiation, surgery and multiple chemotherapies, before she was started on regorafenib because of progressive pulmonary metastases. Clinical examination revealed no breath sounds in the right hemithorax. The patient was tachycardic and orthopneic. Computed tomography scans demonstrated cavitation of former nodular bilateral pulmonary metastases. After drainage and resolution of the right-sided pneumothorax the patient returned eleven days later with recurrent dyspnea, chest pain and subcutaneous emphysema. Bilateral pneumothoraces were treated with chest tubes. Due to left-sided tension pneumothorax video-assisted thoracoscopy and bilateral pleurodeses were performed. Persistent air leaks with severe pain and pulmonary infiltrates led to the death of the patient. Conclusions: Our case illustrates the effectiveness of regorafenib in a highly pretreated patient. However, in our patient the ensuing cavitation of the multiple nodes led to recurrent pneumothoraces and associated infectious complications. Therefore, special surveillance should be implemented to detect potential transformation of solid pulmonary metastases during treatment with this multi-kinase inhibitor.

scholarly journals Higher titer hepatitis B core antibody predicts a higher risk of liver metastases and worse survival in patients with colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyao Li ◽  
Shaofei Li ◽  
Hangbo Tao ◽  
Yixiang Zhan ◽  
Kemin Ni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hepatitis B ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hepatic Metastasis ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background There have been controversial voices on if hepatitis B virus infection decreases the risk of colorectal liver metastases or not. This study aims to the find the association between HBV infection and postoperative survival of colorectal cancer and the risk of liver metastases in colorectal cancer patients. Methods Patients who underwent curative surgical resection for colorectal cancer between January 2011 and December 2012 were included. Patients were grouped according to anti-HBc. Differences in overall survival, time to progress, and hepatic metastasis-free survival between groups and significant predictors were analyzed. Results Three hundred twenty-seven colorectal cancer patients were comprised of 202 anti-HBc negative cases and 125 anti-HBc positive cases, and anti-HBc positive cases were further divided into high-titer anti-HBc group (39) and low-titer anti-HBc group (86). The high-titer anti-HBc group had significantly worse overall survival (5-Yr, 65.45% vs. 80.06%; P < .001), time to progress (5-Yr, 44.26% vs. 84.73%; P < .001), and hepatic metastasis-free survival (5-Yr, 82.44% vs. 94.58%; P = .029) than the low-titer group. Multivariate model showed anti-HBc ≥ 8.8 S/CO was correlated with poor overall survival (HR, 3.510; 95% CI, 1.718–7.17; P < .001), time to progress (HR, 5.747; 95% CI, 2.789–11.842; P < .001), and hepatic metastasis-free survival (HR, 3.754; 95% CI, 1.054–13.369; P = .041) in the anti-HBc positive cases. Conclusions Higher titer anti-HBc predicts a potential higher risk of liver metastases and a worse survival in anti-HBc positive colorectal cancer patients.

A grading system for predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer with liver metastasis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soshi Hori ◽  
Michitaka Honda ◽  
Hiroshi Kobayashi ◽  
Hidetaka Kawamura ◽  
Koichi Takiguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastasis ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Grading System ◽  
Computed Tomography Images

Abstract Objective The prognosis of patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer is determined using tumor size and number of metastases; this is similar to the factors used for the prediction of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. The relationship between the degree of liver metastasis from gastric cancer and prognosis with reference to the classification of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer was investigated. Methods This was a multi-institutional historical cohort study. Among patients with stage IV gastric cancer, who visited the cancer hospitals in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, between 2008 and 2015, those with simultaneous liver metastasis were included. Abdominal pretreatment computed tomography images were reviewed and classified into H1 (four or less liver metastases with a maximum diameter of ≤5 cm); H2 (other than H1 and H3) or H3 (five or more liver metastases with a maximum diameter of ≥5 cm). The hazard ratio for overall survival according to the H grade (H1, H2 and H3) was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results A total of 412 patients were analyzed. Patients with H1, H2 and H3 grades were 118, 162 and 141, respectively, and their median survival time was 10.2, 5.7 and 3.1 months, respectively (log-rank P &lt; 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival was H1: H2: H3 = reference: 1.39 (95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.85): 1.69 (95% confidence interval: 1.27–2.27). Conclusions The grading system proposed in this study was a simple and easy-to-use prognosis prediction index for patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer.

scholarly journals METACHRONOUS COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES HAS BETTER PROGNOSIS - IS IT TRUE?

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudemiro QUIREZE JUNIOR ◽  
Andressa Machado Santana BRASIL ◽  
Lúcio Kenny MORAIS ◽  
Edmond Raymond Le CAMPION ◽  
Eliseu José Fleury TAVEIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Hepatic Metastasis ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Colorectal Hepatic Metastasis

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Liver metastases from colorectal cancer are an important public health problem due to the increasing incidence of colorectal cancer worldwide. Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis has been associated with worse survival, but this prognosis is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the recurrence-free survival and overall survival between groups of patients with metachronous and synchronous colorectal hepatic metastasis. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with colorectal liver metastases seen from 2013 to 2016, divided into a metachronous and a synchronous group. The Cox regression model and the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test were used to compare survival between groups. RESULTS: The mean recurrence-free survival was 9.75 months and 50% at 1 year in the metachronous group and 19.73 months and 63.3% at 1 year in the synchronous group. The mean overall survival was 20.00 months and 6.2% at 3 years in the metachronous group and 30.39 months and 31.6% at 3 years in the synchronous group. Patients with metachronous hepatic metastasis presented worse overall survival in multivariate analysis. The use of biological drugs combined with chemotherapy was related to the best overall survival prognosis. CONCLUSION: Metachronous colorectal hepatic metastasis was associated with a worse prognosis for overall survival. There was no difference in recurrence-free survival between metachronous and synchronous metastases.

Overall survival analysis of the FOXFIRE prospective randomized studies of first-line selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3507-3507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricky A. Sharma ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
Guy A. Van Hazel ◽  
Volker Heinemann ◽  
Navesh K. Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
First Line ◽  
Selective Internal Radiotherapy ◽  
Internal Radiotherapy ◽  
Randomized Studies

3507 Background: The FOXFIRE, SIRFLOX and FOXFIRE-Global (FF-SF-FFG) randomized studies evaluated the efficacy of combining first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with liver metastases. The studies were designed for prospective, combined analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: FF-SF-FFG randomized (1:1) chemotherapy-naïve mCRC patients (performance status 0/1) with liver metastases not suitable for curative resection/ablation. Arm A was oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6/ OxMdG) ± investigator-chosen biologically targeted agent. Arm B was the same systemic therapy (oxaliplatin dose modification) + single treatment SIRT with cycle 1/2 of chemotherapy. Primary tumor in situ and/or limited extra-hepatic metastases were permitted. Minimum sample size was 1075 patients (HR 0.8, 80% power, two-sided 5% significance). Secondary outcomes included PFS, liver-specific PFS and response rate. Apart from safety, outcomes were analysed on intention-to-treat population using meta-analytic methods of pooled individual patient data. Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 1103 patients were randomized in 14 countries. Median age was 63 years (range 23-89); median follow-up 43.3 months. There were 844 deaths. There was no difference in OS (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.90-1.19, p= 0.609) or PFS (HR 0.90, CI 0.79-1.02, p= 0.108) between Arms. Objective response rate ( p= 0.001) and liver-specific progression (HR 0.51, CI 0.43-0.62, p< 0.001) were significantly more favorable in Arm B. Patients in Arm B had higher risk of non-liver progression as first event (HR 1.98, CI 1.53-2.58, p< 0.001). Grade 3-5 adverse events were more common in Arm B (74.0%) than A (66.5%), p= 0.009. In health status questionnaires, EQ-5D utility scores were not significantly different between Arms at 6, 12 or 24 months. Conclusion: Despite higher response rates and improved liver-specific PFS, the addition of SIRT to first-line oxaliplatin-fluorouracil chemotherapy for patients with liver-only and liver-dominant mCRC did not improve OS or PFS. Clinical trial information: 83867919.

Chemotherapy for resected colorectal cancer pulmonary metastases: Utilization and outcomes in routine clinical practice.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 236-236
Author(s):  
Safiya Karim ◽  
Sulaiman Nanji ◽  
Kelly Brennan ◽  
C S. Pramesh ◽  
Christopher M. Booth
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Pulmonary Metastases ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Primary Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Ontario Cancer Registry ◽  
Study Population

236 Background: The role of chemotherapy in the setting of resected colorectal cancer pulmonary metastases (CRCPM) is not well defined. Here we describe utilization of peri-operative chemotherapy and outcomes among patients with resected CRCPM in the general population. Methods: All cases of CRCPM who underwent resection from 2002-2009 were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry (OCR). Electronic treatment records identified peri-operative chemotherapy delivered within 16 weeks before or after pulmonary metastectomy (PM). Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate factors associated with chemotherapy delivery. Cox proportional models were used to explore the association between post-operative chemotherapy and cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The study population included 420 patients. Thirty-six percent of patients (151/420) received peri-operative chemotherapy. Among these patients, 75% (113/151) received post-operative chemotherapy. Factors that were independently associated with use of post-operative chemotherapy included higher socioeconomic status (SES) and no prior adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.01). In adjusted analyses post-operative chemotherapy was not associated with improved CSS (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67-1.47) or OS (HR 0.93 95%CI 0.66-1.31). In exploratory analyses, among those patients who did not receive previous adjuvant therapy for the primary colorectal cancer, post-operative chemotherapy following lung metastatectomy was associated with HR 0.50 (95%CI 0.27-0.95) for OS and HR 0.59 (95%CI 0.27-1.27) for CSS. Conclusions: One third of patients with resected CRCPM in routine practice receive peri-operative chemotherapy. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to evaluate whether chemotherapy following resection of CRCPM is associated with improved survival.

scholarly journals Incidence and Survival of Thyroid Cancer with Lung Metastasis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miaochun Zhong ◽  
Xianghong He ◽  
Lingfei Cui ◽  
Kefeng Lei
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Bone Metastases ◽  
Lung Metastasis ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Isolated Lung ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Thyroid cancer (TC) is common malignancy. Lung metastasis is one of the top metastases for TC. The incidence and survival rates of TC with lung metastasis remains unclear.Methods: Data on TC with lung metastasis and other site-specific metastases were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The chi-square tests were employed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics among patients with different sites of metastases. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. A Cox proportional model was used for multivariate analyses of the patient population. Statistical significance indicated by a two-tailed P value < 0.05. Results: A total of 77322 patients with TC and known sites of distant metastases were identified from 2010-2016. The probability of isolated lung metastasis was significantly higher than that of isolated distant metastasis to other sites among TC patients (P < 0.05). Patients with isolated lung metastases had worse overall and thyroid cancer-specific survival compared to patients with isolated bone metastases (P < 0.05). There was a slight difference in thyroid cancer-specific survival between patients with lung metastasis and patients with liver metastasis(P=0.0496), while there was no significant difference in overall survival. (P >0.05). There was no significant difference in overall survival or thyroid cancer specific survival between patients with lung metastasis and those with brain metastasis (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that white race was associated with better outcomes in terms of both endpoints in the lung metastasis population.Conclusions: The incidence of lung metastasis from TC was higher than that of other organ metastases. Thyroid cancer patients with isolated lung metastases have worse outcomes compared to patients with isolated bone metastases and liver metastases, whereas is similar to brain metastasis. There was the worst survival outcome on patients with multi-organ metastases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document