Bevacizumab eligibility in patients with metastatic cervical cancer: A retrospective review.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17021-e17021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Paul Skelton ◽  
Merry Jennifer Markham
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Vaginal Bleeding ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Active Bleeding ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Poor Renal Function ◽  
To Receive

e17021 Background: Bevacizumab (BEV) is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC) based on the GOG 240 trial, which showed increased survival and response rates (RR). However, because of its contraindications, use of BEV is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive BEV according to eligibility criteria from GOG 240. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006-2016. Chart review was performed to determine their kidney, liver, and bone marrow function, ECOG performance status (PS), presence of an active bleeding condition or nonhealing wound, or inadequately treated venous thromboembolism. Data analysis was performed to determine if the patient would have been eligible to receive BEV based on eligibility criteria from GOG 240. Results: We identified 62 patients with metastatic CC treated at UFHealth between 2006-2016: 1 patient was excluded due to insufficient data. 55 patients (90.2%) would have been ineligible to receive BEV based on the GOG 240 exclusion criteria, and 6 patients (9.8%) would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion from BEV use was active bleeding (45 of 61 pts: 73.8%); 42 of the 45 with bleeding (93.3%) had vaginal bleeding. 18 of 61 (29.5%) would be excluded due to poor PS, 17 of 61 (27.9%) due to poor renal function, and 13 of 61 (21.3%) due to an inadequately anticoagulated thromboembolism. Conclusions: Despite the improved survival and higher RR associated with BEV use in combination with chemotherapy, only 9.8% of metastatic CC patients treated at UFHealth over a ten year period would have been eligible to receive BEV. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding. Though clinical trial data supports the use of BEV with chemo, many patients are simply not eligible due to complications from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab Eligibility in Patients with Metastatic and Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117955491877958 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Paul Skelton ◽  
Jacqueline Castagno ◽  
Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea ◽  
Karen Daily ◽  
Anamaria Yeung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Active Bleeding ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Poor Renal Function ◽  
To Receive

Objective: Bevacizumab is approved for use in combination with chemotherapy for metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer (CC), with increased survival/response rates. However, use of bevacizumab is not always feasible or safe. The purpose of this study was to identify the percentage of metastatic/recurrent CC patients at our institution who would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to identify metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated at UFHealth between 2006 and 2016. Chart review was performed to determine if the patient met bevacizumab eligibility criteria. Results: In total, 79 patients with metastatic/recurrent CC were identified; 85.5% would have been ineligible to receive bevacizumab, and 14.5% would have been eligible. The most common reason for exclusion was active bleeding (68.4%); 94% of which was vaginal. In all, 27.6% would be excluded due to poor renal function, and 23.7% due to poor performance status (PS). Conclusions: Despite improved survival, only 14.5% of metastatic/recurrent CC patients treated over a 10-year period would have been eligible to receive bevacizumab. Most patients would have been excluded due to active bleeding, most commonly vaginal bleeding, a common complication from their disease. Identifying novel therapies for metastatic/recurrent CC patients with improved safety profiles that would allow for their use in this challenging population is critical.

scholarly journals Real-World Experience of Pembrolizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer: A Korean Multi-Center Retrospective Study (KGOG1041)

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Chul Choi ◽  
Yong-Man Kim ◽  
Jeong-Won Lee ◽  
Yong Jae Lee ◽  
Dong Hoon Suh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer

This study investigated the antitumor activity and safety of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent cervical cancer in real-world practice. We conducted a multi-center retrospective study of patients with recurrent or persistent cervical cancer treated with pembrolizumab at sixteen institutions in Korea between January 2016 and March 2020. The primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Data were available for 117 patients. The median age was 53 years (range, 28–79). Sixty-four (54.7%) patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of ≥2. Forty-nine (41.9%) patients were stage ≥III at diagnosis. Eighty-eight (75.2%) patients had squamous cell carcinoma. The median number of prior chemotherapy lines was two (range, 1–6). During the median follow-up of 4.9 months (range, 0.2–35.3), the ORR was 9.4%, with three complete responses and eight partial responses. The median time to response was 2.8 months (range 1.3–13.1), and the median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. In the population of patients with favorable performance status (ECOG ≤1) (n = 53), the ORR was 18.9%, and the median DOR was 8.9 months (range, 7.3–10.4). Adverse events occurred in 55 (47.0%) patients, including eight (6.8%) patients who experienced grade ≥3 events, and two of them were suspicious treatment-related deaths. Pembrolizumab had modest antitumor activity in patients with recurrent cervical cancer comparable to that found in previously reported clinical trials. However, in patients with favorable performance status, pembrolizumab showed effective antitumor activity. Some safety profiles should be carefully monitored during treatment.

Preliminary results of niraparib and brivanib dual therapy evaluation in recurrent, metastatic and persistent cervical cancer (CQGOG0101): An open-label, phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17506-e17506
Author(s):  
Haixia Wang ◽  
Jin Shu ◽  
Dongling Zou ◽  
Qi Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer

e17506 Background: Early-stage cervical cancer (CC) has a good long-term prognosis, with 5-year survival rate more than 90% for localized disease. However, once the CC relapsed, patients lack effective solutions and usually die in less than one year. In this study (CQGOG0101), we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of niraparib combined with brivanib or toripalimab in patients with recurrent CC. Herein, we report the cohort 1 portion of the study (patients recieving Niraparib 200mg and Brivanib 400mg orally).Findings for the cohort 2 of patients receiving niraparib and toripalimab will be reported separately. Methods: The cohort 1 of CQGOG0101 trial was to evaluate the safety and activity of Niraparib combined with Brivanib in patients with recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical cancer. 10 patients were planned to be enrolled (Actually nine patients). Eligible patients were aged 18–70 years with measurable lesions and had an ECOG performance status of 0-2. Patients received oral niraparib 200 mg and brivanib 400 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by RECIST version 1.1. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Results: Between May 8th, 2020 and Jan 22nd, 2021, 9 patients (median age, 50 years old [28-73]) were enrolled. Patients had received a median of two (1-3) previous lines of platinum-based therapy. All of nine patients had distant metastatic lesions and had underwent at least one post-baseline tumor assessment (To deadline for submission), including 1 confirmed partial response, 4 with stable disease, 4 with progressive disease. Median duration of treatment was 3.8 months (3-8.2), three patients were still on treatment. No drug-related grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were detected, the most common grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) included: neutropenia (4 of 9 patients), anemia (2 of 9 patients), thrombocytopenia (1 of 9 patients), hypertension (2 of 9 patients), proteinuria(1 of 9 patients), fatigue (1 of 9 patients), and increased ALT/AST (1 of 9 patients). Conclusions: This combo seems to show a similar efficacy compared to other recurrent cervical cancer late-line therapies. We are planning to initiate the cohort 2 to explore niraparib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody (Toripalimab) in recurrent CC in our trial later. Clinical trial information: NCT04395612.

Biomarker testing patterns and actionability in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) at OneOncology (OneOnc).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 287-287
Author(s):  
Ari M. Vanderwalde ◽  
Esprit Ma ◽  
Elaine Yu ◽  
Tania Szado ◽  
Richard Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Personalized Care ◽  
Specimen Collection ◽  
Targeted Treatments ◽  
Biomarker Testing ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing Ngs ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Testing Patterns ◽  
Test Result

287 Background: Recent approvals of targeted treatments (tx) have improved personalized care in aNSCLC. Biomarker testing is crucial for patients (pts) to receive optimal tx expeditiously. This study examined aNSCLC biomarker testing and tx patterns at OneOnc. Methods: Pts diagnosed with aNSCLC (stage ≥ IIIb) from 1/1/2015 to 5/31/2020, aged ≥ 18 years, and with ≥ 1 visit ≤ 90 days of advanced (Adv) diagnosis (Dx) were retrospectively evaluated using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record derived de-identified database from selected OneOnc sites. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate testing patterns for ALK, BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, PD-L1, and ROS-1 biomarkers and actionable mutation tx pattern. Results: Overall 3,860 aNSCLC pts were included, median age was 69 years, 47% females, 66% non-squamous, 29% squamous, 4% histology NOS, and 23% with ECOG performance status 0-1. Of the 3,152 (82%) pts tested for any biomarker, 64% received next-generation sequencing (NGS) vs. 36% received other biomarker tests only. Testing rates varied by biomarker: EGFR (74%), ALK (72%), ROS-1 (66%), PD-L1 (57%), BRAF (56%), KRAS (54%). Pts who received all 6 biomarker tests increased from 12% (2015), 23% (2016), 40% (2017), 41% (2018), 48% (2019) to 56% (2020). Among the tested pts, the median time from Adv Dx to the first test result was 20 days (d) and from specimen collection after Adv Dx to the first test result was 12 d. Pts tested and treated before test result available declined from 28% (2015) to 16% (2020). Of 1,207 pts with actionable mutations, 390 (32%) received tx before the test result: 35% chemotherapy (chemo) only, 28% chemo + cancer immunotherapy (CIT), and 15% CIT only. After the test result, 26% to 81% of pts received no or other tx not specific to actionable mutations [Table]. Conclusions: Findings from this study demonstrated an increase in aNSCLC biomarker testing at OneOnc over time, while 44% pts in 2020 did not receive testing on all 6 biomarkers. Some pts had tx prior to the test result, but this trend appeared to decline. Further studies are warranted to better understand the reasons for pts receiving tx that were not specific to their actionable mutations.[Table: see text]

Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) versus chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 4-year update from CheckMate 227.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9016-9016
Author(s):  
Luis G. Paz-Ares ◽  
Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu ◽  
Jong-Seok Lee ◽  
Laszlo Urban ◽  
Reyes Bernabe Caro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

9016 Background: 1L NIVO + IPI was shown to provide durable long-term overall survival (OS) benefit vs chemo regardless of tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC in CheckMate 227 Part 1 (NCT02477826); 3-year OS rates were 33% vs 22% in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.67–0.93]) and 34% vs 15% in pts with PD-L1 < 1% (HR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.51–0.81]). Here we report updated results from the study with 4 years’ minimum follow-up. Methods: Adults with previously untreated stage IV / recurrent NSCLC, no known EGFR/ ALK alterations , and ECOG performance status ≤ 1 were enrolled; pts were stratified by squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (NSQ) histology. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% (n = 1189) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO (3 mg/kg Q2W) + IPI (1 mg/kg Q6W), NIVO alone (240 mg Q2W), or chemo. Pts with PD-L1 < 1% (n = 550) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive NIVO + IPI, NIVO (360 mg Q3W) + chemo, or chemo. OS with NIVO + IPI vs chemo in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% was the primary endpoint. Results: With minimum follow-up of 49.4 months (database lock, Feb 18, 2021), pts were at least 2 years beyond the protocol-specified end of immunotherapy treatment. Pts with PD-L1 ≥ 1% continued to show durable benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.90]); 4-year OS rates were 29% (NIVO + IPI), 21% (NIVO), and 18% (chemo). At 4 years, 14% (NIVO + IPI), 10% (NIVO), and 4% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 34%, 30%, and 7% remained in response, respectively. In an exploratory analysis in pts with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, 4-year OS rates were 37% (NIVO + IPI), 26% (NIVO), and 20% (chemo). In pts with PD-L1 < 1%, OS HR for NIVO + IPI vs chemo was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.51–0.81); 4-year OS rates were 24% (NIVO + IPI), 13% (NIVO + chemo) and 10% (chemo). At 4 years, 12% (NIVO + IPI), 7% (NIVO + chemo), and 0% (chemo) remained progression free. Among responders, 31%, 13%, and 0% remained in response, respectively. Among pts who progressed on NIVO + IPI vs chemo, 7% vs 40% (PD-L1 ≥ 1%), and 9% vs 33% (PD-L1 < 1%), received subsequent immunotherapy. Benefit with NIVO + IPI vs chemo was observed for both SQ and NSQ histology (Table). With long-term follow-up, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: With 4 years’ minimum follow-up, 1L NIVO + IPI continued to provide durable, long-term OS benefit vs chemo in pts with advanced NSCLC regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology. Clinical trial information: NCT02477826. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes at discontinuation of anti-angiogenesis therapy in the randomized trial of chemotherapy with bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: an NRG Oncology Group study

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-601
Author(s):  
Dana Chase ◽  
Helen Q Huang ◽  
Bradley J Monk ◽  
Lois Michelle Ramondetta ◽  
Richard T Penson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Life Assessment ◽  
Recurrent Cervical Cancer ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionTo describe patient-reported outcomes and toxicities at time of treatment discontinuation secondary to progression or toxicities in advanced/recurrent cervical cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with bevacizumab.MethodsSummarize toxicity, grade, and health-related quality of life within 1 month of treatment discontinuation for women receiving chemotherapy with bevacizumab in GOG240.ResultsOf the 227 patients who received chemotherapy with bevacizumab, 148 discontinued study protocol treatment (90 for disease progression and 58 for toxicity). The median survival time from treatment discontinuation to death was 7.9 months (95% CI 5.0 to 9.0) for those who progressed versus 12.1 months (95% CI 8.9 to 23.2) for those who discontinued therapy due to toxicities. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities included hematologic, gastrointestinal, and pain. Some 57% (84/148) of patients completed quality of life assessment within 1 month of treatment discontinuation. Those patients who discontinued treatment due to progression had a mean decline in the FACT-Cx TOI of 3.2 points versus 2.2 in patients who discontinued therapy due to toxicity. This was a 9.9 point greater decline in the FACT-Cx TOI scores than those who discontinued treatment due to progression (95% CI 2.8 to 17.0, p=0.007). The decline in quality of life was due to worsening physical and functional well-being. Those who discontinued treatment due to toxicities had worse neurotoxicity and pain.DiscussionPatients who discontinued chemotherapy with bevacizumab for toxicity experienced longer post-protocol survival but significantly greater declination in quality of life than those with progression. Future trial design should include supportive care interventions that optimize physiologic function and performance status for salvage therapies.

Clinical experience of using docetaxel-cisplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A Bangladesh perspective

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15070-15070
Author(s):  
M. Mokhlesuddin ◽  
P. S. Akhter ◽  
D. U. Ahmed ◽  
M. A. Khan ◽  
M. A. Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Bangladeshi Population

15070 Background: Docetaxel is an active agent in the treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a multi-center phase II study to evaluate the response rate, toxicity and survival of docetaxel-cisplatin regimen as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer in Bangladeshi population. Methods: Forty chemotherapy-naïve patients of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer were recruited between October 1999 to March 2002. Eligibility criteria included stage Ic-IV patients, age 18–75 years, an ECOG performance status of 0–3 with adequate hepatic, renal and bone marrow function. Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 as 1 hour IV infusion and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 were given on day 1 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles (average 5 cycles). Tumor responses and toxicities were evaluated by relevant investigations and survival was documented. Results: A total of 40 patients were enrolled. Median age was 44 years (age range 18–75 years). All the patients were evaluable for response. Overall response was observed in 32 patients (80%) with complete response rate 38% (12 patients), partial response rate 62% (20 patients). Stable disease was seen in 5 patients (12.5%) and progressive disease was in 3 patients (7.5%).Two years survival was documented in 62% patients. Toxicities were limited with grade 3 neutropenia in 10 patients (25%) and some non-hematological toxicities (including nausea, vomiting and fluid retention) in twenty-six patients (65%). No severe febrile neutropenia and no events of death were observed. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin appears to be effective with manageable toxicities in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Bangladeshi population. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Randomized phase II study of biweekly gemcitabine (gem)-paclitaxel (pac), gem-carboplatin (carb) and gem-cisplatin (cis) as first-line treatments in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after anthracycline failure

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1099-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Xu ◽  
Z. Jiang ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
S. Yu ◽  
J. Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Dominant Type ◽  
Tumor Involvement ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Tumor Types

1099 Background: Biweekly gem-pac and gem-cis regimens have shown promising activity and safety in different tumor types. In MBC biweekly gem-pac is active and well tolerated. The aim of this multi-country study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gem in combination with pac, carb or cis on a biweekly schedule in patients (pts) with MBC. Methods: Major eligibility criteria included: tissue diagnosis of stage IV breast carcinoma; prior anthracycline therapy; ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1; and written informed consent. Pts were randomized to receive gem 2500 mg/m2 in combination with pac 150 mg/m2 (Arm A), carb AUC 2.5 (Arm B) or cis 50 mg/m2 (Arm C) on day 1 of 2-week cycles. The primary endpoint was response rate, with safety a secondary endpoint. Results: This interim analysis was planned to occur when patient enrollment had reached 50% (75/150 pts), at which point there were 26 pts in Arm A, 25 in Arm B and 24 in Arm C, with 12 pts still on treatment. The baseline characteristics were similar in the three arms, including mean age (Arm A 50.2 yr, Arm B 46.1, Arm C 47.3); ECOG PS (PS 0: 50.0%, 64.0%, 54.2%); mean number of sites of tumor involvement (2.9, 2.6, 2.7); dominant type of metastasis (visceral: 73.1%, 80.0%, 79.2%); and disease-free interval (<24 mo: 53.8%, 60.0%, 41.7%). The mean number of cycles was 6.4, 6.0 and 5.8. There was a partial response in 5/26 efficacy qualified pts (19.2%), 5/25 pts (20.0%) and 2/23 pts (8.7%) in Arms A, B and C, respectively, stable disease in 10 pts (38.5%), 9 pts (36.0%) and 9 pts (39.1%), and progressive disease in 5 pts (19.2%), 6 pts (24.0%) and 6 pts (26.1%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: The three regimens appear to show activity and have manageable toxicity when given on a biweekly schedule. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The combination of the HER2 antibody trastuzumab, the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib, and docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with HER2 overexpressing stage IV breast carcinoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1057-1057
Author(s):  
G. Somlo ◽  
M. Koczywas ◽  
T. Luu ◽  
M. McNamara ◽  
V. Bedell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Topo Ii ◽  
To Receive

1057 Background: Interference with both HER2 and epidermal growth factor (EGFR) dependent pathways may improve therapeutic efficacy of docetaxel (doc) in pts with HER2 overexpressing (+) BC. Methods: Patients (pts) without prior chemotherapy (Rx) exposure for stage IV HER-2 + BC were enrolled. Prior hormonal or adjuvant Rx inclusive of taxane or trastuzumab (tras) were allowed. A left ventricular ejection fraction of > 45% and ECOG performance status of ≥ 2 were required. Pts were to receive doc 75 m2, tras every 3 weeks, and gefitinib (gef) 250 mg daily. BC samples from 12 pts were analyzed by FISH for HER2 and EGFR amplification (amp), and topoisomerase II (topo II) amp or loss. IHC was to be performed to examine p-Src, p-STAT3, Ki67 and survivin expression. Results: The median age was 49 (range, 34–67) and ECOG performance status 0.5 (0–1). The first 9 patients received gef 250 mg daily; 2 pts received dox 75 mg/m2 and developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia (neu), hence, additional pts received doc at 60 mg/m2: 3 more episodes of grade 3 neu were seen. Gef was held due to grade 3 dermatitis (2 pts) and diarrhea (2 pts). Pts received a median of 6 cycles (3–10). Gef schedule then was changed, and was prescribed on days 2–14, only. Three of the next 9 pts experienced grades 3 or 4 neu, and we observed 3 cases of grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicities; pts were able to receive 11 + (range; 5–25+) cycles on this schedule (p<0.04). There were 4 complete (CR)and 6 partial R (23 % CR, 59 % overall R), and 3 pts had stable disease (SD; all R and SD confirmed); 3 pts progressed at 4, 4, and 5 mos, 1 pt was inevaluable. The median time to progression is 12 + mos. Samples from 3 pts revealed topo II amplification and one pt sample showed loss of one topo II allele; none were amplified for EGFR. Outcome will be correlated with IHC defined signal trasduction status and proliferation rates. Conclusions: The combination of doc, tras, and short course of gef is feasible, with encouraging R and SD rates and time to progression. Further exploration of simultaneous blockage of multiple signal transduction pathways is indicated in combination with chemoRx. Supported by NCI CA33572 and by a grant from AstraZeneca. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Smoking and prognostic factors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18048-18048
Author(s):  
S. Altug ◽  
C. Li ◽  
M. Marek ◽  
S. Guclu ◽  
Y. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Secondary Endpoints

18048 Background: The aim of this prospective, multi-country, observational study (B9E-AA-B004) is to estimate the effect of prognostic factors, including continued smoking during therapy, on treatment outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC receiving first- line chemotherapy with a gemcitabine (gem)-platinum combination as part of their routine care. Methods: Major eligibility criteria included: tissue diagnosis of advanced stage IIIB/IV NSCLC not amenable to curative surgery/radiotherapy; no prior chemotherapy; ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1; and written informed consent. A predictive model was constructed and validated by splitting the data at random by centre into two datasets in a ratio of 3:1 Construction:Validation. The primary and secondary endpoints are the effect of prognostic factors on survival and selected adverse events (AEs), respectively. The association of smoking with outcomes was tested in the Construction dataset. Results: This interim analysis to assess the effect of prognostic factors on AEs occurred when all pts had completed treatment. 1214 pts were enrolled: 75.1% male; mean age 60.5 yr, range 23–86 yr; 57.1% Stage IV; 66.2% PS 1; 69.4% received gem-cis, 30.5% gem-carb; 25.7% had never smoked, 70.8% had ever smoked and 11.2% continued smoking during therapy. 22.0% of pts had =1 AE. After variable selection in the Construction database (891 pts) the following factors were associated with an AE possibly related to therapy: disease stage (IV vs III, odds ratio (OR) =1.48, p=0.034), weight loss >10% (OR=0.60, p=0.017), age (<70 vs =70, OR=0.66, p=0.046), treatment (gem- carb vs gem-cis, OR=1.5, p=0.04), pain at baseline (present vs absent, OR=1.5, p=0.03), country (OR vs Taiwan ranged from 0.32 (Israel) to 4.2 (Egypt), p<0.0001). Sex (F vs M, OR=0.86) was then added to the model because of its clinical importance. There was a trend towards a higher probability of an AE with continued smoking during therapy (OR=1.4), but this was not statistically significant (p=0.28). Conclusions: This model can be used to improve the prediction of whether patients are likely to experience treatment-related AEs. While the trend was for a greater AE rate in pts who continued to smoke during therapy, this was not proven. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document