Comparing surgical staging methods for type II endometrial cancers.
e17107 Background: Type II endometrial cancers account for 10% of endoemetrial cancers, but their aggresive nature account for a significant proportion of the morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes type II endometrial cancer patients who underwent staging via laparotomy vs. minimally invasive approach (MIS). Methods: All patients who underwent surgery for Type II endometrial cancer at two cancer centers in Detroit MI from January 2005 and December 2015 were reviewed. Endometrioid histology and those who never had surgery were excluded. Clinical, demographic characteristics, surgical outcomes and progression free survival were examined using univariate and multivariable analysis, Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: A total of 249 patients were included, 193 underwent laparotomy, and 58 MIS, including laparoscopic or robotic surgery. The majority had stage I disease (IA, 104 [41.3%] and IB, 20[7.9%]). Stages II, III, and IV were identified in 18 (7.1%), 79 (31.6%), and 31 (12.4%) respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated being African American (OR 3.43; 95%CI 1.64-7.15), having mixed histology(OR 2.54; 95% CI 1.02-6.32), and stage III-IV disease (OR 2.20; 95%CI 1.04-4.67) was associated with undergoing laparotomy. Higher perioperative complications, EBL >250 cc and blood transfusion were associated with laparotomy. Higher lymph node yield was associated with MIS approaches vs. laparotomy (26 vs. 14 p =<0.001). Recurrence rate was 38 % for the laparotomy group and 19% for MIS. There was no difference in 3 year-PFS after controlling for age, race, procedure, histology, stage and adjuvant therapy. There was no difference in overall survival between laparotomy and MIS for type II endometrial cancers. Conclusions: Being African American race, having mixed histology and stage were associated with undergoing laparotomy for type II endometrial cancers. MIS approaches offered less morbidity and ability to complete staging. However, patient selection likely played a role in this given earlier stage of these cancers. The route of surgery was not associated with PFS or OS, suggesting that MIS approach should be considered especially for ealry stage disease.