Causes of early postpartum complications that result in visits to the emergency department

Objective This study aimed to review the reasons why postpartum women present to the emergency department (ED) over a short term (≤10 days post-delivery) and to identify the risk factors associated with early visits to the ED. Methods This retrospective chart review included all women who delivered at a regional health system (William Osler Health System, WOHS) in 2018 and presented to the WOHS ED within 10 days after delivery. Baseline descriptive statistics were used to examine the patient demographics and identify the timing of the postpartum visit. Univariate tests were used to identify significant predictors for admission. A multivariate model was developed based on backward selection from these significant factors to identify admission predictors. Results There were 381 visits identified, and the average age of the patients was 31.22 years (SD: 4.83), with median gravidity of 2 (IQR: 1–3). Most patients delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery (53.0%). The median time of presentation to the ED was 5.0 days, with the following most common reasons: abdominal pain (21.5%), wound-related issues (12.6%), and urinary issues (9.7%). Delivery during the weekend (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.00–3.65, P = 0.05) was predictive of admission while Group B Streptococcus positive patients were less likely to be admitted (OR 0.22, CI 0.05–0.97, P<0.05) Conclusions This was the first study in a busy community setting that examined ED visits over a short postpartum period. Patient education on pain management and wound care can reduce the rate of early postpartum ED visits.

Download Full-text

Healthcare Use After Buprenorphine Prescription in a Community Emergency Department: A Cohort Study

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.5811/westjem.2021.6.51306 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (6) ◽

pp. 1270-1275

Author(s):

Tinh Le ◽

Parker Cordial ◽

Mackenzie Sankoe ◽

Charlotte Purnode ◽

Ankur Parekh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Emergency Physician ◽

Community Setting ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Similar Time ◽

Initiation Point ◽

Medication Assisted Treatment ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Ed Visits

Introduction: Recent studies from urban academic centers have shown the promise of emergency physician-initiated buprenorphine for improving outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) patients. We investigated whether emergency physician-initiated buprenorphine in a rural, community setting decreases subsequent healthcare utilization for OUD patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a community hospital emergency department (ED) who received a prescription for buprenorphine from June 15, 2018–June 15, 2019. Demographic and opioid-related International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, (ICD-10) codes were documented and used to create a case-matched control cohort of demographically matched patients who presented in a similar time frame with similar ICD-10 codes but did not receive buprenorphine. We recorded 12-month rates of ED visits, all-cause hospitalizations, and opioid overdoses. Differences in event occurrences between groups were assessed with Poisson regression. Results: Overall 117 patients were included in the study: 59 who received buprenorphine vs 58 controls. The groups were well matched, both roughly 90% White and 60% male, with an average age of 33.4 years for both groups. Controls had a median two ED visits (range 0-33), median 0.5 hospitalizations (range 0-8), and 0 overdoses (range 0-3), vs median one ED visit (range 0-8), median 0 hospitalizations (range 0-4), and median 0 overdoses (range 0-3) in the treatment group. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for counts of ED visits was 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49, 0.75, favoring medication-assisted treatment (MAT). For hospitalizations, IRR was 0.34, 95% CI, 0.22, 0.52 favoring MAT, and for overdoses was 1.04, 95% CI, 0.53, 2.07. Conclusion: Initiation of buprenorphine by ED providers was associated with lower 12-month ED visit and all-cause hospitalization rates with comparable overdose rates compared to controls. These findings show the ED’s potential as an initiation point for medication-assisted treatment in OUD patients.

Download Full-text

Ketamine Safety and Use in the Emergency Department for Pain and Agitation/Delirium: A Health System Experience

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.5811/westjem.2019.10.43067 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 21 (2) ◽

pp. 272-281 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Hanjie Mo ◽

Matthew Campbell ◽

Baruch Fertel ◽

Simon Lam ◽

Elizabeth Wells ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Health System ◽

Endotracheal Intubation ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Excited Delirium ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Collection Form ◽

One Year ◽

Favorable Safety

Introduction: Two protocols were developed to guide the use of subdissociative dose ketamine (SDDK) for analgesia and dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium in the emergency department (ED). We sought to evaluate the safety of these protocols implemented in 18 EDs within a large health system. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to evaluate all adult patients who received intravenous (IV) SDDK for analgesia and intramuscular (IM) dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium in 12 hospital-based and six freestanding EDs over a one-year period from the protocol implementation. We developed a standardized data collection form and used it to record patient information regarding ketamine use, concomitant medication use, and any comorbidities that could have impacted the incidence of adverse events. Results: Approximately 570,000 ED visits occurred during the study period. SDDK was used in 210 ED encounters, while dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium was used in 37 ED encounters. SDDK was used in 83% (15/18) of sites while dissociative sedation ketamine was used in 50% (9/18) of sites. Endotracheal intubation, non-rebreather mask, and nasal cannula ≥ four liters per minute were identified in one, five, and three patients, respectively. Neuropsychiatric adverse events were identified in 4% (9/210) of patients who received SDDK. Conclusion: Patients experienced limited neuropsychiatric adverse events from SDDK. Additionally, dissociative sedation ketamine for severe agitation/excited delirium led to less endotracheal intubation than reported in the prehospital literature. The favorable safety profile of ketamine use in the ED may prompt further increases in usage.

Download Full-text

Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with “One-Time” and “Repeat” Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18020486 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (2) ◽

pp. 486

Author(s):

Pavani Rangachari ◽

Jie Chen ◽

Nishtha Ahuja ◽

Anjeli Patel ◽

Renuka Mehta

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Risk Factor ◽

Childhood Asthma ◽

Medical Center ◽

Academic Medical Center ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Primary Research ◽

Ed Visits ◽

The Individual

This retrospective study examines demographic and risk factor differences between children who visited the emergency department (ED) for asthma once (“one-time”) and more than once (“repeat”) over an 18-month period at an academic medical center. The purpose is to contribute to the literature on ED utilization for asthma and provide a foundation for future primary research on self-management effectiveness (SME) of childhood asthma. For the first round of analysis, an 18-month retrospective chart review was conducted on 252 children (0–17 years) who visited the ED for asthma in 2019–2020, to obtain data on demographics, risk factors, and ED visits for each child. Of these, 160 (63%) were “one-time” and 92 (37%) were “repeat” ED patients. Demographic and risk factor differences between “one-time” and “repeat” ED patients were assessed using contingency table and logistic regression analyses. A second round of analysis was conducted on patients in the age-group 8–17 years to match another retrospective asthma study recently completed in the outpatient clinics at the same (study) institution. The first-round analysis indicated that except age, none of the individual demographic or risk factors were statistically significant in predicting of “repeat” ED visits. More unequivocally, the second-round analysis revealed that none of the individual factors examined (including age, race, gender, insurance, and asthma severity, among others) were statistically significant in predicting “repeat” ED visits for childhood asthma. A key implication of the results therefore is that something other than the factors examined is driving “repeat” ED visits in children with asthma. In addition to contributing to the ED utilization literature, the results serve to corroborate findings from the recent outpatient study and bolster the impetus for future primary research on SME of childhood asthma.

Download Full-text

P083: Why do older adults in assisted living facilities use the emergency department: are all these visits necessary?

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2016.259 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 18 (S1) ◽

pp. S106-S106

Author(s):

E. Losier ◽

A. McCollum ◽

P. Jarrett ◽

R. McCloskey ◽

P. Nicholson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Assisted Living ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Care Home ◽

Functional Decline ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Community Services ◽

Level 3 ◽

Ed Visits ◽

One Year

Introduction: Special Care Home (SCH) residents require supervision for activities of daily living but not regular nursing care. Emergency Department (ED) use by seniors in SCHs is poorly studied. A recent study in Nova Scotia found seniors represented over 20% of ED visits. We studied SCH resident ED visits in a community with a population of 30,000 aged over 65 years and with 785 SCH beds, to define reasons for ED visits to a tertiary ED, and if these could be avoided. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of SCH residents’ visits to an ED (SCH-ED) which has 56,000 total ED (TED) visits over one year. Reasons for visit, admission data, and avoidability were collected. A geriatrician and ED physician independently reviewed visits. Initial disagreement on avoidability (27%) was adjudicated through case discussion. Results: Demographic data revealed 344 ED visits by 111 SCH residents over one year; 37% of visits resulted in admission. 13.9% of residents visited the ED on at least one occasion (average 3.1 visits); mean age 78.4 years; female 66.7%; ambulance arrival 91.0%. The three most common chief complaints were shortness of breath, weakness and abdominal pain. Most SCH-ED visits were Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) Level 3 (63.4%, TED 53.3%). Of CTAS Level 3 visits, 35.3% were admitted (TED 12.9%). SCH-ED visits were avoidable in 40.6% of cases. Gastrointestinal (18%), pain (16.5%), falls, functional decline or injury (14%) and respiratory (12%) were the most common avoidable diagnostic groups, accounting for 57% of total SCH visits. Conclusion: ED visits by SCH residents demonstrated increased acuity and admission rates with a high number of repeat visits. Of all SCH-ED visits, 40% were potentially avoidable. Further study may determine if improved community services reduces ED visits or hospital admission. Gastrointestinal, respiratory, falls and pain diagnoses may be important areas of focus.

Download Full-text

Patterns of Support Service, Emergency Department, and Hospital Utilization in Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Descriptive Study

Journal of Palliative Care ◽

10.1177/0825859719851492 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 35 (1) ◽

pp. 34-39

Author(s):

Caitlyn H. McNaughton ◽

Michael Horst ◽

Emily Gehron ◽

Shanthi Sivendran ◽

Julie Nguyen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Advanced Cancer ◽

Support Services ◽

Severe Disease ◽

Community Setting ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Support Service ◽

Advanced Cancer Patients ◽

Individual Support ◽

Nurse Navigator ◽

Ed Visits

Context: Palliative care in oncology provides multiple benefits, however access to specialty palliative clinicians is limited in community cancer centers. Individual support services are more often available, but little is known on the utilization and impact of these services. Objectives: To describe the utilization of outpatient support services in the advanced cancer population and the association with ED and hospital use in a community setting. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 314 patients with advanced cancer of lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and gynecologic origin was conducted. Data collected included demographics, descriptive data, type and number of support services (symptom management, nurse navigator, social worker, nutrition, financial counselor, chaplain, and oncology clinical counselor) within 90 days of diagnosis and descriptions of ED visits/hospitalizations within 12 months of diagnosis. Support services were available to patients by referral. Results: 29.6% of patients were deceased within 6 months and were considered to have severe disease. Patients with severe disease had a significantly greater mean number of support services than patients with non-severe disease (8.9 vs 6.0, p=0.001) and had a greater mean number of visits per year to the ED (6.4 vs 1.8, p<0.001). A greater proportion of patients with severe disease had palliative consultations (48.9% vs 21.7%, p<0.001), but 65.5% of palliative consultations occurred after an ED or hospital visit. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that advanced cancer patients with severe disease had increased healthcare utilization in all areas measured. Despite high utilization, outpatient support services used in a reactive manner were not effective in reducing ED or hospital visits.

Download Full-text

Patient Controlled Analgesia for Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Awaiting Admission from the Emergency Department

Pain Research and Management ◽

10.1155/2016/3218186 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 2016 ◽

pp. 1-5 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Josue Santos ◽

Sasia Jones ◽

Daniel Wakefield ◽

James Grady ◽

Biree Andemariam

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Sickle Cell Disease ◽

Sickle Cell ◽

Treatment Algorithm ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Cell Disease ◽

Patient Controlled Analgesia ◽

Analgesic Treatment ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Ed Visits

Background.A treatment algorithm for sickle cell disease (SCD) pain in adults presenting to a single emergency department (ED) was developed prioritizing initiation of patient controlled analgesia (PCA) for patients awaiting hospitalization.Objectives.Evaluate the proportion of ED visits in which PCA was started in the ED.Methods.A two-year retrospective chart review of consecutive SCD pain ED visits was undertaken. Data abstracted included PCA initiation, low versus high utilizer status, pain scores, bolus opioid number, treatment times, and length of hospitalization.Results.258 visits resulted in hospitalization. PCA was initiated in 230 (89%) visits of which 157 (68%) were initiated in the ED. Time to PCA initiation was longer when PCA was begun after hospitalization versus in the ED (8.6 versus 4.5 hours,p<0.001). ED PCA initiation was associated with fewer opioid boluses following decision to admit and less time without analgesic treatment (allp<0.05). Mean pain intensity (MPI) reduction did not differ between groups. Among visits where PCA was begun in the ED, low utilizers demonstrated greater MPI reduction than high utilizers (2.8 versus 2.0,p=0.04).Conclusions.ED PCA initiation for SCD-related pain is possible and associated with more timely analgesic delivery.

Download Full-text

Reduction in Emergency Department Presentations in a Regional Health System during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine ◽

10.5811/westjem.2020.10.49759 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (4) ◽

pp. 842-850

Author(s):

Edana Mann ◽

Daniel Swedien ◽

Jonathan Hansen ◽

Susan Peterson ◽

Mustapha Saheed ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Health System ◽

Mitigation Measures ◽

Hospital System ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Diagnosis Codes ◽

Icd 10 ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Clinical Conditions ◽

Deep Vein

Introduction: Nationally, there has been more than a 40% decrease in Emergency Department (ED) patient volume during the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) crisis, with reports of decreases in presentations of time-sensitive acute illnesses. We analyzed ED clinical presentations in a Maryland/District of Columbia regional hospital system while health mitigation measures were instituted. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of all adult ED patients presenting to five Johns Hopkins Health System (JHHS) hospitals comparing visits from March 16 through May 15, in 2019 and 2020. We analyzed de-identified demographic information, clinical conditions, and ICD-10 diagnosis codes for year-over-year comparisons. Results: There were 36.7% fewer JHHS ED visits in 2020 compared to 2019 (43,088 vs. 27,293, P<.001). Patients 75+ had the greatest decline in visits (-44.00%, P<.001). Both genders had significant decreases in volume (-41.9%, P<.001 females vs -30.6%, P<.001 males). Influenza like illness (ILI) symptoms increased year-over-year including fever (640 to 1253, 95.8%, P<.001) and shortness of breath (2504 to 2726, 8.9%, P=.002). ICD-10 diagnoses for a number of time-sensitive illnesses decreased including deep vein thrombosis (101 to 39, -61%, P<.001), acute myocardial infarction (157 to 105, -33%, P=.002), gastrointestinal bleeding (290 to 179, -38.3%, P<.001), and strokes (284 to 234, -17.6%, P=0.03). Conclusion: ED visits declined significantly among JHHS hospitals despite offsetting increases in ILI complaints. Decreases in presentations of time-sensitive illnesses were of particular concern. Efforts should be taken to inform patients that EDs are safe, otherwise preventable morbidity and mortality will remain a problem.

Download Full-text

Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Gout at a University Hospital Emergency Department

The Open Rheumatology Journal ◽

10.2174/18743129014090100021 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 21-26 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Naomi Schlesinger ◽

Diane C Radvanski ◽

Tina C Young ◽

Jonathan V McCoy ◽

Robert Eisenstein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

University Hospital ◽

Diagnosis And Treatment ◽

Acute Gout ◽

Inflammatory Drug ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Inflammatory Drugs ◽

The Mean ◽

Anti Inflammatory

Background : Acute gout attacks account for a substantial number of visits to the emergency department (ED). Our aim was to evaluate acute gout diagnosis and treatment at a University Hospital ED. Methods : Our study was a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of acute gout seen in the ED 1/01/2004 - 12/31/2010. We documented: demographics, clinical characteristics, medications given, diagnostic tests, consultations and whether patients were hospitalized. Descriptive and summary statistics were performed on all variables. Results : We found 541 unique ED visit records of patients whose discharge diagnosis was acute gout over a 7 year period. 0.13% of ED visits were due to acute gout. The mean patient age was 54; 79% were men. For 118 (22%) this was their first attack. Attack duration was ≤ 3 days in 75%. Lower extremity joints were most commonly affected. Arthrocentesis was performed in 42 (8%) of acute gout ED visits. During 355 (66%) of ED visits, medications were given in the ED and/or prescribed. An anti-inflammatory drug was given during the ED visit during 239 (44%) visits. Medications given during the ED visit included: NSAIDs: 198 (56%): opiates 190 (54%); colchicine 32 (9%) and prednisone 32 (9%). During 154 (28%) visits an anti-inflammatory drug was prescribed. Thirty two (6%) were given no medications during the ED visit nor did they receive a prescription. Acute gout rarely (5%) led to hospitalizations. Conclusion : The diagnosis of acute gout in the ED is commonly clinical and not crystal proven. Anti-inflammatory drugs are the mainstay of treatment in acute gout; yet, during more than 50% of ED visits, anti-inflammatory drugs were not given during the visit. Thus, improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of acute gout in the ED may be required.

Download Full-text

Treat-and-Release Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Gynecologic Cancers

Journal of Oncology Practice ◽

10.1200/jop.18.00639 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 15 (5) ◽

pp. e428-e438

Author(s):

Benjamin B. Albright ◽

Mucio K. Delgado ◽

Nawar A. Latif ◽

Robert L. Giuntoli ◽

Emily M. Ko ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cervical Cancer ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Low Socioeconomic Status ◽

Wound Care ◽

Gynecologic Cancer ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Emergency Department Utilization ◽

Gynecologic Cancers ◽

Therapeutic Procedures ◽

Ed Visits

PURPOSE: Seventeen percent of patients with cancer visit the emergency department (ED) annually, often with nonemergent complaints. We sought to describe the burden of treat-and-release ED utilization by patients with gynecologic cancers and to identify opportunities for improved triage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with gynecologic cancer diagnoses who were treated and released were identified within the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, a stratified sample of US hospital-based ED visits, from 2009 to 2013. Sample weights were applied to generate national estimates. Associations with visit charges were assessed with weighted multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, there were an estimated 174,092 annual treat-and-release ED visits by patients with gynecologic cancer (95% CI, 163,480 to 184,703 visits), which corresponded to $736 million in annual charges with an average visit charge of $4,232 (95% CI, $4,099 to $4,366). Annual visits and total charges increased significantly over the 5 years under study. Visits were more frequent for patients with cervical cancer (44.1%) versus ovarian (27.8%) and uterine (24.6%) cancer. These patients were younger and more likely to be from low socioeconomic status areas. The most common primary diagnoses were similar across cancers, including abdominal pain (10.5%), chest pain (6.1%), and urinary tract infection (5.2%). The most frequent diagnostics were culture/smear, computed tomography scan, and x-ray, and the most frequent therapeutic procedures included wound care, transfusion, and paracentesis. CONCLUSION: Patients with gynecologic cancers, and cervical cancer in particular, are frequently seen in the ED with issues that could be less expensively managed in an outpatient clinic or urgent care setting. Visit frequency, but not per-visit cost, is increasing over time.

Download Full-text

Characteristics of Emergency Department Visits and Select Predictors of Hospitalization for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in a Safety-Net Health System

Journal of Oncology Practice ◽

10.1200/jop.18.00614 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 15 (6) ◽

pp. e490-e500 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Arthur S. Hong ◽

Navid Sadeghi ◽

Valorie Harvey ◽

Simon Craddock Lee ◽

Ethan A. Halm

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Health System ◽

Safety Net ◽

Emergency Department Visits ◽

Urgent Care ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Care Clinic ◽

Medication Refill ◽

Urban Safety ◽

Ed Visits

PURPOSE: There is little description of emergency department (ED) visits and subsequent hospitalizations among a safety-net cancer population. We characterized patterns of ED visits and explored nonclinical predictors of subsequent hospitalization, including time of ED arrival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer (excluding leukemia and nonmelanoma skin cancer) between 2012 and 2016 at a large county urban safety-net health system. We identified ED visits occurring within 180 days after a cancer diagnosis, along with subsequent hospitalizations (observation stay or inpatient admission). We used mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression to model hospitalization at ED disposition, accounting for variability across patients and emergency physicians. RESULTS: The 9,050 adults with cancer were 77.2% nonwhite and 55.0% female. Nearly one-quarter (24.7%) of patients had advanced-stage cancer at diagnosis, and 9.7% died within 180 days of diagnosis. These patients accrued 11,282 ED visits within 180 days of diagnosis. Most patients had at least one ED visit (57.7%); half (49.9%) occurred during business hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 4:59 pm), and half (50.4%) resulted in hospitalization. More than half (57.5%) of ED visits were for complaints that included: pain/headache, nausea/vomiting/dehydration, fever, swelling, shortness of breath/cough, and medication refill. Patients were most often discharged home when they arrived between 8:00 am and 11:59 am (adjusted odds ratio for hospitalization, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84). CONCLUSION: ED visits are common among safety-net patients with newly diagnosed cancer, and hospitalizations may be influenced by nonclinical factors. The majority of ED visits made by adults with newly diagnosed cancer in a safety-net health system could potentially be routed to an alternate site of care, such as a cancer urgent care clinic.

Download Full-text