Mitigating risk of preventable medical errors across a network through event sharing.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 234-234
Author(s):  
Diane Denny, DBA ◽  
Caitlyn Shinners

234 Background: Medical errors are the 4th leading cause of death in the US. Oncology providers are not immune to preventable medical errors occurring in the treatment of their patients. As a national network of five hospitals that specialize in the treatment of patients fighting complex or advanced-stage cancer, clinicians and quality professionals recognized an opportunity to encourage and formalize the process of sharing safety events, lessons learned, and action plans to mitigate the risk of repeat occurrence. Methods: An Alert Notification process was established consisting of an algorithm depicting two avenues for action when an event occurs. If the event is considered urgent, characterized by immediate high-risk of repeat occurrence or high-risk of severe harm, an alert is called. The hospital nursing officers and quality directors along with the corporate director of pharmacy and vice president of quality/safety convene within 24 hours of the event to: 1) resolve or “halt” the process; 2) escalate if needed; and 3) formulate a communication plan regarding any change in process. If the event does not meet urgent criteria, the hospital conducts a root cause analysis (RCA) or common cause analysis, depending upon the algorithm. A summary of RCAs conducted for events resulting in temporary or permanent severe harm or worse are presented at the network’s monthly safety meeting, with action plans implemented across sites. Results: The notification algorithm was implemented in September 2017. Since its inception, three events have been communicated using the Urgent Alert Notification, including a syringe recall that halted use at all sites until all lot numbers could be checked, and affected syringes pulled. Several events and near misses have been communicated using the non-urgent process, including for example, discussion of a retained foreign object which resulted in review of processes for orienting staff to new products. Conclusions: The process has promoted communication across the five centers as an error prevention strategy. The sharing allows all sites to cross-fertilize resolutions to minimize rework, reduce the risk of repeat events, and build collective knowledge ensuring patient safety is our first commitment.

Author(s):  
Britt Raubenheimer

Extreme events have significant impacts on the nearshore water-land system - where ocean, sound, and estuary processes interact with the nearby land - that pose high risk to society. Observations before, during, and after these events are critical to improve understanding of the interactions and feedbacks among the natural and built environments during major storms, and the corresponding human actions and reactions. The goal of the Nearshore Extreme Events Reconnaissance (NEER) Association is to organize and coordinate a national network of scientists spanning many disciplines to perform rapid, pre-and post-event site characterization, to deploy instruments to observe event processes, and to gather virtual data about the event and provide support to field teams. This presentation provides information about NEER's motivation, event-response and coordination activities, data-distribution plans, and lessons learned to date. Funding for NEER is provided by the U.S. National Science Foundation Coastlines and People Program.Recorded Presentation from the vICCE (YouTube Link): https://youtu.be/9I9Z3OLGszU


1992 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 547
Author(s):  
R. Sirian ◽  
J.G. Hardman

Sexual Health ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Setsuko Hendriksen ◽  
A. K. Sri Krishnan ◽  
Snigda Vallabhaneni ◽  
Sethu Johnson ◽  
Sudha Raminani ◽  
...  

Background As each HIV-infected individual represents a breakdown of HIV primary prevention measures, formative data from representative individuals living with HIV can help shape future primary prevention interventions. Little is known about sexual behaviours and other transmission risk factors of high-risk group members who are already HIV-infected in Chennai, India. Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 27 HIV-infected individuals representing each high-risk group in Chennai (five men who have sex with men (MSM), five female commercial sex workers (CSW), four truckers and other men who travel for business, four injecting drug users (IDU), five married male clients of CSW, and four wives of CSW clients, MSM, truckers, and IDU). Results: Themes relevant to HIV primary prevention included: (1) HIV diagnosis as the entry into HIV education and risk reduction, (2) reluctance to undergo voluntary counselling and testing, (3) gender and sexual roles as determinants of condom use, (4) misconceptions about HIV transmission, and (5) framing and accessibility of HIV education messages. Conclusions: These qualitative data can be used to develop hypotheses about sexual risk taking in HIV-infected individuals in South India, inform primary prevention intervention programs, and improve primary prevention efforts overall.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Hegerl ◽  
Ines Heinz ◽  
Ainslie O'Connor ◽  
Hannah Reich

Due to the many different factors contributing to diagnostic and therapeutic deficits concerning depression and the risk of suicidal behaviour, community-based interventions combining different measures are considered the most efficient way to address these important areas of public health. The network of the European Alliance Against Depression has implemented in more than 120 regions within and outside of Europe community-based 4-level-interventions that combine activities at four levels: (i) primary care, (ii) general public, (iii) community facilitators and gatekeepers (e.g., police, journalists, caregivers, pharmacists, and teachers), and (iv) patients, individuals at high risk and their relatives. This review will discuss lessons learned from these broad implementation activities. These include targeting depression and suicidal behaviour within one approach; being simultaneously active on the four different levels; promoting bottom-up initiatives; and avoiding any cooperation with the pharmaceutical industry for reasons of credibility.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin Ivan Handoko ◽  
Henry Edward Khella ◽  
Erwan Couzigou ◽  
Adel Abdulrahman Al-Marzouqi

Abstract Since the implementation of the Drilling Performance Department in late 2017, ADNOC Offshore has been able to develop a company performance-oriented culture among the drilling teams. This performance culture is reflected in 25% ILT reduction in 2018 and 12% in 2019. Furthermore, 37 NPT RCA cases were investigated and concluded in 2019, which resulted in 57 actions for tracking and closure. With 5 (five) concessions, 9 (nine) different shareholders, and 39 (thirty-nine) rigs, drilling performance management is challenging. ADNOC Offshore created a centralized Drilling Performance Team to capitalize on this diversity as an opportunity to improve the traditional drilling performance role. This paper describes the team's approach on Drilling Performance and the consecutive result. The team enhances the typical drilling performance role of Key Performance Indicator (KPI) management and reporting by adopting the Performance Opportunity Time (POT) and Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Process. At the same time, the Drilling Performance Team facilitates the flow of information between teams to ensure effective knowledge transfer within such a large organization. The POT concept tackles the well duration reduction through the reduction of Invisible Lost Time (ILT) and Non-Productive Time (NPT). To reduce the ILT, the team took advantage of the extensive technical background in the various drilling teams. Performance improvement initiatives were proposed by taking references from different teams within ADNOC Offshore and evaluating the application in other concession. Other approach is to compare with out-of-company references. For NPT reduction, the innovative approach was to use the HSE Root Cause Analysis (RCA) concept. This RCA process led by the Drilling Performance Team was implemented to standardize the approach and have a systematic investigation analysis. This process resulted in identifying root causes and effective corrective action plans. As per HSE, addressing the root causes of incidents would result in the most significant impact in NPT. This approach also allows an independent and more detailed look on the subjects, where commonly these tasks are done in a limited manner by drilling teams alone with their ongoing operational workload. Finally, results are communicated to the drilling organization through lessons learned portal and technical bulletins.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yechiel Soffer ◽  
Dagan Schwartz ◽  
Avishay Goldberg ◽  
Maxim Henenfeld ◽  
Yaron Bar-Dayan

AbstractThis article reviews the literature describing four chemical and nuclear accidents and the lessons learned from each regarding the evacuation of civilian populations. Evacuation may save lives however, if poorly orchestrated, it may cause serious problems. For example, an inaccurate assessment of danger may lead to the evacuation of the same population twice, as the area requiring evacuation becomes larger than originally expected. Evacuation programs should focus on the vulnerable components of the populations, such as the elderly, children, and the disabled, and also should include plans for the care of pets and other animals. Training programs for civilians living near industrial centers and other high-risk areas should be considered. Finally, pre-event planning and preparation can improve the evacuation process and prevent panic behavior, and thus result in fewer casualties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document