ISO-CC-005: A phase I/II study of Modufolin (MTHF) in combination with 5-FU, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab in patients with metastasizing colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 838-838
Author(s):  
Helena Anna Taflin ◽  
Karin M E Ganlov ◽  
Tormod Kyrre Guren ◽  
Christos Papadimitrou ◽  
Nikolaos K. Kentepozidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Metabolic Activation ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Chemotherapy Treatment ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

838 Background: Chemotherapy treatment of Colorectal Cancer, often include 5-Fluorouracil (5- FU). 5-FU inhibits the enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS), stopping the supply of thymidine for DNA synthesis. 5-FU is always combined with a folate, which enhances the 5-FU effect. Marketed folates such as LV/L-LV are prodrugs needing enzymatic conversion. Modufolin is the natural, biologically active form of the folates and is expected to be efficacious in a larger proportion of patients with less inter- and intra-individual variability Methods: ISO-CC-005 is a multi-center, phase I/II study in mCRC patients eligible for 5-FU/folate therapy alone or in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab. The study investigates safety and tolerability of Modufolin at 4 dose levels by analysing the number and severity of AEs, SAEs and DLTs. Efficacy is evaluated as ORR after four cycles of chemotherapy. Gene expression, deoxyuridine levels as an indirect marker of TS inhibition and time to death is also investigated. Three to six patients per cohort are included. All receives Modufolin twice every two weeks during at least four cycles of chemotherapy. Results: Today, 42 patients have been enrolled and 40 have initiated treatment. 13 are 1st line patients, 16 are in 2nd line, 10 are in 3rd line and 1 is in 5th treatment line. 19 SAEs have been reported in 12 patients, 3 of these were judged as at least possibly related to Modufolin. No SAE were judged as solely related to Modufolin. 31 patients have today been evaluated for efficacy. ORR 1st line patients (n=12) All 50% (6 PR, 6 SD) Patients with Modufolin dose ≥60 mg/m2 71% (5 PR, 2 SD) Patients with Modufolin dose ≥60 mg/m2 + oxaliplatin 100% (3 PR) Conclusions: The lack of need for metabolic activation makes Modufolin a better candidate than LV/L-LV for improved outcome of 5-FU-based chemotherapy regimens in mCRC. The ISO-CC-005 study evaluates Modufolin in combination with 5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin ± bevacizumab in mCRC patients in 4 countries in Europe. The results, so far, for both safety and efficacy seems promising. Clinical trial information: NCT02244632.

ISO-005; An open-label, multiple-site, dose cohort, phase I/II study in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS811-TPS811
Author(s):  
Helena Anna Taflin ◽  
Yvonne Wettergren ◽  
Elisabeth Odin ◽  
Johan Haux ◽  
Bengt Gustavsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Metabolic Activation ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Multiple Site ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Stage Iv Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Levels

TPS811 Background: Chemotherapy treatment of Colorectal Cancer, usually includes combinations with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). 5-FU is always combined with Leucovorin, (LV), which significantly enhances the therapeutic effect of 5-FU. The principal mechanisms of action are the same for Modufolin as for LV. However, in contrast to LV, Modufolin does not require metabolic activation to exert its effects - a clear advantage since the activation capacity shows great intra- and inter-individual variability leading to insufficient and unpredictable responses to LV in some patients. Methods: ISO-CC-005 is a multiple-site, international phase I/II study in patients with Stage IV Colorectal Cancer eligible for 5- FU/LV therapy alone or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The study will investigate the tolerability of Modufolin at four dose levels and is designed as a safety study. Tolerability will be assessed by analysing the number and severity of DLTs associated with the chemotherapeutic agents, adversed events and the number of dose adjustments observed for each of the chemotherapeutic agents used in the different treatment arms. 39 valid patients are planned for inclusion, who will receive Modufolin twice every two weeks during four chemotherapy cycles. The study is on-going and still recruting eligible patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02244632.

Phase I Study of a Weekly Schedule of Irinotecan, High-Dose Leucovorin, and Infusional Fluorouracil as First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 907-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Vanhoefer ◽  
Andreas Harstrick ◽  
Claus-Henning Köhne ◽  
Wolf Achterrath ◽  
Youcef M. Rustum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of a weekly schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV), and a 24-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU24h) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer and to assess preliminary data on the antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer were entered onto this phase I study. In the first six dose levels, fixed doses of CPT-11 (80 mg/m2) and LV (500 mg/m2) in combination with escalated doses of 5-FU24h ranging from 1.8 to 2.6 g/m2 were administered on a weekly-times-four (dose levels 1 to 4) or weekly-times-six (dose levels 5 to 6) schedule. The dose of CPT-11 was then increased to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7). RESULTS: Seventy-nine cycles of 5-FU24h/LV with CPT-11 were administered in an outpatient setting. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed during the first cycle at dose levels 1 to 6, but diarrhea of grade 4 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) was observed in three patients after multiple treatment cycles. Other nonhematologic and hematologic side effects, specifically alopecia and neutropenia, did not exceed grade 2. With the escalation of CPT-11 to 100 mg/m2 (dose level 7), diarrhea of grade 3 or higher was observed in four of six patients during the first cycle; thus, the MTD was achieved. Sixteen of 25 response-assessable patients (64%; 95% confidence interval, 45% to 83%) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for further studies are CPT-11 80 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2, and 5-FU24h 2.6 g/m2 given on a weekly-times-six schedule followed by a 1-week rest period. The addition of CPT-11 to 5-FU24h/LV seems to improve the therapeutic efficacy in terms of tumor response with manageable toxicity.

A phase I/II study of capecitabine combined with peginterferon alfa-2a in sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 346-346
Author(s):  
Sadahisa Ogasawara ◽  
Tetsuhiro Chiba ◽  
Yoshihiko Ooka ◽  
Naoya Kanogawa ◽  
Tenyu Motoyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Recommended Dosage ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Peginterferon Alfa ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

346 Background: Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of combining a pyrimidine fluoride drug with interferon. Therefore, this study examined the dose of capecitabine in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN α-2a) (Phase I part) and evaluated its safety and efficacy in sorafenib-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients (Phase II part). Methods: Capecitabine was administrated daily on days 1–14 and PEG-IFN α-2a was given on days 1, 8, and 15. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients were scheduled to received capecitabine (mg/m2/day) and PEG-IFN α-2a (μg/week) at one of three dose levels in phase I: 1200/90, 1600/90, and 2000/90 (levels 1–3, respectively). Results: Thirty patients were enrolled. The recommended dose was level 3. Of the 24 patients given the drug at the recommended dosage, two (8%) showed partial responses, nine (38%) had stable disease, ten (42%) had progressive disease, and three (13%) were not evaluated. The median time to progression was 3.0 months. The most common toxicities were decreased white blood cell, neutrophil, and platelet counts, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, and fatigue. Dose modification was required in ten (42%) patients. Four (17%) patients discontinued treatment because of severe adverse events. Conclusions: Capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2/day combined with PEG-IFN α-2a 90 μg/week had moderate, but manageable toxicity. Further investigation is needed to refine the efficacy. Clinical trial information: UMIN000005697.

scholarly journals Vitamin D Enhances Radiosensitivity of Colorectal Cancer by Reversing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyue Yu ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Baocai Liu ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Guanghui Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1 ◽  
Mesenchymal Transition

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is often resistant to conventional therapies. Previous studies have reported the anticancer effects of vitamin D in several cancers, its role in radiotherapy (RT) remains unknown. We found that 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (VD3), the biologically active form of vitamin D, had antitumor effect on CRC and sensitized CRC cells to ionizing radiation (IR). VD3 demonstrated synergistic effect in combination with IR, which were detected by colony formation and cell proliferation assay. Radiosensitivity restoration induced by VD3 was associated with a series of phenotypes, including apoptosis, autophagy, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Using proteomics, “regulation of cell migration” and “cadherin” were found to be obviously enriched GO terms. Moreover, cystatin D and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), the differentially expressed proteins, were associated with EMT. Next, we confirmed the contributions of these two genes in enhancing IR sensitivity of CRC cells upon inhibition of EMT. As determined by proteomics, the mechanism underlying such sensitivity involved partially block of JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway. Furthermore, VD3 also elicited sensitization to RT in xenograft CRC models without additional toxicity. Our study revealed that VD3 was able to act in synergy with IR both in vitro and in vivo and could also confer radiosensitivity by regulating EMT, thereby providing a novel insight for elevating the efficacy of therapeutic regimens.

A phase I study of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) and cabonivo plus ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic (m) urothelial carcinoma (UC) and other genitourinary (GU) tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4562-4562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea B. Apolo ◽  
Amir Mortazavi ◽  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
Nicole N. Davarpanah ◽  
Rosa Maria Nadal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Castrate Resistant ◽  
Expansion Cohort ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

4562 Background: We report the safety and clinical activity of the combination of CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi in pts with mUC and other mGU tumors (NCT02496208). Methods: In this phase I trial 30 pts were treated in 4 dose levels (DL) for part 1 (CaboNivo) and 18 pts were treated in 3 DL for part 2 (CaboNivoIpi). Pts received Cabo PO daily and Nivo IV (part 1) with Ipi 1mg/kg x 4 doses q3wks (part 2). A mUC and a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) expansion cohort of CaboNivo has initiated enrollment. Tumors were assessed for overall response rate (ORR) q8wks (RECIST 1.1). Adverse events (AEs) were graded (G) by NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Results: From 7/22/15 to 12/31/2016, 48pts (CaboNivo N = 30; CaboNivoIpi N = 18) (mUC N = 19; bladder urachal N = 4; bladder squamous cell carcinoma (bSCC) N = 2; germ cell tumor (GCT) N = 4; castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) N = 9; RCC N = 2, sarcomatoid RCC N = 2, Sertoli cell N = 1, and trophoblastic tumor N = 1 were treated. Median age was 58 (range 35-77), 41 (85%) were male. Common treatment-related G1/2 AEs for CaboNivo: ALT increase (67%), fatigue (63%), diarrhea (60%), hypothyroidism (57%); CaboNivoIpi: fatigue (72%), diarrhea (61%), anorexia (61%); Grade 3 AEs for CaboNivo: hypertension (23%), neutropenia (17%), hypophosphatemia (13%), lipase increase (10%), fatigue (7%), aseptic meningitis (3%); CaboNivoIpi: hypophosphatemia (19%), hypertension (19%), fatigue (13%), hyponatremia (13%), nausea (13%), lipase increase (11%), colitis (6%); G4 CaboNivo: lipase increase (7%) thrombocytopenia (3%); CaboNivoIpi lipase increase (6%) There were no G5 toxicities, no DLTs. 43 pts were evaluable for response: ORR was 30% 13/43 [3 CR (2 mUC, 1 bSCC); 10 PRs (4 mUC, 2 penile, 1 sarcomatoid RCC, 1 urachal, 1 CRPC, 1 bSCC)]. ORR for CaboNivo 39% (mUC 44%); CaboNivoIpi 18% (mUC 29%). 11/13 (85%) of responses were ongoing at cutoff. Conclusions: CaboNivo and CaboNivoIpi combinations were well tolerated with no DLTs and have durable efficacy in mGU tumors particularly mUC. Rare tumors such as bSCC, urachal, and penile cancers demonstrated response to the combination. Larger cohorts of mUC and rare GU tumors are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02496208.

A phase I/II study combining tosedostat with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 410-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽  
Lingling Du ◽  
Andrea S. Teague ◽  
Rama Suresh ◽  
Kian-Huat Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

410 Background: Recent advances in front-line therapy have improved survival in patients with advanced PDAC. A fluorouracil-based regimen is recommended for patients who progress on a gemcitabine-based therapy. Tosedostat is an oral aminopeptidase inhibitor that disrupts the cleavage of amino acids from peptides downstream of proteasomal degradation. It prevents the recycling of free amino acids, leads to intracellular depletion of amino acids, and triggers an amino acid deprivation response that subsequently results in apoptosis. Because PDAC cells frequently upregulate expression of these aminopeptidases, tosedostat offers therapeutic promise, particularly in combination with fluoropyrimidines. Methods: This is a single institution phase I/II trial to evaluate the safety and toxicity of tosedostat plus capecitabine in patients with metastatic PDAC progressed on a gemcitabine-based therapy. The phase I portion is being conducted in a dose de-escalation fashion, with two dose levels of tosedostat (120 mg or 60 mg) p.o. daily on days 1 to 21 with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 p.o. BID on days 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle. If more than one out of 6 patients in the tosedostat (120 mg) cohort experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT), then 6 more will be enrolled to the tosedostat (60 mg) cohort. The primary objective of the phase I portion is to determine the optimal phase II dose. The primary objective of the phase II portion is to determine the progression-free survival at 3 months. Secondary objectives include the overall response rate, overall survival and CA 19-9 response. To avoid futility, interim analysis is planned after 10 evaluable patients enrolled. Results: Up to date, a total of 11 patients have been enrolled in the study, and 10 patients are evaluable. No DLT have been observed. Tosedostat at a dose of 120 mg with capecitabine is extremely well tolerated. Prolonged stable disease has been observed in 4 (40%) patients with a time on treatment of 10 months, 7.5 months, 5.5 months and 4 months, and 3 of the 4 patients remain on the trial. Conclusions: The combination of tosedostat and capecitabine is a well-tolerated regimen with impressive clinical activity in the subset of patients studied thus far. Clinical trial information: NCT02352831.

Phase I Study of O6-Benzylguanine and Temozolomide Administered Daily for 5 Days to Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 7646-7653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Warren ◽  
Alberta A. Aikin ◽  
Madeleine Libucha ◽  
Brigitte C. Widemann ◽  
Elizabeth Fox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Conventional Dose ◽  
Daily Schedule ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity ◽  
Active Dose

Purpose This pediatric phase I trial of O6-benzylguanine (O6BG) and temozolomide (TMZ) on a daily schedule for 5 days, every 28 days was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of TMZ when given with a biologically active dose of O6BG and to define the toxicity profile of the combination in children with solid tumors. Patients and Methods Patients ≤ 21 years old with refractory solid tumors were eligible. O6BG was administered intravenously over 60 minutes daily for 5 days. TMZ was administered orally 30 minutes after completion of each O6BG infusion. Starting doses of O6BG and TMZ were 60 mg/m2/d and 28 mg/m2/d, respectively. O6BG was escalated to 90 and 120 mg/m2/d; TMZ was subsequently escalated to 40, 55, 75, and 100 mg/m2/d. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Results Forty-one patients were enrolled; 32 patients were assessable for toxicity. The combination of O6BG and TMZ was tolerable at TMZ doses less than half of the conventional dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Myelosuppression occurred sporadically at all dose levels and was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at 100 mg/m2/d of TMZ combined with 120 mg/m2/d O6BG. Nonhematologic toxicities were generally mild. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed at 120 mg/m2/d O6BG combined with TMZ doses of 55 mg/m2/d and above. Conclusion The recommended doses of O6BG administered with TMZ on a 5-day schedule in children are 120 mg/m2/d of O6BG and 75 mg/m2/d of TMZ. Evidence of activity was observed at these doses. Myelosuppression was the DLT.

Effects of uranium depletion on 1α-hydroxylase in kidney of rats

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 786-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minfen Yan ◽  
Gaoren Zhong ◽  
Linfeng Gao ◽  
Xiqiao Xia ◽  
Lihua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Form ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Blank Control Group ◽  
Sprague Dawley Rats ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Medium Dose

This study was designed to evaluate the effects of depleted uranium (DU) on 1α-hydroxylase in the kidney of rats and to delinerate the mechanism of damage to kidneys and bones by DU. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were surgically implanted with DU fragments at three dose levels (0.1 g, 0.2 g and 0.3 g). After 3, 6 or 12 months, the concentration of 1α,25(OH)2D3 in the kidney was measured by radioimmunoassay. The activity of 1α-hydroxylase was shown by the production of 1α,25(OH)2D3 after incubation. The results showed that the 1α-hydroxylase activity in the kidney was decreased after 3 months (27.2% at the medium dose DU group, p < 0.05; 33.4% at the high dose DU group, p < 0.01). In contrast, at 6 months and 12 months after implantation of DU, the activity of renal 1α-hydroxylase in DU-treated animals was not decreased significantly in comparison with the controls (p > 0.05). On the other hand, the activity of renal 1α-hydroxylase was decreased by 33.1% (p < 0.05) and 34.4% (p < 0.01) in blank control groups at 6 and 12 months, respectively, when compared with the blank control group at 3 months. In conclusion, this study showed that chronic DU exposure could induce renal damages and inhibit the synthesis of biologically active form of vitamin D, which may be the underlying mechanism of bone metabolic disorder caused by renal injury after DU exposure.

A phase I/II study of nintedanib and capecitabine in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 759-759
Author(s):  
Patrick McKay Boland ◽  
Marwan Fakih ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Melissa Robins ◽  
Renuka V. Iyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Observation Window ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
Dose Levels

759 Background: Refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients (mCRC) have a poor prognosis with median survival of 4-6 months. Nintedanib is a TKI which inhibits VEGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR with preclinical efficacy in bevacizumab resistant CRC. This phase I/II study sought to evaluate the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and efficacy of nintedanib and capecitabine in refractory mCRC patients. Methods: Key eligibility criteria included histologically proven mCRC, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, progression/intolerance to a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-EGFR therapy for RAS wt patients. Prior regorafenib, uncontrolled hypertension ( ≥ 160/90), recent clinically significant thrombosis/hemorrhage, or prior intolerance to capecitabine were exclusionary. Doses were escalated across 2 planned dose levels (DL) in a standard 3+3 design, with escalating doses of capecitabine. DLT observation window was the first 3 weeks after dosing. The primary endpoint was establishment of the RP2D. Results: 10 patients were enrolled across 2 dose levels. 1 patient withdrew consent and was replaced. 5 (50%) were PS 0. No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed. No DLTs were observed. 2/10 (20%) of patients experienced a grade 3 AE, including hyperbilirubinemia (10%), AST elevation (10%), diarrhea (10%), dehydration (10%), and weakness (10%). The most common treatment-related AEs included palmar-plantar eythrodysesthesia (PPE) (50%), diarrhea (40%), stomatitis (30%), nausea (20%), vomiting (20%), and fatigue (20%). The RP2D was determined to be capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 divided bid and nintedanib 200 mg bid. PK data will be presented. Conclusions: Treatment was well tolerated. Most of the observed AEs were grade 1 or 2, without a marked difference between DLs. PPE was readily managed with dose adjustments. The phase II study is ongoing at the RP2D. This study was approved and funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT02393755.

Phase I trial of regorafenib, hydroxychloroquine, and entinostat in metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15580-e15580
Author(s):  
Timothy J Brown ◽  
Thomas Benjamin Karasic ◽  
Charles John Schneider ◽  
Ursina R. Teitelbaum ◽  
Kim Anna Reiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Dose Levels

e15580 Background: The antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib provides a survival benefit in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer. Antiangiogenic therapy causes hypoxic stress within tumor cells, which activate autophagy as a survival mechanism. Entinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, increases dependence on autophagy through epigenetic mechanisms. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) blocks autophagy by blunting lysosomal acidification and is synergistic with antiangiogenic therapies. We hypothesized that HCQ and entinostat would be tolerable with regorafenib and potentiate the antitumor response. Methods: This was a 3+3 phase I trial to find the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of HCQ and entinostat with regorafenib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. No prior regorafenib or HDAC inhibitor therapy was permitted. Regorafenib was dosed at 160mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycles, with provision to lower the starting dose to 80mg if toxicity was excessive. Entinostat was dosed at 3mg weekly in dose level 1 and at 5mg weekly in dose levels 2 and 3 while HCQ was dosed at 200mg qAM and 400mg qPM in dose levels 1 and 2 and at 600mg BID at dose level 3. Expansion was planned at the RP2D with a primary endpoint of objective response rate. Results: Twenty-eight patients were screened, and 20 patients were enrolled from November 2017 to January 2020. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 with no dose-limiting toxicity. The starting regorafenib dose was reduced to 80mg after 3 patients discontinued therapy early due to fatigue or rash due to regorafenib. At dose level 2, 7 patients were enrolled to achieve 6 evaluable patients. One DLT (G3 fatigue) was noted and one patient withdrew consent after 14 days due to fever and tumor pain flare possibly related to treatment. Six patients enrolled at dose level 3; no DLTs were seen. One additional patient received HCQ 400mg BID instead of 600mg BID due to a clerical error. Weight loss (60%), fatigue (50%), and anorexia (50%) were the most common toxicities. Thirteen grade 3 toxicities were noted, with rash (15%), fatigue (10%), and alkaline phosphatase elevation (10%) the most common. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. Seven patients discontinued therapy early due to toxicity. Nearly all patients experienced rapid weight loss, with a range of 1.5 lbs to 27.1 lbs and a median weight loss of 9.5 lbs at two weeks. No objective responses were observed. The median PFS was 1.8 months, the median OS was 5.2 months, and no patient remained on study longer than 4 months. Expansion was not pursued due to toxicity and lack of efficacy. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib, HCQ, and entinostat was poorly tolerated without evident activity in metastatic colorectal cancer. The substantial weight loss suggests a potential adverse metabolic interaction between these drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT03215264.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document