Efficacy of platinum-based regimens as the first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced TNBC and deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12565-e12565
Author(s):  
Nan Wang ◽  
Kun Li ◽  
Wei-Yao Kong ◽  
Xiao-Ran Liu ◽  
Meng-Yao Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Peking University ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

e12565 Background: Platinum-based therapy remains an effective treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), however, the usage is largely limited due to its side effect and rapidly developed drug resistance. High prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations are reported in TNBC. Here we explored efficacy of platinum-based regimens as the first-line treatment for Chinese patients (pts) with advanced TNBC, and analyzed its association with mutations of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA). Methods: We retrospectively analyze 220 patients diagnosed as advanced TNBC who were treated at the Dept. of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital in 2013-2018, and routinely evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Statistical analysis is performed in R 3.5.1. Cox proportional-hazard models are used for survival analysis. Results: 129 pts received non-platinum chemotherapy (NPCT) as the first-line therapy, and 91 pts received platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT). The clinical benefit rate (CBR) and median PFS were not statistically different between NPCT and PBCT groups The median OS was 30.0 and 22.5 months for PBCT and NPCT group respectively (P = 0.09, HR = 0.70). Among them, 114 pts had BRCA gene tested, of which 14 had deleterious gBRCA mutations, 7 in each group. In PBCT group, the CBR was 85.7% and 35.1% for pts with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations respectively (P = 0.04). The median PFS, OS were 14.9 months and 5.3months (P = 0.001), 26.5 and 15.5 months (P = 0.16) for pts with and without the gBRCA mutations. No significant difference was observed between NPCT pts with and without gBRCA mutations as regards the CBR, PFS and OS. PBCT Pts had significantly more grade 3-4 anaemia (5.5% vs 0%) and thrombocytopenia (8.8% vs 0%) while higher percentage of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) (12.4% vs 0%) and peripheral neuropathy (8.6% vs 1.1%) were observed in NPCT pts. Conclusions: The efficacy of platinum-based regimens as the first-line treatment of advanced TNBC insignificantly differs from that of non-platinum therapy. However, they are more effective for patients with deleterious gBRCA mutations, suggesting a BRCA1/2 genetic testing may be warranted for such patients.

Response-Adapted Treatment with Rituximab/Bendamustine/Mitoxantrone/Dexamethasone and Maintenance Therapy with Rituximab in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Relapse or Refractory to First-Line Treatment with Immunochemotherapy. RBMDGELTAMO08 Trial

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1788-1788
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier Peñalver Párraga ◽  
José Antonio Márquez Navarro ◽  
Soledad Durán Nieto ◽  
Pilar Giraldo Castellano ◽  
Carlos Montalbán Sanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a response-adapted therapy with rituximab/bendamustine/mitoxantrone/dexamethasone (RBMD), followed by rituximab (R) maintenance therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL) to first-line treatment with R-chemotherapy (R-ChemoT). Material and methods: Multicenter phase II trial including 60 patients with R/R FL, after a first R-ChemoT line. Induction therapy: R 375 mg/m2 IV, day 1; bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV, days 1 and 2; mitoxantrone 6 mg/m2 IV, day 1; dexamethasone 20 mg/day, PO, days 1 to 5. Cycles of 28 days. Evaluation of response after third cycle. If stable (SD) or progression disease (PD): patient withdrawn from the study. If complete response (CR) or unconfirmed complete response (CRu): administration of fourth cycle. If partial response (PR): administration up to 6 cycles. If CR, CRu, or PR after induction: patient received maintenance therapy with R (375 mg/m2/day every 12 weeks for 2 years). Results: N=60 patients: 50% female, age 63 (32-76) years. Ann Arbor stage III-IV 70% (42/60). FLIPI intermediate-high risk: 50% (30/60). Refractory to R-ChemoT: 18% (11/60). Received RCHOP as first line therapy: 77% (43/60). R maintenance after first line therapy: 43% (26/60). Number of administered RBMD cycles: 4 (1-6). Efectiveness: CR/CRu after 3 cycles (CR-3), 27 patients. Response after induction therapy (4-6 cycles): Overall response (OR), 88.5% (53/60); CR, 58.5% (35/60); CRu, 12% (7/60); PR, 18% (11/60); SD, 1.5% (1/60); PD, 10% (6/60). Median follow-up: 24.41 mo. (15.58-30.15). Progression free survival, median not reached (NR) (28.28-NR). Overall survival, median NR (NR-NR). OR after RBMD in patients who received R maintenance after first line therapy, 96% (25/26; CR + CRu, 65%). OR in patients who did not receive R maintenance after first line therapy, 94% (32/34; CR + CRu, 82%). Safety: Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity: neutropenia, 60% (n=36; 34 patients received G-CSF); anemia, 2% (n=1); thrombopenia, 4% (n=2). Grade 3/4 infections: 8% (n=4); febrile neutropenia 8%, (n=4). Exitus, 2/60 (PD, cycle 1; influenza A, cycle 5). Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity: infusion reaction, 4% (n=2). No skin reactions. Patient withdrawals before R maintenance therapy: no inclusion criteria (NIC), 2/60; protocol delay of over 4 weeks, 7/60. Forty-four patients began R maintenance therapy (CR-3, 24/44). During R maintenance therapy: PD, 8/44 (18%; 5/8 in CR-3 patients); SD, 1/44 (2.5%); NIC, 3/44 (7%, all CR); protocol delay, 1/44 (2.5%); toxicity, 1/44 (2.5%, myelodysplastic syndrome). Response to R maintenance therapy: OR, 68% (30/44); CR, 61% (27/44; in CR-3 patients, 65%, 17/26); CRu, 4.5% (2/44); PR, 2.5% (1/44). Conclusions: RBMD is an effective and safe alternative for patients with R/R FL who have received first line treatment with R-ChemoT and R maintenance therapy. This response-adapted treatment strategy achieved results similar to the scheme with 6 cycles and may allow reduction of the intensity and duration of induction therapy and minimize toxicity. No skin reactions were reported, possibly due to the inclusion of dexamethasone in the treatment scheme. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: Preliminary safety data from KEYNOTE-059.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 161-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Jiang Dian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

161 Background: Standard first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer includes combination chemotherapy with a platinum agent and a fluoropyrimidine. The anti–PD-1 humanized monoclonal antibody pembrolizumab (pembro) has shown promising antitumor activity as monotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer. We report preliminary safety data for pts with advanced gastric cancer treated with pembro + cisplatin and 5-FU in the multicohort, phase 2 KEYNOTE-059 study (NCT02335411). Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥ 18 y and had HER2– relapsed or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, ECOG PS 0-1, and no prior therapy for metastatic disease. Pts received pembro 200 mg + 5-FU 800 mg/m2 (or capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 in Japan) + cisplatin 80 mg/m2 Q3W for 6 cycles followed by pembro + 5-FU for up to 2 y or until confirmed progression, intolerable toxicity, or investigator decision. Primary end point was safety and tolerability of the combination. Results: Of the 17 pts enrolled (10 from Asia, 7 from outside Asia), 70.6% were men, and median age was 58.0 y. Three pts (17.6%) had a prior gastrectomy—2 total, 1 partial. As of the Aug 12, 2015, data cutoff date, median follow-up duration was 3.6 mo (range 2.6-5.4), and pts received a median of 5 treatment cycles (range 3-7). Only 1 pt (5.9%) discontinued treatment (due to progressive disease). There were no treatment-related deaths or discontinuations. Twelve pts (70.6%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade, most commonly neutropenia/decreased neutrophils (n = 7, 41.2%), stomatitis (n = 6, 35.3%), and decreased appetite (n = 5, 29.4%). Eight pts (47.1%) experienced ≥ 1 grade 3-4 treatment-related AE; only neutropenia/decreased neutrophils (n = 4 [23.5%] grade 3, n = 3 [17.6%] grade 4) occurred in > 1 pt. AEs of interest based on immune etiology, regardless of attribution by investigator, were grade 2 infusion-related reaction and grade 2 pruritus (n = 1 [5.9%] each). Conclusions: Preliminary data from KEYNOTE-059 suggest the combination of pembro, cisplatin, and 5-FU has a manageable safety profile as first-line therapy in pts with advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02335411.

Progression-free survival as a predictor of overall survival in patients with advanced breast cancer: A real-world study from the China National Cancer Center.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12590-e12590
Author(s):  
Hongnan Mo ◽  
Binghe Xu ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Qing Li ◽  
Pin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

e12590 Background: Use of progression-free survival (PFS) as a clinical trial endpoint in first-line treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer is attractive, but would be enhanced by establishing a correlation between PFS and overall survival (OS). Methods: From January 2003 to December 2012, 1851 patients with advanced breast cancer at start of first-line therapy were enrolled in this real-world study. An independent cohort of patients hospitalized in 2013 was used for external validation. All data were collected from the Database of China National Cancer Cancer. Results: The correlation coefficient (Pearson’s r) between PFS and OS was 0.807 in patients only receiving endocrine therapy as first-line treatment, 0.643 in those treated with chemotherapy, and 0.642 in the whole cohort. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that PFS = 12 months was the optimal cutoff value for predicting patient’s survival. The median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI 27.8-32.2) in the PFS < 12 months group, and 69.0 months (95% CI 60.8-77.2) in the other group (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that compared with patients who did not progress at 12 months, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death was 2.681 (95% CI, 2.301-3.124; P < 0.0001) for patients with PFS < 12 months. Subgroup analysis based on patient’s age, molecular subtype, visceral metastasis and types of first-line treatment further confirmed that PFS < 12 months was associated with significant poor prognosis in all these subgroups. In patients with luminal type of breast cancer, the HR for death was 2.567 (95%CI 2.147-3.069; P < 0.0001) for patients with PFS < 12 months. Notably, for these patients with luminal type breast cancer who had progressed within 12 months after first-line treatment, addition of chemotherapy in the second-line therapy would surprisingly have adverse effects on patients’ survival when compared with endocrine therapy alone (HR = 1.627, 95%CI 1.016-2.604, P = 0.043). The findings were externally validated in the independent cohort. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first real-world study revealed that PFS at 12 months in first-line therapy predict OS of patients with advanced breast cancer.

scholarly journals Three Weekly Irinotecan and Bolus 5-Fluorouracil Combination in the First Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer - A Single Institution Experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mesmoudi ◽  
Tarik Mahfoud ◽  
Samir Ahid ◽  
Nabil Ismaili ◽  
Saber Boutayeb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Infectious Episode ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background: The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a non-platinum based chemotherapy combination using irinotecan associated to bolus 5-FU as first line treatment in advanced gastric cancer. Materiel and methods: Retrospective analysis of a population of patients treated for metastatic and locally advanced gastric cancer with irinotecan and 5-FU as upfront chemotherapy. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. The median age was 56 years. Seven patients were males and six were of females. Ten patients had a metastatic disease and three patients had a locally advanced disease. Patients received a total number of 43 cycles of chemotherapy. Overall response rate was 38,4%, median time to progression (TTP) was 3 months, and median overall survival was 4 months. Three patients (23,1%) presented grade 3 /4 neutropenia complicated with an infectious episode with fever in two cases, three patients (23,1%) required blood transfusion for a grade 4 anemia, and one patient (7,6%) was hospitalized for a severe episode of diarrhea. Conclusion: Three weekly irinotecan and bolus 5-FU is an interesting combination as first line treatment of advanced gastric cancer; designed clinical trials are needed to confirm the activity of this combination.

Comparison of quality-adjusted survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma receiving first-line treatment with temsirolimus (TEMSR) or interferon-α (IFN) or the combination of IFN+TEMSR

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5049-5049 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Parasuraman ◽  
G. Hudes ◽  
D. Levy ◽  
A. Strahs ◽  
L. Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Health State ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

5049 Background: In a phase 3, randomized, 3-arm study of TEMSR or IFN or the combination of TEMSR + IFN in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and poor-prognostic features, TEMSR improved overall survival (p=0.0069) and progression-free survival (p=0.0001) vs. IFN (Hudes et al. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:LBA4). Quality-adjusted survival was a pre-defined endpoint and is reported. Methods: Quality-adjusted time without symptoms and toxicity (QTWiST) was estimated by partitioning overall survival into 3 distinct health states: time with serious toxicity, time with progression, and time without symptoms and toxicity (TWiST). Survival was value-weighted when patients completed quality of life questionnaires (EQ-5D) at weeks 12 and 32, when a grade 3 or 4 adverse event (AE) was reported, upon relapse or progression, or upon withdrawal from the study. Treatment group comparisons used restricted means analyses estimated from censored survival data. Restricted means were computed for duration of each health state by truncating data at median follow-up (17.9 months). Variance and covariance were estimated using bootstrap methods. Results: All 626 randomized patients in the study were included in computation of health state durations. EQ-5D questionnaires were obtained from 260/300 (87%) upon progression and 230/570 (40%) after a grade 3/4 AE. Patients receiving TEMSR alone had 38% greater TWiST than those receiving IFN alone (TEMSR=6.5 months vs. IFN=4.7 months, p=0.00048). There was no significant difference in TWiST between the combination arm and IFN alone (IFN+TEMSR=5.4 months vs. IFN=4.7 months, p=0.1288). Patients receiving TEMSR alone had 23% greater Q-TWiST than those receiving IFN alone (TEMSR=7.0 months vs. IFN=5.7 months; p=0.0015). There was no significant difference in Q-TWiST for the combination arm compared with IFN alone (IFN+TEMSR=6.1 months vs. IFN=5.7 months, p=0.3469). Conclusions: Patients with advanced RCC receiving TEMSR alone had significantly greater quality-adjusted survival than those receiving IFN alone. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Second-line systemic treatment for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 371-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Elizabeth Rogers ◽  
Lindsey Law ◽  
D. Van Nguyen ◽  
Wei Qiao ◽  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Line Treatment

371 Background: Five-year survival for advanced cholangiocarcinoma (aCC) is reported at 5-10%. For advanced, unresectable patients, gemcitabine plus platinum (GEM-P) combination chemotherapy is common practice as first-line treatment with progression free survival (PFS) of 8 months and overall survival (OS) of 11.7 months. Data regarding chemotherapy treatment after first-line progression is limited. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with aCC from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2012 who received second-line chemotherapy at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). Median PFS was the primary endpoint. Secondary objectives included disease control rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) and OS. Inclusion criteria: aCC diagnosis, progression on first-line therapy, and reimaging studies at MDACC. Exclusion criteria: patients who received localized treatment for aCC prior to second-line therapy or consolidative chemoradiation, mixed histology tumors, and those with a history of another malignancy. Results: 56 patients were identified, with the majority having intrahepatic aCC (95%). 80% of patients received gemcitabine based first-line treatment (GEM-P +/- erlotinib, GEM monotherapy). Second-line systemic treatment included GEM-P (19.6%), GEM + fluoropyrmidine (GEM-FU) (28.6%), fluoropyrmidine combination (FU-combo) (37.5%), and other consisting of chemotherapy or biotherapy monotherapy or combination (14.3%). Total median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI = 2.3 to 3.8). Disease control rate was 50% with a median OS of 13.8 months (95% CI = 12 to19.3). No significant difference in PFS or OS was identified between the four second line treatment groups. A higher CA 19-9 at the start of second line treatment correlated with a worse survival (p= <0.01). Conclusions: This retrospective study revealed a 50% disease control rate, median PFS of 2.7 months, and a potential for improvement in OS in patients who received second line systemic treatment. Agents that may be considered include GEM + FU, FU-combination therapy, or GEM-P if not given first line.

Cetuximab maintenance therapy in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer patients with wild-type RAS and BRAF: A single-center retrospective study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15004-e15004
Author(s):  
Tao Jiang ◽  
Xiaoyan Lin ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Jianwei Zhen ◽  
Bin Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

e15004 Background: Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil and irinotecan) is preferred first line therapy for RAS and BRAF wild-type (RBWT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, the side effects often require dose-reductions or discontinuation calling for maintenance strategies to reduce toxicity and preserve efficacy. Therefore, we evaluated efficacy and safety of cetuximab maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in unresectable mCRC patients with RBWT. Methods: This single center, retrospective study enrolled patients (aged 18-71 years) with untreated mCRC with RBWT, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2, with at least one measurable lesion according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumor (RECIST). All patients received first line cetuximab plus FOLFIRI every two weeks for 9-12 cycles, after which, patients with treatment response chose to either enter observation (stop treatment) or maintenance 1 (cetuximab plus irinotecan) group. After 6-12 cycles of maintenance 1, patients with treatment response entered maintenance 2 (cetuximab only). If patients progressed on maintenance 2, reintroduction of cetuximab plus FOLFIRI was suggested. Primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS); while secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), objective remission rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS). Safety events were also evaluated. Results: Among 62 enrolled patients, 56 patients completed first-line treatment (DCR: 90.3%, ORR: 62.9%) and 30 patients entered maintenance 1 [median PFS1 (mPFS) =6.1 months, 95%CI: 6.0-6.2, DCR=60%, ORR=30%]. Of these, 18 entered maintenance 2 [mPFS2=6.6 months, 95%CI: 5.1-8.1, DCR=27.8%, ORR=5.6%]. The mFFS was significantly longer in maintenance 1 (12.8 months, 95%CI: 10.8-14.8) compared to observation group (3.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21, 95%CI: 2.6-3.4, P<0.001). Overall mFFS was 19.0 (95%CI: 11.0-27.0) in maintenance and 9.5 months in observation group (HR: 0.195, 95%CI: 7.4-11.6; P<0.001). Rash acneiform, mucositis and asthenia were the common adverse events observed during maintenance treatment. Conclusions: Maintenance treatment with cetuximab after first line therapy significantly improved FFS, with acceptable safety profile in untreated mCRC RBWT patients.

Genetic Aberrations and Response to Fludarabine as First Line Treatment in a Serie of B-CLL Patients.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2131-2131
Author(s):  
Pilar Giraldo ◽  
Araceli Rubio-Martinez ◽  
Valle Recasens ◽  
Mikel Valganon ◽  
Paz Latre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Genetic Aberrations ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background: Genetic factors have been established in the recent years as the most important independent predictors of disease progression and survival in patients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL). Fludarabine is an approved first-line treatment for B-CLL, which achieves superior remission rates than traditional therapies. The drug is equally effective in early and advanced disease and in younger and elderly patients with B-CLL but different results have been found in patients with cytogenetic aberrations as methylation in the TP53 promoter Aims: To evaluate the response to Fludarabine as first-line therapy in B-CLL patients with advanced stages. Patients and methods: In the study 55 B-CLL patients were enrolled. The diagnosis was established based on standard morphologic and immunophenotypic criteria, and classified on high clinical risk category Rai stage III/IV treated with Fludarabine (25 mg/m2 daily for 5 days IV in a 28-day cycle) as first-line therapy from January 00 to December 03. Response was evaluated after 4 cycles of therapy and in those patients which had not achieved complete remission (CR) two additional cycles were administrated. Criteria for response were established using the revised 1996 NCIWG. FISH studies were performed using the probes LSI p53 (17p13), LSI D13S25 (13q14), CEP 12 and ATM gene (11q22). The sequences of the IGVH genes were determined in cDNA of the patients. Responses to therapy, time to progression disease and overall survival were available to analyse in 41 patients. Association was studied using contingence tables followed by Fisher exact test and to evaluate survival by acturial method of Kaplan Meier and Cox regression. Results: Mean age 64 (36.9–83.9), female 53.7%. 75% of patients presented genetic aberrations associated with worse prognosis: del (17p) and/or del (11q) (45%). No-mutated IGVH genes (57%). Response: 83.5% of patients achieved response (CR 47.8%). Related to genetic aberrations the responses were: 55.5% in patients with del(17p), 75.0% del(11q), 100% +12, 88.8% del(13q) and 100% of patients without genetic alterations showed response to Fludarabine. The 48.8 % of patients developed progression of disease with mean duration of the response of 15.1 months. Related to genetic aberrations the progression was over 81% of patients with genetic aberrations versus 55.5% without genetic alterations (p=0.044). The overall survival was 68.0 months. 34.1% of patients are alive in CR, 36.6% are alive with stable disease 7.3 % are alive with disease in progression and 22.0 % have died. Conclusions: A high response to Fludarabine in first line therapy was observed, however only 55.5% of patients with del(17p) showed response. Patients with genetic aberrations had higher significant rate of progression in comparison with those containing normal genotypes.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (36) ◽  
pp. 4317-4345 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Gordan ◽  
Erin B. Kennedy ◽  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Muhammad Shaalan Beg ◽  
Steven T. Brower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of published phase III randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic therapy for advanced HCC and provide recommended care options for this patient population. RESULTS Nine phase III randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) may be offered as first-line treatment of most patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and following management of esophageal varices, when present, according to institutional guidelines. Where there are contraindications to atezolizumab and/or bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or lenvatinib may be offered as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and ECOG PS 0-1. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, and until better data are available, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options for appropriate candidates include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, or ramucirumab (for patients with α-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL), or atezo + bev where patients did not have access to this option as first-line therapy. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also reasonable options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Consideration of nivolumab + ipilimumab as an option for second-line therapy and third-line therapy is discussed. Further guidance on choosing between therapy options is included within the guideline. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document