Afatinib in the treatment of advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation: An observational real-world study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20518-e20518
Author(s):  
Yun Li ◽  
Xiaohua Wang ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Yingying Kou ◽  
Xianglei Ma ◽  
...  

e20518 Background: Compared with the first generation of EGFR-TKI, Afatinib has a broader spectrum of activity and can better inhibit tumor growth. At present, the therapeutic effects of Afatinib varies on patients with different EGFR mutations and studies on the mechanism of acquired Afatinib resistance are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Afatinib in the treatment of EGFR-mutation NSCLC who hadn’t received EGFR-TKI in the past. Methods: 88 patients with advanced NSCLC who had EGFR mutations were enrolled and given oral 40 mg Afatinib daily until disease progression or adverse events that could not be handled by dosage reduction. Efficacy and safety in different subgroups were analyzed. Results: Among 88 patients, the common mutation rate of EGFR was 79.5%, and the rare mutation rate was 20.5%. The objective remission rate (ORR) was 54.5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 92.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.2 months (95% CI 11.4-18.5), 27 patients (30.7%) continued Afatinib treatment after tumor progression, and the median time to progression of clinical symptoms (TTSP) was 16.3 months (95% CI 12.7-19.3). A total of 13 patients (14.8%) reduced Afatinib dosage of due to adverse events. Subgroup analysis showed that Afatinib had better effect on patients harboring common EGFR mutation but not exon 20 mutation, and was not affected by brain metastasis, dosage and lines of therapy. Among patients who progressed on Afatinib, 65.4% harbored T790M mutation. Most T790M patients received the third generation EGFR-TKI including AZD9291 and oxetinib treatment. The most common adverse reactions were diarrhea, rash, paronychia and stomatitis. Conclusions: Afatinib showed good efficacy and tolerance in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations. Continuation of Afatinib treatment after cancer progression could delay the progression of disease symptoms. The third generation EGFR-TKI could become a treatment option after Afatinib resistance. These findings reflected the real-world clinical practice of Afatinib.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22186-e22186
Author(s):  
Caicun Zhou ◽  
Xuefei Li ◽  
Shengxiang Ren ◽  
Guohua Yang ◽  
Wei He

e22186 Background: It is reported that abundance of EGFR mutation is related with efficacy of EGFR TKI in advanced NSCLC patients with positive EGFR mutations. This study was designed to investigate influence of EGFR mutations and their abundance on efficacy of EGFR TKI. Methods: 141 advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR TKI and available tissue for EGFR mutations were enrolled into the study. EGFR mutation was detected with the kit of AmoyDx ARMS and concentration of mutant EGFR was detected with the method of a quantitative competitive allele specific Taqman PCR technology (qCAST). In this assay, copies from EGFR mutants were calibrated by standard curve respectively, and the mutation rates were estimated through normalizing by copies of a conserved sequence in EGFR exon2. The relationship between abundance of EGFR mutations and efficacy of EGFR TKI was analyzed. Results: The median age of patients was 59 years old, and in which 54.3% were male, 71.7% ex-somkers. Among all of the patients, adenocarcinoma accounted for 57.7%, squamous cell carcinoma 27.2%, adeno-squamous cell carcinoma 7.6%, and others 7.6%. 46.7% of patients harbored EGFR mutations, and in which 48.7% existed more than 20% abundance of EGFR mutations. Overall response rate was 31.4% and progression free survival was 5.0 months. The final analysis data will be reported at the conference. Conclusions: The abundance of EGFR mutations might affect the efficacy of EGFR-TKI, and quantitation of mutant EGFR may better predict for efficacy of EGFR TKI in advanced NSCLC.


BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e046451
Author(s):  
Kageaki Watanabe ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoh ◽  
Yukio Hosomi ◽  
Kazuhiro Usui ◽  
Go Naka ◽  
...  

IntroductionOsimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is widely used as the first-line treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, most cases ultimately acquire resistance to osimertinib, and no effective treatment has been currently established for cases having progressive disease (PD) with osimertinib. In clinical practice, EGFR-TKI therapy could be continued beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST)-defined PD cases when they are clinically stable. Currently, the progression pattern of osimertinib and criteria for identifying patients who might benefit from osimertinib beyond PD are unknown. In addition, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib as the first-line treatment in real-world clinical practice remain unclear in Japan. This multicentre study was designed to evaluate the real-world data on first-line osimertinib and its post-treatment.Methods and analysisThe study enrols patients with EGFR mutation-positive, advanced or recurrent NSCLC who received EGFR-TKI as the first-line therapy after 1 September 2018, from October 2019 to August 2020, and those started on osimertinib will be followed up until August 2022. We will evaluate the efficacy and safety of the first-line osimertinib treatment, adherence to it, progression patterns on RECIST PD and subsequent treatment.Ethics and disseminationAll participating patients will provide written informed consent before entering the study. The protocol, amendments and patients’ informed consent forms will be approved before study commencement by the institutional review board or independent ethics committee at each participation site (Lead Ethics Committee; Japan Red Cross Medical Center (26 April 2019, order number 976)). Patients will be anonymised before registration into the study and their anonymised data will be collected from the case report form. The results of this study will be presented at the national and international conferences and submitted for publication.Trial registration numberUMIN000038683.


Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (9) ◽  
pp. 929
Author(s):  
Yutaka Yamada ◽  
Hisao Imai ◽  
Tomohide Sugiyama ◽  
Hiroyuki Minemura ◽  
Kenya Kanazawa ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective first-line chemotherapeutic agents for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. However, the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment is not sufficient in elderly patients (over 75 years of age) harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Therefore, we investigated the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations. Materials and Methods: Between April 2008 and December 2015, we analyzed 78 elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations with first-line EGFR-TKI treatment at four Japanese institutions. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety profiles of EGFR-TKI rechallenge after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R mutation). Results: Twenty-two patients in the cohort were rechallenged with EGFR-TKI. The median age was 79.5 years (range 75–87 years). Despite the fact that it was a retrospective analysis, even with EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment the response rate was 23%, progression-free survival was 5.3 months, and overall survival was 14.4 months. Common adverse events included rash acneiform, paronychia, diarrhea, and anorexia. There were no treatment-related deaths. Due to the occurrence of adverse events of grade 2 or more, dose reduction was performed in 15 (68.2%) of 22 cases. Conclusions: EGFR-TKI rechallenge treatment after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC harboring drug-sensitive EGFR mutations was one of the limited, safe and effective treatment options for elderly EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7525-7525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Heon ◽  
Mizuki Nishino ◽  
Sarah B. Goldberg ◽  
Jennifer Porter ◽  
Lecia V. Sequist ◽  
...  

7525 Background: Patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC and sensitizing EGFR mutations who initially respond to gefitinib or erlotinib eventually develop acquired resistance to the TKIs. Anecdotal and retrospective reports suggest that EGFR-TKI resistant cancers can respond again to gefitinib or erlotinib after an interval off the TKI. This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the impact of EGFR-TKI retreatment after a drug-free interval in EGFR mutant NSCLC with acquired resistance to gefitinib or erlotinib. Methods: Pts with stage IV or relapsed NSCLC with sensitizing EGFR mutations and acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI seen at the DFCI/MGH between 8/00 and 8/11 who were retreated with single agent gefitinib or erlotinib after an EGFR-TKI-free interval were identified from a prospective trial. The objective tumor response (CR, PR, SD, PD) was determined using RECIST 1.1. Results: 19 pts were eligible and had adequate scans for radiographic assessments after the reinstitution of an EGFR-TKI. The response rate and median PFS to the initial course of gefitinib (n=4) or erlotinib (n=15) were 16/19 (84%) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.8-11.3) respectively. All pts were retreated with erlotinib after 1 to 4 intervening systemic regimens. The median interval from EGFR-TKI discontinuation to erlotinib retreatment was 11 months (range, 2-46). 4 of the 19 pts (21%) had PD as the best response to erlotinib retreatment, 14 (74%) had SD for at least 1 month, and 1 (5%) had a PR. The median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.0-6.7). 3 pts remained on erlotinib without progression for 6 months. 3 pts had their tumors rebiopsied before (n=2) or during (n=1) erlotinib retreatment; 1 of the 3 had EGFR T790M in association with the initial sensitizing EGFR mutation, and another had a secondary PIK3CA mutation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that erlotinib retreatment is an option for EGFR mutated NSCLC with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI after a drug-free interval and progression on intervening therapy. Additional advanced NSCLC pts without a documented EGFR mutation who fulfill the clinical definition of acquired resistance are undergoing review to expand our cohort.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3172
Author(s):  
Giannis Mountzios ◽  
Anna Koumarianou ◽  
Alexandros Bokas ◽  
Dimitrios Mavroudis ◽  
Epaminondas Samantas ◽  
...  

Background: Real-world data on the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations at or after progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC are lacking. Methods: This ongoing observational study was carried out by 23 hospital-based physicians in Greece. The decision to perform cobas®EGFR Mutation Test v2 in tissue and/or plasma at disease progression was made before enrollment. For patients with negative/inconclusive T790M plasma-based results, tissue re-biopsy could be performed. Results: Ninety-six (96) eligible patients were consecutively enrolled (median age: 67.8 years) between July-2017 and September-2019. Of the patients, 98% were tested upon progression using plasma and 2% using tissue/cytology biopsy. The T790M mutation was detected in 16.0% of liquid biopsies. Tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22.8% of patients with a T790M-negative plasma result. In total, the T790M positivity rate was 21.9%, not differing between patients on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Higher (≥2) ECOG performance status and longer (≥10 months) time to disease progression following EGFR-TKI treatment initiation were associated with T790M positivity. Conclusions: Results from plasma/tissue-cytology samples in a real-world setting, yielded a T790M positivity rate lower than previous reports. Fewer than one in four patients with negative plasma-based testing underwent tissue re-biopsy, indicating the challenges in routine care settings.


Author(s):  
Giannis Mountzios ◽  
Anna Koumarianou ◽  
Alexandros Bokas ◽  
Dimitrios Mavroudis ◽  
Epaminondas Samantas ◽  
...  

Background: Real-world data on the molecular epidemiology of EGFR resistance mutations at or after progression with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced NSCLC are lacking. Methods: This ongoing observational study was carried out by 23 hospital-based physicians in Greece. The decision to perform Cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 in tissue and/or plasma at disease progression was made before enrollment. For patients with negative/inconclusive T790M plasma-based results, tissue re-biopsy could be performed. Results: Ninety-six (96) eligible patients were consecutively enrolled (median age: 67.8 years) between July-2017 and September-2019. Of the patients, 98% were tested upon progression using plasma and 2% using tissue/cytology biopsy. The T790M mutation was detected in 16.0% of liquid biopsies. Tissue re-biopsy was performed in 22.8% of patients with a T790M-negative plasma result. In total, the T790M positivity rate was 21.9%, not differing between patients on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. Higher (≥2) ECOG performance status and longer (≥10 months) time to disease progression following EGFR-TKI treatment initiation were associated with T790M positivity. Conclusions: Results from plasma/tissue-cytology samples in a real-world setting, yielded a T790M positivity rate lower than previous reports. Fewer than one in four patients with negative plasma-based testing underwent tissue re-biopsy, indicating the challenges in routine care settings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110357
Author(s):  
Allen Chung-Cheng Huang ◽  
Chi-Hsien Huang ◽  
Jia-Shiuan Ju ◽  
Tzu-Hsuan Chiu ◽  
Pi-Hung Tung ◽  
...  

Background: There are limited comparisons of first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in large, real-world cohorts of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutations. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC ( N = 612) with common EGFR mutations receiving first-line gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib were grouped and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutations were analyzed. Results: The gefitinib/erlotinib and afatinib groups each contained 206 patients after matching. Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, patients receiving afatinib achieved longer median PFS (16.3 versus 14.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.020) and had a lower risk of progression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57–0.94); p = 0.017]. Median OS (37.3 versus 34.2 months; log-rank test p = 0.500) and reduction in risk of death [HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.65–1.23); p = 0.476] did not differ significantly between groups. T790M positivity was significantly higher in the gefitinib/erlotinib than afatinib group (70.9% versus 44.6%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that afatinib was independently associated with lower T790M positivity [odds ratio (OR) 0.27 (95% CI, 0.14–0.53); p < 0.001], whereas ⩾12 months PFS after EGFR-TKI treatment [OR 3.00 (95% CI, 1.56–5.98); p = 0.001] and brain metastasis [OR 2.12 (95% CI, 1.08–4.26); p = 0.030] were associated with higher T790M positivity. Sequential third-generation EGFR-TKI treatment was administered to 63 patients, in whom median OS after the second–third-generation and first–third-generation EGFR-TKI sequences were 38.8 and 29.1 months, respectively. Conclusion: Compared with gefitinib/erlotinib, afatinib had a higher treatment efficacy and a lower secondary T790M positivity in a large, real-world cohort of Asian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document