A phase I clinical study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of FN-1501 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3150-TPS3150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Edward Richardson ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Lin Lin ◽  
Viviana Bozon ◽  
Ai-Min Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma ◽  
Flt3 Mutations ◽  
Expansion Cohort

TPS3150 Background: Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), a group of transmembrane proteins, are responsible for growth factor signaling transduction in normal cellular functions. Abnormal RTK functions are associated with human tumorigenesis. FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) belongs to the type III receptor tyrosine kinase family and plays a well-established role in normal growth and differentiation of hematopoietic precursor cells. FLT3 mutations have been reported to occur in approximately 30% newly diagnosed AML patients. The internal tandem duplications mutation (FLT3/ITD) is the major mutation and correlated with more aggressive progress and poor prognosis. FN-1501 is an inhibitor of various tyrosine kinases such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6(CDK4/6), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), KIT protein, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and RET protein, particularly potent on FLT3. The preclinical data generated from biochemical, cell based and animal in vivo studies suggest that FN-1501 as a single agent could offer cancer patients clinical benefit by inhibiting multiple tyrosine kinases including FLT3, PDGFR, KIT, ALK, and RET. Methods: This is a Phase1, open label, multicenter, dose-escalation study that will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary efficacy of FN-1501 in up to 33 cancer patients with solid tumors. There is a dose escalation phase that will be followed by an expansion cohort. The dose escalation phase utilizes a standard “3 + 3” design where doses of FN-1501 will be escalated up to the Maximum-Tolerated Dose (MTD) or until the Recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) is identified. Once the MTD or RP2D dose is identified, an expansion cohort including patients with hematologic malignancies will be enrolled to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of FN-1501. Key exploratory analyses will include an evaluation of safety and efficacy and levels of expression and/or amplification of FLT3 mutations. As of February 8, 2019, cohorts 1 and 2 have been completed without a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). A total of 11 patients have been treated. Enrollment to cohort 3 is on-going. Clinical trial information: NCT03690154.

Targeting Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinases by Polyphenols: New Move Towards Anti-tumor Drug Discovery

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil S. Sakle ◽  
Shweta A. More ◽  
Sachin A. Dhawale ◽  
Santosh N. Mokale
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Cell Functions ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma

Background: Cancer is a complex disease involving genetic and epigenetic alteration that allows cells to escape normal homeostasis. Kinases play a crucial role in signaling pathways that regulate cell functions. Deregulation of kinases leads to a variety of pathological changes, activating cancer cell proliferation and metastases. The molecular mechanism of cancer is complex and the dysregulation of tyrosine kinases like Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK), Bcr-Abl (Fusion gene found in patient with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (CML), JAK (Janus Activated Kinase), Src Family Kinases (SFKs), ALK (Anaplastic lymphoma Kinase), c-MET (Mesenchymal- Epithelial Transition), EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor receptor), PDGFR (Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptor), RET (Rearranged during Transfection) and VEGFR (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor) plays major role in the process of carcinogenesis. Recently, kinase inhibitors have overcome many problems of traditional cancer chemotherapy as they effectively separate out normal, non-cancer cells as well as rapidly multiplying cancer cells. Methods: Electronic databases were searched to explore the small molecule tyrosine kinases by polyphenols with the help of docking study (Glide-7.6 program interfaced with Maestro-v11.3 of Schrödinger 2017) to show the binding energies of polyphenols inhibitor with different tyrosine kinases in order to differentiate between the targets. Results: From the literature survey, it was observed that the number of polyphenols derived from natural sources alters the expression and signaling cascade of tyrosine kinase in various tumor models. Therefore, the development of polyphenols as a tyrosine kinase inhibitor against targeted proteins is regarded as an upcoming trend for chemoprevention. Conclusion: In this review, we have discussed the role of polyphenols as chemoreceptive which will help in future for the development and discovery of novel semisynthetic anticancer agents coupled with polyphenols.

scholarly journals Protein Tyrosine Kinases: Their Roles and Their Targeting in Leukemia

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
Kalpana K. Bhanumathy ◽  
Amrutha Balagopal ◽  
Frederick S. Vizeacoumar ◽  
Franco J. Vizeacoumar ◽  
Andrew Freywald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Protein Kinases ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Tyrosine Protein Kinase ◽  
Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition Factor ◽  
The Impact

Protein kinases constitute a large group of enzymes catalysing protein phosphorylation and controlling multiple signalling events. The human protein kinase superfamily consists of 518 members and represents a complicated system with intricate internal and external interactions. Protein kinases are classified into two main families based on the ability to phosphorylate either tyrosine or serine and threonine residues. Among the 90 tyrosine kinase genes, 58 are receptor types classified into 20 groups and 32 are of the nonreceptor types distributed into 10 groups. Tyrosine kinases execute their biological functions by controlling a variety of cellular responses, such as cell division, metabolism, migration, cell–cell and cell matrix adhesion, cell survival and apoptosis. Over the last 30 years, a major focus of research has been directed towards cancer-associated tyrosine kinases owing to their critical contributions to the development and aggressiveness of human malignancies through the pathological effects on cell behaviour. Leukaemia represents a heterogeneous group of haematological malignancies, characterised by an uncontrolled proliferation of undifferentiated hematopoietic cells or leukaemia blasts, mostly derived from bone marrow. They are usually classified as chronic or acute, depending on the rates of their progression, as well as myeloid or lymphoblastic, according to the type of blood cells involved. Overall, these malignancies are relatively common amongst both children and adults. In malignant haematopoiesis, multiple tyrosine kinases of both receptor and nonreceptor types, including AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL), Discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1), Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), Mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor (MET), proto-oncogene c-Src (SRC), Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) and pro-oncogenic Abelson tyrosine-protein kinase 1 (ABL1) mutants, are implicated in the pathogenesis and drug resistance of practically all types of leukaemia. The role of ABL1 kinase mutants and their therapeutic inhibitors have been extensively analysed in scientific literature, and therefore, in this review, we provide insights into the impact and mechanism of action of other tyrosine kinases involved in the development and progression of human leukaemia and discuss the currently available and emerging treatment options based on targeting these molecules.

scholarly journals Companion Biomarkers: Paving the Pathway to Personalized Treatment for Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1447-1456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Duffy ◽  
John Crown
Keyword(s):  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Viral Oncogene ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Viral Oncogene Homolog

BACKGROUND Companion biomarkers are biomarkers that are used in combination with specific therapies and that prospectively help predict likely response or severe toxicity. In this article we review the role of companion biomarkers in guiding treatment in patients with cancer. CONTENT In addition to the established companion biomarkers such as estrogen receptors and HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) in breast cancer, several new companion biomarkers have become available in recent years. These include v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations for the selection of patients with advanced colorectal cancer who are unlikely to benefit from anti–epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations for selecting patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib or erlotinib), v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutations for selecting patients with advanced melanoma for treatment with anti-BRAF agents (vemurafenib and dabrafenib), and anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) translocations for identifying patients with NSCLC likely to benefit from crizotinib. SUMMARY The availability of companion biomarkers should improve drug efficacy, decrease toxicity, and lead to a more individualized approach to cancer treatment.

265 Phase 1b study of avelumab + M9241 (NHS-IL12) in patients with advanced solid tumors: interim analysis results from a urothelial carcinoma (UC) dose-expansion cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A291-A291
Author(s):  
Jean-Laurent Deville ◽  
Alain Ravaud ◽  
Marco Maruzzo ◽  
Theodore Gourdin ◽  
Michele Maio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Expansion Cohort

BackgroundAvelumab is an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of advanced UC after disease progression during or following platinum-based chemotherapy and as maintenance treatment in patients whose disease has not progressed with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.1–3 M9241 is an immunocytokine composed of 2 heterodimers of IL-12 fused to the heavy chains of a human antibody targeting DNA released from necrotic tumor cells.4 During dose-escalation, avelumab + M9241 was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, including 2 objective responses in patients with UC.5 We report on an interim analysis of efficacy and safety from the dose-expansion part of JAVELIN IL-12 (NCT02994953).MethodsEligible patients had locally advanced or metastatic UC that had progressed on first-line therapy, were aged =18 years, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, and were immune checkpoint inhibitor naive. Patients received the recommended phase 2 dose5 of avelumab 800 mg intravenously once weekly (QW) in combination with M9241 16.8 µg/kg subcutaneously Q4W for the first 12 weeks, then continued the combination with avelumab Q2W. The primary endpoints were confirmed best overall response (BOR) per investigator assessment (RECIST 1.1) and safety. The expansion cohort followed a 2-stage design. During stage 1 (single-arm part of the study), 16 patients were enrolled and treated. A futility analysis based on BOR was planned to determine if stage 2 (randomized controlled part of the study) would be initiated.ResultsAt data cut-off (Jun 3, 2020), 16 patients had received avelumab + M9241 for a median duration of 8 weeks (range, 4.0–25.0 weeks). No complete or partial responses were observed; the study failed to meet the criterion (>2 responders) to initiate stage 2. Two patients (12.5%) had stable disease, 13 (81.3%) had progressive disease, and 1 (6.3%) was not evaluable. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 15 patients (93.8%); the most common (in =4 patients) were pyrexia (50.0%), nausea (37.5%), asthenia (31.3%), anemia (25.0%), and hyperthermia (25.0%); grade 4 gamma-glutamyltransferase increased occurred in 1 patient (6.3%). No TRAEs led to death. Pharmacodynamic effects on the peripheral immune system and results of pharmacokinetic and biomarker analyses will also be reported.ConclusionsThe predefined efficacy criterion to proceed to stage 2 was not met. The combination was well tolerated; no new safety signals emerged and the profile was consistent with the dose-escalation part of the study.5Trial RegistrationNCT02994953Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by each site’s independent ethics committee.ConsentN/AReferencesBavencio(avelumab) injection [package insert]. Rockland, MA: EMD Serono, Inc; New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2020.Health Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada.html. Accessed July 31, 2020.US Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves avelumab for urothelial carcinoma maintenance treatment. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-avelumab-urothelial-carcinoma-maintenance-treatment. Accessed July 31, 2020.Fallon J, Tighe R, Kradjian G, et al. The immunocytokine NHS-IL12 as a potential cancer therapeutic. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1869–1884.Strauss J, Vugmeyster Y, Sznol M, et al. Phase 1b, open-label, dose escalation study of M9241 (NHS-IL12) plus avelumab in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5 Suppl):Abstract 4062.

Phase I study of mesothelin-targeted immunotoxin LMB-100 in combination with tofacitinib in patients with advanced pancreatobiliary cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3051-3051
Author(s):  
Nebojsa Skorupan ◽  
Mehwish Iqra Ahmad ◽  
Guillaume Joe Pegna ◽  
Cody J. Peer ◽  
Jane B. Trepel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Pseudomonas Exotoxin A ◽  
Recombinant Immunotoxin ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Expansion Cohort ◽  
Almost All

3051 Background: LMB-100 recombinant immunotoxin consists of a mesothelin-binding Fab for targeting a modified Pseudomonas exotoxin A payload to tumors. Previous clinical trials demonstrated that almost all patients formed anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs) to LMB-100 that made administration beyond cycle 2 ineffective. Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor that prevented formation of ADAs against a closely related immunotoxin in pre-clinical studies. The primary objective of the dose escalation cohort was assessment of safety and tolerability of LMB-100 given with tofacitinib to patients with mesothelin-expressing solid tumors. The primary objective of the expansion cohort was to determine whether co-administration of tofacitinib delays formation of neutralizing LMB-100 ADAs. Methods: Patients (n = 13) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and other mesothelin-expressing solid tumors (n = 3; cholangiocarcinoma, appendix, cystadenocarcinoma) were treated for up to 3 cycles with LMB-100 as a 30-minute infusion on days 4, 6, and 8 at two dose levels (100 and 140 mcg/kg) and co-treated with oral tofacitinib for the first 10 days of the cycle (10 mg BID). Results: Dose level 1 of LMB-100 was started at 100 mcg/kg one dose level below the single agent MTD. Dose escalation to 140 mcg/kg (dose level 2) resulted in DLTs in 2 of the 3 patients treated: grade 3 cardiac toxicity and grade 4 hyponatremia, both attributed to capillary leak syndrome. Ultimately, 7 patients were treated at dose level 1 without DLTs and 100 mcg/kg was chosen as the LMB-100 dose for the expansion cohort. The last of 6 patients treated in the expansion cohort developed grade 4 pericardial effusion leading to early closure of the study for toxicity. No objective responses were seen. Of the 8 patients who received two cycles of treatment at MTD, 4 met prespecified criteria for ADA prevention, and 2 patients who went on to receive cycle 3 had detectable LMB-100 plasma drug levels after administration. Conclusions: LMB-100 was unable to be co-administered safely with tofacitinib. ADA formation was prevented in 2 patients through 3 cycles, a rare occurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT04034238.

Novel CoupledCAR technology for treating colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2528-2528
Author(s):  
Lei Xiao ◽  
Song Li ◽  
Chengfei Pu ◽  
Zhiyuan Cao ◽  
Xinyi Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Lentiviral Vectors ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

2528 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has made significant progress in the treatment of blood cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma. However, the therapy faces many challenges in treating solid tumors. These challenges include physical barriers, tumor microenvironment immunosuppression, tumor heterogeneity, target specificity, and limited expansion in vivo. Methods: We designed a CAR lentivirus vector that consisted of a humanized CD19-specific single-chain variable fragment (scFv), a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, and a CD3ζ signaling domain.The lentivirus was produced by transfecting HEK-293T cells with CAR lentiviral vectors and viral packaging plasmids. Patient’s CD3 T cells was cultured in X-VIVO medium containing 125U/mL 1interleukin-2 (IL-2), and transduced with CAR lentivirus at certain MOI 24h after stimulated by anti-CD3/CD28 magnetic beads. Transduction efficiency was evaluated at 7 to 9 days after CAR lentivirus transduction, and quality controls for fungi, bacteria, mycoplasma, chlamydia, and endotoxin were performed. After infusion, serial peripheral blood samples were collected, and the expansion and the cytokine release of CART cells were detected by FACS and QPCR,respectively. The evaluation of response level for patients were performed at month 1,month 3,and month 6 by PET/CT. Results: We engineered CoupledCAR T cells with lentiviral vectors encoding an anti-GCC (guanylate cyclase 2C) CAR molecule. To verify the safety and efficacy of CoupledCAR-T cells for treating solid tumors, we conducted several clinical trials for different solid tumors, including seven patients with colorectal cancer. These seven patients failed multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In the clinical trial, the metastatic colorectal cancer patients were infused with autologous anti-GCC CoupledCAR-T cells range from 4.9×105/kg to 2.9×106/kg. We observed that CoupledCAR-T cells expanded significantly in the patients and infiltrated tumor tissue sites, demonstrating enhanced anti-tumor activities. PET/CT showed significant tumor shrinkage and SUV max declined, and the ongoing responses were monitored. Patient 3 achieved complete response and the best overall response rate (ORR, include complete remission, complete metabolic response, and partial response.) was 57.1% (4/7), complete remission (CR) rate was 14.3% (1/7). Conclusions: In conclusion, the clinical data demonstrated that CoupledCAR-T cells effectively expanded, infiltrated tumor tissue sites, and kill tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer. We used immunotherapy to achieve complete remission in patients with advanced colorectal cancer for the first time. We are recruiting more colorectal cancer patients to further test the safety and efficacy of anti-GCC CoupledCAR T cells. Since our CoupledCAR technology is a platform technology, we are expanding it to treat other solid tumors using different target tumor markers.

Profiling receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in Chinese breast cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15092-e15092
Author(s):  
Zhonghua Tao ◽  
Xichun Hu ◽  
Wen-Ming Cao ◽  
Jianxia Liu ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Domain ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

e15092 Background: Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are a class of tyrosine kinases that regulate cell-to-cell communication and control a variety of complex biological functions. Dysregulation of RTK signaling partly due to chromosomal rearrangements leads to novel tyrosine kinase fusion oncoproteins which are possibly driver alterations to cancers. Targeting some RTK fusions with specific tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) is an effective therapeutic strategy across a spectrum of RTK fusion-related cancers. However, there is still a paucity of extensive RTK fusion investigations in breast cancer. We aimed to characterize RTK fusions in Chinese breast cancer patients. Methods: An in-house sequencing database of 1440 Chinese breast cancer patients using a 520-gene NGS sequencing panel was thoroughly reviewed. RTK fusion was defined as an in-frame fusion with the tyrosine kinase domain of the RTK completely retained with the only exception of ERBB2 fusion which was not counted due to its unclear significance. Concomitant mutations and TMB were also analyzed and calculated. Patients’ clinical characteristics were retrieved from case records. Results: 27 RTK fusion-positive breast cancers (12 tissues + 15 plasmas) were identified, patients had a median age of 52 years. Triple-negative breast cancer subtype comprised 37% with luminal and HER2 positive subtypes being 40.8% and 22.2%, respectively. 77.8% of patients were at stage IV and 22.2% at stage I-III. Ten were treatment naïve. RTK fusions occurred in 2% of breast cancers in our database, compared with the prevalence of 0.6% and 1.3% in MSKCC and TCGA, respectively. In the subset of stage IV patients, our database showed a significantly higher RTK fusion frequency than that in MSKCC (3.2% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.013). FGFR2 fusions were seen most commonly (n = 7), followed by RET (n = 4), ROS1 (n = 3), NTRK3 (n = 3), BRAF (n = 2), and NTRK1 (n = 2). Other RTK fusions including ALK, EGFR, FGFR1, FGFR3, MET, and NTRK2 were identified in one patient each. Of note, the normalized abundance of RTK fusion (fusion AF/max AF) correlated negatively with TMB (r = -0.48, p = 0.017). Patients with TMB < 4 (Muts/Mb) displayed a higher fusion abundance than those with TMB ≥ 4 (Muts/Mb) (p = 0.018), suggesting a higher likelihood of subclonal nature for RTK fusions in TMB-high patients. Moreover, CREBBP mutation only co-occurred with FGFR2 fusion (p = 0.012), while NTRK3 fusion and TP53 mutation were mutually exclusive (p = 0.019). Conclusions: This is the first study comprehensively delineating the prevalence and spectrum of RTK fusions in Chinese breast cancers. Further study is ongoing to identify the enriched subpopulation which may benefit from RTK fusion inhibitors.

scholarly journals First-in-human phase I trial of anti-hepatocyte growth factor antibody (YYB101) in refractory solid tumor patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592092679
Author(s):  
Seung Tae Kim ◽  
Jung Yong Hong ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Joon Oh Park ◽  
Young Whan Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Hepatocyte Growth Factor ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Hepatocyte Growth

Background: YYB101, a humanized monoclonal antibody against hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), has shown safety and efficacy in vitro and in vivo. This is a first-in-human trial of this antibody. Materials and Methods: YYB101 was administered intravenously to refractory cancer patients once every 4 weeks for 1 month, and then once every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity, at doses of 0.3, 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30 mg/kg, according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. Maximum tolerated dose, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were studied. HGF, MET, PD-L1, and ERK expression was evaluated for 9 of 17 patients of the expansion cohort (20 mg/kg). Results: In 39 patients enrolled, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 0.3 mg/kg, and the most commonly detected toxicity was generalized edema ( n = 7, 18.9%) followed by pruritis and nausea ( n = 5, 13.5%, each), fatigue, anemia, and decreased appetite ( n = 4, 10.8%, each). No patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events. YYB101 showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics up to 30 mg/kg. Partial response in 1 (2.5%) and stable disease in 17 (43.5%) were observed. HGF, MET, PD-L1, and ERK proteins were not significant predictors for treatment response. However, serum HGF level was significantly lowered in responders upon drug administration. RNA sequencing revealed a mesenchymal signature in two long-term responders. Conclusion: YYB101 showed favorable safety and efficacy in patients with refractory solid tumors. Based on this phase I trial, a phase II study on the YYB101 + irinotecan combination in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients is planned. Conclusion: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02499224

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document