ATALANTE-1 randomized phase III trial, OSE 2101 versus standard treatment as second- or third-line in HLA-A2 positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9121-TPS9121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
Giuseppe Giaccone ◽  
Rafal Dziadziuszko ◽  
Fabrice Denis ◽  
Teresa Moran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Nsclc Patients

TPS9121 Background: New treatment strategies are needed for advanced NSCLC patients who progress on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Tedopi (OSE2101) is a neoepitope vaccine restricted to HLA-A2 positive patients (45%) targeting five tumor-associated antigens frequently expressed in lung cancer cells, ACE, HER2, MAGE2, MAGE3 and P53. Previously, in a phase II trial (Barve et al. JCO 2008), Tedopi showed a median overall survival (OS) of 17.3 months with a manageable safety profile in advanced NSCLC patients. ATALANTE-1 (NCT02654587) is a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of TEDOPI with standard of care (SoC) treatment in HLA-A2 positive patients with advanced NSCLC, as second- or third-line therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC without EGFR-sensitizing mutations or ALK rearrangements; progressive disease to platinum-based chemotherapy (ChT) with sequential or concurrent ICI; HLA-A2 positivity (blood test); ECOG PS 0-1; with treated and asymptomatic brain metastases,, are randomized 2:1 to receive 5mg Tedopi subcutaneously Q3W for 6 cycles, then Q8W for the reminder of the year and finally Q12W, or SoC treatment with: docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W or pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 Q3W (in non-squamous and pemetrexed-naïve patients). Treatment continues until progression, intolerable toxicity or consent withdrawal, in both arms. Patients are stratified by histology, best response to first line, and line rank of ICI. Tumor assessment is performed every 6 weeks (RECIST 1.1). Primary endpoint is OS. Secondary end points are PFS, ORR, DCR, and duration of response, quality of life and safety. This is a superiority study with a hazard ratio of 0.7, two-sided alpha 5% and power 80%, after 278 events are observed. An independent analysis (1year OS rate) is planned in the first 84 patients treated with Tedopi. Last trial review by the DMC in June 18 suggested that the trial continues as planned. Translational research will be performed evaluating pharmacodynamic markers of efficacy such as immunogenicity response against Tedopi vaccine neoantigens, as well as parameters in liquid and tissue biopsies. End January 19, 87 patients (51 Tedopi, 36 Soc) have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02654587.

scholarly journals Circulating regulatory T cells predict efficacy and atypical responses in lung cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da Hyun Kang ◽  
Chaeuk Chung ◽  
Pureum Sun ◽  
Da Hye Lee ◽  
Song-I Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Treg Cells ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
National University

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for a variety of cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we investigated the frequency of pseudoprogression and hyperprogression in lung cancer patients treated with ICIs in the real world and aimed to discover a novel candidate marker to distinguish pseudoprogression from hyperprogression soon after ICI treatment. Methods This study included 74 patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors at Chungnam National University Hospital (CNUH) between January 2018 and August 2020. Chest X-rays were examined on day 7 after the first ICI dose to identify changes in the primary mass, and the response was assessed by computed tomography (CT). We evaluated circulating regulatory T (Treg) cells using flow cytometry and correlated the findings with clinical outcomes. Results The incidence of pseudoprogression was 13.5%, and that of hyperprogression was 8.1%. On day 7 after initiation of treatment, the frequency of CD4+CD25+CD127loFoxP3+ Treg cells was significantly decreased compared with baseline (P = 0.038) in patients who experienced pseudoprogression and significantly increased compared with baseline (P = 0.024) in patients who experienced hyperprogression. In the responder group, the frequencies of CD4+CD25+CD127loFoxP3+ Treg cells and PD-1+CD4+CD25+CD127loFoxP3+ Treg cells were significantly decreased 7 days after commencement of treatment compared with baseline (P = 0.034 and P < 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Circulating Treg cells represent a promising potential dynamic biomarker to predict efficacy and differentiate atypical responses, including pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, after immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

scholarly journals Development of nomogram based on immune-related gene FGFR4 for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Zhixuan Ren ◽  
Bentong Yu ◽  
Jian Tang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Cancer Genomics ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a frontier in the field of clinical technology for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, the predictive biomarker of ICIs mainly including the expression of PD-L1, TMB, TIICs, MMR and MSI-H. However, there are no official biomarkers to guide the treatment of ICIs and to determine the prognosis. Therefore, it is essential to explore a systematic nomogram to predict the prognosis of ICIs treatment in NSCLC Methods In this work, we obtained gene expression and clinical data of NSCLC patients from the TCGA database. Immune-related genes (IRGs) were downloaded from the ImmPort database. The detailed clinical annotation and response data of 240 advanced NSCLC patients who received ICIs treatment were obtained from the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to perform survival analyses, and selected clinical variables to develop a novel nomogram. The prognostic significance of FGFR4 was validated by another cohort in cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics. Results 3% of the NSCLC patients harbored FGFR4 mutations. The mutation of FGFR4 were confirmed to be associated with PD-L1, and TMB. Patients harbored FGFR4 mutations were found to have a better prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) to ICIs treatment (FGFR4: P = 0.0209). Here, we built and verified a novel nomogram to predict the prognosis of ICIs treatment for NSCLC patients. Conclusion Our results showed that FGFR4 could serve as novel biomarkers to predict the prognosis of ICIs treatment of advanced NSCLC. Our systematic prognostic nomogram showed a great potential to predict the prognosis of ICIs for advanced NSCLC patients.

scholarly journals Consolidation With Pembrolizumab and Nab-Paclitaxel After Induction Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shetal A. Patel ◽  
David E. Gerber ◽  
Allison Deal ◽  
Kathe Douglas ◽  
Chad V. Pecot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundInduction with four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy was the standard of care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) until the approval of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in the first-line setting. Switch maintenance therapy has shown promise in improving survival by exposing patients to novel, non-cross–resistant agents earlier in their treatment course.MethodsWe performed this open-label, three-arm, randomized phase II study (NCT02684461) to evaluate three sequences of consolidation with pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients without progressive disease post induction chemotherapy. Consolidation was either sequential with pembrolizumab for four cycles followed by nab-paclitaxel for four cycles (P→A), nab-paclitaxel followed by pembrolizumab (A→P), or concurrent nab-paclitaxel and pembrolizumab for four cycles (AP).ResultsTwenty patients were randomized before the study was closed early due to the approval of first-line checkpoint inhibitors. We found that consolidation is feasible and well tolerated, with 30% of patients experiencing grade 3 toxicity. The median progression-free survival and OS in months (95% CI) in P→A were 10.1 (1.5–NR), 27.6 (1.7–NR); 8.4 (1.2–9.0), 12.7 (4.4–NR) in A→P; and 10.2 (5.1–NR), NR. Quality of life as measured by FACT-L improved in the majority of patients during the course of the study.ConclusionSequential and concurrent consolidation regimens are well tolerated and have encouraging overall survival in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

scholarly journals Circulating Tumor Cell PD-L1 Expression as Biomarker for Therapeutic Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in NSCLC

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kloten ◽  
Lampignano ◽  
Krahn ◽  
Schlange
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarker ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Over the last decade, the immune checkpoint blockade targeting the programmed death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis has improved progression-free and overall survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PD-L1 tumor expression, along with tumor mutational burden, is currently being explored as a predictive biomarker for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, lung cancer patients may have insufficient tumor tissue samples and the high bleeding risk often prevents additional biopsies and, as a consequence, immunohistological evaluation of PD-L1 expression. In addition, PD-L1 shows a dynamic expression profile and can be influenced by intratumoral heterogeneity as well as the immune cell infiltrate in the tumor and its microenvironment, influencing the response rate to PD-1/PD-L1 axis ICIs. Therefore, to identify subgroups of patients with advanced NSCLC that will most likely benefit from ICI therapies, molecular characterization of PD-L1 expression in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) might be supportive. In this review, we highlight the use of CTCs as a complementary diagnostic tool for PD-L1 expression analysis in advanced NSCLC patients. In addition, we examine technical issues of PD-L1 measurement in tissue as well as in CTCs.

Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) 2: CAPPA-2 study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8066-8066
Author(s):  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Saverio Cinieri ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Roberto Bianco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

8066 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) is the standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, but the evidence of its efficacy among ECOG PS2 pts is weak, because these pts are usually excluded from clinical trials; concern exists about tolerability and feasibility of standard CT in these pts. No prospective randomized trial has tested the addition of cisplatin to single-agent CT in pts with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Methods: CAPPA-2 was a multicentre, randomized phase III study for first-line treatment of PS2 pts with advanced NSCLC. Patients, aged 18-70, were eligible if they had stage IV or IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or metastatic supraclavicular nodes (TNM VI ed.) and adequate organ function. Patients in standard arm received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 dd1 and 8.Patients in experimental arm received cispaltin 60 mg/m2 d1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 dd1 and 8. All treatments were repeated q3w, up to 4 cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To have 80% power of detecting hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, corresponding to an increase in median OS from 4.8 to 6.8 months, 285 deaths were required. Results: The study was stopped in June 2012 after the enrolment of 57 pts, due to the slow accrual and the report of positive results from a similar study. Median OS was 3.0 months with single-agent gemcitabine and 5.9 months with cisplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98, p=0.039). Combination CT produced longer PFS (median 1.7 vs. 3.3 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89, p=0.017) and higher response rate (4% vs. 18%, p=0.19), without substantial increase in toxicity. Conclusions: Addition of cisplatin to single-agent gemcitabine improves survival as first-line treatment of PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT00526643.

scholarly journals Comparative Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Yi Chen ◽  
Chi-Hsien Huang ◽  
Wang-Chun Chen ◽  
Ming-Shyan Huang ◽  
Yu-Feng Wei
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Combination Regimens

Abstract Backgrounds: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or in combination with chemotherapy (CT) are the standard of care for first-line therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without actionable mutations. The safety ranking of different ICI and CT combination regimens has not been investigated. This study was aimed to provide a toxicity profile and safety ranking of different ICI and CT combination regimens.Methods: We performed comprehensive searches of phase 2 and 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing different ICI regimens (alone or combination) or CT for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Outcomes of interest were the cumulative incidence of any treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), grade 3-5 TRAEs (grade 3-5), any immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and grade 3-5 irAEs (grade 3-5). Odds ratios and 95% credible intervals were calculated as summary statistics to quantify the effect of different ICI combination regimens. Results: We included 23 RCTs from 2016 to 2021 with a total of 14,378 patients. The incidence of any TRAEs and grade 3-5 TRAEs ranked from high to low were ICI-CT (probability: 74.88%), ICI-ICI-CT (50.60%), CT alone (74.79%), ICI-ICI (98.37%), and ICI monotherapy (99.37%). Adding CT to ICI regimens resulted in a higher incidence of any grade or grade 3-5 TRAEs compared to ICI-ICI combinations or ICI monotherapy. However, ICI-ICI-CT combinations did not result in a higher incidence of TRAEs than ICI-CT combinations. For any irAEs and grade 3-5 irAEs, the ranking was ICI-ICI (probability: 97.38), ICI monotherapy (96.98%), ICI-CT (99.44%), and CT alone (99.98%). Notably, the incidence of any grade and grade 3-5 irAEs was lower when adding CT to ICI monotherapy. Conclusion: Lack of head-to-head comparisons, these findings provide evidence for clinical decision-making when considering different ICI combination regimens for advanced NSCLC patients.

A randomized phase III trial of single-agent pemetrexed (P) versus carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and performance status (PS) of 2.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7506-7506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogerio Lilenbaum ◽  
Mauro Zukin ◽  
Jose Rodrigues Pereira ◽  
Carlos H. Barrios ◽  
Ronaldo De Albuquerque Ribeiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Nsclc Patients

7506 Background: No standard of care exists for patients with advanced NSCLC and PS 2 and clinical practice ranges from supportive care to combination chemotherapy. Methods: In a Brazilian multicenter phase III randomized trial, advanced NSCLC patients, with any histology at first, amended to non-squamous only, PS 2, no prior chemotherapy, and adequate organ function, were randomized to P alone (500 mg/m2) or CP (AUC 5 + same P) administered every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Stratification factors included stage (IIIB vs. IV); age (≥70 vs. <70); and weight loss (≥5 kg vs. <5kg). The primary endpoint was overall survival and the study was powered to demonstrate an improvement in median survival from 2.9 to 4.3 months based on a prior CALGB trial. Results: A total of 217 patients were enrolled from 8 centers in Brazil and 1 in the US from April 2008 to July 2011. Twelve patients were ineligible and excluded. The 2 arms (P=102; CP=103) were balanced for patient characteristics. 14 patients had squamous and another 12 had unknown histology. The response rates were P = 10% and CP = 24% (p=0.019). In the ITT population, the median PFS was P = 3.0 mo and CP = 5.9 mo (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.34; 0.63, p<0.001) and median OS was P = 5.6 mo vs. CP = 9.1 mo (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.41; 0.79, p=0.001). 1-year survival rates were 22% and 39% respectively. Similar results were seen when squamous patients were excluded from the analysis. Grade ¾ anemia (5.5%; 12%) and neutropenia (2.8%; 5.6%) were more frequent in CP. There were 4 treatment-related deaths in the CP arm. 30% of patients in each arm received 2nd line therapy Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with CP significantly improves survival, with acceptable safety, in eligible patients with advanced NSCLC and PS 2, and represents a new standard.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document