A phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of CV301 plus atezolizumab (Atezo) in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS494-TPS494
Author(s):  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
Benjamin Louis Maughan ◽  
Xiao X. Wei ◽  
Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽  
Kerry L. Kilbridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
T Cell Infiltration ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Total Accrual

TPS494 Background: Anti-PD1/PD-L1 can achieve durable responses in advanced UC but most patients (pts) do not respond. Combination strategies with agents that “prime” the immune system may improve outcomes. CV301 comprises two recombinant poxviruses, Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and Fowlpox (FPV), encoding the human transgenes for CEA, MUC-1, and a Triad of Co-stimulatory Molecules (TRICOM: ICAM-1, LFA-3, and B7-1). MVA-CV301 is used for priming doses and FPV-CV301 is used for booster doses to achieve a heterologous prime boost regimen. In preclinical studies, BN-platform vaccine plus PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibited synergistic anti-tumor efficacy, T-cell infiltration, and PD-L1 upregulation in tumors. CEA and MUC-1 are expressed, in 41-90% and 55-91% of any stage UC, respectively, and in ~100% of metastatic UC. An ongoing Phase Ib trial of CV301 plus anti-PD-1 agent has demonstrated a similar safety profile to anti-PD-1 monotherapy with only mild vaccine-related adverse events (AEs). Methods: This is a Phase 2, single-arm, multi-institutional trial designed to study CV301 plus atezo as 1st-line treatment in pts with advanced UC ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 (Cohort 1) and as salvage treatment in pts with UC progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy (Cohort 2). MVA-CV301 is given subcutaneously (SC) on Days 1 and 22 and FPV-CV301 SC every 21 days for 4 doses, then every 6 weeks until 6 months, then every 12 weeks until 2 years. Atezo 1200mg is given every 21 days. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints: immune response, OS, PFS, response duration, AEs. Tumor and serial blood samples will be collected for biomarker analyses; 1-sided α is 0.025/cohort in this design. With a 2-stage design, success criteria are based on historic ORR (H0) and alternative ORR (H1) with ≥70% power. For Cohort 1, assuming H0 = 0.23, H1 = 0.43, then Cohort 1 sample size N1= 14, responders required at stage 1 to continue R1≥3, total accrual goal N = 33, total responders to reject H0, R≥13. For Cohort 2, assuming H0 = 0.15, H1 = 0.33, then N1= 13, R1≥2, N = 35, R≥10. Accrual has begun; completion is expected within 1 year. Clinical trial information: NCT03628716.

scholarly journals Atezolizumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer: a pooled analysis from the Spanish patients of the IMvigor 210 cohort 2 and 211 studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sotelo ◽  
T. Alonso-Gordoa ◽  
P. Gajate ◽  
E. Gallardo ◽  
R. Morales-Barrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Duration ◽  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Geographical Regions ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Background The studies IMvigor 210 cohort 2 and IMvigor211 evaluated the efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) upon progression to platinum-based chemotherapy worldwide. Yet, the real impact of this drug in specific geographical regions is unknown. Materials and methods We combined individual-level data from the 131 patients recruited in Spain from IMvigor210 cohort 2 and IMvigor211 in a pooled analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed in the overall study population and according to PD-L1 expression on tumour-infiltrating immune cells. Results Full data were available for 127 patients; 74 (58%) received atezolizumab and 53 (42%) chemotherapy. Atezolizumab patients had a numerically superior median overall survival although not reaching statistical significance (9.2 months vs 7.7 months). No statistically significant differences between arms were observed in overall response rates (20.3% vs 37.0%) or progression-free survival (2.1 months vs 5.3 months). Nonetheless, median duration of response was superior for the immunotherapy arm (non-reached vs 6.4 months; p = 0.005). Additionally, among the responders, the 12-month survival rates seemed to favour atezolizumab (66.7% vs 19.9%). When efficacy was analyzed based on PD-L1 expression status, no significant differences were found. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred more frequently in the chemotherapy arm [46/57 (81%) vs 44/74 (59%)]. Conclusion Patients who achieved an objective response on atezolizumab presented a longer median duration of response and numerically superior 12 month survival rates when compared with chemotherapy responders along with a more favorable safety profile. PD-L1 expression did not discriminate patients who might benefit from atezolizumab.

EV-301: Phase III study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin (EV) versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS497-TPS497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
Ignacio Duran ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS497 Background: Standard first-line treatment for patients (pts) with la/mUC is cisplatin-based chemotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy for pts unfit for cisplatin. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are standard treatment options for pts who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. While some pts with la/mUC achieve durable responses with CPIs, less than 25% of pts respond. Following failure of a CPI, no therapies are approved. Enfortumab vedotin is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E to tumors expressing Nectin-4, which is expressed in 97% of mUC pt samples (Petrylak et al. ASCO, 2017). In a phase 1 study (EV-101; NCT02091999), single-agent EV 1.25 mg/kg was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 42% across the overall population of pts with mUC; in pts with prior CPI therapy or liver metastasis at baseline confirmed ORRs of 42% and 36% were observed. A pivotal phase 2 study of EV in la/mUC pts with prior CPI treatment (EV-201; NCT03219333) is ongoing. Methods: EV-301 is a global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial (NCT03474107) enrolling adult pts with la/mUC and an ECOG performance status score ≤1, who have received a prior platinum-containing chemotherapy, and have experienced disease progression during or following treatment with a CPI. Approximately 550 pts will be randomized (1:1) to receive EV (1.25 mg/kg) administered by IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle ( Arm A), or investigator choice of IV docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinflunine (EU only) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle ( Arm B). Treatment with the study drug will continue until radiological disease progression, intolerance, or other discontinuation criterion is met. Radiological assessments of tumor response status will be performed at baseline and every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall response rate, as well as assessment of safety/tolerability, and quality-of-life parameters. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999.

TROPHY-u-01: A phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with advanced urothelial cancer after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy and/or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS495-TPS495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Petros Grivas ◽  
Neeraj Agarwal ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS495 Background: Patients (pts) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy and pts ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy who progress after CPI have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. Trop-2 is an epithelial cell surface antigen that is overexpressed in UC. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate that targets Trop-2 and delivers the active metabolite (SN38) of the topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan to tumor cells. In a phase 1/2 single-arm trial, pts with advanced cancers received SG 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle; preliminary results in the cohort of 41 evaluable pts with mUC and a median of 3 (range 1–6) prior therapies showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 34%. Adverse events (AE) were mostly low grade, including diarrhea (63%), nausea (56%), and fatigue (49%). Neutropenia (all grades) occurred in 49% of pts (≥ grade 3/4, 39%; treatment-related serious AE of febrile neutropenia, 5%). Median overall survival was 16.1 months, and median progression-free survival was 7.1 months. These results warrant further investigation in a dedicated phase 2 trial. Methods: TROPHY-U-01 is a single-arm, open-label, global phase 2 trial evaluating the antitumor activity and safety of SG in 140 pts with advanced UC. The primary cohort (progression after platinum chemotherapy and CPI) will enroll 100 pts in a Simon 2-stage design with > 90% power accounting for dropouts to exclude the null hypothesis or ORR < 12%, while a second cohort (40 pts) will comprise cisplatin-ineligible pts who received prior CPI. The primary objective is ORR per RECIST 1.1, assessed by central review. Secondary objectives include response duration, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Enrollment began in August 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT03547973.

A phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter, global study of first-line (1L) durvalumab in combination with standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy and durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab and soc chemotherapy versus soc chemotherapy alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS499-TPS499
Author(s):  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Srikala S. Sridhar ◽  
Osamu Ogawa ◽  
Dario Ruscica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS499 Background: Despite high response rates to 1L SoC for locally advanced or metastatic UC chemotherapy (gemcitabine +cisplatin or gemcitabine + carboplatin for patients who are cisplatin-ineligible [poor performance status, impaired renal function, comorbidities]), most patients experience disease progression. Novel strategies like combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy offer hope for improving clinical outcomes. Durvalumab is a selective, high affinity, engineered human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80. Tremelimumab is a human IgG2 mAb directed against CTLA-4. The mechanisms of action of PD-1 and CTLA-4 are nonredundant, so targeting both checkpoint pathways may have additive or synergistic efficacy compared to monotherapy. Studies in other tumor types of platinum-based chemotherapy combined with checkpoint blockade have yielded improved efficacy with acceptable safety and support exploration of this approach for 1L locally advanced or metastatic UC. Methods: NILE is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, global trial that will enroll approximately 1265 patients who will be randomized (1:1:1) to durvalumab + SoC chemotherapy, durvalumab + tremelimumab + SoC chemotherapy, or SoC chemotherapy as 1L-line therapy in patients with histologically or cytologically documented, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival using blinded independent central review assessments per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, OS at 24 months, proportion of patients alive and progression free at 12 months, duration of response, disease control rate, time from randomization to second progression, and HRQoL. Safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers will also be assessed. The study opened for enrollment in September 2018. Clinical trial information: NCT03682068.

A phase III, randomized, open label, multicenter, global study of first-line (1L) durvalumab in combination with standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy and durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab and SOC chemotherapy versus SOC chemotherapy alone in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4590-TPS4590
Author(s):  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
Andrea Necchi ◽  
Srikala S. Sridhar ◽  
Osamu Ogawa ◽  
Natasha Angra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS4590 Background: Despite high response rates to 1L SoC for locally advanced or metastatic UC chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin or gemcitabine + carboplatin for patients who are cisplatin-ineligible [poor performance status, impaired renal function, comorbidities]), most patients experience disease progression. Novel strategies such as combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy offer hope for improving clinical outcomes. Durvalumab is a selective, high affinity, engineered human IgG1 mAb that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80. Tremelimumab is a human IgG2 mAb directed against CTLA-4. The mechanisms of action of PD-1 and CTLA-4 are nonredundant, so targeting both checkpoint pathways may have additive or synergistic efficacy compared with monotherapy. Studies of platinum-based chemotherapy combined with checkpoint blockade in other tumor types have yielded improved efficacy with acceptable safety and support exploration of this approach for 1L locally advanced or metastatic UC. Methods: NILE (NCT03682068) is a randomized, open-label, multicenter, global trial that will enroll approximately 1265 patients with histologically or cytologically documented, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Patients will be randomized (1:1:1) to durvalumab + SoC chemotherapy, durvalumab + tremelimumab + SoC chemotherapy, or SoC chemotherapy as 1L therapy. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival using blinded independent central review assessments per RECIST 1.1 and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, OS at 24 months, proportion of patients alive and progression free at 12 months, duration of response, disease control rate, time from randomization to second progression, and health-related quality of life. Safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers will also be assessed. The study opened for enrollment in September 2018. 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2019 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. Clinical trial information: NCT03682068.

Neoadjuvant itraconazole (I) in patients (pts) with resectable basal cell carcinoma (BCC): A phase II multistage study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22081-e22081
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Perez Pereira ◽  
Sergio Jobim Azevedo ◽  
Juliano Cé Coelho ◽  
Taiane Francieli Rebelatto ◽  
Gabriela Lusa Viapiana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Stage 1

e22081 Background: Targeting the hedgehog (HH) protein family pathway has consistently shown activity in locally advanced and metastatic BCC. Itraconazole is an affordable agent with known toxicity profile that demonstrates in vitro HH signaling inhibition, suggesting a possible role in BCC treatment. Initial results of a phase 2 study designed to investigate efficacy of Itraconazole as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BCC are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had biopsy-proven resectable BCC, ECOG PS 0-3, adequate organ function and measurable disease. Dosing of I consisted of 200mg twice daily for 60 days followed by surgery. Simon two-stage design was used to test a null rate of 5% vs. 20% (power = 0.80; α = 0.05, unilateral). If ≥1 of 13 pts in stage 1 have objective response (OR) according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, 14 more pts will be enrolled. If ≥4 of 27 pts have OR, the treatment is worthy of further study. Secondary endpoints include safety and change in Ki-67 and Gli1. Results: Thirteen pts with 14 measurable lesions enrolled from Jan/2018 to Feb/2019; 1 pt was not evaluable, but was included in safety analysis. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. After 60 days of treatment, all patients had R0 resection as primary planned and 1 (8.3%) PR was observed. There were no progressions during the study. OR rate was 8.3%. No grade 3 AE or SAE were reported. 6 pts had grade 1 or 2 AEs at least possibly related to I including depression, headache, GPT elevation, diarrhea, abdominal pain and bilirubin elevation. Conclusions: Itraconazole showed initial anti-tumor activity in pts with resectable BCC, no safety concerns were observed. Study will proceed to Simon’s second stage. Clinical Trial Information: NCT03972748 , 47011715.0.0000.5327 . [Table: see text]

A phase Ib study of combination of avelumab and taxane-based chemotherapy in platinum refractory or ineligible metastatic urothelial cancer (AVETAX study).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 487-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Garje ◽  
Timothy Ginader ◽  
Douglas Earl Laux ◽  
Kenneth Gerard Nepple ◽  
Mohammed M. Milhem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Expansion Cohort

487 Background: Advanced bladder cancer is the most common malignancy of the urinary system with 5-year OS rates of 5-7%. Platinum based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors are currently available treatment options but with limited benefit. We hypothesize that combining Avelumab (anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy) with Docetaxel is safe and will lead to cancer cell death releasing neoantigens with enhanced anti-tumor immune mediated cytotoxicity. Methods: This is a phase 1b, single arm, non-randomized, open label prospective clinical trial to evaluate the combination of Avelumab and Docetaxel in adult subjects with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, or within 12 months of neoadjuvant or adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy. It has two phases: Phase 1b dose de-escalation of docetaxel (Level 0: 75, Level -1: 60 or Level -2: 45 mg/m2) with standard dose avelumab (10 mg/kg) to establish phase 2 dose in the standard 3+3 design. In the dose expansion phase, the phase 2 dose of docetaxel with avelumab will be evaluated for efficacy. The combination therapy is administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles and then avelumab alone is continued every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint is safety. Efficacy endpoints include objective response rate, progression free survival and overall survival. Results: At the cutoff date of 10/21/2019, 10 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. Only one of the six patients treated with level 0 dose of docetaxel had a dose limiting toxicity (neutropenic fever). Docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 along the avelumab was deemed safe for dose expansion cohort. Additional 4 patients were enrolled in the dose expansion cohort. Efficacy data is preliminary with 1 patient achieving CR, 2 pts had PR, 2 pts had SD, 1 pt PD and 4 pts are not yet evaluable. The most common Grade 3 or 4 AEs were febrile neutropenia, urinary tract infection and confusion. No treatment related deaths were noted. Conclusions: The combination of docetaxel in combination with avelumab is safe and the preliminary data showed promising efficacy, further data to be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT03575013.

scholarly journals Complete Response With Immunotherapy: A Case of Metastatic Bladder Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 232470962110356
Author(s):  
Balraj Singh ◽  
Parminder Kaur ◽  
Sachin Gupta ◽  
Nirmal Guragai ◽  
Michael Maroules
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Novel Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Broad Variety

Bladder cancer is the most common urinary tract malignancy. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the first line of treatment in locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. Immunotherapy has become a novel therapy option in a broad variety of malignancies including bladder cancer. Immunotherapy is approved as first line of treatment in patients who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy and second-line treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed after platinum-based treatments. We present the case of an 83-year-old female with metastatic bladder cancer who was chemotherapy ineligible and had complete response with immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab.

Palbociclib (P) in patients (pts) with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with CDK4 amplification: Results from the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR) study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11565-11565
Author(s):  
Scott Schuetze ◽  
Michael Rothe ◽  
Pam K. Mangat ◽  
Liz Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Stage Design ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

11565 Background: TAPUR is a phase II basket study evaluating anti-tumor activity of commercially available targeted agents in pts with advanced cancers with genomic alterations. Results in a cohort of STS pts with CDK4 amplification treated with P are reported. Methods: Eligible pts had advanced STS, no standard treatment options, measurable disease, ECOG PS 0-2, and adequate organ function. Genomic testing was performed in CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited site selected labs. Pts received P at 125 mg orally once daily for 21 days, followed by 7 days off until disease progression. Pts matched to P had CDK4 amplification and no RB mutations. Simon 2-stage design tested the null disease control (DC) - defined as partial (PR), complete response (CR) or stable disease at 16+ weeks (SD 16+) - rate of 15% vs. 35% (power = 0.85; α = 0.10). If ≥2 of 10 pts in stage 1 have DC, 18 more pts are enrolled. If ≥7 of 28 pts have DC, the null DC rate is rejected. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 29 pts (66% male) with STS with CDK4 amplification were enrolled from July 2016 to Nov 2019. 1 pt was not evaluable and excluded from efficacy analyses. Demographics and outcomes are summarized in Table. One pt with partial response (PR) and 12 pts with SD16+ were observed for DC and objective response (OR) rates of 48% (95% CI: 31%, 62%) and 3.7% (95% CI: 0.1%, 19%), respectively, and the null DC rate of 15% was rejected (p<0.001). 9/13 pts with DC continued on treatment for >32 weeks. 14 pts had at least one grade 3-4 AE at least possibly related to P with the most common being low WBC/platelets. Other grade 3 AEs included increased alanine aminotransferase, anemia, and fatigue. Conclusions: Monotherapy P demonstrated anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated pts with STS with CDK4 amplification. Additional study is warranted to confirm the efficacy of P in pts with STS with CDK4 amplification. Clinical trial information: NCT02693535. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document