Checkpoint inhibitor treatment in patients with isolated in-transit melanoma metastases.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10070-10070
Author(s):  
Lucy Storey ◽  
Mohammed Abdul-Latif ◽  
Sophia Kreft ◽  
Emma Barrett ◽  
Lisa M Pickering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Disease Characteristics ◽  
Melanoma Metastases ◽  
In Transit

10070 Background: In the context of multiple in-transit melanoma metastases without nodal involvement, a variety of treatment modalities have historically been employed including surgery, laser, isolated limb perfusion/infusion, intralesional interleukin-2, T-VEC and electrochemotherapy. Unfortunately, most patients treated with these modalities experience subsequent disease progression. While checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) are a standard of care for bulky unresectable stage III and for stage IV melanoma, patients with isolated in-transit metastases were rarely included in registration studies. There are anecdotal reports of lower response rates in these patients despite them having disease characteristics that would usually be associated with a good response. Methods: We report data from 11 retrospective patient cohorts treated at cancer centres across Europe who received CPI between 2016 and April 2019. All patients had multiple in-transit metastases without clinical or radiological evidence of nodal or distant disease. Disease response was assessed using CT, PET-CT or MRI depending on clinical indication. All patients had at least one prior resection of loco-regional relapsed disease and were deemed not curable by further surgery. Results: Sixty three patients meeting criteria were identified, 40 females and 23 males. Median age was 72 years and 54 (86%) patients had a normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). 19 (30%) patients had a BRAF mutation. At treatment initiation, the majority 55 (87.3%) received single agent PD-1 inhibitor, 7 (11.1%) combination ipilimumab + nivolumab and 1 (1.6%) received single agent anti-CTLA 4. The overall response rate was 62% for the full population. The response rate with anti-PD1 monotherapy was 59%. With a median FU of 23 months, the median PFS was 26 months, median OS not reached. OS estimates with 95% CI: 12 month - 93% (87-100%), 24 month - 88% (80-98%), 36 month - 80% (67-95%). Conclusions: The results show a high response rate to CPI in patients with in-transit metastases and support early treatment with CPI following identification of in-transit metastases not curable with surgery whilst disease characteristics remain favourable.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for in-transit melanoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9583-9583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Nan Tie ◽  
Julia Elizabeth Lai-Kwon ◽  
Lumine Na ◽  
Michael Alexander Rtshiladze ◽  
James Bozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Melanoma Metastases ◽  
Locoregional Therapies ◽  
In Transit

9583 Background: The efficacy of ICIs in metastatic melanoma is well-established. However, there is limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma metastases (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM. Methods: A multisite, retrospective review of patients with ITM treated with ICI from 2004-2018. Demographic and clinicopathological factors (age, sex, primary site, AJCC version 8 stage, BRAF status, prior locoregional therapies) were collected. Objective response rate (ORR) based on a clinician-assessed best overall response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 69 (range 19-89); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10(19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single agent PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PDL-1/MEK inhibitor (atezolizumab and cobimetinib). ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single agent anti PD-1, 38% for single agent anti-CTLA4, and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (Table). The median follow-up was 15 months (2-46). The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-N/A). PFS at 1 and 2 years were 48% and 39%. Fourteen (56%) progressed locoregionally and 11 (44%) progressed distantly. OS at 1 and 2 years were 85% and 63%; the median OS was not reached. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR. Conclusions: ICI produces objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence despite locoregional therapies. [Table: see text]

The Current Role of Immunotherapy in mCRPC: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalibey H ◽  
◽  
Hansen TF ◽  
Zedan AH ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The development of immunotherapy has shown promising results in several malignant diseases, including prostate cancer, calling for a systematic review of the current literature. This review aims to evaluate the present data and prospects of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC). Methods: Articles were identified via a systematic search of the electronic database Pubmed, in accordance with the PICO process and following the PRISMA guidelines. Articles in English studying immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mCRPC published between March 2010 and March 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Endpoints of interest were Overall Survival (OS), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), clinical Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) response rate. Results: Ten articles were identified as eligible for inclusion. The studies primarily explored the use of Ipilimumab, a CTLA-4 inhibitor, and Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor. These drugs were both used either as monotherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities. The largest trial included in the review demonstrated no significant difference in overall survival between the intervention and placebo. However, two studies presented promising data combing immunotherapy and immune vaccines. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events ranging from 10.1% to 82.3%, whit diarrhea, rash, and fatigue were the most frequently reported. Forty relevant ongoing trials were identified exploring immunotherapy with or without a parallel treatment modality. Conclusion: Overall, the current data shows that the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy may have limited impact on mCRPC, and the results from ongoing combinational trials are eagerly awaited.

scholarly journals Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with primary ocular adnexal lymphoma in Northern Thailand

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-97
Author(s):  
Kasem Seresirikachorn ◽  
Sakarin Ausayakhun ◽  
Damrong Wiwatwongwana ◽  
Ponsak Mahanupab ◽  
Teerada Daroontum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Northern Thailand ◽  
Ocular Adnexal Lymphoma ◽  
Operative Notes

Purpose: To assess the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with primary ocular adnexal lymphoma (OAL) in Northern Thailand. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Data was collected from electronic medical records and operative notes from Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 2009 and December 2014. All available tissue biopsies of 54 patients were reviewed by agreement of two pathologists. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results: A total number of 54 patients were identified of which 57.4% were female. The median age was 61.0 years (range, 4-86). The most common subtype of lymphoma was extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (ENMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) (n = 46, 85.2%). Seventy-five percent of the patients presented with a mass at the ocular adnexa, while 14.8% of the patients presented with proptosis. The sites of origin were as follows: lacrimal (46.3%), orbit (31.5%), conjunctiva (13%) and eyelid (7.4%). Two-thirds of the patients had Ann-Arbor Stage I, while 22% of patients had Stage IV. The majority of the patients (68.1%) had a low-risk international prognosis index (IPI). Treatment modalities involved field radiation (IFRT, 50%), chemotherapy (31.6%), combined chemoradiotherapy (7.9%) and surgical resection (10.5%). The overall response rate was 100% with a complete response rate of 77.8%. In patients with low-grade lymphoma, including MALT lymphoma, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 69.9% and 92.5%, respectively. Conclusion: ENMZL of MALT was the major subtype of primary OAL. Radiotherapy was an effective treatment for the lower stages of disease providing a high response rate and encouraging survival outcomes.

scholarly journals Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Nan Tie ◽  
Julia Lai-Kwon ◽  
Michael Alexander Rtshiladze ◽  
Lumine Na ◽  
James Bozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
In Transit

BackgroundThe efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments.ResultsFifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26–94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2–46).ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR.Conclusions and relevanceICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence.

EV-301: Phase III study to evaluate enfortumab vedotin (EV) versus chemotherapy in patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS497-TPS497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Jonathan E. Rosenberg ◽  
Ignacio Duran ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Guru Sonpavde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS497 Background: Standard first-line treatment for patients (pts) with la/mUC is cisplatin-based chemotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy for pts unfit for cisplatin. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are standard treatment options for pts who progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. While some pts with la/mUC achieve durable responses with CPIs, less than 25% of pts respond. Following failure of a CPI, no therapies are approved. Enfortumab vedotin is a fully humanized monoclonal antibody that delivers the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin E to tumors expressing Nectin-4, which is expressed in 97% of mUC pt samples (Petrylak et al. ASCO, 2017). In a phase 1 study (EV-101; NCT02091999), single-agent EV 1.25 mg/kg was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 42% across the overall population of pts with mUC; in pts with prior CPI therapy or liver metastasis at baseline confirmed ORRs of 42% and 36% were observed. A pivotal phase 2 study of EV in la/mUC pts with prior CPI treatment (EV-201; NCT03219333) is ongoing. Methods: EV-301 is a global, multicenter, open-label phase 3 trial (NCT03474107) enrolling adult pts with la/mUC and an ECOG performance status score ≤1, who have received a prior platinum-containing chemotherapy, and have experienced disease progression during or following treatment with a CPI. Approximately 550 pts will be randomized (1:1) to receive EV (1.25 mg/kg) administered by IV infusion over approximately 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle ( Arm A), or investigator choice of IV docetaxel, paclitaxel, or vinflunine (EU only) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle ( Arm B). Treatment with the study drug will continue until radiological disease progression, intolerance, or other discontinuation criterion is met. Radiological assessments of tumor response status will be performed at baseline and every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint is overall survival; secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, duration of response, and overall response rate, as well as assessment of safety/tolerability, and quality-of-life parameters. Clinical trial information: NCT02091999.

Overall responses with coordinated pembrolizumab and high dose IL-2 (5-in-a-row schedule) for therapy of metastatic clear cell renal cancer: A single center, single arm trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 657-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Alexander Chatzkel ◽  
Jennifer Swank ◽  
Steven Ludlow ◽  
Kristina Lombardi ◽  
Cortlin Croft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Lower Confidence Bound

657 Background: Ligation of IL-2 receptor or blockade of PD-1 receptor may change lymphocytes to induce regression of cancers with diverse histology or site of origin. Single agent objective response rates of 14-25% have been reported for IL-2 therapy of metastatic clear cell RCC (ccRCC). A response rate of 33% was observed in pembrolizumab treated ccRCC patients. Nivolumab treated ccRCC patients were observed to have early intratumoral migration of lymphocytes. A case report of IL-2 induced major regression right after no change on nivolumab therapy suggested that combining the two means of lymphocyte stimulation could be effective. Other trials combining IL-2 receptor agonists (NKTR-214) and PD-1 blockade have also reported regression of ccRCC. Distinctive attributes of high dose IL-2 therapy are the required inpatient stay and the durability of the complete responses. Methods: This single-institution, single arm study addresses the safety and feasibility of the combination of IL-2 and pembrolizumab in the treatment of metastatic ccRCC. Subjects are treated on four nine-week blocks, as follows: Pembrolizumab is given on weeks 1, 4, and 7 of each block. Patients are admitted for 5 doses of high dose IL-2 (given over ~ 33 hours/3 days) on weeks 2, 3, 5, and 6 of blocks 2 and 3. Safety is monitored by a Pocock boundary of .05 likelihood of 0.15 dose limiting toxicity rate. The Simon 2-stage alternative hypothesis for the sample size was a 45+% major response rate vs null hypothesis < 20%, at alpha = 0.10, 90% power. Results: No accrual stop for safety was triggered. Thirteen of the first 18 patients responded, substantially exceeding the requirement of 8+/24 combination-treated patients to reject the null. Seven patients responded after receiving pembrolizumab alone, six after starting combination therapy in block 2. Accrual is completed; at 27. Kaplan-Meier analysis projects ORR of 69%, with ORR 90%-lower confidence bound of 55%. Conclusions: The combination of high dose IL-2 and pembrolizumab is feasible, with a high response rate, justifying further exploration of this dual immune treatment of metastatic ccRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02964078.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Personalized Cancer Vaccines in Combination With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan-Yan Liao ◽  
Shuang Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cancer Vaccines ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Strong Immune Response ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Central Tolerance ◽  
Personalized Cancer

Cancer immunotherapy can induce sustained responses in patients with cancers in a broad range of tissues, however, these treatments require the optimized combined therapeutic strategies. Despite immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have lasting clinical benefit, researchers are trying to combine them with other treatment modalities, and among them the combination with personalized cancer vaccines is attractive. Neoantigens, arising from mutations in cancer cells, can elicit strong immune response without central tolerance and out-target effects, which is a truly personalized method. Growing studies show that the combination can elevate the antitumor efficacy with acceptable safety and minimal additional toxicity compared with single agent vaccine or ICI. Herein, we have searched these preclinical and clinical trials and summarized safety and efficacy of personalized cancer vaccines combined with ICIs in several malignancies. Meanwhile, we discuss the rationale of the combination and future challenges.

Cabozantinib versus other TKIs after CPI treatment in the real-world management of patients with mRCC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16539-e16539
Author(s):  
Florence Marteau ◽  
Brooke Harrow ◽  
Christine McCarthy ◽  
Joel Wallace ◽  
Alisha Monnette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Routine Care ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
P Value ◽  
The Real ◽  
The Us ◽  
Risk Patients

e16539 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a treatment option for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), but there is limited clinical data on the efficacy of targeted therapies following CPI treatment. Cabozantinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets multiple receptor kinases implicated in tumorigenesis. In the US, cabozantinib is approved for use in patients with advanced RCC including after CPI treatment. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study (NCT04353765) evaluated outcomes associated with cabozantinib or other TKIs (axitinib, lenvatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, sunitinib) in patients with mRCC following CPI treatment. Eligible patients initiated TKI therapy between May 1, 2016 and Sep 31, 2019 and had received a CPI as their last systemic treatment prior to TKI therapy. Patients were identified from the US Oncology Network iKnowMed electronic health record database through structured queries and a targeted chart review. The following real-world outcomes were assessed: 6-month response rate (RR6months; primary); overall response rate (ORR); overall survival (OS); time to treatment discontinuation (TTD); rates of dose reductions, and discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs). The p value for RR6months (χ2 test) was used to test for non-inferiority. Results: Eligible patients ( n = 247) had a mean (SD) age of 65.9 (10.5) years and 74.1% were male; 75.7% ( n = 187) received cabozantinib and 24.3% ( n = 60) received other TKIs. All patients had intermediate or poor MSKCC score; more poor-risk patients received cabozantinib than other TKIs (28.9% vs 20%). Outcomes data are shown in the Table. Compared with other TKIs, cabozantinib was associated with a significantly higher RR6months and ORR, and TTD was twice as long with cabozantinib. Discontinuation due to AEs was more frequent with other TKIs than with cabozantinib, although this was not statistically significant; 21.7% of discontinuations occurred during the first 3 months of treatment. AEs leading to discontinuation were consistent with the known safety profile of the products. Conclusions: In this mRCC population receiving routine care in the US, cabozantinib was used more frequently than other TKIs after CPI treatment. Cabozantinib was an effective and well tolerated option post-CPI, with a high response rate in the real-world setting.abozantinib was associated with a significantly higher response rate and a lower discontinuation rate due to AEs; TTD was double that of other TKIs. Clinical trial information: NCT04353765. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document