FRACTION-RCC: Innovative, high-throughput assessment of nivolumab + ipilimumab for treatment-refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5007-5007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Harriet M. Kluger ◽  
Saby George ◽  
Scott S. Tykodi ◽  
Timothy M. Kuzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Adaptive Design ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response

5007 Background: The immuno-oncology (I-O) combination nivolumab + ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) is approved for first-line (1L) and NIVO is approved for second-line treatment post TKI therapy in aRCC. The open-label, randomized, phase 2 Fast Real-Time Assessment of Combination Therapies in Immuno-Oncology (FRACTION-RCC; NCT02996110) platform study has an adaptive design allowing rapid evaluation of I-O therapies, including NIVO+IPI or other investigational combinations. This FRACTION analysis reports preliminary outcomes with NIVO+IPI in aRCC pts after progression on checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Methods: All pts, except 1, had previously received and progressed on checkpoint inhibitor treatment. Pts received NIVO+IPI (NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W ×4, then after 6 weeks, NIVO 480 mg Q4W), up to 2 years or until progression, toxicity, or protocol-specified discontinuation. Primary endpoints were confirmed objective response rate (ORR; per investigator using RECIST v1.1), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival probability at week 24. Safety outcomes were reported. Results: 46 pts were randomized to NIVO+IPI. Pts had 0 (n = 1), 1 (n = 10), 2 (n = 12), 3 (n = 10), or ≥4 (n = 13) prior lines of therapy. All pretreated pts had prior anti-PD-(L)1-, none had prior anti-CTLA-4- therapy, and 37 had prior TKI-based therapy; 45 pts progressed on anti-PD-(L)1 as the most recent therapy. Most pts had clear cell aRCC (n = 44). After a median study follow-up of 8.9 months, ORR was 15.2%; no pts achieved complete response and 7 achieved partial response. DOR ranged from 2–19+ months (n = 7); 5 pts had ongoing response. Six of 7 responders had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 36 pts (78.3%; fatigue, rash [both 19.6%], and diarrhea [17.4%] were most common). Grade 3–4 treatment-related AEs were reported in 13 pts (28.3%; diarrhea [8.7%], ↑amylase and ↑lipase [both 6.5%] were most common). Treatment-related immune-mediated AEs of any grade were reported in 22 pts (47.8%; rash [19.6%], diarrhea [17.4%], and ↑alanine aminotransferase [8.7%]). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Updated and expanded results with an additional 3 months of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: These results suggest that NIVO+IPI may provide durable partial response in some pts with prior progression on checkpoint inhibitors, including some heavily pretreated pts. The safety profile of NIVO+IPI in FRACTION pts was similar to historic data in aRCC with this combination. Clinical trial information: NCT02996110 .

Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Response

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.

Real-world (rw) clinical outcomes for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients (pts) treated with second line (2L) ramucirumab plus docetaxel (R+D) post frontline (1L) platinum based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (Pt + ICI).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20727-e20727
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Melson Clarke ◽  
Raina Mathur ◽  
Cliff Molife ◽  
Marta Batus ◽  
Victoria Jennifer Stefaniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Community Practice ◽  
Best Response ◽  
First Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Duration Of Response

e20727 Background: R+D is approved for use in pts with aNSCLC after Pt chemotherapy. With recent approvals, ICI can now be added to Pt chemotherapy (Pt + ICI) in 1L. This retrospective observational study provides an exploratory view of baseline characteristics and rw clinical effectiveness outcomes for pts receiving 2L R+D post 1L Pt + ICI. Methods: All adult pts treated with 2L R+D after 1L Pt + ICI therapy between 03/01/2015 and 06/30/2018, with ≥ 3 months follow up, were selected from the Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database (n = 15). Rw clinical endpoints during R+D therapy included rw objective response rate (rwORR), rw disease control rate (rwDCR), rw best response, as well as Kaplan-Meier estimates of rw time to first response & rw duration of response. Results: Median age was 62 years, 10 pts (66.6%) were aged < 65 years, 11 (73.3%) were men, 3 (20.0%) had no history of smoking, 14 (93.3%) had non-squamous histology, 4 (26.7%) were EGFR positive, 3 (20.0%) were KRAS positive and 6 (85.7%) were PD-L1 negative. Of the 8 pts with a documented rw tumor response assessment, 3 (37.5%) had partial response (PR), 3 (37.5%) had stable disease (SD), & 2 (25.0%) had progressive disease as their rw best response. The rwORR (PR or complete response [CR]) & rwDCR (PR, CR, or SD) were 37.5% and 75.0%, respectively. Among responding pts, median time to first response was 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.3 - not reached [NR]) & median duration of response was 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.5 - NR). Patient numbers were too small (n = 15) and duration of follow-up was too short (3.4 months [IQR, 0.7 - 5.4]) to make robust estimation of overall survival or rw progression free survival. Conclusions: Data from this small patient cohort in US community practice are not conclusive and should be considered exploratory, but do show high rates of rw objective response and rw disease control rates during 2L R+D following 1L Pt + ICI. Data with larger sample sizes and additional follow-up are needed to better understand outcomes of R+D following the addition of ICI to 1L Pt chemotherapy regimens.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Two-year clinical update.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Therapy Option ◽  
Grade 3

4040 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188 . [Table: see text]

First-line treatment of iNHL or MCL patients with BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP: Results of the BRIGHT 5-year follow-up study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7500-7500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Richard van der Jagt ◽  
Julie E. Chang ◽  
Peter Wood ◽  
Tim E. Hawkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve

7500 Background: BRIGHT, a phase 3, open-label, noninferiority study comparing efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) vs rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) or rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) in treatment-naive patients (pts) with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), showed that the complete response rate for first-line BR was statistically noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP ( Blood 2014). Pts were monitored for ≥5 years (yr) to assess the overall effect of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP in a controlled clinical setting. This analysis reports the time-to-event variables of the 5-yr follow-up (FU) study. Methods: Pts with iNHL or MCL randomized to 6-8 cycles of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP underwent complete assessments at end of treatment, then were monitored regularly. Progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS) were compared using a stratified log-rank test. Results: Of 447 randomized pts, 224 received BR, 104 R-CHOP, and 119 R-CVP; 419 entered the FU. The median FU time was 65.0 and 64.1 months for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively. The 5-yr PFS rate was 65.5% (95% CI 58.5-71.6) and 55.8% (48.4-62.5), and OS was 81.7% (75.7-86.3) and 85% (79.3-89.3) for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for PFS was 0.61 (0.45-0.85; P= .0025), EFS 0.63 (0.46-0.84; P= .0020), DOR 0.66 (0.47-0.92; P= .0134), and OS 1.15 (0.72-1.84; P= .5461) comparing BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP. Similar results were found in iNHL [PFS 0.70 (0.49-1.01; P= .0582)] and MCL [PFS 0.40 (0.21-0.75; P= .0035)], with the strongest effect in MCL. Use of R maintenance was similar, 43% in BR and 45% in R-CHOP/R-CVP. B was included as second-line in 27 (36%) of the 75 pts requiring therapy who originally received R-CHOP/R-CVP. Comparable safety profiles with expected adverse events were observed in the FU study in BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP. Conclusions: The long-term FU of the BRIGHT study has confirmed that PFS, EFS, and DOR were significantly better for BR, and OS was not statistically different between BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP. The safety profile was as previously reported. Clinical trial information: NCT00877006.

NivoCUP: An open-label phase II study on the efficacy of nivolumab in cancer of unknown primary.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 106-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junko Tanizaki ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Kohei Akiyoshi ◽  
Hironobu Minami ◽  
Hiroki Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pathological Examination ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previously Treated

106 Background: CUP has a poor prognosis with a median survival of less than 12 months. Given the recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors in several cancer types, we performed a multicenter phase II study of nivolumab in CUP patients (pts). Methods: The main population of this study is CUP pts who were previously treated with more than one line of systemic chemotherapy. Previously untreated CUP pts were also enrolled for exploratory analysis. Pathological examination (including IHC), CT, FDG-PET, gastroscopy and colonoscopy and medical examination were mandatory for diagnosis of CUP before enrollment. CUP pts belonging to favorable prognosis groups were excluded from the trial. Nivolumab (240 mg/body) was delivered as an intravenous infusion every 2 weeks for up to 52 cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee in previously treated pts. The secondary objectives include investigator-assessed ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety and the association between the efficacy of nivolumab and PD-L1 expression. Results: A total of 56 CUP pts, 45 previously treated and 11 previously untreated pts, were enrolled in this trial. The median age was 65.5 years, 22 pts were male. Median follow-up was 8.05 mo (range, 0.1 to 20.7 mo). Of 45 previously treated pts, 2 and 9 had an investigator-assessed complete response and partial response (ORR 24.4%, 95% CI: 12.9-39.5%), with a median PFS (mPFS) and OS (mOS) of 5.4 mo (95% CI: 2.6-6.9) and 15.1 mo (95% CI: 8.3-NR), respectively. Among 11 previously untreated pts, 1 pt had partial response (ORR 9.1%, 95% CI: 0.2-41.3%). The mPFS was 3.9 mo and the mOS was not reached in untreated pts (95% CI: 1.1-5.6, and 95% CI: 2.6-NR, respectively). Nivolumab demonstrated a mPFS of 5.1mo (95% CI: 2.7-5.6) and a mOS of 15.9 mo (95% CI: 8.4-NR) in an overall population. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 57% of overall pts with 5% of grade 3 or higher, and the most common were rash (27%), hypothyroidism (16%), and diarrhea/colitis (16%). No treatment related death was observed. Conclusions: In pts with previously treated and untreated CUP, nivolumab demonstrated durable antitumor activity with a manageable safety. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030649.

Subcutaneous daratumumab in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously treated with intravenous daratumumab: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study (LYNX).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8553-TPS8553
Author(s):  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Susan Wroblewski ◽  
Ming Qi ◽  
Thomas Renaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response

TPS8553 Background: The intravenous (IV) formulation of daratumumab (DARA), a human CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody, is approved in many countries for use as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and in combination with standard-of-care regimens in RRMM or newly diagnosed MM. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation of DARA is under investigation in several ongoing studies. In the phase 3 COLUMBA study, DARA SC was shown to be non-inferior to DARA IV, demonstrating similar efficacy and pharmacokinetics, with a significantly decreased rate of infusion-related reactions and reduced administration time. The phase 2 LYNX (MMY2065) study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of retreatment with DARA. Methods: In this ongoing, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study, ~230 patients (pts) with prior exposure to DARA will be randomized 1:1 to receive carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) ± DARA. Pts must have received 1 to 2 prior lines of therapy (at least one of which included DARA IV), with DARA-based therapy completed ≥3 months prior to randomization. Eligible pts have achieved a partial response or better (IMWG criteria) to DARA-based therapy, with a duration of response of ≥4 months. Pts must not have discontinued DARA due to a related adverse event or received prior treatment with carfilzomib. Pts will receive 20 mg/m2 carfilzomib IV on Day 1 of Cycle 1, escalated to 70 mg/m2 on Days 8 and 15; carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 will be administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle thereafter. Dexamethasone 40 mg will be administered (IV or PO) QW for Cycles 1-9 and then on Days 1, 8 and 15 from Cycle 10 onwards. Pts in the D-Kd group will also receive DARA SC (1,800 mg co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; Halozyme]) QW in Cycles 1-2, Q2W in Cycles 3-6, and Q4W thereafter. The primary endpoint is the rate of pts achieving a very good partial response or better. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate, rate of pts achieving complete response or better, progression-free survival, overall survival, overall minimal residual disease-negativity rate, time to next treatment, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03871829 .

Efficacy of avelumab + axitinib (A + Ax) versus sunitinib (S) by IMDC risk group in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Extended follow-up results from JAVELIN Renal 101.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4574-4574
Author(s):  
John B. A. G. Haanen ◽  
James Larkin ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Laurence Albiges ◽  
Brian I. Rini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Group ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Group A ◽  
To Receive

4574 Background: In the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 trial (NCT02684006), treatment-naive patients with aRCC receiving A + Ax showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) across International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups (favorable [F], intermediate [I], and poor [P]) compared with patients receiving S. Here we report updated efficacy results for A + Ax vs S by IMDC risk groups from the third interim analysis. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either A (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) plus Ax (5 mg orally twice daily) or S (50 mg orally once daily) for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). Patients were categorized per IMDC risk group into F, I, and P subgroups, and outcomes were assessed for F, I, P, and I + P. Overall survival (OS) and PFS, ORR, complete response (CR), and duration of response (DoR) per investigator assessment (RECIST v1.1) were assessed. Results: The study enrolled 886 patients with aRCC. At data cutoff (Apr 2020), median (95% CI) follow-up for OS in the A + Ax was NR (42.2-NE) vs 37.8 (31.4-NE) months with S. The Table shows OS, PFS, ORR, CR, and DOR by IMDC risk group. A + Ax generally showed improved efficacy compared with S across IMDC groups. Conclusions: Consistent with previously reported results from prior interim analyses, extended follow-up confirms the efficacy benefits of A + Ax vs S across IMDC risk groups in patients with aRCC. Patients continue to be followed up for the final OS analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT02684006. [Table: see text]

Safety and activity of nivolumab monotherapy in advanced and metastatic (A/M) gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEC): Results from the CheckMate-032 study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dung T. Le ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Emiliano Calvo ◽  
Joseph W. Kim ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Response

6 Background: Patients (pts) with GC/GEC often present with A/M disease, which has a poor prognosis, with 1-year survival < 30%, and few treatment options. Nivolumab is a fully human anti-PD-1 IgG4 monoclonal antibody with a favorable safety profile and efficacy in melanoma, non–small-cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. The phase I/II, open-label CheckMate-032 study evaluated nivolumab ± ipilimumab in pts with solid tumors. Here, we report initial results for pts with GEC/GC receiving nivolumab monotherapy. Methods: Pts with A/M histologically confirmed GC/GEC, irrespective of PD-L1 status, were assigned to receive nivolumab alone (3 mg/kg IV Q2W) and treated until disease progression (PD) or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); other endpoints included safety, progression-free survival, overall survival (OS), and biomarker status. Results: 59 pts were enrolled and treated with single-agent nivolumab. Median age was 60 y (range 29–80), and 83% of pts received ≥ 2 prior regimens. At database lock, 10 pts were on active treatment; 49 pts discontinued (PD, n = 40; unrelated adverse events, n = 4; treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs], n = 2; other, n = 3). Pts received a median of 4 doses (range 1–25). ORR was 12% (n = 7/58; 1 complete response, 6 partial responses); 12 pts (21%) had stable disease. Among responders, median duration of response was 7.1 mo (95% CI, 3.0–13.2). Median OS was 6.8 mo (95% CI, 3.3–12.4); 12-mo OS rate was 38% (95% CI, 23.2–52.7). 39% of tumor samples were PD-L1 positive ( ≥ 1% cutoff). ORRs in pts with PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors were 18% and 12%, respectively. TRAEs occurred in 66% of pts; most were Grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 14% of pts and included pneumonitis, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, hypothyroidism, and increased aspartate and alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase levels. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Nivolumab monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pts with GC/GEC. Objective responses occurred in pts with PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT01928394.

First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Updated results for KEYNOTE-427 cohort A.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4570-4570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott S. Tykodi ◽  
Frede Donskov ◽  
Jae-Lyun Lee ◽  
Cezary Szczylik ◽  
Jahangeer Malik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clear Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy

4570 Background: KEYNOTE-427 (NCT02853344) is an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study to evaluate efficacy and safety of first-line single-agent pembro, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in patients (pts) with ccRCC (cohort A) and non–clear cell RCC (cohort B). Updated follow up from cohort A are presented. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed ccRCC, measurable per RECIST v1.1, and no prior systemic therapy were eligible. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for 2 y or until confirmed progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or pt decision to withdraw. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST v1.1 blinded independent central review). Additional end points included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 110 pts enrolled; median (range) follow-up was 18.0 (2.5-22.7) mo. Median age (range) was 64 (29-87); 38.2%, 47.3%, and 14.5% had favorable, intermediate, and poor IMDC risk, respectively; 47.3% were PD-L1 positive. Confirmed ORR was 36.4% with 3 (2.7%) CRs and 37 (33.6%) PRs. Median DOR was not reached. Median PFS was 7.1 mo (95% CI, 5.6-11.0) and median OS was not reached. Results by IMDC category are outlined in the table. By PD-L1 status, confirmed ORR was 44.2% and 29.3% for positive and negative, respectively. By sarcomatoid differentiation (n=11), confirmed ORR was 63.6%. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 80.9%, with pruritus (28.2%) and fatigue (28.2%) most commonly reported. One pt died of treatment-related pneumonitis. Conclusions: With a median 18-months’ follow up, first-line pembro monotherapy continued to show antitumor activity in pts with ccRCC. Meaningful responses were observed in pts with intermediate/poor IMDC risk, PD-L1 positive and sarcomatoid differentiated tumors. Safety profile was comparable to previously reported. Clinical trial information: NCT02853344. [Table: see text]

A phase Ib study of abemaciclib in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) (NCT02779751): Interim results.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Peter Kabos ◽  
Joseph Thaddeus Beck ◽  
Michael Jon Chisamore ◽  
Anwar Hossain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Metastatic Setting

1051 Background: Abemaciclib is an orally administered, selective small molecule cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and 6 inhibitor, approved to treat HR+, HER2- MBC patients (pts) on a continuous twice daily dosing schedule as monotherapy or in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine based therapy or in combination with fulvestrant. Abemaciclib monotherapy increased tumor immunogenicity and synergized with anti-PD-1 to boost antitumor efficacy in murine models. Here we report safety and antitumor activity of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab in HR+, HER2- MBC pts. Methods: This multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label, multi-cohort phase Ib study of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab enrolled a cohort of endocrine resistant HR+, HER2- MBC pts who had received 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC. No prior CDK4/6 inhibitor was allowed. Patients received 150mg abemaciclib orally every 12 hours plus pembrolizumab 200mg IV on day 1 every 21 days. Primary objective was to characterize safety of the abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab combination. Secondary objectives included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Of 28 pts enrolled, 15 (54%) received 1 line and 10 (36%) 2 lines of prior systemic chemotherapy in the locally advanced/metastatic setting. Safety of the combination was generally consistent with known side effects of abemaciclib and pembrolizumab and was generally manageable. Grade 3/4 adverse events in >2 pts included neutropenia (8 pts/29%), AST increase (5 pts/18%), diarrhea, and ALT increase (3 pts/11% each). Eight pts had confirmed partial response (29% ORR), and disease control rate (complete response [CR]+partial response [PR]+stable disease [SD]) was 82%. Clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD persisting for ≥6 months) was 46%. Median PFS and OS were 8.9 months (95% CI 3.9, 11.1) and 26.3 months (95% CI 20.0, 31.0), respectively. Conclusions: Combination of abemaciclib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a generally tolerable safety profile with numerically higher rate of transaminase elevations than reported for the individual treatments. Compared to historical data for abemaciclib monotherapy in a similar pt population, a numerically higher but not obviously different ORR, PFS, and OS was observed. Clinical trial information: NCT02779751 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document