Cabozantinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and safety data from an international multicenter real-world cohort.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16668-e16668
Author(s):  
Fabian Finkelmeier ◽  
Bernhard Scheiner ◽  
Catherine Leyh ◽  
Jan Best ◽  
Thorben Wilhelm Fründt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Real World ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Advanced Liver Disease ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
International Multicenter

e16668 Background: The multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib has been approved by the European Medicines Agency in November 2018 for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) prior treated with sorafenib. We report, to our knowledge, for the first time safety and efficacy data of an international, multicenter, real-world cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with cabozantinib. Methods: Patients with HCC who were treated with cabozantinib were retrospectively identified across 10 centers in Austria and Germany. Patients´ characteristics, side effects, duration of treatment and survival data were analyzed until January 17, 2020. Results: 74 patients were identified of whom 65 patients were male (88%) and 9 were female (12%). The median age at the start of cabozantinib treatment was 66 years. The most common underlying liver diseases included hepatitis C in 15 (20%), hepatitis B in 6 (8%), alcohol in 17 (23%) and NAFLD/NASH in 20 (27%) patients, respectively. 64 patients (86%) had BCLC stage C and 43 patients (58%) were Child Pugh A. Cabozantinib was used as systemic second- and third-line treatment in 37 (50%), and 25 (34%) patients, respectively. In the remaining patients cabozantinib was used in further lines. The median starting dose was 40 mg (20-60 mg). In 26 patients (35%) a dose reduction due to side effects was performed. Following best responses under cabozantinib were documented: partial response in 4 (5%), stable disease in 22 (30%), and progressive disease in 24 (32%) patients, respectively. 24 patients (32%) had not yet been evaluable. The median duration of cabozantinib treatment was 4.4 months. 35 patients (47%) had died at day of data analysis. The median overall survival from start of cabozantinib treatment was 7.7 months. Most common adverse events were fatigue and diarrhea. Conclusions: Cabozantinib treatment was effective, safe and feasible in patients with advanced HCC. Patients in the real life setting had more advanced liver disease – only 58% of patients were Child A. Duration of treatment was similar to the phase 3 trial (CELESTIAL). However, overall survival was shorter, probably due to more advanced liver disease.

scholarly journals Cabozantinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Efficacy and Safety Data from an International Multicenter Real-Life Cohort

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Fabian Finkelmeier ◽  
Bernhard Scheiner ◽  
Catherine Leyh ◽  
Jan Best ◽  
Thorben Wilhelm Fründt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Hepatitis C Infection ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Multikinase Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
International Multicenter

<b><i>Background and Aims:</i></b> The multikinase inhibitor cabozantinib has been approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. We report safety and efficacy data of an international, multicenter, real-life cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with cabozantinib. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Patients with HCC who were treated with cabozantinib were retrospectively identified across 11 centers in Austria, Switzerland, and Germany. Patients’ characteristics, adverse events, duration of treatment and overall survival (OS) data were analyzed until April 1, 2020. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Eighty-eight patients from 11 centers were included. The predominant underlying liver diseases were NAFLD/NASH in 26 (30%) and hepatitis C infection in 21 (24%) patients. Seventy-eight patients (89%) were classified as Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage C. Sixty patients (68%) were Child-Pugh A, whereas 22 (25%) were Child-Pugh B, respectively. Cabozantinib was used as systemic second- and third-line or later treatment in 41 (47%) and 46 (52%) patients, respectively. The following best responses under cabozantinib were documented: partial response in 6 (7%), stable disease in 28 (32%), and progressive disease in 28 (32%) patients, respectively. Fifty-two patients (59%) died during follow-up. The median OS from start of cabozantinib treatment was 7.0 months in the entire cohort and 9.7 months in Child-Pugh A patients, while Child-Pugh B patients had a median OS of 3.4 months, respectively. Thirty-seven (42%) patients fulfilled the CELESTIAL inclusion and exclusion criteria, showing a median OS of 11.1 months. Most common adverse events were fatigue (15.6%) and diarrhea (15.6%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Cabozantinib treatment was effective, safe, and feasible in patients with advanced HCC in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Patients in the real-life setting had more advanced liver disease – in which 25% of patients were Child-Pugh B. However, OS in patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis was similar to that reported in the phase 3 trial (CELESTIAL).

Assessment of radioembolization among patients who met the inclusion criteria for Sorafenib Hepatocellular Carcinoma Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14654-e14654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Sangro ◽  
Livio Carpanese ◽  
Roberto Cianni ◽  
Daniele Gasparini ◽  
Rita Golfieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Good Liver Function

e14654 Background: SHARP was pivotal in determining the safety and efficacy of sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with predominately good liver function. In practice, many patients with advanced HCC receive radioembolization (RE). Investigators from the European Network on RE with yttrium-90 resin microspheres (ENRY) group conducted an analysis of safety and survival among consecutive patients who met the SHARP inclusion criteria. Methods: 58% of patients (189 of 325) who had received RE between 09/2003 and 12/2009 were considered SHARP-equivalents. Of these, 11.6% received sorafenib 4.7 months (median) after RE for a median duration of 2.8 months. Safety and tolerability analyses were conducted up to day 90 post RE; changes from baseline were recorded and transitions in CTCAE grades >3 tested. Statistical analyses used SAS (SAS, Cary NC) version 9.2 XP Pro. Results: Like the SHARP sorafenib cohort, most patients had advanced HCC (BCLC stage C: 72.5%), good liver function (Child–Pugh class A: 100%) and ECOG performance status (0–1: 90.5%). Macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread (EHD) or both was present in 33.9%. 20.1% had received prior surgical procedures, 8.5% prior ablative procedures and 33.3% prior vascular [chemo]embolization. RE was predominantly a single whole-liver procedure (median activity 1.7 GBq). Median overall survival was 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.8–12.8) in the SHARP-equivalent cohort, 10.2 months (8.3–11.8) in patients with MVI/EHD, 9.7 months (7.6–10.9) in advanced HCC (BCLC stage C) and 16.6 months (11.2–22.8) in intermediate HCC (BCLC stage B). Treatment-related adverse events (all grades; grade >3) were: fatigue (50.3%; 2.1%), abdominal pain (25.9%; 2.1%), nausea/vomiting (31.2%; 0.5%) and GI ulcer (3.2%; 1.0%). At baseline, raised bilirubin (all grades) was present in 20.3%, increasing to 49.4% of patients evaluated up to day 90. Bilirubin grade was unchanged in 58.1% and increased in 37.8%; 4.0% had ≥grade 3 events. Conclusions: In patients matching the inclusion criteria for SHARP, RE was well tolerated with a median overall survival which compares favorably with sorafenib.

Role and strategies of radiofrequency ablation in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14701-e14701
Author(s):  
Min Hua Chen ◽  
Wei Yang ◽  
Jie Wu ◽  
Wei Wu ◽  
Kun Yan
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Percutaneous Ablation ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Tnm System ◽  
Liver Protection

e14701 Background: To investigate the application value and strategies of ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which is common in china. Methods: A total of 655 patients with unresectablely advanced HCC underwent percuatenous RFA therapy and 92 patients with 136 tumors among them were enrolled into the study. According to the 6th UICC/AJCC-TNM system, 82 and 10 patients were in stage III and IV, respectively. The tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 8.0 cm (mean±SD, 4.5±1.6 cm). 59 patients had solitary tumor and the remaining 33 patients had multiple tumors. The Child-Pugh classification of A, B and C were 58,32 and 2 patients, respectively. Established strategies included: (1) select RFA indications based on the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) results; (2) design radical protocols based on invasive range showed by CEUS; (3) multiple overlapping ablations based on mathematical protocol; (4) two or three bipolar RFA electrodes with three dimensional localization; (5) color US guided percutaneous ablation of tumor feeding artery (including TACE) + RFA for HCC with rich supply. The patients underwent follow-up using enhanced CT at one month, and then every three months after RFA. The ablation was considered a success if no abnormal enhancement or wash-out was detected in the treated area on the CT scan at one month. All patients after RFA received liver protection treatments. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: Early complete tumor necrosis rate after initial RFA was 90.4% (123/136 tumors). Serious complications were developed in two patients (2.2%) and no treatment-related death occurred. 3~129 months were followed up. Local recurrence rate was 15.4 %(21/136 tumors). The 1-, 3-, 5-year overall survival rates were 83.3 %, 48.3 %, 21.9%, respectively, and the median survival time was 35 months. Conclusions: RFA treatment of advanced HCC proved to be feasible. Paying attention to apply treatment strategies and liver protection therapies in RFA can effectively improve the survival.

A population-based analysis of prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 163-163
Author(s):  
Alan D. Smith ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Factors ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Sorafenib Treatment ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Staging Systems

163 Background: Available clinical prognostic scoring systems for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were developed in the era of conventional chemotherapy. In 2008, the molecularly targeted agent sorafenib became the new standard of care for advanced HCC due to its survival benefit. The utility of these prognostic models in the setting of sorafenib is unclear. Our aims were to assess for new prognostic factors in patients treated with sorafenib and compare these with known prognostic systems. Methods: All patients diagnosed with advanced HCC from 2008 to 2010 in British Columbia, Canada and treated with sorafenib at any 1 of 5 regional cancer centers were eligible. Based on the established Okuda, CLIP, Barcelona, and French staging systems, we collected baseline demographic and disease characteristics of patients prior to receipt of sorafenib. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to examine for associations between these clinical factors and overall survival. Results: Of 183 patients identified, 152 were evaluable: median age was 63 years, 78% were men, average number of sorafenib treatment was 5.3 cycles, and median overall survival was 9.6 months. The prevalence of hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and alcohol-related liver disease were 32%, 15%, and 11%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that poor performance status, presence of clinical ascites, as well as elevated serum AST, GGT, ALP, bilirubin and platelet levels were each associated with worse overall survival (all p<0.05). In multivariate analyses, however, none of these clinical factors continued to be independently predictive of outcome (all p>0.05). Conclusions: Traditional clinical prognostic factors developed in the era of conventional chemotherapy do not appear to have the same prognostic utility in this contemporary Western cohort of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib. This observation underscores the need to identify molecular biomarkers that provide better prognostic information.

Systemic targeted and immunotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Cersosimo
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy

Abstract Purpose The activity of targeted agents and immunotherapy in the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is reviewed. Summary The first drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for advanced HCC, sorafenib, was approved in 2007. Regorafenib, the second drug, was approved 10 years later. Six additional drugs have been approved since. Targeted agents and checkpoint inhibitors are the only agents approved for systemic therapy of advanced HCC. Sorafenib and lenvatinib are approved as first-line agents, with regorafenib, cabozantinib, ramucirumab, nivolumab (used alone or with ipilimumab), and pembrolizumab approved for patients who have received prior sorafenib therapy. Most patients in phase 3 studies had Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis, and data on the use of these agents in patients with more advanced hepatic dysfunction are limited. All of the targeted agents improve survival in patients with advanced disease. Median overall survival durations of up to 12.3 and 13.6 months were reported with use of sorafenib and lenvatinib, respectively, in phase 3 trials. Overall survival durations of 10.6, 10.2, and 9.2 months have been achieved with use of regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab as second-line therapy after sorafenib. A median overall survival of 13.2 months was reported in 1 cohort of a dose-expansion study of nivolumab in which all patients received prior sorafenib therapy. Median survival durations of 12.9 months and 13.9 months were reported with use of pembrolizumab in patients with a history of sorafenib therapy. The most common adverse effects associated with targeted agents are dermatological effects, diarrhea, fatigue, and hypertension. Immune-mediated adverse effects are associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusion Targeted agents and checkpoint inhibitors are the standard of therapy for patients who need systemic therapy for advanced HCC.

The use of cabozantinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Hong Kong multi-center experience.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 316-316
Author(s):  
Yawen Dong ◽  
Thomas Wai-Tong Leung ◽  
Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Hcc

316 Background: In the phase III CELESTIAL trial, cabozantinib showed significant improvement in overall survival with good tolerability in advanced HCC population. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy, survival and tolerability of cabozatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in a real life setting. Methods: Between February 2018 and October 2019, consecutive advanced HCC patients who received cabozatinib alone or in combination at University of Hong Kong Health System hospitals were analysed. Cabozantinib was administered at 60 mg continuously daily. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and tolerability were evaluated. Results: Overall, 22 patients were included. The median age was 57.1 years (range 48.5-58.6). All patients except one were hepatitis B carriers. More than 80% of the patients had underlying Child-Pugh A cirrhosis. Most patients had metastatic disease (95.5%). More than 70% of patients received cabozantinib beyond second-line, and most of the patients had prior exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and/or immunotherapy. The median time from the start of first-line systemic treatment to the start of cabozantinib was 11.2 months. Cabozantinib was administered to 11 patients (50%) as single agent, while the other half received cabozantinib in combination with mostly immune checkpoint inhibitors. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. The table below shows the ORR. The overall median TTP and OS were 4.2 and 8.90 months, respectively. Interestingly, among those who received single agent cabozantinib, the median OS was 5.36 months in contrast to 12.32 months in the patients received combination. Overall, 90.9% of patients experienced treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) with transient liver function occurred in nearly 50% patients. Nevertheless, Grade 3/4 TRAEs was only 12%. Conclusions: Our present study showed that the use of cabozatinib in advanced HCC patients had good anti-tumour activity and survival benefits with acceptable toxicity profile. [Table: see text]

Prognostic factors of survival in 236 advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients enrolled in prospective clinical trials of systemic therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15632-e15632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Lin ◽  
D. Chang ◽  
Y. Shao ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
C. Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Staging Systems

e15632 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignant disease. Promising results of prospective clinical trials using systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC are emerging. The aim of this study was to explore prognostic factors of survival in advanced HCC patients eligible for clinical trials of systemic therapy. Methods: From December 1990 to July 2005, 236 patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled into 6 phase II trials of systemic therapy using the following regimens: (1) oral etoposide + tamoxifen, (2)doxorubicin + tamoxifen, (3)IFN-α2b + doxorubicin + tamoxifen, (4)pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, (5)thalidomide, and (6)arsenic trioxide. Univariate and multivariate analyses of 23 relevant clinical characteristics/staging systems were used to identify prognostic factors of survival. Results: Baseline characteristics: median age 55; male/female: 192/44; HBsAg(+) 71%; anti-HCV(+) 30%; Okuda stage I/II/III: 42%/55%/3%; AJCC stage III/IV: 30%/61%; BCLC stage B/C/D: 1%/94%/5%; CLIP score 0–3/4–6: 70%/30%; portal vein thrombosis 53%; extrahepatic metastasis 59%; prior chemoembolization 46%. The objective response rate according to WHO criteria was 11.4%. The median overall survival was 118 days (95% CI, 103–133). In the multivariate analysis, significant predictors of a shorter overall survival were: HBsAg(+) with a hazard ratio (HR) = 1.808 (95% CI, 1.121–2.916; P= 0.015), symptomatic with HR = 1.745 (95% CI, 1.072–2.840; P= 0.025), ECOG≥2 with HR = 1.763 (95% CI, 1.040–2.988; P= 0.035), and high BCLC stage with HR = 3.282 (95% CI, 1.129–9.541; P= 0.029). Conclusions: Patients with advanced HCC who are eligible for systemic therapeutic trials have patient- and disease-related prognostic factors. Positive HBsAg, symptomatic, ECOG performance≥2, and high BCLC stage predict a shorter overall survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Real-world experience with Lenvatinib in the management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A single-center Indian experience.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16596-e16596
Author(s):  
Amit Rauthan ◽  
S.P. Somashekhar ◽  
Poonam Patil ◽  
Shabber Zaveri
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Single Center ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
First Line Treatment

e16596 Background: Sorafenib has been the standard first line treatment for more than a decade in advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Lenvatinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor which inhibits VEGF receptors 1-3, FGF receptors 1-4, PDGF receptor alpha, RET and KIT, and has activity in multiple cancers. In the recent phase III REFLECT trial, Lenvatinib was non-inferior to Sorafenib in the first line management of advanced HCC. It showed better response rates, improved progression free survival (PFS) with similar overall survival (OS). There is no data of Lenvatinib in Indian patients. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective study, which included patients with metastatic or unresectable HCC who received treatment with Lenvatinib at our center. The endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS and toxicity. Results: 31 patients received Lenvatinib from Dec 2017 to Oct 2019. Patients greater than 60kg received 12mg/day and those less than 60kg received 8mg/day. There were 5 females and 26 males. Median age was 60 years (29-78 years). All patients were BCLC stage C. Child Pugh score was A in 20 patients, B in 9 patients and C in 2 patients. AFP was elevated in 25 (80.6%) patients. 26 patients received Lenvatinib as initial therapy, 3 received it after Sorafenib progression, and 2 received after Sorafenib and Nivolumab progression. 6 patients (19.35%) achieved partial response (PR), 12 (38.7%) had stable disease and 13 (41.9%) had progressive disease by recist criteria. ORR was 19.35% and disease control rate was 58%. 2 patients underwent TACE after achieving PR. The median PFS was 7 months. The common adverse events were hypertension, weight loss, palmar plantar rashes, dysphonia and fatigue. Grade 3 AEs occurred in 8 patients (25.8%). 10 patients (32.2%) required dose reduction due to side effects. Conclusions: Lenvatinib has demonstrated a high response rate and disease control rate in our patients. Achieving a PFS of 7 months is an improvement over our previous Sorafenib experience. Further followup will demonstrate the overall survival. It is well tolerated and most side effects can be managed with patient education. The major advantage has been that in contrast to Sorafenib, only 32.2% patients required dose reduction due to side effects. These results are practice changing and Lenvatinib has become our first line regimen in advanced HCC. Lenvatinib would provide a good backbone to combine immunotherapy as first line treatment in future.

scholarly journals Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen-Immunoglobulin M complex levels predict survival in patients with cirrhosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Cagnin ◽  
Alessandra Biasiolo ◽  
Andrea Martini ◽  
Mariagrazia Ruvoletto ◽  
Santina Quarta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Immunoglobulin M ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen ◽  
Advanced Liver Disease

AbstractComplications of chronic liver diseases – particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) – are a major cause of mortality worldwide. Several studies have shown that high or increasing levels of serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen-Immunoglobulin M complex (SCCA-IgM) are associated with development of HCC in patients with advanced liver disease and worse survival in patients with liver cancer. The aim of the present study was to assess, in patients with advanced liver disease, differences in long-term clinical outcomes in relation to baseline levels of serum SCCA-IgM. Ninety one consecutive outpatients with liver cirrhosis of different etiologies, without hepatocellular carcinoma at presentation, were enrolled from April 2007 to October 2012 in a prospective study. For a median time of 127 months, patients were bi-annually re-evaluated. SCCA-IgM complex levels were determined with a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The results provided evidence that serum SCCA-IgM is a predictor of overall survival. The best cut-off to discriminate both HCC-free and overall survival rates was 120 AU/mL. Patients with baseline values higher than this threshold showed a substantial increase in both HCC incidence rate and all-cause mortality rate. In conclusion, a single measurement of serum SCCA-IgM helps to identify those patients with liver cirrhosis with increased risks of HCC development and mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document