Differential impact of inpatient and outpatient palliative care on end-of-life outcomes in hospitalized patients with cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24069-e24069
Author(s):  
Arielle R. Urman ◽  
Mary K. Buss ◽  
Robert J. Besaw ◽  
Kathleen A. Lee ◽  
Jonathan C. Yeh
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Oncology Unit

e24069 Background: Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with advanced cancer, and current ASCO guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, recent data show that PC teams at many cancer centers see more inpatient consults than outpatient visits; the comparative impact of inpatient versus outpatient PC is not well-described. For this reason, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized cancer patients to quantify exposure to inpatient/outpatient PC, and to describe associations between PC exposure and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures including hospice utilization, advance care planning (ACP), and intensity of care. Methods: We identified all patients admitted to one cancer center’s inpatient oncology unit during a fiscal year (10/1/2017 - 9/30/2018). Demographics, admission statistics, inpatient/outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Deceased patients were identified through chart review and public obituaries. Results were summarized by descriptive statistics, and standard statistical tests were used to evaluate associations between PC exposure and EOL outcomes. Results: 842 patients were hospitalized in one year. 522 patients died by the study end-date of 10/1/2020 and were included in analysis. 50% of deceased patients had any PC exposure prior to death, but only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Patients seen by PC were younger at time of death (median: 67 vs 72 years; p < .001) and more likely to be female (52% vs 42%; p = .03). Compared to patients never seen by PC, patients with any PC exposure were significantly more likely to enroll in hospice (78% vs 44%; p < .0001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% vs 55%; p < .0001), have scanned ACP documents (53% vs 31%; p < .0001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in the hospital (67% vs 40%; p < .01). PC exposure was not associated with differences in 30-day re-admissions, systemic cancer therapy in the last 14 days of life, or intensive care (ICU) utilization in the last 30 days of life. Notably, PC exposure was associated with longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (8.4 vs 7.0 days), but this association was reversed for patients seen by outpatient PC versus all others (6.3 vs 8.3 days; p < .01). Patients seen by outpatient PC also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 vs 27.1 days; p < .01) and less EOL ICU use (6% vs 15%; p < .05) compared to all others. Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of hospitalized cancer patients, PC exposure was associated with significant improvements in multiple EOL quality measures. The subset of patients seen by outpatient PC experienced additional benefits, including shorter hospital LOS, longer hospice LOS, and less EOL ICU utilization. These findings point to differential effects between inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of early, longitudinal PC involvement.

Differential impact of inpatient and outpatient palliative care on end-of-life outcomes in hospitalized patients with cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Arielle R. Urman ◽  
Mary K. Buss ◽  
Robert J. Besaw ◽  
Laura E. Dodge ◽  
Kathleen A. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Quality Measures ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Patients With Cancer

24 Background: Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes for patients with advanced cancer, and current ASCO guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, recent data show that PC teams at many cancer centers see more inpatient consults than outpatient visits; the comparative impact of inpatient versus outpatient PC is not well-described. For this reason, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized cancer patients to quantify exposure to inpatient/outpatient PC, and to describe associations between PC exposure and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures including hospice utilization, advance care planning (ACP), and intensity of care. Methods: We identified all patients admitted to one cancer center’s inpatient oncology unit during one fiscal year (10/1/2017-9/30/2018). Demographics, admission statistics, inpatient/outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Decedents were identified through chart review and public obituaries. Results were summarized by descriptive statistics, and standard statistical tests were used to evaluate associations between PC exposure and EOL outcomes. Results: 842 patients were hospitalized in one year. 522 patients died by the study end-date of 10/1/2020 and were included in analysis. 50% of decedents had any PC exposure prior to death, but only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Patients seen by PC were younger at time of death, (median: 67 vs 72 years; p <.001) and more likely to be female (52% vs 42%; p =.03). Compared to patients never seen by PC, patients with any PC exposure were significantly more likely to enroll in hospice (78% vs 44%; p <.0001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% vs 55%; p <.0001), have scanned ACP documents (53% vs 31%; p <.0001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in the hospital (67% vs 40%; p <.01). PC exposure was not associated with differences in 30-day re-admissions, systemic cancer therapy in the last 14 days of life, or intensive care (ICU) utilization in the last 30 days of life. Notably, PC exposure was associated with longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (8.4 vs 7.2 days), but this association was reversed for patients seen by outpatient PC versus all others (6.3 vs 8.2 days; p <.01). Patients seen by outpatient PC also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 vs 27.1 days; p <.01) and less EOL ICU use (6% vs 15%; p <.05) compared to all others. Conclusions: In this large retrospective study of hospitalized patients with cancer, PC exposure was associated with significant improvements in multiple EOL quality measures. The subset of patients seen by outpatient PC experienced additional benefits, including shorter hospital LOS, longer hospice LOS, and less EOL ICU utilization. These findings point to differential effects between inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of early, longitudinal PC involvement.

Different Associations Between Inpatient or Outpatient Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan C. Yeh ◽  
Arielle R. Urman ◽  
Robert J. Besaw ◽  
Laura E. Dodge ◽  
Kathleen A. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Advance Care

PURPOSE Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes in advanced cancer, and guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, many PC teams see more inpatient than outpatient consults. We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with cancer to quantify exposure to inpatient and outpatient PC and describe associations between PC and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures. METHODS We identified all decedents admitted to an inpatient oncology unit in 1 year (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2018) and abstracted hospitalization statistics, inpatient and outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes. Descriptive statistics, univariate tests, and multivariate analysis evaluated associations between PC and patient outcomes. RESULTS In total, 522 decedents were identified. 50% saw PC; only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Decedents seen by PC were more likely to enroll in hospice (78% v 44%; P < .001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% v 55%; P < .001), have advance care planning documents (53% v 31%; P < .001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in hospital (67% v 40%; P < .01). Decedents seen by PC had longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS; 8.4 v 7.0 days; P = .03), but this association reversed for decedents seen by outpatient PC (6.3 v 8.3 days; P < .001), who also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 v 27.1 days; P < .01) and less EOL intensive care (6% v 15%; P < .05). CONCLUSION PC was associated with significantly more hospice utilization and advance care planning. Patients seen specifically by outpatient PC had shorter hospital LOS and longer hospice LOS. These findings suggest different effects of inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of robust outpatient PC.

scholarly journals Changes of End of Life Practices for Cancer Patients and Their Association with Hospice Palliative Care Referral over 2009-2014: A Single Institution Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Jung Jho ◽  
Eun Jung Nam ◽  
Il Won Shin ◽  
Sun Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Aggressive Cancer ◽  
Care Practices ◽  
Record Review ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
Hospice Palliative Care

Purpose In Korea, hospice palliative care (HPC) provision for cancer patients has increased recently. However, whether end of life (EoL) care practices have improved along with the development of HPC is unclear. We intended to investigate the changes in EoL care practices and their association with HPC referral. Materials and Methods Retrospective medical record review of adult cancer patients who died at National Cancer Center Korea from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2014 was performed. Changes of EoL practices including chemotherapy within 2 weeks from death, death in intensive care unit (ICU), documentation of “do not resuscitate (DNR)” within 7 days from death and referral to HPC from 2009 to 2014 were analyzed as well as the association between referral to HPC and other practices. Results A total of 2,377 cases were included in the analysis. Between 2009 and 2014, referral to HPC increased and DNR documentation within 7 days from death decreased significantly. Cases for chemotherapy within 2 weeks from death and death in ICU didn’t change over the study period. Patients referred to HPC were less likely to receive chemotherapy within 2 weeks from death, die in ICU and document DNR within 7 days from death. Conclusion During the study period, EoL practices among cancer patients partly changed toward less aggressive in our institution. HPC referral was associated with less aggressive cancer care at the EoL. Policies to promote EoL discussion are necessary to improve the EoL practices of cancer patients.

scholarly journals Disparities in access to palliative care facilities for patients with and without cancer: A retrospective review

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921632110073
Author(s):  
Christine Lau ◽  
Christopher Meaney ◽  
Matthew Morgan ◽  
Rose Cook ◽  
Camilla Zimmermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Low Performance ◽  
Electronic Referral

Background: To date, little is known about the characteristics of patients who are admitted to a palliative care bed for end-of-life care. Previous data suggest that there are disparities in access to palliative care services based on age, sex, diagnosis, and socioeconomic status, but it is unclear whether these differences impact access to a palliative care bed. Aim: To better identify patient factors associated with the likelihood/rate of admission to a palliative care bed. Design: A retrospective chart review of all initiated palliative care bed applications through an electronic referral program was conducted over a 24-month period. Setting/participants: Patients who apply and are admitted to a palliative care bed in a Canadian metropolitan city. Results: A total of 2743 patients made a total of 5202 bed applications to 9 hospice/palliative care units in 2015–2016. Referred and admitted cancer patients were younger, male, and more functional than compared to non-cancer patients (all p < 0.001). Referred and admitted patients without cancer were more advanced in their illness trajectory, with an anticipated prognosis <1 month and Palliative Performance Status of 10%–20% (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, a diagnosis of cancer and a prognosis of <3 months were associated with increased likelihood and/or rate of admission to a bed, whereas the presence of care needs, a longer prognosis and a PPS of 30%–40% were associated with decreased rates and/or likelihood of admission. Conclusion: Patients without cancer have reduced access to palliative care facilities at end-of-life compared to patients with cancer; at the time of their application and admission, they are “sicker” with very low performance status and poorer prognoses. Further studies investigating disease-specific clinical variables and support requirements may provide more insights into these observed disparities.

scholarly journals Shifting Palliative Care Paradigm in Primary Care From Better Death to Better End-of-Life : A Swiss Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sommer ◽  
Christopher Chung ◽  
Dagmar M. Haller ◽  
Sophie Pautex
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

Chemotherapy use at the end of life in Brazil.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24003-e24003
Author(s):  
Munir Murad Junior ◽  
Thiago Henrique Mascarenhas Nébias ◽  
Marcos Antonio da Cunha Santos ◽  
Mariangela Cherchiglia
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Study Population ◽  
One Year

e24003 Background: Chemotherapy in the last days of life is not associated with a survival benefit, and recent data suggest it may cause harm by decreasing quality of life and increasing costs. Both ESMO and ASCO have published position statements encouraging discussions about the appropriate cessation of chemotherapy. End-of-life chemotherapy rates vary worldwide but in summary, up to a fifth of cancer patients are treated with chemotherapy in the last month of life with no clear benefits. The aim of this study is to describe the rate of chemotherapy use in the last month of life in patients who are candidates for palliative care in Brazil. Methods: It is a prospective non-concurrent cohort carried out from a database developed through probabilistic and deterministic linkage of data from information systems of the Brazilian Public Health System. The study population is composed of all patients who started cancer treatment between 2009 and 2014 and who was hospitalized at least 1 time after starting treatment. To address the indication for palliative care, patients whose death occurred within one year after the first hospitalization were selected. Results: A total of 299,202 patients started cancer treatment in that period and 62,249 died 1year after hospitalization. Among the deceased patients, the median age was 62 years, 50.9% of them were in stage IV and 34.1% in stage III and 46% lived in the southeastern region of the country. The most common cancers were lung (n = 17805; 28.6%) colorectal (n = 12273; 19.7%) and gastric (n = 10248; 16.5%). The average number of hospitalizations was 2.7 and 89% of these patients required emergency hospitalization. About half (45,4%; n=28,250) of the patients underwent chemotherapy at the last 30 days of life. The rates of use of chemotherapy in the last month was 44% for lung cancer, 74,4% for colon, 50.2% for gastric and 51.8% breast cancers. Conclusions: Despite international recommendations on the use of chemotherapy at the end of life, this seems to be a common practice unfortunately. Measures to implement early palliative care should be a priority for the care of cancer patients in Brazil.

OP456 Encouraging Shared Decision-Making Of Goals Of Care Discussions In Lung Cancer Patients Using A Smartphone Application

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Amanda Lovato ◽  
Nisha Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Goals Of Care ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients

IntroductionAn important reason for receiving non-beneficial treatment at end-of life is the lack of timely discussions on goals of care and end-of-life preferences. A recent randomized clinical trial demonstrated that patients primed with a questionnaire on their end-of-life preferences were more likely to initiate such conversations with their doctors. Our objective is to integrate the questionnaire into a smartphone application to facilitate early goals of care discussions. To achieve this goal, we first plan to undertake a feasibility study to understand stakeholder preferences.MethodsAs part of a quality improvement initiative at our Canadian quaternary-care hospital, we conducted focus groups with oncology and palliative care physicians and patients to understand barriers to early conversations on end-of-life preferences, and to assess feasibility of using smartphone technology in facilitating these conversations. The app would integrate a questionnaire to patients and send prompts to physicians on patient readiness and timing of conversations.ResultsWe conducted separate focus groups with lung cancer patients (n = 6) and clinicians in oncology (n = 6) and palliative care (n = 6). Clinical teams expressed enthusiasm about early conversations but raised several barriers including system (lack of electronic documentation and access to data; multiple physicians), clinician (lack of time) and patient (stigma associated with end-of-life) barriers. Clinicians agreed that an app could overcome some of these barriers such as access to patient and electronic data by making patients the repository of all their data and empowering them to initiate discussions. However, they raised concerns about universal accessibility of such technology, especially among the elderly. Patient focus groups will take place in March 2021 and inform us on feasibility in this population.ConclusionsThere is a consensus among physicians at our hospital that early end-of-life conversations have the potential to mitigate adverse events and that use of a smart phone app could facilitate such conversations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document