ADAPTlate: A randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III trial on adjuvant dynamic marker—Adjusted personalized therapy comparing abemaciclib combined with standard adjuvant endocrine therapy versus standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in (clinical or genomic) high-risk, HR+/HER2- early breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS598-TPS598
Author(s):  
Oleg Gluz ◽  
Iris Scheffen ◽  
Tom Degenhardt ◽  
Norbert Walter Marschner ◽  
Matthias Christgen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Translational Research ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Genomic Risk

TPS598 Background: The WSG ADAPT trial program addresses the individualization of (neo)adj. decision-making in EBC. The ADAPT umbrella trial established early predictive molecular surrogate markers for response after a 3-wk endocrine treatment (ET) to omit chemotherapy (CT) in a cohort of early high-risk HR+/HER2- pts. ADAPTlate seeks to improve adj. therapy for pts. at high risk for late disease recurrence, who completed definite locoregional therapy (with / without (neo-)adj. CT) and are under adj. ET. This high-risk population does not derive optimal benefit from standard ET, develops secondary ET resistance, and late recurrences. Methods: Prospective, multi-center, interventional, two-arm, open, randomized, controlled adj. phase III trial (NCT04565054) to investigate additional benefit from 2 years of the CDK4/6-inhibitor abemaciclib combined with ET compared to ET alone in pts. with high-risk HR+/HER2- EBC. Abemaciclib demonstrated to improve outcome in metastatic BC and even in EBC when given as part of primary therapy. Primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of iDFS of abemaciclib + ET vs. standard ET. Secondary objectives include OS, dDFS, occurrence of CNS metastases, QoL, and translational research. Recruitment started in 9/2020 to screen 1250 pts. and to randomize 903 pts. in a ratio 3:2. Until date of submission, 33 pts. were screened and 22 randomized. Pre-/postmenopausal pts. with histologically confirmed invasive HR+/HER2- EBC, 2-6 y after primary diagnosis, with either known high clinical risk (c/pN 2-3 OR high CTS score in pN 0-1 OR non-pCR after neoadj. CT in cN 1 or G3 tumors OR G3 and Ki-67 ≥ 40% in pN 0-1) or known high genomic risk (RS >25 in c/pN 0, RS >18 in c/pN 1 OR high risk Prosigna, EPclin or Mammaprint in pN 0-1) or intermediate clinical, but unknown genomic risk (luminal B-like (G3 or Ki-67 ≥20%) in c/pN 0-1 AND either RS >25 in c/pN 0 or RS >18 in c/p N1 in screening) will be eligible. Treatment duration is 2 years for the abemaciclib + ET (premenopausal: AI + GnRH) arm, followed by at least 3-6 years ET alone. Pts. in control arm will receive 5-8-years ET at investigator´s choice. ePROs are collected using CANKADO. Translational analyses: Exploratory tissue biomarker research to assess alterations in molecular markers. Liquid biopsies (CTC/ctDNA/ctRNA) will be assessed for mutations and gene expression relevant for HR+/HER2- EBC using an appropriate technology at time of testing. Conclusions: ADAPTlate seeks to evaluate whether Abemaciclib + ET is superior to ET alone in pts. with clinical or genomic high-risk EBC even 2-6 years after initial diagnosis. Translational research aims at assessing potential mechanisms of resistance to endocrine and/or CDK4/6 targeted therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04565054.

Predictive value of MRP-1 in localized high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: a translational research associated to ISG-STS 1001 randomized phase III trial.

2021 ◽  
pp. molcanther.0315.2021
Author(s):  
Javier Martín-Broto ◽  
Maria Lopez-Alvarez ◽  
David S Moura ◽  
Rafael Ramos ◽  
Paola Collini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Translational Research ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

Zoledronic Acid Prevents Cancer Treatment–Induced Bone Loss in Premenopausal Women Receiving Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Hormone-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Report From the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 820-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F.X. Gnant ◽  
Brigitte Mlineritsch ◽  
Gero Luschin-Ebengreuth ◽  
Stephan Grampp ◽  
Helmut Kaessmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
T Score

Purpose Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer can be associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) that may lead to skeletal morbidity. This study examined whether zoledronic acid can prevent bone loss associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal patients. Patients and Methods This study is a randomized, open-label, phase III, four-arm trial comparing tamoxifen (20 mg/d orally) and goserelin (3.6 mg every 28 days subcutaneously) ± zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) versus anastrozole (1 mg/d orally) and goserelin ± zoledronic acid for 3 years in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer. In a BMD subprotocol at three trial centers, patients underwent serial BMD measurements at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Results Four hundred one patients were included in the BMD subprotocol. Endocrine treatment without zoledronic acid led to significant (P < .001) overall bone loss after 3 years of treatment (BMD, −14.4% after 36 months; mean T score reduction, −1.4). Overall bone loss was significantly more severe in patients receiving anastrozole/goserelin (BMD, −17.3%; mean T score reduction, −2.6) compared with patients receiving tamoxifen/goserelin (BMD, −11.6%; mean T score reduction, −1.1). In contrast, BMD remained stable in zoledronic acid–treated patients (P < .0001 compared with endocrine therapy alone). No interactions with age or other risk factors were noted. Conclusion Endocrine therapy caused significant bone loss that increased with treatment duration in premenopausal women with breast cancer. Zoledronic acid 4 mg every 6 months effectively inhibited bone loss. Regular BMD measurements and initiation of concomitant bisphosphonate therapy on evidence of bone loss should be considered for patients undergoing endocrine therapy.

A study of ERG, PTEN, and ki-67 in a phase III trial assessing docetaxel and estramustine in high-risk localized prostate cancer (GETUG 12).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5063-5063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanna Rajpar ◽  
Philippe Vielh ◽  
Agnes Laplanche ◽  
Francois Lesaunier ◽  
Remy Delva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

Copy-number and targeted sequencing analyses to identify distinct prognostic groups: Implications for patient selection to targeted therapies amongst anti-endocrine therapy resistant early breast cancers.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 524-524
Author(s):  
Jane Bayani ◽  
Elizabeth Kornaga ◽  
Cheryl Crozier ◽  
Gun Ho Jang ◽  
Irina Kalatskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Targeted Sequencing ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
The Impact

524 Background: Hormone receptor positive breast cancer is a therapeutic challenge. Despite optimal anti-endocrine therapies, most breast cancer deaths follow a diagnosis of early luminal cancer. To understand the impact of multiple aberrations in the context of current therapy, we assessed the prognostic ability of genomic signatures as a putative stratification tool to targeted therapies. Methods: This a priori study is based on molecular pathways which might predict response to targeted therapies. DNA from 420 patients from the phase III TEAM pathology cohort were used. Patients with a distant recurrence within 5 years were matched by clinical variables to those disease-free at follow up. Copy number analysis was performed using the Affymetrix Oncoscan Assay. Targeted sequencing was performed in a subset of samples for genes based on signaling cassettes mined from the ICGC. Pathways were identified as aberrant if there were copy number variations (CNVs) and/or mutations in any of the pre-determined pathway genes: 1) CCND1/CCND2/CCND3/CDK4/CDK6; 2) FGFR1/FGFR2/FGFR2/FGFR4; and 3) AKT1/AKT2/PIK3CA/PTEN. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were used for DFS between groups. Hazard ratios were calculated using the Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, tumour size, grade, lymph node and HER2 status. Results: 390/420 samples passed informatics QC filters. For the CCND/CDK pathway, patients with no CNV changes experienced a better DFS (HR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.3, p < 0.001). For the FGFR/FGF pathway, a similar outcome is seen among patients without CNVs (HR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.0; p = 0.005). For AKT/PIK3CA, a decrease in DFS was seen in those with aberrations (HR = 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8, p = 0.03). Conclusions: We demonstrated that CNVs of genes within CDK4/CCND, PIK3CA/AKT and FGFR pathways are independently linked to high risk of relapse following endocrine treatment, with implications for identifying those patients who are at high-risk for recurrence despite optimal anti-endocrine therapy and linking molecular features driving these cancers to targeted therapies.

A phase III trial of nivolumab with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- primary breast cancer: CheckMate 7FL.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS604-TPS604
Author(s):  
Sherene Loi ◽  
Heather L. McArthur ◽  
Nadia Harbeck ◽  
Lajos Pusztai ◽  
Suzette Delaloge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Er Expression

TPS604 Background: Patients (pts) diagnosed with primary estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HER2−) breast cancer (BC) of high grade and/or low ER expression are at increased risk of relapse, despite current standard of care (SoC). Promising data assessing programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibition coupled with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pts with high-risk ER+, HER2− BC noted improved pathologic complete response (pCR), which is identified as a valid surrogate endpoint for long-term clinical outcomes. Methods: CheckMate 7FL (NCT04109066) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, global phase 3 study evaluating nivolumab (NIVO) vs placebo (PBO) in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in pts with high-risk, ER+, HER2− primary BC. Eligible pts are male or female, aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed grade 2 with ER expression of 1–9%, or grade 3, T1c-2, cN1-2 (tumor size ≥2 cm) or T3-T4, cN0-cN2 ER+, HER2− BC. Pts eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery, with adequate organ function, ECOG PS of 0 or 1, and tissue available for biomarker assessments will be enrolled. Approximately 1200 pts will be randomized 1:1 to NIVO or PBO, stratified by programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor grade (2 or 3), axillary nodal status (+ or −), and anthracycline + cyclophosphamide schedule (Q3W or Q2W). In the neoadjuvant phase, pts will receive NIVO 360 mg Q3W or PBO + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 QW for four 3-week cycles, followed by NIVO 360 mg Q3W (or 240 mg Q2W) or matching PBO in combination with either doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 Q3W or Q2W for 4 cycles. Pts will undergo surgery after completion of the neoadjuvant phase. Following surgery, pts will enter the adjuvant phase and receive NIVO 480 mg Q4W or PBO for 7 cycles + investigator’s choice of ET per local SoC. Primary endpoints are pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) and event-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, disease-free survival, distant-metastasis-free survival, safety, pCR (ypT0 ypN0 and ypT0/is) rates, overall response rates, residual cancer burden, and quality of life. Interim analyses are planned. The study is currently enrolling. Clinical trial information: NCT04109066 .

Palbociclib combined with endocrine treatment in breast cancer patients with high relapse risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Subgroup analyses of premenopausal patients in PENELOPE-B.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 518-518
Author(s):  
Frederik Marmé ◽  
Miguel Martin ◽  
Michael Untch ◽  
Herve R. Bonnefoi ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Endocrine Treatment ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity

518 Background: PENELOPE-B assessed efficacy of the CDK4/6 inhibitor 1-year palbociclib versus placebo added to endocrine therapy (ET) as post-neoadjuvant treatment in a high-risk breast cancer population. Palbociclib did not improve invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to placebo (3-year iDFS 81.3% vs 77.7%) (Loibl et al. J Clin Oncol 2021). Here we report results from the subpopulation of premenopausal women. Methods: Patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer without pathological complete response after taxane‐containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and at high risk of relapse (CPS‐EG score ≥3 or 2 and ypN+) were randomized (1:1) to receive 13 cycles of palbociclib 125mg daily or placebo on days 1-21 in a 28d cycle in addition to standard endocrine treatment including tamoxifen (TAM) +/- gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) and aromatase inhibitor (AI) +/- GnRH. Randomization was stratified by nodal status at surgery, age ( < 50 vs ≥50 years), Ki-67, region, and CPS-EG score. Results: 616/1250 patients were premenopausal at the time of enrollment, 185 of these patients (30.0%) were younger than 40 years of age. 95.2% had ypN+ after surgery; 42.8% had ypT2 and 46.8% a CPS-EG score of 3. 23.1% of the premenopausal women had a Ki67 of > 15% in residual disease. 66.1% started with TAM alone; 19.3% with TAM and ovarian function suppression (OFS); and 13.6% received an AI+OFS. There was no difference in iDFS between palbociclib and placebo in the premenopausal women HR 0.948 (0.693-1.30). The 3-year iDFS was 80.6% and 78.3%, respectively. Palbociclib vs placebo in subgroups by endocrine treatment: TAM alone HR 1.05 (0.715-1.53) p = 0.817; TAM+GnRH HR 0.52 (0.267-1.02) p = 0.057 and AI+GnRH HR 1.58 (0.548-4.56) p = 0.397; pinteraction0.124. Hematologic toxicity was significantly more common with palbociclib. Non-hematological toxicity any grade palbociclib vs placebo were: fatigue 67.4% vs 51.3%; hot flushes 52.2% vs 54.8%; bone pain 15.6% vs 16.6%; and vaginal dryness 11.0% vs 11.5%. When receiving palbociclib fewer patients in the AI+GnRH group vs the TAM +/- GnRH cohort experienced anemia (54.1% vs 80.5%) and thrombocytopenia (37.8% vs 65.1%). Fatigue (75.7% vs 66.3%) and nausea (40.5% vs 24.9%) were more common with AI+GnRH than TAM +/-GnRH when palbociclib was added. Thromboembolic events were low with overall 9 events (4 vs 5; AI+GnRH 2.4% vs 1.3% TAM+/-GnRH). Conclusions: The addition of palbociclib to endocrine therapy did not improve iDFS in premenopausal women. These are the first safety results from a phase III study for the combination tamoxifen +/-GnRH and palbociclib. The addition of palbociclib to tamoxifen +/-GnRH in premenopausal women did not increase side effects compared to AI+GnRH and seems to be an alternative to AI+GnRH. Clinical trial information: NCT01864746.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document