Assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with genitourinary malignancies.

38 Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has vast implications on the health system. Patients with a cancer diagnosis may face greater challenges in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We sought to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among patients with genitourinary malignancies. We performed a cross-sectional survey study at a Comprehensive Cancer Center during the current pandemic. Results: A total of 86 participants were recruited to the study to date, 72.1% had prostate, 19.8% had kidney, and 12.8% had bladder cancer. A subset (n = 5) had more than one primary tumor. The mean time from diagnosis was 6.47 years (std dev 6.01, range from 0 to 27 years). Overall, 73% reported having metastatic disease and prior treatment with surgery (62%), radiation (71%), or systemic therapy (68%), with 68.6% currently receiving cancer treatment. In the study, 78.9% of patients were >65 years of age and 88.2% were White. The majority of participants had a bachelor’s degree or higher level of education (74.4%), were legally married (82.6%), were homeowners (91.9%), and reported an annual household income of >$100,000 (56.0%). Among respondents, 7% reported loss/change of health insurance and 30% reported a decrease in household income. Among patients with reduced household income, 23% reported a reduction of more than 50%. In this study, 28% of patients reported that the pandemic impacted their cancer treatment. Overall 7% reported decrease in frequency of labs, 11% reported a delay in obtaining a scan, 5% reported treatment delays, and 96% reported use of telemedicine (video or telephone) visit. Overall, 59% reported fear of hospitalization, 23% reported delays in seeking medical care, and 16% reported missing required medications. Conclusions: The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with genitourinary malignancies is extensive. Ongoing research is evaluating the impact across socio-demographically groups and examine clinical outcomes associated with delays in care and medication non-adherence.

Download Full-text

A Cross-Sectional Survey Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Cancer Care of Adolescents and Young Adults

Current Oncology ◽

10.3390/curroncol28040278 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 28 (4) ◽

pp. 3201-3213

Author(s):

Kaitlyn Howden ◽

Camille Glidden ◽

Razvan G. Romanescu ◽

Andrew Hatala ◽

Ian Scott ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Young Adults ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Cancer Care ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Positive Impact ◽

Care Delivery ◽

Adolescents And Young Adults ◽

P Value ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

The Impact

We aimed to describe the negative and positive impacts of changes in cancer care delivery due to COVID-19 pandemic for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) in Canada, as well as the correlates of negative impact and their perspectives on optimization of cancer care. We conducted an online, self-administered survey of AYAs with cancer living in Canada between January and February 2021. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with a negative impact on cancer care. Of the 805 participants, 173 (21.5%) experienced a negative impact on their cancer care including delays in diagnostic tests (11.9%), cancer treatment (11.4%), and appointments (11.1%). A prior diagnosis of mental or chronic physical health condition, an annual income of <20,000 CAD, ongoing cancer treatment, and province of residence were independently associated with a negative cancer care impact (p-value < 0.05). The majority (n = 767, 95.2%) stated a positive impact of the changes to cancer care delivery, including the implementation of virtual healthcare visits (n = 601, 74.6%). Pandemic-related changes in cancer care delivery have unfavorably and favorably influenced AYAs with cancer. Interventions to support AYAs who are more vulnerable to the adverse effects of the pandemic, and the thoughtful integration of virtual care into cancer care delivery models is essential.

Download Full-text

Does a treatment delay affect the survival of octogenarian patient population?

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.8_suppl.149 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽

pp. 149-149

Author(s):

Ali Mehmood Raufi ◽

Hassaan Jafri ◽

Todd W. Gress

Keyword(s):

Cancer Treatment ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Patient Population ◽

Gynecological Cancer ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Treatment Delay ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Management ◽

The Impact

149 Background: The cancer management of the elderly patient is an increasingly important and challenging issue. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to evaluate the impact of treatment delay on survival outcome of cancer in octogenarian patients. Methods: From 2006 to 2015, established cancer patients age 80 and above who received treatment at our comprehensive cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the relationship between a delay in cancer treatment of more than 30 days in the octogenarian patient and survival using Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: There were 235 octogenarian cancer patients available for evaluation and 115 of these had a delay in initiation of cancer treatment ( > 30 days). Mean age was 83.7 years the treatment delay (TD) group and 83.9 in the no treatment delay (NTD) group (p = 0.70) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 2 or more was present in 22.6% of the TD group and 18.3% of the NTD group (p = 0.42). Metastatic disease was higher in the NTD group (22.5% vs. 11.3% TD group; p = 0.051). There were more breast (36.5% TD vs. 12.5% NTD group) and lung cancer (26.9% TD vs. 18.3% NTD group) in the TD group, and more genitourinary (20.8% NTD vs. 9.6% TD group) and gynecological cancer (20.8% NTD vs. 15.6% TD group) in the NTD group (p < 0.001 for overall comparison). Median overall survival was higher in the TD group (50 vs. 24 months NTD group; p = 0.001). Treatment delay was still associated with improved survival even after adjusting for age, gender, ECOG, stage of disease, and type of tumor (HR 0.64, CI 0.44-0.92). Conclusions: We found that a delay in cancer treatment in the octogenarian patient was associated with better overall survivial. Bias in regards to the reasons for the treatment delay may exist and could have affected our results. We attempted to minimize this bias by adjusting for characteristics that influence treatment between our two study groups. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that a delay in cancer treatment at minimum did not adversely affect mortality in this older patient population.

Download Full-text

“Artificial But Better Than Nothing”

HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal ◽

10.1177/1937586716677737 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 10 (3) ◽

pp. 51-60 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Sarah Blaschke ◽

Clare C. O’Callaghan ◽

Penelope Schofield

Keyword(s):

Survey Study ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Design Solution ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Environmental Intervention ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Waiting Room ◽

Plant Materials ◽

Convenience Sample ◽

Better Than

Objective: To investigate patient, staff, and carer responses to an environmental intervention in an oncology clinic waiting room and evaluate the acceptability of artificial plant materials. Design Postintervention: Cross-sectional survey study. Setting: Oncology outpatient clinic waiting room located in a metropolitan comprehensive cancer center in Australia. Main Outcome Measure: Observer ratings of perceived qualities and effects of lifelike (fake) plants while spending time in the waiting room. Participants: Convenience sample ( N = 143) consisted of 73 cancer patients, 13 staff, 52 carers, and 5 “others” aged between 24 and 89 years ( M = 56, SD = 14.5). Intervention: Artificial plant arrangements, hanging installations, two movable green walls, and one rock garden on wheels placed throughout the outpatients’ clinic waiting room. Results: Eighty-one percent (115/142) of respondents noticed the green features when first entering the waiting room and 67% (90/134) noticed they were artificial. Eighty-one percent (115/142) indicated “like/like a lot” when reporting their first reaction to the green features. Forty-eight percent (68/143) were positively affected and 23% (33/143) were very positively affected. Eighty-one percent (110/135) agreed/strongly agreed that “The greenery brightens the waiting room,” 62% (80/130) agreed/strongly agreed that they “prefer living plants,” and 76% (101/133) agreed/strongly agreed that “‘lifelike’ plants are better than no plants.” Comments included mostly positive appraisals and occasional adverse reactions to artificial plants. No significant differences were found between patients’, staff, and carers’ reactions. Conclusions: The environmental intervention positively impacted patients’, staff, and carers’ perceptions of the oncology waiting room environment. Patients, staff, and carers mostly accepted artificial plants as an alternative design solution to real plants.

Download Full-text

Psychological Impacts of COVID-19 During the First Nationwide Lockdown in Vietnam: Web-Based, Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.24776 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Khanh Ngoc Cong Duong ◽

Tien Nguyen Le Bao ◽

Phuong Thi Lan Nguyen ◽

Thanh Vo Van ◽

Toi Phung Lam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Psychological Distress ◽

General Population ◽

Psychological Health ◽

Online Survey ◽

Survey Study ◽

Limited Information ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Event Scale ◽

The Impact

BACKGROUND The first nationwide lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic was implemented in Vietnam from April 1 to 15, 2020. Nevertheless, there has been limited information on the impact of COVID-19 on the psychological health of the public. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of psychological issues and identify the factors associated with the psychological impact of COVID-19 during the first nationwide lockdown among the general population in Vietnam. METHODS We employed a cross-sectional study design with convenience sampling. A self-administered, online survey was used to collect data and assess psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress of participants from April 10 to 15, 2020. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) were utilized to assess psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress of participants during social distancing due to COVID-19. Associations across factors were explored using regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 1385 respondents completed the survey. Of this, 35.9% (n=497) experienced psychological distress, as well as depression (n=325, 23.5%), anxiety (n=195, 14.1%), and stress (n=309, 22.3%). Respondents who evaluated their physical health as average had a higher IES-R score (beta coefficient [B]=9.16, 95% CI 6.43 to 11.89), as well as higher depression (B=5.85, 95% CI 4.49 to 7.21), anxiety (B=3.64, 95% CI 2.64 to 4.63), and stress (B=5.19, 95% CI 3.83 to 6.56) scores for DASS-21 than those who rated their health as good or very good. Those who self-reported their health as bad or very bad experienced more severe depression (B=9.57, 95% CI 4.54 to 14.59), anxiety (B=7.24, 95% CI 3.55 to 10.9), and stress (B=10.60, 95% CI 5.56 to 15.65). Unemployment was more likely to be associated with depression (B=3.34, 95% CI 1.68 to 5.01) and stress (B=2.34, 95% CI 0.84 to 3.85). Regarding worries about COVID-19, more than half (n=755, 54.5%) expressed concern for their children aged <18 years, which increased their IES-R score (B=7.81, 95% CI 4.98 to 10.64) and DASS-21 stress score (B=1.75, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.24). The majority of respondents (n=1335, 96.4%) were confident about their doctor’s expertise in terms of COVID-19 diagnosis and treatment, which was positively associated with less distress caused by the outbreak (B=–7.84, 95% CI –14.58 to –1.11). CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the effect of COVID-19 on mental health during the nationwide lockdown among the general population in Vietnam. The study provides useful evidence for policy decision makers to develop and implement interventions to mitigate these impacts. CLINICALTRIAL

Download Full-text

Quality of Life in People Living With HIV: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Survey in Belgium

AIDS Education and Prevention ◽

10.1521/aeap.2021.33.3.249 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 33 (3) ◽

pp. 249-264

Author(s):

Gert Scheerder ◽

Sandra Van den Eynde ◽

Patrick Reyntiens ◽

Ria Koeck ◽

Jessika Deblonde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Negative Impact ◽

Sexual Life ◽

People Living With Hiv ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Related Stigma ◽

Living With Hiv ◽

The Impact

This cross-sectional survey explored the quality of life in 505 people living with HIV in Belgium. Several domains of quality of life were impaired: 26% had been diagnosed with depression and 43% had weak social support. HIV-related stigma is still widespread, with 49% believing most people with HIV are rejected and 65% having experienced discrimination due to HIV. The impact of HIV was limited on professional life, but 40% experienced a negative impact on life satisfaction and 41% a negative impact on sexual life. For several domains, people with a recent diagnosis of HIV and long-term survivors had significantly worse scores. This survey also uncovered strengths of people living with HIV, such as positive coping and HIV self-image. Expanding the scope of quality of life in people living with HIV may provide a more complete picture of relevant life domains that may be impacted by living with HIV, but this needs further validation.

Download Full-text

The impact of COVID 19 pandemic on pattern of cancer mortality in Najran, Saudi Arabia: a single-cancer center experience

10.21203/rs.3.rs-305960/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ahmed M Badheeb ◽

Mohamed A Badheeb ◽

Hamdi A Alhakimi

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Saudi Arabia ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Cancer Mortality ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Anti Cancer ◽

Before And After ◽

The Difference ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: The aim of this paper is to compare the patterns and determinants of cancer mortality in Najran region before and after the COVID-19 epidemics. The association between cancer mortality and each of age, sex, site of cancer, stage, and the 30-days survival rate after the last dose of chemotherapy were assessed.Materials & Methods: Adult cancer patients who died of cancer in King Khalid Hospital in Najran Saudi Arabia, were included in this retrospective observational study. We compared mortality patterns in a period of 6 months in 2020 (March to August) with the corresponding period of 2019.Results: 50 dead adult cancer patients were included, 24 in 2019 and 26 in 2020. Among them, 21% vs 42% were younger than 65 years of age; 61% vs 62% were males, for the years 2019 & 2020 respectively. The top three killers in 2019 were colorectal, gastro-esophageal cancers, and hepatocellular carcinoma, while in 2020 were colorectal, hepatocellular carcinoma, and lymphomas. About 16.7% of patients died within 30 days of receiving anti-cancer treatment in 2019 in comparison with 7.7% in 2020. The difference in the 30-days mortality after receiving anti-cancer treatment was not statistically significant between 2019 and 2020 (p = 0.329).Conclusion: The Year 2020, the time of the COVID-19pandemic, was not associated with a significant increase in short-term mortality among patients with malignancy in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Our results generally reflect the crucial role of strict preventive national measures in saving lives and warrants further exploration.

Download Full-text

Alcohol-related harm to others in England: a cross-sectional analysis of national survey data

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021046 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (5) ◽

pp. e021046 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Caryl Beynon ◽

David Bayliss ◽

Jenny Mason ◽

Kate Sweeney ◽

Clare Perkins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Negative Impact ◽

Cross Sectional Survey ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Harm To Others ◽

Using Data ◽

Socioeconomic And Demographic Factors ◽

The Impact ◽

Alcohol Related Harm ◽

Related Harm

ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence, the frequency and the perpetrators of alcohol-related harm to others (AHTO) and identify factors associated with experiencing harm and aggressive harm.DesignCross-sectional survey.SettingEngland.ParticipantsAdults (general population) aged 16 and over.Outcome measuresPercentage of respondents who experienced harm. Socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with the outcomes. Outcomes were (1) experienced harm/did not experience harm and (2) experienced aggressive harm (physically threatened, physically hurt and forced/pressured into something sexual)/did not experience an aggressive harm (no aggressive harm plus no harm at all).ResultsData to support a response rate calculation were not collected; 96.3% of people surveyed completed the AHTO questions. The weighted sample was 4874; 20.1% (95% CI 18.9 to 21.4, N=980) reported experiencing harm in the previous 12 months and 4.6% (95% CI 4.0 to 5.4, N=225) reported experiencing an aggressive harm. Friends and strangers were the dominant perpetrators. Most harms (74.8%) occurred less than monthly. Factors associated with experiencing harm were: younger age (p<0.001), drinking harmfully/hazardously (p<0.001), white British (p<0.001 compared to other white groups and Asian groups and p=0.017 compared to black groups), having a disability (p<0.001), being educated (p<0.001 compared to no education) and living in private rented accommodation (p=0.004 compared with owned outright). Being in the family stage of life (defined as having children in the household) had significantly lower odds of harm (p=0.006 compared to being single), as did being retired (p<0.001 compared to being employed). Factors associated with experiencing an aggressive harm were similar.ConclusionsThis exploratory study, using data collected through the Alcohol Toolkit Survey, shows that AHTO affects 20.1% of the population of England. Even apparently minor harms, like being kept awake, can have a negative impact on health, while aggressive harms are clearly of concern. Using a standard methodology to measure harm across studies would be advantageous. Policies that focus on alcohol must take into consideration the impact of drinking on those other than the drinker.

Download Full-text

Parenting while living with advanced cancer: A qualitative study

Palliative Medicine ◽

10.1177/0269216316661686 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 31 (3) ◽

pp. 231-238 ◽

Cited By ~ 27

Author(s):

Eliza M Park ◽

Devon K Check ◽

Mi-Kyung Song ◽

Katherine E Reeder-Hayes ◽

Laura C Hanson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Qualitative Study ◽

Functional Status ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Metastatic Cancer ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Parental Concerns ◽

The Impact

Background: Patients with advanced cancer who have dependent children are an important population with a life-limiting illness and high levels of psychological distress. Few studies have addressed the experience of being a parent with advanced cancer and their potential palliative needs. Aim: To describe the experience of living with advanced cancer as a parent, including illness experience, parental concerns, and treatment decision making and to explore whether these experiences differ by their functional status. Design: We conducted a cross-sectional, qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Setting and participants: A total of 42 participants with metastatic cancer and with at least one child under the age of 18 years were recruited from a comprehensive cancer center. 25 participants were rated as having high functional status (the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale = 0–1) and 17 with low functional status (ECOG=2–4). Results: We identified four themes regarding the experience of being a parent with advanced cancer: (1) parental concerns about the impact of their illness and death on their children, (2) “missing out” and losses of parental role and responsibilities, (3) maintaining parental responsibilities despite life-limiting illness, and (4) parental identity influencing decision making about treatment. Parental functional status influenced not only physical responsibilities but also intensified parenting psychological concerns. Conclusion: Parents with metastatic cancer may have unique palliative care needs as they experience parenting concerns while managing the psychological and physical demands of advanced cancer.

Download Full-text

Impact of Safety Concerns of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) and Regulatory Changes on the Use of ESAs and Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusions at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v112.11.1300.1300 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 112 (11) ◽

pp. 1300-1300

Author(s):

Saroj Vadhan-Raj ◽

Victoria E. Hawkins ◽

Xiao Zhou ◽

Kurt Sizer ◽

Lincy S. Lal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hematological Malignancies ◽

Black Box ◽

Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Safety Concerns ◽

Regulatory Changes ◽

Time Period ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Oncology Clinical Trials ◽

The Impact

Abstract Safety signals raised in the recent oncology clinical trials have led to various regulatory restrictions including FDA black-box warning, National Coverage Determination (NCD), and updated ASCO/ASH guidelines in 2007. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these changes on the utilization of ESAs and on transfusion (Tx) of RBCs in 2006 (prior to changes) and 2007. We identified the total number of unique patients that received any treatment including chemotherapy, radiation, transfusions, or any treatment in the out-patient and in-patient settings during this 2 year time period. All the data on the ESA doses dispensed by the hospital pharmacy and all the RBC transfusions dispensed by the Blood bank were also analyzed. The ESA units were calculated by converting 40,000 units of epoetin alfa or 100 mcg of darbepoetin alfa to one unit of ESA. When comparing 2007 to 2006, the number of patients that received ESAs decreased by 26% and the total ESA units decreased by 30%. The overall usage of ESAs decreased by 55%, from 2398 units in 1/2006 to 1080 units in 12/2007. However, the number of pts that received RBC transfusions increased only by 6% and the total number of RBC units transfused by 2% (from 38,218 units in 2006 to 38,948 units in 2007). The median Hgb on the day of transfusion was same for each year (Hgb 8.2 g/dL for both 2006 and 2007), suggesting that the lack of impact on RBC Tx may not be due to a change in Tx threshold. The total number of unique patients referred and treated at MDACC during 2007 (24,356) increased by 13% from 2006 (21,619), not accounting for a lack of impact on transfusions. We therefore examined Hgb at the initiation of ESAs in a subset of pts (n=212) that had not received ESA for at least 3 months. The median Hgb/HCT values at the initiation of ESAs were 9.5 g/dL/27.4. The most frequent utilization of ESAs and transfusions was in patients with hematological malignancies. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the recent ESA safety concerns and related regulatory changes have significantly affected the ESA utilization. The lack of significant impact of reduced ESA usage on RBC transfusions may be related to a lower Hgb threshold used at initiation of ESAs and/or the targeted patient population (less likely to respond) treated with ESAs. Further research is needed to establish the factors contributing to the lack of correlation and to optimize the use of ESAs.

Download Full-text