A Russian Version of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Preliminary Data

1995 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher I. Eckhardt ◽  
Howard Kassinove ◽  
Sergei V. Tsytsarev ◽  
Denis G. Sukhodolsky
1991 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale R. Fuqua ◽  
Elizabeth Leonard ◽  
Mark A. Masters ◽  
Randy J. Smith ◽  
James L. Campbell ◽  
...  

Assessment ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Kirby Forgays ◽  
Charles D. Spielberger ◽  
Scott A. Ottaway ◽  
Donald G. Forgays

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65
Author(s):  
Ana N. Tibubos ◽  
Karin Schermelleh-Engel ◽  
Sonja Rohrmann

Abstract. The purpose of the present study was to develop a short form of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2) based on the German STAXI-2. Item selection was performed based on exploratory factor analyses (EFA) using descriptive statistical parameters and content-related considerations on calibration samples ( N1 = 215, N2 = 310). The factorial structure of the final extracted scales was validated via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) ( N3 = 216, N4 = 310). Overall, results present an economic and reliable questionnaire with a total length of 24 items: State Anger short scales Feeling Angry, Verbal Anger Impulse, and Physical Anger Impulse (3 items each), that can be aggregated to a total State Anger score, as well as Trait Anger short scales Angry Reaction (3 items), Anger Expression-In, Anger Expression-Out, and Anger Control (4 items each). The structure of State Anger is identical to the German long version with improved internal consistency in the short form. Regarding the Trait scales, critique on the STAXI-2 has been taken into account resulting in the elimination of the subscale Trait Temperament due to redundancy with Trait Anger Expression-Out and for economic reasons. Other than that, the structure has remained the same. In addition, strict measurement invariance was established based on multi-group CFA for both the State and the Trait scales across gender and age groups, which has not been investigated for STAXI-2 versions to date.


1997 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald G. Forgays ◽  
Deborah Kirby Forgays ◽  
Charles D. Spielberger

1987 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kay Biaggio ◽  
William H. Godwin

To understand better the relationship between depression and various constructs of anger and hostility, 112 university students were administered the MMPI Depression scale, the Hostility and Direction of Hostility Questionnaire, the Overcontrolled Hostility Scale, the Anger Expression Scale, and the State-Trait Anger Scale. Among depressed subjects there was a more intense experience of hostility, particularly inwardly directed hostility, and a diminished sense of control over anger or a disinclination to manage anger.


2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Nakajima ◽  
Ines Bouanene ◽  
Sana El-Mhamdi ◽  
Mohamed Soltani ◽  
Stephan Bongard ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 617-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg E. Dear ◽  
Bruce D. Watt ◽  
John Dockerlll

The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory administered to prison inmates has supported the factor structure of the three anger expression scales although this structure has not been verified with Australian participants. Data collected from 397 Western Australian male prisoners produced a factor structure consistent with the scale structure outlined in the 1991 manual. Scale means and standard deviations were similar to those reported for U.S. and Canadian prisoners. It is therefore appropriate to use the standard scoring procedures with Australian male prisoners.


2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Krisztina Lindqvist ◽  
Anna Maria Dåderman ◽  
Åke Hellström

The first Swedish adaptations of the Novaco Anger Scale-1998 (R. W. Novaco, personal communication, April 11, 2001), the Provocation Inventory, (R. W. Novaco, personal communication, April 11, 2001) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (Spielberger, 1999) (named as NAS-1998-S, PI-S and STAXI-2-S respectively), were performed in this study. A sample of undergraduate males (N=100) from Stockholm University completed the adaptations. Investigations of factor structures, relationships between scales, reliability, and construct validity of the adaptations were performed and the results were related to previous studies. The hypothesised factor structures were found for NAS-1998-S and PI-S; for STAXI-2-S a modified three-factor solution emerged. The adaptations had appropriate levels of reliability. The obtained model of construct validity revealed substantial similarity to Spielberger's (1999) multidimensional anger model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document