SWEDISH ADAPTATIONS OF THE NOVACO ANGER SCALE-1998, THE PROVOCATION INVENTORY, AND THE STATE-TRAIT ANGER EXPRESSION INVENTORY-2

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Krisztina Lindqvist ◽  
Anna Maria Dåderman ◽  
Åke Hellström
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
Personal Communication ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Factor Solution ◽  
Three Factor

The first Swedish adaptations of the Novaco Anger Scale-1998 (R. W. Novaco, personal communication, April 11, 2001), the Provocation Inventory, (R. W. Novaco, personal communication, April 11, 2001) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (Spielberger, 1999) (named as NAS-1998-S, PI-S and STAXI-2-S respectively), were performed in this study. A sample of undergraduate males (N=100) from Stockholm University completed the adaptations. Investigations of factor structures, relationships between scales, reliability, and construct validity of the adaptations were performed and the results were related to previous studies. The hypothesised factor structures were found for NAS-1998-S and PI-S; for STAXI-2-S a modified three-factor solution emerged. The adaptations had appropriate levels of reliability. The obtained model of construct validity revealed substantial similarity to Spielberger's (1999) multidimensional anger model.

A Russian Version of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory: Preliminary Data

1995 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher I. Eckhardt ◽  
Howard Kassinove ◽  
Sergei V. Tsytsarev ◽  
Denis G. Sukhodolsky
Keyword(s):  
Preliminary Data ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Russian Version

A Structural Analysis of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory

1991 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale R. Fuqua ◽  
Elizabeth Leonard ◽  
Mark A. Masters ◽  
Randy J. Smith ◽  
James L. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Analysis ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger

Factor Structure of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory for Middle-Aged Men and Women

Assessment ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Kirby Forgays ◽  
Charles D. Spielberger ◽  
Scott A. Ottaway ◽  
Donald G. Forgays
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Men And Women

scholarly journals Short Form of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-65
Author(s):  
Ana N. Tibubos ◽  
Karin Schermelleh-Engel ◽  
Sonja Rohrmann
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Statistical Parameters ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
State Anger ◽  
Exploratory Factor Analyses

Abstract. The purpose of the present study was to develop a short form of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2) based on the German STAXI-2. Item selection was performed based on exploratory factor analyses (EFA) using descriptive statistical parameters and content-related considerations on calibration samples ( N1 = 215, N2 = 310). The factorial structure of the final extracted scales was validated via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) ( N3 = 216, N4 = 310). Overall, results present an economic and reliable questionnaire with a total length of 24 items: State Anger short scales Feeling Angry, Verbal Anger Impulse, and Physical Anger Impulse (3 items each), that can be aggregated to a total State Anger score, as well as Trait Anger short scales Angry Reaction (3 items), Anger Expression-In, Anger Expression-Out, and Anger Control (4 items each). The structure of State Anger is identical to the German long version with improved internal consistency in the short form. Regarding the Trait scales, critique on the STAXI-2 has been taken into account resulting in the elimination of the subscale Trait Temperament due to redundancy with Trait Anger Expression-Out and for economic reasons. Other than that, the structure has remained the same. In addition, strict measurement invariance was established based on multi-group CFA for both the State and the Trait scales across gender and age groups, which has not been investigated for STAXI-2 versions to date.

Turkish adaptation and validation of Spielberger’s State Anger Subscale

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
Tuba Kalay ◽  
İlke Sine Egeci ◽  
Serap Ozer
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
Experimental Manipulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Analytic Structure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Original Form ◽  
State Anger ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the State Anger Subscale of Spielberger using a sample of Turkish undergraduate students aged 18 to 31 years. The scale’s reliability and validity were assessed by examining its internal consistency, factor analytic structure, concurrent, and construct validity. Supporting the validity of the scale, one factor structure underlying the original form was replicated. A statistically significant relation between the State Trait Anger Expression Inventory and the Novaco Anger Scale was also found. Regarding construct validity, an experimental manipulation using anger induction and imagination revealed a significant difference between experimental and control group. Overall, the findings indicate that the State Anger Subscale is a reliable and valid assessment tool for research and clinical practice to identify angry people in Turkey. Keywords: State anger, anger expression, adaptation, STAXI, emotions.

Factor Structure of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory

1997 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald G. Forgays ◽  
Deborah Kirby Forgays ◽  
Charles D. Spielberger
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger

Relation of Depression to Anger and Hostility Constructs

1987 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kay Biaggio ◽  
William H. Godwin
Keyword(s):  
University Students ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Sense Of Control ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Hostility Scale

To understand better the relationship between depression and various constructs of anger and hostility, 112 university students were administered the MMPI Depression scale, the Hostility and Direction of Hostility Questionnaire, the Overcontrolled Hostility Scale, the Anger Expression Scale, and the State-Trait Anger Scale. Among depressed subjects there was a more intense experience of hostility, particularly inwardly directed hostility, and a diminished sense of control over anger or a disinclination to manage anger.

scholarly journals Psychometric Examination of an Arabic Version of the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e322-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Nakajima ◽  
Ines Bouanene ◽  
Sana El-Mhamdi ◽  
Mohamed Soltani ◽  
Stephan Bongard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anger Expression ◽  
The State ◽  
Trait Anger ◽  
Arabic Version
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document