scholarly journals Amphioxus: Beginning of Vertebrate and End of Invertebrate Type GnRH Receptor Lineage

Endocrinology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 150 (6) ◽  
pp. 2847-2856 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Tello ◽  
Nancy M. Sherwood
Keyword(s):  
Inositol Phosphate ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
Adipokinetic Hormone ◽  
Branchiostoma Floridae ◽  
Vertebrate Lineage ◽  
Functional Conservation ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Amphioxus Genome

In vertebrates, activation of the GnRH receptor is necessary to initiate the reproductive cascade. However, little is known about the characteristics of GnRH receptors before the vertebrates evolved. Recently genome sequencing was completed for amphioxus, Branchiostoma floridae. To understand the GnRH receptors (GnRHR) from this most basal chordate, which is also classified as an invertebrate, we cloned and characterized four GnRHR cDNAs encoded in the amphioxus genome. We found that incubation of GnRH1 (mammalian GnRH) and GnRH2 (chicken GnRH II) with COS7 cells heterologously expressing the amphioxus GnRHRs caused potent intracellular inositol phosphate turnover in two of the receptors. One of the two receptors displayed a clear preference for GnRH1 over GnRH2, a characteristic not previously seen outside the type I mammalian GnRHRs. Phylogenetic analysis grouped the four receptors into two paralogous pairs, with one pair grouping basally with the vertebrate GnRH receptors and the other grouping with the octopus GnRHR-like sequence and the related receptor for insect adipokinetic hormone. Pharmacological studies showed that octopus GnRH-like peptide and adipokinetic hormone induced potent inositol phosphate turnover in one of these other two amphioxus receptors. These data demonstrate the functional conservation of two distinct types of GnRH receptors at the base of chordates. We propose that one receptor type led to vertebrate GnRHRs, whereas the other type, related to the mollusk GnRHR-like receptor, was lost in the vertebrate lineage. This is the first report to suggest that distinct invertebrate and vertebrate GnRHRs are present simultaneously in a basal chordate, amphioxus.

scholarly journals Conserved Amino Acid Residues that Are Important for Ligand Binding in the Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Receptor Are Required for High Potency of GnRH II at the Type II GnRH Receptor

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sipho Mamputha ◽  
Zhi-liang Lu ◽  
Roger W. Roeske ◽  
Robert P. Millar ◽  
Arieh A. Katz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inositol Phosphate ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Antagonist Activity ◽  
Conserved Residues ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Mutant Receptors

Abstract GnRH I regulates reproduction. A second form, designated GnRH II, selectively binds type II GnRH receptors. Amino acids of the type I GnRH receptor required for binding of GnRH I (Asp2.61(98), Asn2.65(102), and Lys3.32(121)) are conserved in the type II GnRH receptor, but their roles in receptor function are unknown. We have delineated their functions using mutagenesis, signaling and binding assays, immunoblotting, and computational modeling. Mutating Asp2.61(97) to Glu or Ala, Asn2.65(101) to Ala, or Lys3.32(120) to Gln decreased potency of GnRH II-stimulated inositol phosphate production. Consistent with proposed roles in ligand recognition, mutations eliminated measurable binding of GnRH II, whereas expression of mutant receptors was not decreased. In detailed analysis of how these residues affect ligand-dependent signaling, [Trp2]-GnRH I showed lesser decreases in potency than GnRH I at the Asp2.61(97)Glu mutant. In contrast, [Trp2]-GnRH II showed the same loss of potency as GnRH II at this mutant. This suggests that Asp2.61(97) contributes to recognition of His2 of GnRH I, but not of GnRH II. GnRH II showed a large decrease in potency at the Asn2.65(101)Ala mutant compared with analogs lacking the C⋕O group of Gly10NH2. This suggests that Asn2.65(101) recognizes Gly10NH2 of GnRH II. GnRH agonists showed large decreases in potency at the Lys3.32(120)Gln mutant, but antagonist activity was unaffected. This suggests that Lys3.32(120) recognizes agonists, but not antagonists, as in the type I receptor. These data indicate that roles of conserved residues are similar, but not identical, in the type I and II GnRH receptors.

scholarly journals Mammalian Type I Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptors Undergo Slow, Constitutive, Agonist-Independent Internalization

Endocrinology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 1415-1422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Pawson ◽  
Elena Faccenda ◽  
Stuart Maudsley ◽  
Zhi-Liang Lu ◽  
Zvi Naor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
G Protein ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
G Protein Coupled Receptors ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Type I ◽  
Receptor Desensitization ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Carboxyl Terminal ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Regulatory elements present in the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of G protein-coupled receptors contribute to agonist-dependent receptor desensitization, internalization, and association with accessory proteins such as β-arrestin. The mammalian type I GnRH receptors are unique among the rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors because they lack a cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail. In addition, they do not recruit β-arrestin, nor do they undergo rapid desensitization. By measuring the internalization of labeled GnRH agonists, previous studies have reported that mammalian type I GnRH receptors undergo slow agonist-dependent internalization. In the present study, we have measured the internalization of epitope-tagged GnRH receptors, both in the absence and presence of GnRH stimulation. We demonstrate that mammalian type I GnRH receptors exhibit a low level of constitutive agonist-independent internalization. Stimulation with GnRH agonist did not significantly enhance the level of receptor internalization above the constitutive level. In contrast, the catfish GnRH and rat TRH receptors, which have cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails, displayed similar levels of constitutive agonist-independent internalization but underwent robust agonist-dependent internalization, as did chimeras of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor with the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tails of the catfish GnRH receptor or the rat TRH receptor. When the carboxyl-terminal Tyr325 and Leu328 residues of the mammalian type I GnRH receptor were replaced with alanines, these two mutant receptors underwent significantly impaired internalization, suggesting a function for the Tyr-X-X-Leu sequence in mediating the constitutive agonist-independent internalization of mammalian type I GnRH receptors. These findings provide further support for the underlying notion that the absence of the cytoplasmic carboxyl-terminal tail of the mammalian type I GnRH receptors has been selected for during evolution to prevent rapid receptor desensitization and internalization to allow protracted GnRH signaling in mammals.

scholarly journals Type II gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH-II) in reproductive biology

Reproduction ◽  
2003 ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Pawson ◽  
K Morgan ◽  
SR Maudsley ◽  
RP Millar
Keyword(s):  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Human Type ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Ligand Precursors

Humans may be particularly unusual with respect to the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) control of their reproductive axis in that they possess two distinct GnRH precursor genes, on chromosomes 8p11-p21 and 20p13, but only one conventional GnRH receptor subtype (type I GnRH receptor) encoded within the genome, on chromosome 4. A disrupted human type II GnRH receptor gene homologue is present on chromosome 1q12. The genes encoding GnRH ligand precursors and GnRH receptors have now been characterized in a broad range of vertebrate species, including fish, amphibians and mammals. Ligand precursors and receptors can be categorized into three phylogenetic families. Members of each family exist in primitive vertebrates, whereas mammals exhibit selective loss of ligand precursor and receptor genes. One interpretation of these findings is that each ligand-cognate receptor family may have evolved to fulfil a separate function in reproductive physiology and that species-specific gene inactivation, modification or loss may have occurred during evolution when particular roles have become obsolete or subject to regulation by a different biochemical pathway. Evidence in support of this concept is available following the characterization of the chromosomal loci encoding the human type II GnRH receptor homologue, a rat type II GnRH receptor gene remnant (on rat chromosome 18) and a mouse type II GnRH ligand precursor gene remnant (on mouse chromosome 2). Whether type I GnRH and type II GnRH peptides elicit different signalling responses in humans by activation of the type I GnRH receptor in a cell type-specific fashion remains to be shown. Recent structure-function studies of GnRH ligands and GnRH receptors and their expression patterns in different tissues add further intrigue to this hypothesis by indicating novel roles for GnRH such as neuromodulation of reproductive function and direct regulation of peripheral reproductive tissues. Surprises concerning the complexities of GnRH ligand and receptor function in reproductive endocrinology should continue to emerge in the future.

scholarly journals The chicken type III GnRH receptor homologue is predominantly expressed in the pituitary, and exhibits similar ligand selectivity to the type I receptor

2009 ◽  
Vol 202 (1) ◽  
pp. 179-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nerine T Joseph ◽  
Kevin Morgan ◽  
Robin Sellar ◽  
Derek McBride ◽  
Robert P Millar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inositol Phosphate ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Northern Analysis ◽  
Receptor Subtype ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Age Difference ◽  
Type I ◽  
Ligand Selectivity ◽  
Red Jungle Fowl ◽  
Sexually Mature

Two GnRH isoforms (cGnRH-I and GnRH-II) and two GnRH receptor subtypes (cGnRH-R-I and cGnRH-R-III) occur in chickens. Differential roles for these molecules in regulating gonadotrophin secretion or other functions are unclear. To investigate this we cloned cGnRH-R-III from a broiler chicken and compared its structure, expression and pharmacological properties with cGnRH-R-I. The broiler cGnRH-R-III cDNA was 100% identical to the sequence reported in the red jungle fowl and white leghorn breed. Pituitary cGnRH-R-III mRNA was ∼1400-fold more abundant than cGnRH-R-I mRNA. Northern analysis indicated a single cGnRH-R-III transcript. A pronounced sex and age difference existed, with higher pituitary transcript levels in sexually mature females versus juvenile females. In contrast, higher expression levels occurred in juvenile males versus sexually mature males. Functional studies in COS-7 cells indicated that cGnRH-R-III has a higher binding affinity for GnRH-II than cGnRH-I (Kd: 0.57 vs 19.8 nM) with more potent stimulation of inositol phosphate production (ED50: 0.8 vs 4.38 nM). Similar results were found for cGnRH-R-I, (Kd: 0.51 vs 10.8 nM) and (ED50: 0.7 vs 2.8 nM). The initial rate of internalisation was faster for cGnRH-R-III than cGnRH-R-I (26 vs 15.8%/min). Effects of GnRH antagonists were compared at the two receptors. Antagonist #27 distinguished between cGnRH-R-I and cGnRH-R-III (IC50: 2.3 vs 351 nM). These results suggest that cGnRH-R-III is probably the major mediator of pituitary gonadotroph function, that antagonist #27 may allow delineation of receptor subtype function in vitro and in vivo and that tissue-specific recruitment of cGnRH-R isoforms has occurred during evolution.

scholarly journals Cloning and Characterization of a Functional Type II Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor with a Lengthy Carboxy-Terminal Tail from an Ancestral Vertebrate, the Sea Lamprey

Endocrinology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (8) ◽  
pp. 3351-3361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Silver ◽  
Nathaniel V. Nucci ◽  
Adam R. Root ◽  
Karen L. Reed ◽  
Stacia A. Sower
Keyword(s):  
Inositol Phosphate ◽  
Sea Lamprey ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Functional Type ◽  
Vertebrate Lineage ◽  
Functional Features ◽  
Full Length Transcript ◽  
Carboxy Terminal

Abstract A full-length transcript encoding a functional type II GnRH receptor was cloned from the pituitary of the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. The current study is the first to identify a pituitary GnRH receptor transcript in an agnathan, which is the oldest vertebrate lineage. The cloned receptor retains the conserved structural features and amino acid motifs of other known GnRH receptors and notably includes a C-terminal intracellular tail of approximately 120 amino acids, the longest C-terminal tail of any vertebrate GnRH receptor identified to date. The lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to activate the inositol phosphate (IP) signaling system; stimulation with either lamprey GnRH-I or lamprey GnRH-III led to dose-dependent responses in transiently transfected COS7 cells. Furthermore, analyses of serially truncated lamprey GnRH receptor mutants indicate perturbations of the C-terminal tail disrupts IP accumulation, however, the tailless lamprey GnRH receptor was not only functional but was also capable of stimulating IP levels equal to wild type. Expression of the receptor transcript was demonstrated in the pituitary and testes using RT-PCR, whereas in situ hybridization showed expression and localization of the transcript in the proximal pars distalis of the pituitary. The phylogenetic placement and structural and functional features of this GnRH receptor suggest that it is representative of an ancestral GnRH receptor. In addition to having an important role in lamprey reproductive processes, the extensive C-terminal tail of this lamprey GnRH receptor may have great significance for understanding the evolutionary change of this vital structural feature within the GnRH receptor family.

scholarly journals Tunicate Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Peptides Selectively Activate Ciona intestinalis GnRH Receptors and the Green Monkey Type II GnRH Receptor

Endocrinology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 146 (9) ◽  
pp. 4061-4073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier A. Tello ◽  
Jean E. Rivier ◽  
Nancy M. Sherwood
Keyword(s):  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Inositol Phosphate ◽  
Ciona Intestinalis ◽  
Positive Control ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Intracellular Camp ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Green Monkey

Abstract In vertebrates, GnRH binds to its receptor and stimulates predominantly Gq/11-mediated signal transduction in gonadotropes. However, little is known about the GnRH receptor and its signaling pathway in tunicates, a group that arose before the vertebrates. Although tunicates have had duplications of a few genes in the last 600 million years, the early vertebrates had duplications of the full genome. Also unknown is the nature of GnRH signaling in the tunicate, which lacks both a pituitary gland and sex steroids. However, we know that tunicates have GnRH peptides because we previously reported six GnRH peptides encoded within the tunicate genome of Ciona intestinalis. Here we clone and sequence cDNAs for four putative GnRH receptors from C. intestinalis. These are the only invertebrate GnRH receptors found to date. Each Ciona GnRH receptor was expressed in COS-7 cells, incubated with each of the six C. intestinalis GnRHs and assayed for a signaling response. GnRH receptors 1, 2, and 3 responded to Ciona GnRH peptides to stimulate intracellular cAMP accumulation. In contrast, only GnRH receptor 1 activated inositol phosphate turnover in response to one of the Ciona GnRHs. The green monkey type II GnRH receptor cDNA was tested as a comparison and a positive control. In conclusion, the four GnRH receptors encoded within the C. intestinalis genome were all transcribed into messenger RNA, but only three of the Ciona GnRH receptors were biologically active in our assays. The Ciona GnRH receptors almost exclusively activated the cAMP pathway.

scholarly journals Functional characterization and kinetic studies of an ancestral lamprey GnRH-III selective type II GnRH receptor from the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
M R Silver ◽  
S A Sower
Keyword(s):  
Intact Cell ◽  
Functional Characterization ◽  
Kinetic Studies ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Gnrh Receptors ◽  
Series Of Experiments

The recently cloned lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to have several unique features, including the longest intracellular C-terminal tail (120 amino acids (aa)) of any previously described GnRH receptor. In the current study, a series of experiments were performed examining cAMP responses, binding kinetics, whole cell competitive binding assays and internalization studies of the lamprey GnRH receptor using a series of three C-terminal tail truncations (80 aa, 40 aa and 0 aa) to better describe the functional significance of this unique vertebrate GnRH receptor. Activation of the lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to stimulate cAMP production in a dose-dependant manner when treated with either lamprey GnRH-I (LogEC50 −6.57±0.15) or lamprey GnRH-III (LogEC50 −8.29±0.09). Truncation analysis indicated that the membrane proximal 40 aa of the lamprey GnRH receptor C-terminal tail contain a motif required for cAMP accumulation. Saturation binding assays using the wild type and truncated lamprey GnRH receptors revealed that all of three truncated lamprey GnRH receptors were capable of binding lamprey GnRH-I. Competitive, intact cell-binding assays suggested that the lamprey GnRH receptor is lamprey GnRH-III selective, based on the observed pharmacological profile: lamprey GnRH-III (Inhibitory constant (Ki) 0.708±0.245 nM)=chicken GnRH-II (Ki 0.765±0.160 nM) > mammalian GnRH (Ki 12.9±1.96 nM) > dAla6Pro9NEt mammalian GnRH (Ki 21.6±9.68 nM) > lamprey GnRH-I (Ki 118.0±23.6). Finally, the lamprey GnRH receptor was shown to undergo rapid ligand-dependant internalization, which was significantly diminished in the tail-less truncated form. We have shown from our current and our previous structural studies that this unique lamprey GnRH receptor shares several characteristics of both type I and type II GnRH receptors which suggests that this receptor has retained ancestral characteristics that can provide insight into the function and evolution of the vertebrate GnRH receptor family.

scholarly journals Charged Residues Flanking the Transmembrane Domain of Two Related Toxin–Antitoxin System Toxins Affect Host Response

Toxins ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 329
Author(s):  
Andrew Holmes ◽  
Jessie Sadlon ◽  
Keith Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Host Response ◽  
Cytoplasmic Membrane ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
Transcriptomic Response ◽  
Specific Amino Acid ◽  
Transporter Protein

A majority of toxins produced by type I toxin–antitoxin (TA-1) systems are small membrane-localized proteins that were initially proposed to kill cells by forming non-specific pores in the cytoplasmic membrane. The examination of the effects of numerous TA-1 systems indicates that this is not the mechanism of action of many of these proteins. Enterococcus faecalis produces two toxins of the Fst/Ldr family, one encoded on pheromone-responsive conjugative plasmids (FstpAD1) and the other on the chromosome, FstEF0409. Previous results demonstrated that overexpression of the toxins produced a differential transcriptomic response in E. faecalis cells. In this report, we identify the specific amino acid differences between the two toxins responsible for the differential response of a gene highly induced by FstpAD1 but not FstEF0409. In addition, we demonstrate that a transporter protein that is genetically linked to the chromosomal version of the TA-1 system functions to limit the toxicity of the protein.

Burn-in procedures for a generalized model

2001 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 542-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hwan Cha
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Replacement Policy ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Failure Model ◽  
Minimal Repair ◽  
Optimal Replacement ◽  
Complete Repair ◽  
Optimal Replacement Policy ◽  
Type Of Failure

In this paper two burn-in procedures for a general failure model are considered. There are two types of failure in the general failure model. One is Type I failure (minor failure) which can be removed by a minimal repair or a complete repair and the other is Type II failure (catastrophic failure) which can be removed only by a complete repair. During a burn-in process, with burn-in Procedure I, the failed component is repaired completely regardless of the type of failure, whereas, with burn-in Procedure II, only minimal repair is done for the Type I failure and a complete repair is performed for the Type II failure. In field use, the component is replaced by a new burned-in component at the ‘field use age’ T or at the time of the first Type II failure, whichever occurs first. Under the model, the problems of determining optimal burn-in time and optimal replacement policy are considered. The two burn-in procedures are compared in cases when both the procedures are applicable.

Comparison of Means: An F Test Followed by a Modified Multiple Range Procedure

1979 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet Popper Shaffer
Keyword(s):  
Error Control ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Critical Value ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
F Test ◽  
Range Test

If used only when a preliminary F test yields significance, the usual multiple range procedures can be modified to increase the probability of detecting differences without changing the control of Type I error. The modification consists of a reduction in the critical value when comparing the largest and smallest means. Equivalence of modified and unmodified procedures in error control is demonstrated. The modified procedure is also compared with the alternative of using the unmodified range test without a preliminary F test, and it is shown that each has advantages over the other under some circumstances.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document