The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Akam
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
The Body ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Simple Pattern ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Maternal Determinants ◽  
Segment Pattern ◽  
Pair Rule

The metameric organization of the Drosophila embryo is generated in the first 5 h after fertilization. An initially rather simple pattern provides the foundation for subsequent development and diversification of the segmented part of the body. Many of the genes that control the formation of this pattern have been identified and at least twenty have been cloned. By combining the techniques of genetics, molecular biology and experimental embryology, it is becoming possible to unravel the role played by each of these genes. The repeating segment pattern is defined by the persistent expression of engrailed and of other genes of the ‘segment polarity’ class. The establishment of this pattern is directed by a transient molecular prepattern that is generated in the blastoderm by the activity of the ‘pair-rule’ genes. Maternal determinants at the poles of the egg coordinate this prepattern and define the anteroposterior sequence of pattern elements. The primary effect of these determinants is not known, but genes required for their production have been identified and the product of one of these, bicoid is known to be localized at the anterior of the egg. One early consequence of their activity is to define domains along the A-P axis within which a series of ‘cardinal’ genes are transcribed. The activity of the cardinal genes is required both to coordinate the process of segmentation and to define the early domains of homeotic gene expression. Further interactions between the homeotic genes and other classes of segmentation genes refine the initial establishment of segment identities.

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Function in the Drosophila Embryo

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-284
Author(s):  
William D Tracey ◽  
Xiangqun Ning ◽  
Martin Klingler ◽  
Sunita G Kramer ◽  
J Peter Gergen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Function ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Developmental Context ◽  
Maternal Mrna ◽  
Early Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule

Abstract The specific functions of gene products frequently depend on the developmental context in which they are expressed. Thus, studies on gene function will benefit from systems that allow for manipulation of gene expression within model systems where the developmental context is well defined. Here we describe a system that allows for genetically controlled overexpression of any gene of interest under normal physiological conditions in the early Drosophila embryo. This regulated expression is achieved through the use of Drosophila lines that express a maternal mRNA for the yeast transcription factor GAL4. Embryos derived from females that express GAL4 maternally activate GAL4-dependent UAS transgenes at uniform levels throughout the embryo during the blastoderm stage of embryogenesis. The expression levels can be quantitatively manipulated through the use of lines that have different levels of maternal GAL4 activity. Specific phenotypes are produced by expression of a number of different developmental regulators with this system, including genes that normally do not function during Drosophila embryogenesis. Analysis of the response to overexpression of runt provides evidence that this pair-rule segmentation gene has a direct role in repressing transcription of the segment-polarity gene engrailed. The maternal GAL4 system will have applications both for the measurement of gene activity in reverse genetic experiments as well as for the identification of genetic factors that have quantitative effects on gene function in vivo.

Hierarchy of the genetic interactions that specify the anteroposterior segmentation pattern of the Drosophila embryo as monitored by caudal protein expression

Development ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mlodzik ◽  
W.J. Gehring
Keyword(s):  
Protein Product ◽  
The Body ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Fate Map ◽  
Gradient Distribution ◽  
Segmentation Genes ◽  
Anteroposterior Axis ◽  
Segmentation Pattern ◽  
Maternal Determinants ◽  
Homeotic Selector

The establishment of the body pattern of Drosophila along the anteroposterior axis requires the coordinated functions of at least three classes of genes. First, the maternally active coordinate genes define the polarity of the embryo and act as primary determinants; second, the segmentation genes divide the developing embryo into the correct number of segments and third, the segments become specified by the homeotic selector genes. We have examined the effects of mutations in the genes of the first two classes on the spatial distribution of the protein product(s) of the caudal (cad) gene, which in wild type shows a graded distribution along the anteroposterior axis during the syncytial blastoderm stage, whereas its persistent zygotic expression is confined to the telson region (the posterior terminal structures). Mutations in maternal genes that specify the spatial coordinates of the egg and the future embryo change the gradient distribution of cad according to the alterations of the fate map which they produce. A second group of maternally expressed genes, the gap genes of the ‘grandchildless-knirps’ group, which are considered to represent posterior activities, do not have any effect on the cad gradient. The same is true for the zygotic segmentation genes that are active after fertilization. However, the same class of zygotic genes partly affects the zygotic cad expression in the telson. Therefore, the two phases of cad expression represent different levels within the genetic hierarchy. The cad protein gradient seems to form in response to the primary maternal determinants independent of the segmentation genes, whereas the latter influence zygotic cad expression in the telson region which corresponds to a homeotic selector gene function.

Dynamic changes in the functions of Odd-skipped during early Drosophila embryogenesis

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (23) ◽  
pp. 4851-4861 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Saulier-Le Drean ◽  
A. Nasiadka ◽  
J. Dong ◽  
H.M. Krause
Keyword(s):  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Dynamic Changes ◽  
Stage Of Development ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Candidate Target ◽  
Pair Rule

Although many of the genes that pattern the segmented body plan of the Drosophila embryo are known, there remains much to learn in terms of how these genes and their products interact with one another. Like many of these gene products, the protein encoded by the pair-rule gene odd-skipped (Odd) is a DNA-binding transcription factor. Genetic experiments have suggested several candidate target genes for Odd, all of which appear to be negatively regulated. Here we use pulses of ectopic Odd expression to test the response of these and other segmentation genes. The results are complex, indicating that Odd is capable of repressing some genes wherever and whenever Odd is expressed, while the ability to repress others is temporally or spatially restricted. Moreover, one target gene, fushi tarazu, is both repressed and activated by Odd, the outcome depending upon the stage of development. These results indicate that the activity of Odd is highly dependent upon the presence of cofactors and/or overriding inhibitors. Based on these results, and the segmental phenotypes generated by ectopic Odd, we suggest a number of new roles for Odd in the patterning of embryonic segments. These include gap-, pair-rule- and segment polarity-type functions.

ladybird, a tandem of homeobox genes that maintain late wingless expression in terminal and dorsal epidermis of the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Jagla ◽  
T. Jagla ◽  
P. Heitzler ◽  
G. Dretzen ◽  
F. Bellard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
The Body ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Anal Plate ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Cdna Sequences ◽  
Complete Inactivation ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Regulatory Feedback Loop ◽  
Dorsal Epidermis

ladybird early and ladybird late genes, tandemly located in the Drosophila 93E homeobox gene cluster, encode highly related homeodomain-containing transcription factors. Here we report the cloning of the complete cDNA sequences of both genes and a study of their expression and regulatory interactions with the segment polarity gene wingless in the epidermis. ladybird genes are co-expressed with wingless in epidermal cells close to the posterior parasegmental boundaries and in terminal regions of the body. In mutant embryos with altered wingless function, transcription of ladybird early and ladybird late is changed; it disappears completely from the epidermis in wingless-embryos, indicating wingless-dependence. After 6 hours of development, wingless expression is maintained by gooseberry in the ventral epidermis. However, in the dorsal epidermis and the terminal regions of the body, expression of wingless is independent of gooseberry but requires a wingless-ladybird regulatory feedback loop. Loss of ladybird function reduces the number of wingless-expressing cells in dorsal epidermis and leads to complete inactivation of wingless in the anal plate. Consequently, mutant ladybird embryos fail to develop anal plates and ubiquitous embryonic expression of either one or both ladybird genes leads to severe defects of the dorsal cuticle. Lack of late wingless expression and anal plate formation can be rescued with the use of a heat-shock-ladybird transgene.

Analysis of maternal effect mutant combinations elucidates regulation and function of the overlap of hunchback and Kruppel gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Gaul ◽  
H. Jackle
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Effect ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Protein Distribution ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
And Function ◽  
Pair Rule

The metameric organisation of the Drosophila embryo is generated early during development, due to the action of maternal effect and zygotic segmentation and homeotic genes. The gap genes participate in the complex process of pattern formation by providing a link between the maternal and the zygotic gene activities. Under the influence of maternal gene products they become expressed in distinct domains along the anteroposterior axis of the embryo; negative interactions between neighboring gap genes are thought to be involved in establishing the expression domains. The gap gene activities in turn are required for the correct patterning of the pair-rule genes; little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms. We have monitored the distribution of gap and pair-rule genes in wild-type embryos and in embryos in which the anteroposterior body pattern is greatly simplified due to combinations of maternal effect mutations (staufen exuperantia, vasa exuperantia, vasa exuperantia, bicoid oskar, bicoid oskar torsolike, vasa torso exuperantia). We show that the domains of protein distribution of the gap genes hunchback and Kruppel overlap in wild-type embryos. Based on the analysis of the maternal mutant combinations, we suggest an explanation of how this overlap is generated. Furthermore, our data show that different constellations of gap gene activities provide different input for the pair-rule genes, and thus strongly suggest that the overlap of hunchback and Kruppel in wild-type is functional in the formation of the patterns of pair-rule genes.

Polyembryonic development: insect pattern formation in a cellularized environment

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Grbic ◽  
L.M. Nagy ◽  
S.B. Carroll ◽  
M. Strand
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Regulatory Proteins ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Axial Patterning ◽  
Copidosoma Floridanum ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Egg Polarity ◽  
Polarity Gene

THe polyembryonic wasp Copidosoma floridanum produces up to 2000 individuals from a single egg. During the production of individual embryos the original anteroposterior axis of the egg is lost and axial patterning must subsequently be reestablished within each embryo. The mechanism by which this occurs is unknown. In most insects, egg polarity is established during oogenesis and early development takes place in a syncytium. In Drosophila melanogaster, the syncytium is considered essential for establishing the morphogenetic gradients that initiate segmental patterning. However, we found that development of C. floridanum occurs almost exclusively in a cellularized environment. To determine whether the D. melanogaster patterning cascade is conserved in the absence of a syncytium, we analyzed the expression of Even-skipped, Engrailed and Ultrabithorax/Abdominal-A during polyembryonic development. Here we show that in spite of the absence of a syncytium, the elements of the D. melanogaster segmentation hierarchy are conserved. The segment-polarity gene Engrailed and the homeotic genes Ultrabithorax/Abdominal-A are expressed in a conserved pattern relative to D. melanogaster. However, we detect an alteration in the expression of the Even-skipped antigen. Even-skipped is initially expressed in segmentally reiterated stripes and not in the pair-rule pattern as it is in D. melanogaster. We also observe that the expression of these regulatory proteins does not occur during the early proliferative phases of polyembryony. Our results indicate that a syncytium is not required for segmental patterning in this insect.

scholarly journals Growth zone segmentation in the milkweed bug Oncopeltus fasciatus sheds light on the evolution of insect segmentation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tzach Auman ◽  
Ariel D. Chipman
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Growth Zone ◽  
Oncopeltus Fasciatus ◽  
Milkweed Bug ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Temporal Relationships ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Segment Pattern ◽  
Pair Rule

AbstractOne of the best studied developmental processes is the Drosophila segmentation cascade. However, this cascade is generally considered to be highly derived and unusual. We present a detailed analysis of the sequential segmentation cascade of the milkweed bug Oncopletus fasciatus, as a comparison to Drosophila, with the aim of reconstructing the evolution of insect segmentation. We analyzed the expression of 12 genes, representing different phases during segmentation. We reconstruct the spatio-temporal relationships among these genes And their roles and position in the cascade. We conclude that sequential segmentation in the Oncopeltus germband includes three phases: Primary pair-rule genes generate segmental gene expression in the anterior growth zone, followed by secondary pair-rule genes, expressed in the transition between the growth zone and the segmented germband. Segment polarity genes are expressed in the segmented germband. This process generates a single-segment periodicity, and does not have a double-segment pattern at any stage.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Structure and Expression of odd-skipped and Two Related Genes That Encode a New Family of Zinc Finger Proteins in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn C Hart ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Douglas E Coulter
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Functional Divergence ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Amino Acid Substitutions ◽  
New Family ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule

Abstract The odd-skipped (odd) gene, which was identified on the basis of a pair-rule segmentation phenotype in mutant embryos, is initially expressed in the Drosophila embryo in seven pair-rule stripes, but later exhibits a segment polarity-like pattern for which no phenotypic correlate is apparent. We have molecularly characterized two embryonically expressed odd-cognate genes, sob and bowel (bowl), that encode proteins with highly conserved C2H2 zinc fingers. While the Sob and Bowl proteins each contain five tandem fingers, the Odd protein lacks a fifth (C-terminal) finger and is also less conserved among the four common fingers. Reminiscent of many segmentation gene paralogues, the closely linked odd and sob genes are expressed during embryogenesis in similar striped patterns; in contrast, the less-tightly linked bowlgene is expressed in a distinctly different pattern at the termini of the early embryo. Although our results indicate that odd and sob are more likely than bowl to share overlapping developmental roles, some functional divergence between the Odd and Sob proteins is suggested by the absence of homology outside the zinc fingers, and also by amino acid substitutions in the Odd zinc fingers at positions that appear to be constrained in Sob and Bowl.

Head versus trunk patterning in the Drosophila embryo; collier requirement for formation of the intercalary segment

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (19) ◽  
pp. 4385-4394 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Crozatier ◽  
D. Valle ◽  
L. Dubois ◽  
S. Ibnsouda ◽  
A. Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Phenotypic Analysis ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Combinatorial Model ◽  
Hlh Transcription Factors ◽  
Head Skeleton ◽  
Pair Rule

Whereas the segmental nature of the insect head is well established, relatively little is known about the genetic and molecular mechanisms governing this process. In this paper, we report the phenotypic analysis of mutations in collier (col), which encodes the Drosophila member of the COE family of HLH transcription factors and is activated at the blastoderm stage in a region overlapping a parasegment (PS0: posterior intercalary and anterior mandibular segments) and a mitotic domain, MD2. col mutant embryos specifically lack intercalary ectodermal structures. col activity is required for intercalary-segment expression both of the segment polarity genes hedgehog, engrailed, and wingless, and of the segment identity gene cap and collar. The parasegmental register of col activation is controlled by the combined activities of the head-gap genes buttonhead and empty spiracles and the pair-rule gene even skipped; it therefore integrates inputs from both the head and trunk segmentation systems, which were previously considered as being essentially independent. After gastrulation, positive autoregulation of col is limited to cells of anterior PS0. Conversely, heat-pulse induced ubiquitous expression of Col leads to disruption of the head skeleton. Together, these results indicate that col is required for establishment of the PS(−1)/PS0 parasegmental border and formation of the intercalary segment. Our data support neither a simple combinatorial model for segmental patterning of the head nor a direct activation of segment polarity gene expression by head-gap genes, but rather argue for the existence of parasegment-specific second order regulators acting in the head, at a level similar to that of pair-rule genes in the trunk.

Regulation of wingless transcription in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 283-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.W. Ingham ◽  
A. Hidalgo
Keyword(s):  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathway ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Transduction Pathway ◽  
Segment Polarity Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Segment Polarity Gene ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Polarity Gene

The segment polarity gene wingless (wg) is expressed in a complex pattern during embryogenesis suggesting that it plays multiple roles in the development of the embryo. The best characterized of these is its role in cell pattening in each parasegment, a process that requires the activity of other segment polarity genes including patched (ptc) and hedgehog (hh). Here we present further evidence that ptc and hh encode components of a signal transduction pathway that regulate the expression of wg transcription following its activation by pair-rule genes. We also show that most other aspects of wg expression are independent of this regulatory network.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document