Analysis of maternal effect mutant combinations elucidates regulation and function of the overlap of hunchback and Kruppel gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm embryo

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 651-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Gaul ◽  
H. Jackle
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Effect ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Protein Distribution ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms ◽  
And Function ◽  
Pair Rule

The metameric organisation of the Drosophila embryo is generated early during development, due to the action of maternal effect and zygotic segmentation and homeotic genes. The gap genes participate in the complex process of pattern formation by providing a link between the maternal and the zygotic gene activities. Under the influence of maternal gene products they become expressed in distinct domains along the anteroposterior axis of the embryo; negative interactions between neighboring gap genes are thought to be involved in establishing the expression domains. The gap gene activities in turn are required for the correct patterning of the pair-rule genes; little is known, however, about the underlying mechanisms. We have monitored the distribution of gap and pair-rule genes in wild-type embryos and in embryos in which the anteroposterior body pattern is greatly simplified due to combinations of maternal effect mutations (staufen exuperantia, vasa exuperantia, vasa exuperantia, bicoid oskar, bicoid oskar torsolike, vasa torso exuperantia). We show that the domains of protein distribution of the gap genes hunchback and Kruppel overlap in wild-type embryos. Based on the analysis of the maternal mutant combinations, we suggest an explanation of how this overlap is generated. Furthermore, our data show that different constellations of gap gene activities provide different input for the pair-rule genes, and thus strongly suggest that the overlap of hunchback and Kruppel in wild-type is functional in the formation of the patterns of pair-rule genes.

Two distinct mechanisms for differential positioning of gene expression borders involving the Drosophila gap protein giant

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (19) ◽  
pp. 3765-3774 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Wu ◽  
R. Vakani ◽  
S. Small
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Early Embryo ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Anterior Border ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Differential Positioning ◽  
Pair Rule

We have combined genetic experiments and a targeted misexpression approach to examine the role of the gap gene giant (gt) in patterning anterior regions of the Drosophila embryo. Our results suggest that gt functions in the repression of three target genes, the gap genes Kruppel (Kr) and hunchback (hb), and the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve). The anterior border of Kr, which lies 4–5 nucleus diameters posterior to nuclei that express gt mRNA, is set by a threshold repression mechanism involving very low levels of gt protein. In contrast, gt activity is required, but not sufficient for formation of the anterior border of eve stripe 2, which lies adjacent to nuclei that express gt mRNA. We propose that gt's role in forming this border is to potentiate repressive interaction(s) mediated by other factor(s) that are also localized to anterior regions of the early embryo. Finally, gt is required for repression of zygotic hb expression in more anterior regions of the embryo. The differential responses of these target genes to gt repression are critical for the correct positioning and maintenance of segmentation stripes, and normal anterior development.

Posterior stripe expression of hunchback is driven from two promoters by a common enhancer element

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 3067-3077 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Margolis ◽  
M.L. Borowsky ◽  
E. Steingrimsson ◽  
C.W. Shim ◽  
J.A. Lengyel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Upstream Region ◽  
Enhancer Element ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Two Phases ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient

The gap gene hunchback (hb) is required for the formation and segmentation of two regions of the Drosophila embryo, a broad anterior domain and a narrow posterior domain. Accumulation of hb transcript in the posterior of the embryo occurs in two phases, an initial cap covering the terminal 15% of the embryo followed by a stripe at the anterior edge of this region. By in situ hybridization with transcript-specific probes, we show that the cap is composed only of mRNA from the distal transcription initiation site (P1), while the later posterior stripe is composed of mRNA from both the distal and proximal (P2) transcription initiation sites. Using a series of genomic rescue constructs and promoter-lacZ fusion genes, we define a 1.4 kb fragment of the hb upstream region that is both necessary and sufficient for posterior expression. Sequences within this fragment mediate regulation by the terminal gap genes tailless (tll) and a huckebein, which direct the formation of the posterior hb stripe. We show that the tll protein binds in vitro to specific sites within the 1.4 kb posterior enhancer region, providing the first direct evidence for activation of gene expression by tll. We propose a model in which the anterior border of the posterior hb stripe is determined by tll concentration in a manner analogous to the activation of anterior hb expression by bicoid.

Positioning adjacent pair-rule stripes in the posterior Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (10) ◽  
pp. 2945-2955 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Langeland ◽  
S.F. Attai ◽  
K. Vorwerk ◽  
S.B. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Posterior Border ◽  
Adjacent Pair ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Competitive Mechanism ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Drosophila Embryos ◽  
Do So

We present a genetic and molecular analysis of two hairy (h) pair-rule stripes in order to determine how gradients of gap proteins position adjacent stripes of gene expression in the posterior of Drosophila embryos. We have delimited regulatory sequences critical for the expression of h stripes 5 and 6 to 302 bp and 526 bp fragments, respectively, and assayed the expression of stripe-specific reporter constructs in several gap mutant backgrounds. We demonstrate that posterior stripe boundaries are established by gap protein repressors unique to each stripe: h stripe 5 is repressed by the giant (gt) protein on its posterior border and h stripe 6 is repressed by the hunchback (hb) protein on its posterior border. Interestingly, Kruppel (Kr) limits the anterior expression limits of both stripes and is the only gap gene to do so, indicating that stripes 5 and 6 may be coordinately positioned by the Kr repressor. In contrast to these very similar cases of spatial repression, stripes 5 and 6 appear to be activated by different mechanisms. Stripe 6 is critically dependent upon knirps (kni) for activation, while stripe 5 likely requires a combination of activating proteins (gap and non-gap). To begin a mechanistic understanding of stripe formation, we locate binding sites for the Kr protein in both stripe enhancers. The stripe 6 enhancer contains higher affinity Kr-binding sites than the stripe 5 enhancer, which may allow for the two stripes to be repressed at different Kr protein concentration thresholds. We also demonstrate that the kni activator binds to the stripe 6 enhancer and present evidence for a competitive mechanism of Kr repression of stripe 6.

The molecular basis for metameric pattern in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Akam
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
The Body ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Homeotic Genes ◽  
Simple Pattern ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Maternal Determinants ◽  
Segment Pattern ◽  
Pair Rule

The metameric organization of the Drosophila embryo is generated in the first 5 h after fertilization. An initially rather simple pattern provides the foundation for subsequent development and diversification of the segmented part of the body. Many of the genes that control the formation of this pattern have been identified and at least twenty have been cloned. By combining the techniques of genetics, molecular biology and experimental embryology, it is becoming possible to unravel the role played by each of these genes. The repeating segment pattern is defined by the persistent expression of engrailed and of other genes of the ‘segment polarity’ class. The establishment of this pattern is directed by a transient molecular prepattern that is generated in the blastoderm by the activity of the ‘pair-rule’ genes. Maternal determinants at the poles of the egg coordinate this prepattern and define the anteroposterior sequence of pattern elements. The primary effect of these determinants is not known, but genes required for their production have been identified and the product of one of these, bicoid is known to be localized at the anterior of the egg. One early consequence of their activity is to define domains along the A-P axis within which a series of ‘cardinal’ genes are transcribed. The activity of the cardinal genes is required both to coordinate the process of segmentation and to define the early domains of homeotic gene expression. Further interactions between the homeotic genes and other classes of segmentation genes refine the initial establishment of segment identities.

scholarly journals The neuroblast timer gene nubbin exhibits functional redundancy with gap genes to regulate segment identity in Tribolium

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia R A Tidswell ◽  
Matthew A Benton ◽  
Michael E Akam
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Gene Network ◽  
In Situ Hybridisation ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Sequential Mode ◽  
And Function

In Drosophila, segmentation genes of the gap class form a regulatory network that positions segment boundaries and assigns segment identities. This gene network shows striking parallels with another gene network known as the neuroblast timer series. The neuroblast timer genes hunchback, Krüppel, nubbin, and castor are expressed in temporal sequence in neural stem cells to regulate the fate of their progeny. These same four genes are expressed in corresponding spatial sequence along the Drosophila blastoderm. The first two, hunchback and Krüppel, are canonical gap genes, but nubbin and castor have limited or no roles in Drosophila segmentation. Whether nubbin and castor regulate segmentation in insects with the ancestral, sequential mode of segmentation remains largely unexplored. We have investigated the expression and functions of nubbin and castor during segment patterning in the sequentially-segmenting beetle Tribolium. Using multiplex fluorescent in situ hybridisation, we show that Tc-hunchback, Tc-Krüppel, Tc-nubbin and Tc-castor are expressed sequentially in the segment addition zone of Tribolium, in the same order as they are expressed in Drosophila neuroblasts. Furthermore, simultaneous disruption of multiple genes reveals that Tc-nubbin regulates segment identity, but does so redundantly with two previously described gap/gap-like genes, Tc-giant and Tc-knirps. Knockdown of two or more of these genes results in the formation of up to seven pairs of ectopic legs on abdominal segments. We show that this homeotic transformation is caused by loss of abdominal Hox gene expression, likely due to expanded Tc-Krüppel expression. Our findings support the theory that the neuroblast timer series was co-opted for use in insect segment patterning, and contribute to our growing understanding of the evolution and function of the gap gene network outside of Drosophila.

Activation of the easter zymogen is regulated by five other genes to define dorsal-ventral polarity in the Drosophila embryo

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. 607-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Chasan ◽  
Y. Jin ◽  
K.V. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Effect ◽  
Serine Proteases ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Vitelline Membrane ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Zymogen Activation ◽  
Embryonic Polarity ◽  
Dominant Mutant ◽  
Maternal Effect Genes

The product of the Drosophila easter gene, a member of the trypsin family of serine proteases, must be more active ventrally than dorsally to promote normal embryonic polarity. The majority of the easter protein in the embryo is present in the unprocessed zymogen form and appears to be evenly distributed in the extracellular space, indicating that the asymmetric activity of wild-type easter must arise post-translationally. A dominant mutant form of easter that does not require cleavage of the zymogen for activity (ea delta N) is active both dorsally and ventrally. The ea delta N mutant bypasses the requirement for five other maternal effect genes, indicating that these five genes exert their effects on dorsal-ventral patterning solely by controlling the activation of the easter zymogen. We propose that dorsal-ventral asymmetry is initiated by a ventrally-localized molecule in the vitelline membrane that nucleates an easter zymogen activation complex, leading to the production of ventrally active easter enzyme.

scholarly journals Embryonic geometry underlies phenotypic variation in decanalized conditions

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anqi Huang ◽  
Jean-François Rupprecht ◽  
Timothy E Saunders
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Phenotypic Variation ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Segmentation Gene Expression ◽  
Environmental Variations ◽  
Anterior Posterior

During development, many mutations cause increased variation in phenotypic outcomes, a phenomenon termed decanalization. Phenotypic discordance is often observed in the absence of genetic and environmental variations, but the mechanisms underlying such inter-individual phenotypic discordance remain elusive. Here, using the anterior-posterior (AP) patterning of the Drosophila embryo, we identified embryonic geometry as a key factor predetermining patterning outcomes under decanalizing mutations. With the wild-type AP patterning network, we found that AP patterning is robust to variations in embryonic geometry; segmentation gene expression remains reproducible even when the embryo aspect ratio is artificially reduced by more than twofold. In contrast, embryonic geometry is highly predictive of individual patterning defects under decanalized conditions of either increased bicoid (bcd) dosage or bcd knockout. We showed that the phenotypic discordance can be traced back to variations in the gap gene expression, which is rendered sensitive to the geometry of the embryo under mutations.

Segmental polarity and identity in the abdomen of Drosophila is controlled by the relative position of gap gene expression

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 21-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Lehmann ◽  
Hans Georg Frohnhöfer
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Relative Concentration ◽  
Posterior Pole ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Posterior Group ◽  
Pole Plasm ◽  
Maternal Gene

The establishment of the segmental pattern in the Drosophila embryo is directed by three sets of maternal genes: the anterior, the terminal and the posterior group of genes. Embryos derived from females mutant for one of the posterior group genes lack abdominal segmentation. This phenotype can be rescued by transplantation of posterior pole plasm into the abdominal region of mutant embryos. We transplanted posterior pole plasm into the middle of embryos mutant either for the posterior, the anterior and posterior, or all three maternal systems and monitored the segmentation pattern as well as the expression of the zygotic gap gene Krüppel in control and injected embryos. We conclude that polarity and identity of the abdominal segments do not depend on the relative concentration of posterior activity but rather on the position of gap gene expression. By changing the pattern of gap gene expression, the orientation of the abdomen can be reversed. These experiments suggest that maternal gene products act in a strictly hierarchical manner. The function of the maternal gene products becomes dispensable once the position of the zygotically expressed gap genes is determined. Subsequently the gap genes will control the pattern of the pair-rule and segment polarity genes.

The zygotic control of Drosophila pair-rule gene expression. II. Spatial repression by gap and pair-rule gene products

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.B. Carroll ◽  
S.H. Vavra
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Gene Mutant ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Regulatory Effects ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Zygotic Control

We examined gene expression patterns in certain single and double pair-rule mutant embryos to determine which of the largely repressive pair-rule gene interactions are most likely to be direct and which interactions are probably indirect. From these studies we conclude that: (i) hairy+ and even-skipped (eve+) regulate the fushi tarazu (ftz) gene; (ii) eve+ and runt+ regulate the hairy gene; (iii) runt+ regulates the eve gene; but, (iv) runt does not regulate the ftz gene pattern, and hairy does not regulate the eve gene pattern. These pair-rule interactions are not sufficient, however, to explain the periodicity of the hairy and eve patterns, so we examined specific gap gene mutant combinations to uncover their regulatory effects on these two genes. Our surprising observation is that the hairy and eve genes are expressed in embryos where the three key gap genes hunchback (hb), Kruppel (Kr), and knirps (kni) have been removed, indicating that these gap genes are not essential to activate the pair-rule genes. In fact, we show that in the absence of either hb+ or kni+, or both gap genes, the Kr+ product represses hairy expression. These results suggest that gap genes repress hairy expression in the interstripe regions, rather than activate hairy expression in the stripes. The molecular basis of pair-rule gene regulation by gap genes must involve some dual control mechanisms such that combinations of gap genes affect pair-rule transcription in a different manner than a single gap gene.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document