scholarly journals Hyperactivation of the folded gastrulation pathway induces specific cell shape changes

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Morize ◽  
A.E. Christiansen ◽  
M. Costa ◽  
S. Parks ◽  
E. Wieschaus

During Drosophila gastrulation, mesodermal precursors are brought into the interior of the embryo by formation of the ventral furrow. The first steps of ventral furrow formation involve a flattening of the apical surface of the presumptive mesodermal cells and a constriction of their apical diameters. In embryos mutant for folded gastrulation (fog), these cell shape changes occur but the timing and synchrony of the constrictions are abnormal. A similar phenotype is seen in a maternal effect mutant, concertina (cta). fog encodes a putative secreted protein whereas cta encodes an (alpha)-subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein. We have proposed that localized expression of the fog signaling protein induces apical constriction by interacting with a receptor whose downstream cellular effects are mediated by the cta G(alpha)protein. <P> In order to test this model, we have ectopically expressed fog at the blastoderm stage using an inducible promoter. In addition, we have examined the constitutive activation of cta protein by blocking GTP hydrolysis using both in vitro synthesized mutant alleles and cholera toxin treatment. Activation of the fog/cta pathway by any of these procedures results in ectopic cell shape changes in the gastrula. Uniform fog expression rescues the gastrulation defects of fog null embryos but not cta mutant embryos, arguing that cta functions downstream of fog expression. The normal location of the ventral furrow in embryos with uniformly expressed fog suggests the existence of a fog-independent pathway determining mesoderm-specific cell behaviors and invagination. Epistasis experiments indicate that this pathway requires snail but not twist expression.

2001 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Oda ◽  
S. Tsukita

Invagination of the epithelial cell sheet of the prospective mesoderm in Drosophila gastrulation is a well-studied, relatively simple morphogenetic event that results from dynamic cell shape changes and cell movements. However, these cell behaviors have not been followed at a sufficiently short time resolution. We examined mesoderm invagination in living wild-type embryos by real-time imaging of fluorescently labeled cell-cell adherens junctions, which are located at the apical zones of cell-cell contact. Low-light fluorescence video microscopy directly visualized the onset and progression of invagination. In an initial period of approximately 2 minutes, cells around the ventral midline reduced their apical surface areas slowly in a rather synchronous manner. Next, the central and more lateral cells stochastically accelerated or initiated their apical constriction, giving rise to random arrangements of cells with small and relatively large apices. Thus, we found that mesoderm invagination began with slow synchronous and subsequent fast stochastic phases of cell apex constriction. Furthermore, we showed that the mesoderm invagination of folded gastrulation mutant embryos lacked the normal two constriction phases, and instead began with asynchronous, feeble cell shape changes. Our observations suggested that Folded gastrulation-mediated signaling enabled synchronous activation of the contractile cortex, causing competition among the individual mesodermal cells for apical constriction. Movies available on-line: http://www.biologists.com/JCS/movies/jcs2073.html


Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Leptin ◽  
B. Grunewald

The first morphogenetic movement during Drosophila development is the invagination of the mesoderm, an event that folds a one-layered epithelium into a multilayered structure. In this paper, we describe the shape changes and behaviour of the cells participating in this process and show how mutations that change cell fate affect this behaviour. We divide the formation of the mesodermal germ layer into two phases. During the first phase, the ventral epithelium folds into a tube by a series of concerted cell shape changes (ventral furrow formation). Based on the behaviour of cells in this phase, we conclude that the prospective mesoderm is not a homogeneous cell population, but consists of two subpopulations. Each subpopulation goes through a distinctive sequence of specific cell shape changes which together mediate the invagination of the ventral furrow. In the second phase, the invaginated tube of mesoderm loses its epithelial character, the mesoderm cells disperse, divide and then spread out along the ectoderm to form a single cell layer. To test how ventral furrow formation depends on cell fates in the mesoderm and in neighbouring cells we alter these fates genetically using maternal and zygotic mutations. These experiments show that some of the aspects of cell behaviour specific for ventral furrow cells are part of an autonomous differentiation programme. The force driving the invagination is generated within the region of the ventral furrow, with the lateral and dorsal cell populations contributing little or none of the force. Two known zygotic genes that are required for the formation of the mesoderm, twist and snail, are expressed in ventral furrow cells, and the correct execution of cell shape changes in the mesoderm depends on both. Finally, we show that the region where the ventral furrow forms is determined by the expression of mesoderm-specific genes, and not by mechanical or other epigenetic properties of the egg.


Glia ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Torres-Aleman ◽  
Maria Teresa Rejas ◽  
Sebastian Pons ◽  
Luis Miguel Garcia-Segura

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clint S. Ko ◽  
Prateek Kalakuntla ◽  
Adam C. Martin

AbstractDuring development, coordinated cell shape changes and cell divisions sculpt tissues. While these individual cell behaviors have been extensively studied, how cell shape changes and cell divisions that occur concurrently in epithelia influence tissue shape is less understood. We addressed this question in two contexts of the early Drosophila embryo: premature cell division during mesoderm invagination, and native ectodermal cell divisions with ectopic activation of apical contractility. Using quantitative live-cell imaging, we demonstrated that mitotic entry reverses apical contractility by interfering with medioapical RhoA signaling. While premature mitotic entry inhibits mesoderm invagination, which relies on apical constriction, mitotic entry in an artificially contractile ectoderm induced ectopic tissue invaginations. Ectopic invaginations resulted from medioapical myosin loss in neighboring mitotic cells. This myosin loss enabled non-mitotic cells to apically constrict through mitotic cell stretching. Thus, the spatial pattern of mitotic entry can differentially regulate tissue shape through signal interference between apical contractility and mitosis.


Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 2005-2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Davidson ◽  
M.A. Koehl ◽  
R. Keller ◽  
G.F. Oster

The forces that drive sea urchin primary invagination remain mysterious. To solve this mystery we have developed a set of finite element simulations that test five hypothesized mechanisms. Our models show that each of these mechanisms can generate an invagination; however, the mechanical properties of an epithelial sheet required for proper invagination are different for each mechanism. For example, we find that the gel swelling hypothesis of Lane et al. (Lane, M. C., Koehl, M. A. R., Wilt, F. and Keller, R. (1993) Development 117, 1049–1060) requires the embryo to possess a mechanically stiff apical extracellular matrix and highly deformable cells, whereas a hypothesis based on apical constriction of the epithelial cells requires a more compliant extracellular matrix. For each mechanism, we have mapped out a range of embryo designs that work. Additionally, the simulations predict specific cell shape changes accompanying each mechanism. This allows us to design experiments that can distinguish between different mechanisms, all of which can, in principle, drive primary invagination.


Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 23-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Leptin ◽  
José Casal ◽  
Barbara Grunewald ◽  
Rolf Reuter

Several morphogenetic processes occur simultaneously during Drosophila gastrulation, including ventral furrow invagination to form the mesoderm, anterior and posterior midgut invagination to create the endoderm, and germ band extension. Mutations changing the behaviour of different parts of the embryo can be used to test the roles of different cell populations in gastrulation. Posterior midgut morphogenesis and germ band extension are partly independent, and neither depends on mesoderm formation, nor mesoderm formation on them. The invagination of the ventral furrow is caused by forces from within the prospective mesoderm (i. e. the invaginating cells) without any necessary contribution from other parts of the embryo. The events that lead to the cell shape changes mediating ventral furrow formation require the transcription of zygotic genes under the control of twist and snail. Such genes can be isolated by molecular and genetic screens.


2006 ◽  
Vol 239 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julio Aracena ◽  
Mauricio González ◽  
Alejandro Zuñiga ◽  
Marco A. Mendez ◽  
Verónica Cambiazo

Development ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 147 (17) ◽  
pp. dev191049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kia Z. Perez-Vale ◽  
Mark Peifer

ABSTRACTDuring embryonic development, a simple ball of cells re-shapes itself into the elaborate body plan of an animal. This requires dramatic cell shape changes and cell movements, powered by the contractile force generated by actin and myosin linked to the plasma membrane at cell-cell and cell-matrix junctions. Here, we review three morphogenetic events common to most animals: apical constriction, convergent extension and collective cell migration. Using the fruit fly Drosophila as an example, we discuss recent work that has revealed exciting new insights into the molecular mechanisms that allow cells to change shape and move without tearing tissues apart. We also point out parallel events at work in other animals, which suggest that the mechanisms underlying these morphogenetic processes are conserved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document