scholarly journals Análise acerca da aplicação da Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro (na redação dada pela Lei 13.655/2018) no que concerne à interpretação de normas de direito público: operações interpretativas e princípios gerais de direito administrativo

2018 ◽  
Vol 277 (3) ◽  
pp. 247
Author(s):  
Rafael Maffini ◽  
Juliano Heinen
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Administrative Efficiency ◽  
De Se ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Object Of Study ◽  
Legal Consequences

<p>Analysis of the incidence of the Statute of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law (in the writing given by Act 13.655/2018) on the interpretation of public law rules: interpretative operations and general principles of administrative law</p><p> </p><p>O presente trabalho pretende analisar as inovações legislativas produzidas pela Lei nº 13.655/2018, bem como suas consequências jurídicas. Tal Diploma Legal modificou o Decreto-Lei nº 4.657/1942, denominado de “Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro”. Para tanto, o trabalho se dividiu em seis eixos teóricos: primeiro se disserta sobre as modificações legais que traçam parâmetros interpretativos com foco no “consequencialismo” e o “realismo” da interpretação do direito público. Por conseguinte, analisam-se as disposições relativas à segurança jurídica. Em um terceiro plano, confere-se ênfase aos mecanismos legais que franqueiam maior participação e consenso entre a administração pública e o cidadão. Ainda, tratar-se-á de analisar a reponsabilidade das autoridades públicas e dos agentes que atuam na função consultiva. Também a eficiência administrativa será objeto de estudo, percebendo o que a legislação mencionada inovou no tema. Por fim, será demonstrado como a motivação das condutas administrativas, já merecedora da devida importância, dado seu status de princípio constitucional, restou ainda mais prestigiada pela Lei nº 13.655/2018. Analisar-se-á dissertativamente tal legislação, essencialmente em relação aos aspetos relativos à aplicação da Lei de Introdução às Normas do Direito Brasileiro (na redação dada pela Lei nº 13.655/2018) no que concerne à interpretação e aplicação de normas de direito público e, muito particularmente, ao modo como, nessas operações interpretativas, se enformam certos princípios gerais de direito administrativo, a fim de se perceber analiticamente as mudanças e potencialidades feitas pela edição da recente norma.</p><p> </p><p>The present work intends to analyze the legislative innovations produced by Legal Act nº 13.655/2018, as well as its legal consequences. This legislation modified Legal Act nº 4.657/1942, called “Statute of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law”. In order to do so, the work was divided into six theoretical axes: first, it discusses the legal modifications that draw interpretive parameters with a focus on “consequentialism” and the “realism” of the interpretation of Public Law. Consequently, the provisions on legal certainty are examined. In a third plan, emphasis is placed on the legal mechanisms that lead to greater participation and consensus between the Public Administration and the citizen. Also, it will be a question of analyzing the responsibility of the public authorities and of the agents that act in the advices function. Also the administrative efficiency will be object of study, realizing what the mentioned legislation innovated in the subject. Finally, it will be demonstrated how the motivation of administrative conduct, already deserving of due importance, given its status as a constitutional principle, remained even more prestigious under Legal Act nº 13.655/2018. Such legislation will be analyzed, essentially in relation to the aspects related to the incidence of the Statute of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law (in the wording given by Legal act nº 13.655/2018) regarding the interpretation of norms of Law Public and, in particular, to the way in which, in these interpretative operations, certain general principles of Administrative Law are formed, in order to understand analytically the changes and potentialities made by the edition of the recent norm.</p>

scholarly journals Legal principles of counteraction to corruption and organized crime and the place of administrative and legal regulation among them

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 58-63
Author(s):  
О. О. Вороний
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Organized Crime ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
National Importance ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The Subject

Based on the analysis of the current domestic and international legislation, the author has provided characteristics of the legal principles for combating corruption and organized crime. It has been established that the legal principles for combating corruption and organized crime covers currently a large number of regulatory acts of international and national importance; it has been emphasized that a key place among them belongs to administrative and legal regulation. It has been found out that administrative and legal regulation is a form of legal influence on public relations, which is carried out on the basis of the norms of administrative branch of law. Thus, this legal influence operates in the field of public relations that arise as a result of the activities of public law entities, in particular public authorities. Besides, administrative and legal regulation is, first of all, the system of norms that regulate organizational and administrative issues, aspects of the division of competence of public law entities and their legal relationship. The emphasis has been placed on the fact that if we consider the system of legal principles for combating corruption and organized crime, they mostly consist of the rules of administrative law, since they regulate organizational forms of combating corruption and organized crime as a special activity of public authorities, determine the competence of each of the subject of combating corruption and organized crime, establish structural and system aspects of such activities, establish features of control and supervision over the process of its implementation, etc. It has been established that administrative and legal regulation is dominant in the system of legal principles for conducting activities to combat corruption and organized crime in Ukraine.

scholarly journals Hesitantly towards mutual recognition of “vaccination passports”. A survey on potential ubiquity in administrative law

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (special) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub HANDRLICA
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Recognition ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Administrative Authority ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Written Law ◽  
Theoretical Considerations ◽  
Legal Consequences

The problem of potential ubiquity emerged in administrative law because of transboundary circulation of various certificates, licences and permits. These documents, approving certain facts, may appear before an administrative authority of another State. Thus, the applicable regime of public law must qualify the legal consequences of such documents in the realm of the applicable administrative law. This article aims to discuss this problem with regard to the challenges arising in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemics. Prospective introduction of “immunity certificates” and “vaccination passports” in various jurisdictions and the need to establish mutual recognition of such “passports” and “certificates” is the subject of attention. The article points out existence of several dogmatic approaches to the fact that foreign administrations have either approved a fact, or granted a right. Some of these dogmatic approaches have been reflected in the written law. However, at the same time, in theory, other solutions than those provided by the current legal framework would also be theoretically possible. The importance of these theoretical considerations is demonstrated regarding the very current discussions on the introduction of “immunity certificates” and “vaccination passports”.

Interim relief in the public law context

1999 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-48
Author(s):  
Nicholas Bamforth
Keyword(s):  
Judicial Review ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Private Law ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Citizens ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Law Commission

THE remedial aspects of judicial review illustrate in particularly vivid form the divergent nature of public and private law proceedings. The prerogative orders–mandamus, certiorari and prohibition–are available only via judicial review. Leave is required for judicial review but not for private law actions. By contrast with the private law writ procedure, judicial review must be brought promptly and within three months. In judicial review, a remedy can still be denied to the applicant who establishes a substantive case. As the Law Commission made clear in its Report Administrative Law: Judicial Review and Statutory Appeals, “[j]udicial review often involves values and policy interests, which must be balanced against and may transcend the individual interests, which are normally the subject of litigation between private citizens” (Law Com. No. 226, para. 2.1).

Administrative Law

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Elliott ◽  
Jason N. E. Varuhas
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Administrative Action ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Comprehensive Coverage

Administrative Law Text and Materials combines carefully selected extracts from key cases, articles, and other sources with detailed commentary. This book provides comprehensive coverage of the subject and brings together in one volume the best features of a textbook and a casebook. Rather than simply presenting administrative law as a straightforward body of legal rules, the text considers the subject as an expression of underlying constitutional and other policy concerns, which fundamentally shape the relationship between the citizen and the state. Topics covered include: jurisdiction, the status of unlawful administrative action, public law principles, abuses of discretion, fairness, remedies, and the liability of public authorities.

SUBJECTS AND OBJECTS OF PUBLIC MARKETING

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 260-270
Author(s):  
Yevgeny Victorovich Romat ◽  
Yury Volodimirovich Havrilechko
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Municipal Government ◽  
Executive Power ◽  
Marketing Concept ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Public Marketing ◽  
The Public ◽  
State Management ◽  
Management Concepts ◽  
The Subject

The article is devoted to research of theoretical problems of the concepts of the subject and object of public marketing. The definitions of these concepts are considered in the article, the evolution of their development is studied. The article provides an analysis of the main approaches to the notion of subjects and objects of public marketing, their relationship and role in the processes of public marketing. The authors proposes concrete approaches to their systematization. These approaches allow us to identify specific types of public marketing and their main characteristics. Relying on the analysis of the concept of “subject of public (state) management”, it is concluded that as bodies of state marketing, most often act as executive bodies of state power. In this case, the following levels of marketing subjects in the system of public administration are allocated: the highest level of executive power; Branch central bodies of executive power; Local government bodies; Separate government agencies. It is noted that the diversity of subjects of public marketing is explained, first of all, by the dependence on the tasks of the state and municipal government, the possibilities of introducing the marketing concept of these subjects and certain characteristics of the said objects of state marketing. It is noted that the concept of “subject of public marketing” is not always the identical notion of “subject of public administration”. First, not all public authorities are subjects of state marketing. In some cases, this is not appropriate, for example, in the activities of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine or the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine. Secondly, state marketing is just one of many alternative management concepts, which is not always the most effective in the public administration system.

Fiduciary Principles and Public Offices

2019 ◽  
pp. 302-322
Author(s):  
Ethan J. Leib ◽  
Stephen R. Galoob
Keyword(s):  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Public Officials ◽  
Public Office ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Normative Structure ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law

This chapter examines how fiduciary principles apply to public offices, focusing on what it means for officeholders to comport themselves to their respective public roles appropriately. Public law institutions can operate in accordance with fiduciary norms even when they are enforced differently from the remedial mechanisms available in private fiduciary law. In the public sector, fiduciary norms are difficult to enforce directly and the fiduciary norms of public office do not overlap completely with the positive law governing public officials. Nevertheless, core fiduciary principles are at the heart of public officeholding, and public officers need to fulfill their fiduciary role obligations. This chapter first considers three areas of U.S. public law whose fiduciary character reinforces the tenet that public office is a public trust: the U.S. Constitution’s “Emoluments Clauses,” administrative law, and the law of judging. It then explores the fiduciary character of public law by looking at the deeper normative structure of public officeholding, placing emphasis on how public officeholders are constrained by the principles of loyalty, care, deliberation, conscientiousness, and robustness. It also compares the policy implications of the fiduciary view of officeholding with those of Dennis Thompson’s view before concluding with an explanation of how the application of fiduciary principles might differ between public and private law settings and how public institutions might be designed or reformed in light of fiduciary norms.

scholarly journals Gestão do Judiciário e gestão da qualidade: uma questão de princípios - Judiciary management and quality management: a question of principles

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Pizzio Da Silva ◽  
José Eudacy Feijó Paiva
Keyword(s):  
Quality Management ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Management System ◽  
Quality Management System ◽  
Iso 9001 ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Judicial Administration ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Point Of Reference

<p>O objetivo deste artigo é contribuir ao debate acerca da gestão do Poder Judiciário tendo como referência o princípio constitucional da eficiência na administração pública e os princípios da gestão da qualidade. Sob esse enfoque são abordados os temas da crise na administração pública e na administração judiciária. Através de uma revisão bibliográfica em livros e artigos levantou-se as contribuições de autores sobre o tema em análise. Uma correlação entre os princípios da qualidade e a realidade encontrada na administração de unidades judiciárias, através das fontes analisadas para o estudo, é realizada com o fim de demonstrar a validade da aplicação dos princípios para nortear as mudanças necessárias para a melhoria da prestação jurisdicional e a aumentar a satisfação da sociedade. O artigo apresenta a aplicabilidade de um sistema de gestão da qualidade, conforme o modelo da norma ABNT NBR ISO 9001:2015, como uma alternativa eficaz para que o Poder Judiciário apresente a resposta mais adequada para a necessidade de melhoria na eficiência da gestão do Poder Judiciário.</p><p> </p><p>The purpose of this article is to contribute to the debate about the management of the Judiciary having as point of reference the constitutional principle of efficiency in the Public Administration and the principles of quality management. This approach addresses the issues of crisis in the public administration and judicial administration. Through a bibliographical review in books and articles the contributions of authors on the subject under analysis were compiled. A correlation between the principles of quality and the reality found in the management of judicial units, through the sources analyzed for the study, is established in order to demonstrate the validity of the application of the principles to guide the changes necessary to improve the jurisdictional performance and to increase the satisfaction of society. The article presents the applicability of a quality management system, according to the model of ABNT NBR ISO 9001: 2015, as an effective alternative for the Judiciary to provide the most appropriate response to the need of improving the efficiency of the Judiciary management.</p><p> </p>

scholarly journals ON THE NEED TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT IN THE TERRITORY OF THE KRASNODAR TERRITORY A PROJECT OF A STANDARD ELECTRONIC PLATFORM FOR MONITORING PUBLIC OPINION ON HEALTH ISSUES IN THE MUNICIPALITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
S.А. Kuemzhieva ◽  
◽  
V.V. Goncharov ◽  
D.D. Oblogin ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Individual State ◽  
Health Issues ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Public ◽  
Constitutional Principle ◽  
Constant Control ◽  
The People ◽  
Goals And Objectives ◽  
Municipal Level

The article is devoted to the study of the need to develop and implement on the territory of the Krasnodar Territory a project of a standard electronic platform for monitoring public opinion on health issues in the municipality. The authors substantiate the position that the powers delegated by the people to the public authorities need constant control by the public. Without public control, there is a risk of appropriation of power, usurpation of power by individual state authorities and their officials. The mechanism of feedback between the authorities and the people, one of the elements of which is the monitoring of public opinion, plays an important role in the implementation of the constitutional principle of democracy. At the same time, it is important to monitor public opinion on local issues at the municipal level, since these issues affect the vast majority of the country's population. A significant segment of local issues is somehow related to the organization and functioning of health care institutions and the provision of medical services to the population. In this regard, it seems necessary to develop and implement in the territory of the Krasnodar Territory a project of a standard electronic platform for monitoring public opinion on health issues in the municipality. The article analyzes the goals and objectives of this project, examines the main problems associated with its formation and implementation, justifies the main stages of project preparation, as well as a list of measures to improve regional legislation that will contribute to the implementation of this project. The paper uses a number of methods of scientific research, in particular: the methods of induction; deduction; classification; statistical; sociological; comparative-legal; historical; formal-logical.

scholarly journals Atuação das organizações sociais na administração dos serviços de saúde: eficiência e seu instrumento de concretização do direito fundamental a saúde - Action of social organizations in the administration of health services

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Garbini Both ◽  
André Rodrigues Meneses
Keyword(s):  
Social Services ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Economic Sector ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Private Partnership ◽  
The Public ◽  
Social Organizations ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Article 5 ◽  
Percentage Data

<p>O presente trabalho objetiva analisar a atuação, legalidade e eficiência das organizações sociais. Uma vez que, esta tem sido motivo de intensos questionamentos, por parte daqueles que não enxergam benefícios na criação de um terceiro setor econômico. Há quem defenda que, é dever exclusivo do poder público, executar e fiscalizar os serviços sociais. A contrário senso há quem defenda uma publicização dos serviços que não são executados apenas pelo poder estatal, mas também pelo setor privado. Sendo assim, porque contrariar uma parceria publico-privada que só objetiva trazer benefícios para a população brasileira?</p><p>No decorrer deste estudo, será respondido tal questionamento, por meio de reflexões acerca das discussões e alegações de inconstitucionalidade da lei 9.637/98, de parte da lei de licitações ─ 8.666/93. Bem como, da suposta violação dos seguintes preceitos constitucionais: artigo 5ª, XVII e XVIII; artigo 22, XXVII; artigo 23; artigo 37, II, X e XXI; artigo 40, caput e § 4º; artigos 70, 71 e 74; artigo 129; artigo 169; artigo 175; artigo 196; artigo 197; artigo 199, § 1º; artigo 205; artigo 206; artigo 208; artigo 209; artigo 215; artigo 216, § 1º; artigo 218 e artigo 225. Onde será comprovado por meio de dados percentuais a eficiência e os benefícios advindos da sua criação.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>This paper aims to analyze the performance, legality and efficiency of social organizations. Since this has been the subject of intense questions from those who do not see benefits in the creation of a third economic sector. There are those who argue that it is the exclusive responsibility of the public authorities to execute and supervise social services. On the contrary, there are those who advocate an advertisement of services that are not only carried out by state power, but also by the private sector. So, why oppose a public-private partnership that only aims to bring benefits to the Brazilian population?</p><p>In the course of this study, this question will be answered, through reflections on the discussions and allegations of unconstitutionality of Law 9.637 / 98, part of the law of bidding - 8.666 / 93. As well as the alleged violation of the following constitutional precepts: Article 5, XVII and XVIII; article 22, XXVII; Article 23; Article 37, II, X and XXI; article 40, caput and paragraph 4; Articles 70, 71 and 74; article 129; Article 169; article 175; Article 196; article 197; article 199, paragraph 1; Article 205; Article 206; article 208; Article 209; Article 215; article 216, paragraph 1; article 218 and article 225. Where will be proven by means of percentage data the efficiency and the benefits coming from its creation.mptions that justify the use of them with greater efficiency in the achievement of the public interest.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document