scholarly journals Low-volume high-intensity interval training for children with obesity: a commentary

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Jaak Jürimäe
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Common Chronic Disease ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

Obesity is the most common chronic disease in childhood, and is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) later in life. Being obese is inversely associated with physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in children. Increased CRF may negate the detrimental effects of obesity-associated risk factors for CVD, while poor CRF has been associated with increased arterial stiffness and higher levels of blood inflammatory markers. The use of time efficient high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to reduce CVD risk factors and body mass, improve CRF and other health parameters has become popular during the last years in adults with obesity. However, a relatively few studies have investigated the effect of HIIT on body composition, CRF and cardiometabolic biomarkers in children with obesity. It is expected that low-volume HIIT programs are feasable for community-based body mass reduction and health promotion in children with obesity.

Two weeks of high-intensity interval training improves novel but not traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors in adolescents

2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (6) ◽  
pp. H1039-H1047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bert Bond ◽  
Emma J. Cockcroft ◽  
Craig A. Williams ◽  
Sam Harris ◽  
Phillip E. Gates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Aerobic Fitness ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Cvd Risk Factors ◽  
Cvd Risk ◽  
Postprandial State ◽  
High Intensity Interval

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) improves traditional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in adolescents, but no study has identified the influence of HIIT on endothelial and autonomic function in this group. Thirteen 13- to 14-yr-old adolescents (6 girls) completed six HIIT sessions over 2 wk. Each training session consisted of eight to ten 1-min repetitions of cycling at 90% peak power interspersed with 75 s of unloaded cycling. Traditional (triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, insulin, and blood pressure) and novel [flow-mediated dilation (FMD), heart rate variability (HRV)] CVD risk factors were assessed in a fasted and postprandial state before (PRE), 1 day after (POST-1D), and 3 days after (POST-3D) training. Aerobic fitness was determined PRE and POST-3D. Two weeks of HIIT had no effect on aerobic fitness or traditional CVD risk factors determined in the fasted or postprandial state ( P > 0.15). Compared with PRE, fasted FMD was improved POST-1D [ P = 0.003, effect size (ES) = 0.70] but not POST-3D ( P = 0.32, ES = 0.22). Fasted FMD was greater POST-1D compared with POST-3D ( P = 0.04, ES = 0.48). Compared with PRE, postprandial FMD was greater POST-1D ( P < 0.001, ES = 1.01) and POST-3D ( P = 0.01, ES = 0.60). Fasted HRV was greater POST-1D ( P = 0.001, ES = 0.71) and POST-3D ( P = 0.02, ES = 0.44). The test meal lowered HRV in all laboratory visits ( P < 0.001, ES = 0.59), but there were no differences in postprandial HRV between visits ( P > 0.32 for all). Two weeks of HIIT enhanced endothelial function and HRV without improvements in traditional CVD risk factors. However, most of this favorable adaptation was lost POST-3D, suggesting that regularly performing high-intensity exercise is needed to maintain these benefits.

scholarly journals A pilot study examining the effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training and continuous low to moderate intensity training on quality of life, functional capacity and cardiovascular risk factors in cancer survivors

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellie Toohey ◽  
Kate L. Pumpa ◽  
Leonard Arnolda ◽  
Julie Cooke ◽  
Desmond Yip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Moderate Intensity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Intensity Training

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training and continuous low to moderate intensity training on quality of life, functional capacity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in cancer survivors.MethodsCancer survivors within 24 months post-diagnosis were randomly assigned into the low-volume high-intensity interval training group (n = 8) or the continuous low to moderate intensity training group (n = 8) group for 36 sessions (12 weeks) of supervised exercise. The low-volume high-intensity interval training (LVHIIT) group performed 7 × 30 s intervals (≥85% maximal heart rate) and the continuous low to moderate intensity training (CLMIT) group performed continuous aerobic training for 20 min (≤55% maximal heart rate) on a stationary bike or treadmill.ResultsSignificant improvements (time) were observed for 13 of the 23 dependent variables (ES 0.05–0.61,p ≤ 0.05). An interaction effect was observed for six minute walk test (18.53% [32.43–4.63] ES 0.50,p ≤ 0.01) with the LVHIIT group demonstrating greater improvements.ConclusionThese preliminary findings suggest that both interventions can induce improvements in quality of life, functional capacity and selected cardiovascular disease risk factors. The LVHIIT program was well tolerated by the participants and our results suggest that LVHIIT is the preferred modality to improve fitness (6MWT); it remains to be seen which intervention elicits the most clinically relevant outcomes for patients. A larger sample size with a control group is required to confirm the significance of these findings.

Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve health and fitness?

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna B. Gillen ◽  
Martin J. Gibala
Keyword(s):  
High Intensity ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Oxidative Capacity ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Exercise Participation ◽  
Cardiometabolic Disorders ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Growing research suggests that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient exercise strategy to improve cardiorespiratory and metabolic health. “All out” HIIT models such as Wingate-type exercise are particularly effective, but this type of training may not be safe, tolerable or practical for many individuals. Recent studies, however, have revealed the potential for other models of HIIT, which may be more feasible but are still time-efficient, to stimulate adaptations similar to more demanding low-volume HIIT models and high-volume endurance-type training. As little as 3 HIIT sessions per week, involving ≤10 min of intense exercise within a time commitment of ≤30 min per session, including warm-up, recovery between intervals and cool down, has been shown to improve aerobic capacity, skeletal muscle oxidative capacity, exercise tolerance and markers of disease risk after only a few weeks in both healthy individuals and people with cardiometabolic disorders. Additional research is warranted, as studies conducted have been relatively short-term, with a limited number of measurements performed on small groups of subjects. However, given that “lack of time” remains one of the most commonly cited barriers to regular exercise participation, low-volume HIIT is a time-efficient exercise strategy that warrants consideration by health practitioners and fitness professionals.

High-Intensity Interval Training and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Children: A Meta-analysis

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. e2021050810
Author(s):  
Monserrat Solera-Martínez ◽  
Ángel Herraiz-Adillo ◽  
Ismael Manzanares-Domínguez ◽  
Lidia Lucas De La Cruz ◽  
Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

scholarly journals Low-volume high-intensity interval training improves cardiometabolic health, work ability and well-being in severely obese individuals: a randomized-controlled trial sub-study

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Reljic ◽  
Fabienne Frenk ◽  
Hans J. Herrmann ◽  
Markus F. Neurath ◽  
Yurdagül Zopf
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Work Ability ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Cardiometabolic Health ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
Severely Obese ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Abstract Background Obesity is associated with impaired health and lower work ability. Increased physical activity is a cornerstone in the treatment of obesity and related risk factors. Recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has emerged as a popular exercise option. However, data regarding the effects on cardiometabolic health, perceived work ability and well-being in severely obese individuals are lacking. Methods Sixty-five obese individuals with sedentary occupation (48.7 ± 9.9 years, BMI: 39.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2) were randomly allocated to an extremely time-efficient HIIT (5 × 1 min at 80–95% maximal heart rate on cycle ergometers, 2×/week for 12 weeks) or an inactive control group (CON). Both groups received nutritional counseling to support weight loss. Primary outcome was maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), secondary outcomes were cardiometabolic risk indices, body composition, work ability index (WAI), quality of life (QoL, EQ-5D-5L-questionnaire) and perceived stress (PSQ-questionnaire). Results Mean body weight reduction was 5.3 kg [95% confidence interval (95% CI) − 7.3 to − 3.3 kg] in the HIIT group (P < 0.001) and 3.7 kg (95% CI − 5.3 to − 2.1 kg) in CON (P < 0.001), respectively. Only the HIIT group showed significant (P < 0.001) changes in VO2max [+ 3.5 mL/kg/min (95% CI 2.5 to 4.6 mL/kg/min)], waist circumference [–7.5 cm (95% CI − 9.8 to − 5.1 kg)], mean arterial blood pressure [− 11 mmHg (95% CI − 14 to − 8 mmHg)], WAI [+ 3.0 points (95% CI 1.7 to 4.3 points)] and QoL [+ 10% (95% CI 5 to 16%)]. In CON, none of these parameters improved significantly. Conclusions Low-volume HIIT may induce significant improvements in cardiometabolic health, especially VO2max, WAI and well-being in obese individuals after only 12 weeks. Our results underpin the wide range of benefits on health and subjective measures through exercise that go well beyond simple weight loss through dietary restriction alone. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Id: NCT03306069. Registered 10 October 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03306069.

scholarly journals Anthropometric, Cardiopulmonary and Metabolic Benefits of the High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate, Low-Intensity or Control for Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (22) ◽  
pp. 4524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lora-Pozo ◽  
Lucena-Anton ◽  
Salazar ◽  
Galán-Mercant ◽  
Moral-Munoz
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval ◽  
Intensity Training

Abstract: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity interval training compared with no intervention and other types of training interventions for people with Type 2 Diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that used high-interval intensity training to improve anthropometric, cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions were conducted. The search was performed during October–December 2017 using the databases PubMed, Web of Science and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the PEDro scale. A total of 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis. After statistical analysis, favorable results were obtained for high-Intensity Interval Training compared with control (non-intervention): [Weight: Standardized mean difference (SMD) = −2.09; confidence interval (CI) 95%: (−3.41; −0.78); body-mass index: SMD = −3.73; CI 95%: (−5.53; −1.93); systolic blood pressure: SMD = −4.55; CI 95%: (−8.44; −0.65); VO2max: SMD = 12.20; CI 95%: (0.26; 24.14); HbA1c: SMD = −3.72; CI 95%: (−7.34; −0.10)], moderate intensity continuous training: [body-mass index: SMD = −0.41; CI 95%: (−0.80; −0.03); VO2max: SMD = 1.91; CI 95%: (0.18; 3.64)], and low intensity training: [Weight: SMD = −2.06; CI 95%: (−2.80; −1.31); body-mass index: SMD = −3.04; CI 95%: (−5.16; −0.92); systolic blood pressure: SMD = −2.17; CI 95%: (−3.93; −0.41); HbA1c: SMD = −1.58; CI 95%: (−1.84; −1.33)]. The results show that high-intensity interval training can be a useful strategy in order to improve anthropometric, cardiopulmonary and metabolic parameters in people with Type 2 diabetes. Despite this, it could be essential to clarify and unify criteria in the intervention protocols, being necessary new lines of research.

scholarly journals Light-intensity and high-intensity interval training improve cardiometabolic health in rats

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 945-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romeo B. Batacan ◽  
Mitch J. Duncan ◽  
Vincent J. Dalbo ◽  
Kylie J. Connolly ◽  
Andrew S. Fenning
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Light Intensity ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk ◽  
Interval Training ◽  
Cardiometabolic Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiac Conduction ◽  
High Intensity Interval Training ◽  
High Intensity Interval

Physical activity has the potential to reduce cardiometabolic risk factors but evaluation of different intensities of physical activity and the mechanisms behind their health effects still need to be fully established. This study examined the effects of sedentary behaviour, light-intensity training, and high-intensity interval training on biometric indices, glucose and lipid metabolism, inflammatory and oxidative stress markers, and vascular and cardiac function in adult rats. Rats (12 weeks old) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: control (CTL; no exercise), sedentary (SED; no exercise and housed in small cages to reduce activity), light-intensity trained (LIT; four 30-min exercise bouts/day at 8 m/min separated by 2-h rest period, 5 days/week), and high-intensity interval trained (HIIT, four 2.5-min work bouts/day at 50 m/min separated by 3-min rest periods, 5 days/week). After 12 weeks of intervention, SED had greater visceral fat accumulation (p < 0.01) and slower cardiac conduction (p = 0.04) compared with the CTL group. LIT and HIIT demonstrated beneficial changes in body weight, visceral and epididymal fat weight, glucose regulation, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and mesenteric vessel contractile response compared with the CTL group (p < 0.05). LIT had significant improvements in insulin sensitivity and cardiac conduction compared with the CTL and SED groups whilst HIIT had significant improvements in systolic blood pressure and endothelium-independent vasodilation to aorta and mesenteric artery compared with the CTL group (p < 0.05). LIT and HIIT induce health benefits by improving traditional cardiometabolic risk factors. LIT improves cardiac health while HIIT promotes improvements in vascular health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document