Comparison of Radiation Risk of Cancer Incidence among PA Mayak Workers Hired at Different Calendar Periods

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
I. Kuznetsova
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Radiation Risk ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Point Estimate ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Range Restriction ◽  
Epidemiological Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Purpose: comparative epidemiological analysis of cancer incidence rates among PA Mayak workers hired at different calendar periods. Material and Methods: The cohort of PA Mayak workers hired at reactors, radiochemical, plutonium, water preparing and repair plants in 1948-1982 was selected for analysis of solid cancer (except lung, liver and bone) incidence. The cohort was divided into two subcohorts 1948-1958 and 1959-1982 years of hire. Regression models of relative risk included the description of background rates and excess radiation risk was used. Results: The radiation relative risk per 1 Gy was (ERR/Gy: 0.11; 95 % CI: 0.02; 0.21) in the subcohort of workers hired in 1948–1958 and was close to the estimates from previous studies for the whole cohort. In the subcohort of workers hired in 1959–1982 the point estimate of ERR/Gy was 3 times higher than in the subcohort 1948–1958 years of hire, but it was not statistically significant in the whole dose range. Restriction of doses up to 2 Gy allowed to get significant estimate of ERR/Gy (0.45; 95 % CI: 0.04; 0.95), which 4 times higher the estimate in the first subcohort calculated with the same restriction (0.11; 95 % CI: -0.01; 0.25). All subcohorts differences were not statistically significant and we can say about point distinctions only.

scholarly journals Estimating of radiation risks of malignant neoplasms among Russian Chernobyl cleanup workers

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-77
Author(s):  
V.V. Kashcheev ◽  
◽  
S.Yu. Chekin ◽  
S.V. Karpenko ◽  
M.A. Maksioutov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Radiation Risk ◽  
Excess Relative Risk ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Risk Coefficient ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Cleanup Workers

The paper considers radiation risks of solid cancer incidence and mortality, as well as risk of leu-kemia incidence (other than chronic lymphocytic leukemia) among Russian Chernobyl cleanup workers (liquidators). The study of the cohort of liquidators carried out at the National Radiation Epidemiological Registry (NRER) was based on the follow-up data collected from 1992 over 2019. The size of the Chernobyl cleanup workers cohort exceeded 65 thousand people, their av-erage age at the time of entering the exclusion zone was 34 years, the average external gamma radiation dose received by liquidators during their cleanup work was about 0.133 Gy. Radiation-induced risks of solid cancer incidence and mortality in the study cohort were statistically signifi-cant, the risk magnitude rose with increasing the follow-up length. For the maximum follow-up period, from 1992 over 2019, the excess relative risk coefficient for solid cancer incidence was ERR/Gy=0.62, 95% CI (0.29; 0.98), and excess relative risk coefficient for solid cancer mortality was ERR/Gy=0.74, 95% CI (0.32; 1.22), the estimated coefficients were in good agreement with similar coefficients calcu-lated for the Russian liquidators with the use of ICRP radiation risk models. Non-parametric esti-mates of relative radiation risk within the same dose intervals for solid cancers and for leukemias in the cohort of liquidators were statistically significant for radiation doses above 0.150 Gy. For radiation doses below 0,150 Гр the linear non-threshold model is conservative, i.e. there was ev-idence for statistically significant radiation risk of leukemia incidence among liquidators during the first 11 years after the accident, from 1986 over 1997, ERR/Gy=4.41, 95% CI (0.24; 14.23). In later years, until 2018 there was no evidence of radiation-related risk of leukemia incidence. Out-comes of future studies will impact on optimization of radiological protection, development of reference levels for Russian general public exposure and improvement of the system for delivery of targeted medical care to people exposed to radiation.

scholarly journals Cancer Incidence in Patients With Acromegaly: A Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 2182-2188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Dal ◽  
Michelle Z Leisner ◽  
Kasper Hermansen ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Mads Bengtsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Context Acromegaly has been associated with increased risk of cancer morbidity and mortality, but research findings remain conflicting and population-based data are scarce. We therefore examined whether patients with acromegaly are at higher risk of cancer. Design A nationwide cohort study (1978 to 2010) including 529 acromegaly cases was performed. Incident cancer diagnoses and mortality were compared with national rates estimating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). A meta-analysis of cancer SIRs from 23 studies (including the present one) was performed. Results The cohort study identified 81 cases of cancer after exclusion of cases diagnosed within the first year [SIR 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9 to 1.4]. SIRs were 1.4 (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.6) for colorectal cancer, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.5 to 2.1) for breast cancer, and 1.4 (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.6) for prostate cancer. Whereas overall mortality was elevated in acromegaly (SIR 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.6), cancer-specific mortality was not. The meta-analysis yielded an SIR of overall cancer of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2 to 1.8). SIRs were elevated for colorectal cancer, 2.6 (95% CI, 1.7 to 4.0); thyroid cancer, 9.2 (95% CI, 4.2 to 19.9); breast cancer, 1.6 (1.1 to 2.3); gastric cancer, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4 to 2.9); and urinary tract cancer, 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3). In general, cancer SIR was higher in single-center studies and in studies with <10 cancer cases. Conclusions Cancer incidence rates were slightly elevated in patients with acromegaly in our study, and this finding was supported by the meta-analysis of 23 studies, although it also suggested the presence of selection bias in some earlier studies.

scholarly journals Occupational radiation exposure and cancer incidence in a cohort of diagnostic medical radiation workers in South Korea

2021 ◽  
pp. oemed-2021-107452
Author(s):  
Won Jin Lee ◽  
Seulki Ko ◽  
Ye Jin Bang ◽  
Seung-Ah Choe ◽  
Yeongchull Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
South Korean ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Medical Radiation ◽  
Radiation Workers ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
Occupational Radiation

ObjectivesWe investigated the association between protracted low-dose ionising radiation and the risk of cancer in medical radiation workers, the largest group of workers with occupational radiation exposures.MethodsData of all South Korean diagnostic medical radiation workers enrolled at the National Dose Registry during 1996–2011 were merged with the death and cancer incidence data until 31 December 2017. SIRs, relative risks and excess relative risks (ERRs) for cancer were calculated to quantify the radiation dose–response relationship using Poisson regression models.ResultsA total of 3392 first primary cancer cases were identified among 93 920 diagnostic medical radiation workers. The mean cumulative badge dose in the cohort was 7.20 mSv. The ERRs for solid cancer with a 5-year lag and haematopoietic cancers with a 2-year lag for all workers were 0.15 per 100 mGy (95% CI −0.20 to 0.51) and 0.09 per 100 mGy (95% CI −2.02 to 2.20), respectively. The ERRs for cancers did not significantly vary by job title, different lag years or after excluding thyroid and lung cancers. Sensitivity analyses restricted to workers employed for at least 1 year, or who were employed in or after 1996, or who had exposure to a cumulative badge dose of 1 mSv or more showed similar results.ConclusionsOccupational radiation doses were not significantly associated with cancer incidence among South Korean diagnostic medical radiation workers. However, cautious interpretation of ERRs is needed due to the limitations of short follow-up and low cumulative radiation doses.

scholarly journals Radiogenic risk of solid cancer incidence in persons exposed to radiation in childhood in the Southern Urals

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
L. Yu. Krestinina ◽  
S. A. Shalaginov ◽  
S. S. Silkin ◽  
S. B. Epifanova ◽  
A. V. Akleyev
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Southern Urals ◽  
In Utero ◽  
Excess Relative Risk ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Techa River ◽  
Incidence Analysis

The aim of this work is to assess the radiogenic risk of solid cancers incidence in the members of the Urals Childhood Exposure Cohort. The cohort includes people exposed under 20 years of age as a result of two radiation accidents at the Mayak Production Association in the Southern Urals (discharges of radioactive waste into the Techa River and the formation of the East Ural radioactive trace). The number of the cohort for solid cancer incidence analysis is 31,578 individuals. All the members were postnatally exposed and some of them – in-utero. Some of their parents were exposed before conception. 2,018 solid cancers were registered on the incidence catchment area during the period 1956-2018, the total amount of person years was 818,083. The analysis was carried out by the Poisson regression method with a simple parametric excess relative risk model. 95% confidence intervals were estimated with maximum likelihood approach. Only a postnatal dose was used in the first solid cancer incidence analysis of this cohort members with due account for preconception exposure of parents. TRDS-2016 mean postnatal dose accumulated over the entire follow-up period in the stomach of cohort members was 0.047 Gy. The analysis showed linear dependence of solid cancer incidence excess relative risk on postnatal dose. Excess relative risk was 0.66/Gy, р=0.006 with a five-year latency period. While estimating excess relative risk in different age groups at the beginning of exposure, a significant risk was present only in the age group under 1 year and amounted to 2.16/Gy; р<0.02 at the onset of exposure. The present results are in agreement with the results of the solid cancer incidence risk analysis both in the Techa River Cohort of exposed In-Utero where a statistically significant excess relative risk from a postnatal dose was revealed, and with the results of risk analysis in the Japanese cohort of people exposed in-utero and in early childhood.

scholarly journals Cancer Incidence and Mortality in 260,000 Nordic Twins With 30,000 Prospective Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Skytthe ◽  
Jennifer R. Harris ◽  
Kamila Czene ◽  
Lorelei Mucci ◽  
Hans-Olov Adami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Cancer Risk Factors ◽  
Background Population ◽  
Incidence And Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

AbstractThe Nordic countries have comprehensive, population-based health and medical registries linkable on individually unique personal identity codes, enabling complete long-term follow-up. The aims of this study were to describe the NorTwinCan cohort established in 2010 and assess whether the cancer mortality and incidence rates among Nordic twins are similar to those in the general population. We analyzed approximately 260,000 same-sexed twins in the nationwide twin registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Cancer incidence was determined using follow-up through the national cancer registries. We estimated standardized incidence (SIR) and mortality (SMR) ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) across country, age, period, follow-up time, sex and zygosity. More than 30,000 malignant neoplasms have occurred among the twins through 2010. Mortality rates among twins were slightly lower than in the general population (SMR 0.96; CI 95% [0.95, 0.97]), but this depends on information about zygosity. Twins have slightly lower cancer incidence rates than the general population, with SIRs of 0.97 (95% CI [0.96, 0.99]) in men and 0.96 (95% CI [0.94, 0.97]) in women. Testicular cancer occurs more often among male twins than singletons (SIR 1.15; 95% CI [1.02, 1.30]), while cancers of the kidney (SIR 0.82; 95% CI [0.76, 0.89]), lung (SIR 0.89; 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and colon (SIR 0.90; 95% CI [0.87, 0.94]) occur less often in twins than in the background population. Our findings indicate that the risk of cancer among twins is so similar to the general population that cancer risk factors and estimates of heritability derived from the Nordic twin registers are generalizable to the background populations.

scholarly journals Solid cancer incidence risk in in the Ural cohort of the accidentally exposed population: 1956–2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-17
Author(s):  
L. Yu. Krestinina ◽  
S. S. Silkin ◽  
L. D. Mikryukova ◽  
S. B. Epifanova ◽  
A. V. Akleyev
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Chronic Exposure ◽  
Excess Relative Risk ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
The Southern Urals ◽  
Exposed Population ◽  
Incidence Risk ◽  
Incidence Analysis

To date, the study of the effects of chronic exposure of the South Ural population has been carried out in two separate cohorts – in the Techa River Cohort and in the East Urals Radioactive Trace Cohort. In 2019, the Ural cohort of accidentally exposed population was formed. It included the population exposed in two radiation situations in the Southern Urals in the 1950s. The number of the combined cohort for the cancer incidence analysis was about 60 thousand people, the follow-up period was extended to 2017, the number of solid cancers was 4537, and the number of person-years was 1283267, which is 3 times more than when analyzing the effects of exposure in each of the two radiation situations separately. In the incidence analysis of all solid cancer types, we used the dose accumulated in the walls of the stomach, which corresponds to the dose accumulated in most organs and tissues with the exception of bone tissue and red bone marrow. The mean dose to the stomach accumulated over the entire follow-up period for cohort members was 38 mGy, the maximum -1.13 Gy. The paper presents the first results of solid cancer incidence risk analysis in the combined cohort, which show a statistically significant dose dependence of the incidence in case of chronic exposure in the range of low and medium doses. The sex and age-averaged excess relative risk value of 0.075/100 mGy (the 95% confidence interval is 0.039–0.113) is comparable to that obtained in the studies of the Japanese cohort of atomic bomb survivors. The statistically significant excess relative risk value of 0.047/100 mGy, obtained separately for men, is in good agreement with that in professional cohorts where men prevail – in the cohort of the Chernobyl NPP accident clean-up workers and in the cohort of professional workers in the three countries (UK, France, USA). The established cohort with a long follow-up period has a great potential for furthermore detailed studies of the effects of radiation and non-radiation factors on public health.

Cancer incidence in Behçet's Disease.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13583-e13583
Author(s):  
Deniz Can Guven ◽  
Ertugrul Cagri Bolek ◽  
Sabri Engin Altintop ◽  
Burcu Celikten ◽  
Burak Yasin Aktas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Behçet’S Disease ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Behcet’S Disease ◽  
Behçet's Disease ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Behcet's Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

e13583 Background: Previous studies demonstrated increased risk of cancer in systemic autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and sjögren syndrome due to uncontrolled inflammation. Behçet’s disease (BD) was also reported to be associated with an increased risk of cancer, although data is limited and differences in study designs was an important issue. In this study, we aimed to assess cancer incidence in a large cohort of BD patients and to compare with the data of the Turkish National Cancer Registry (TNCR) in the same age and gender groups. Methods: The study cohort consisted of BD patients of > 18 years old age and without a prior cancer diagnosis who were prospectively recorded in Hacettepe University Vasculitis Center. Data on any cancer was collected from the patient files. Cancer incidence was compared with age- and gender-specific cancer incidence rates of the normal population retrieved from the 2014 Turkish National Cancer Registry (TNCR) data using standardized incidence rates (SIR). Results: Totally 451 adult cases with BD were included in the study. The median age of the cohort was 43 (20-75) and 52.5% of the patients were males. Eleven cancer cases were observed during a median 124 months follow up. Behçet’s Disease was associated with an increase in cancer risk compared to expected counts in the corresponding age and sex group (SIR 2.84, 95% CI 1.50-4.94, p < 0.001). Cancer risk was particularly increased in men (SIR: 5.63, 95% CI: 2.62–10.70, p < 0.001) compared to TNCR data. Patients with papulopustular lesions had a trend towards a decreased risk of cancer (p = 0.060) and patients using azathioprine had a significantly decreased cancer risk (p = 0.031). Conclusions: This study revealed the cancer risk of patients BD was increased approximately three times compared to corresponding age and sex group. Besides the routine care, increased attention for cancer surveillance is required in the follow-up of BD patients.

scholarly journals Cancer incidence after childhood irradiation for tinea capitis in a Portuguese cohort

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1105) ◽  
pp. 20180677
Author(s):  
Luís Antunes ◽  
Maria José Bento ◽  
Manuel Sobrinho-Simões ◽  
Paula Soares ◽  
Paula Boaventura
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Dose ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Tinea Capitis ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Objectives: Our aim was to compare cancer incidence in a cohort exposed in childhood (1950–63) to a therapeutic dose of radiation in the North of Portugal and followed-up until the end of 2012, with the incidence rates for the same age and sex in the general population. Methods: A population-based North Region cancer registry (RORENO) was used to assess which members of the cohort developed cancer. The association between radiation exposure and overall and specific cancer sites was evaluated using standardised incidence ratios (SIR). Results: Over the full follow-up period, 3357 individuals of the 5356 original tinea capitis (TC) cohort (63%) were retrieved in the RORENO, and 399 new cancer cases were identified, representing an increased risk of 49% when compared with the general population (SIR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.35–1.64). The risk was slightly higher in males than in females (SIR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.43–1.89 vs SIR = 1.35; CI = 1.17–1.55). The risk was slightly higher in the individuals exposed to a higher radiation dose (SIR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.22–2.51 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.31–1.62 for 325–475 R). In females, there was an excess cancer risk in all cancers with the higher radiation dose (SIR = 2.00; 95% CI: 1.21–3.13 for ≥630 R vs SIR = 1.30; 95% CI: 1.11–1.51 for 325–475 R) which was not observed in males, and for combined dose categories significantly raised SIRs for thyroid and head and neck cancer, suggesting a possible higher radiosensitivity of females. An increased risk was also observed for some cancers located far from the irradiated area. Conclusions: The results suggest an association between radiation exposure and later increased cancer risk for cancers located near the radiation exposed area, mainly thyroid, and head and neck cancers. Further studies are necessary to disentangle possible non-radiation causes for distant cancers increased risk. Advances in knowledge: This paper shows a possible association between childhood X-ray epilation and increased risk of cancer which was not previously investigated in the Portuguese TC cohort.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document