scholarly journals FINANCIAL AND LEGAL PROBLEMS IN PLEDGING OF INTER-BUDGET TRANSFERS FROM BUDGET OF SUBJECT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION TO LOCAL BUDGETS

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (4) ◽  
pp. 330-336
Author(s):  
Дмитрий Ерохин ◽  
Dmitriy Erokhin ◽  
Антон Новиков ◽  
Anton Novikov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

Standard-legal documentation of the subject of the Russian Federation (Bryansk Region) regulating a process of interbudget transfers provision in the form of subsidies from the budget of the subject of the Russian Federation to local budgets are analyzed. According to the results of the analysis carried out there are revealed law enforcement problems the elimination of which allows ensuring higher budget efficiency.

LEGAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PROBLEMS OF CONDUCTING COMPREHENSIVE COMMISSION INSPECTIONS OF PENAL FACILITIES ON THE SUBJECT OF ANTI-TERRORIST SECURITY STATE ASSESSMENT OF PENAL OBJECTS (TERRITORIES)

2021 ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Олег Игоревич Денисенко ◽  
Оганнес Давитович Мкртчян
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
State Assessment ◽  
The State ◽  
Organizational Level ◽  
Penal System ◽  
High Quality ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Qualitative Characteristics

В связи с увеличением числа преступлений террористической направленности разрешения требуют вопросы, связанные с обеспечением объектов (территорий) УИС инструментами антитеррористической защищенности, к которым можно отнести такие, как проведение организационно-практических мероприятий антитеррористической защиты объектов УИС, наличие соответствующей документации и ответственного должностного лица, выполнение режимных требований на объектах УИС в соответствии с законодательством РФ, а также обеспечение контроля за количественными и качественными характеристиками эксплуатируемых инженерно-технических средств охраны и надзора. Актуальность проводимого исследования обусловлена необходимостью качественной реализации в правоприменительной практике совокупности требований обеспечения мероприятий по обеспечению антитеррористической защищенности объектов (территорий) УИС с целью защиты прав и интересов всех субъектов уголовно-исполнительной системы от террористического посягательства. Авторами выявляются проблемы правового и организационного уровня при оценке состояния антитеррористической защищенности объектов УИС: формализм при проведении обследований, недостаточный уровень оснащенности объектов УИС инженерно-техническими средствами охраны и надзора, а также финансирования для удовлетворения нужд объектов УИС в части обеспечения антитеррористической защищенности. Помимо прочего упоминаются такие проблемы, как отсутствие унифицированных принципов организации деятельности комплексных комиссионных обследований, разработанных с учетом современных правоприменительных норм и запросов практики, а также обосновывается необходимость повышения компетентности сотрудников ФСИН России при проведении комплексных комиссионных обследований. In connection with the increase in the number of terrorist crimes, the resolution requires issues related to the provision of facilities (territories) of the penal system with anti-terrorist security tools, which include such as the implementation of organizational and practical measures for the anti-terrorist protection of the penal system, the availability of appropriate documentation and a responsible official, the implementation of regime requirements at the facilities of the penal system in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, as well as ensuring control over the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the operating engineering and technical means of protection and supervision. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that in law enforcement practice, a high-quality implementation of the set of requirements for ensuring the anti-terrorist protection of objects (territories) of the penal system is required so that the rights and interests of all subjects of the penal system in terms of protection from terrorist encroachment are observed. The authors identify the problems of the legal and organizational level when assessing the state of anti-terrorist security of penal facilities: formalism in conducting surveys, insufficient equipment of penal facilities with engineering and technical means of protection and supervision, as well as the level of funding to meet the needs of penal facilities in terms of ensuring anti-terrorist protection. Among other things, such problems as the lack of unified principles for organizing the activities of complex commission surveys, developed taking into account modern law enforcement norms and practice requests, are mentioned, as well as the need to improve the competence of employees of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia when conducting comprehensive commission surveys is substantiated.

scholarly journals Jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Nikolay Basmanov ◽  
Andrei Vladimirovich Ilin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article discusses the question of territorial jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions (Russian Federation, constituent entities of the Russian Federation, municipal formations). The subject of this research is the current procedural norms regulating the questions of jurisdiction, and the established law enforcement practice. Attention is turned to the existence of gaps in legal regulation of the question of jurisdiction over claims made against public-legal institutions in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The authors analyze the established approaches in law enforcement practice towards solution of the aforementioned problem. Methodological framework includes the comparative-legal method and such formal-logical methods, as analysis, synthesis and induction. The relevance and practical importance are substantiated by the subject of research – the law enforcement practice formed by the Russian judicial authorities over the recent years. The conclusion is made on the need for elimination of the existing gap in the normative-legal regulation by amending the current procedural legislation.

scholarly journals Modern problems of implementing the strategies of the legal policy of the Russian Federation in the context of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Viacheslavovich Krylov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Conceptual Level ◽  
Legal Policy ◽  
Enforcement Policy ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Conflict Situations ◽  
Coronavirus Infection ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the problems of the legal policy of the Russian Federation during the pandemic of the new coronavirus infection COVID-19. One of the most serious problems associated with the levels of implementation of legal policy was the actual absence of conceptual strategies of legal policy, since during the period under review, legal policy was implemented not at the traditional conceptual level, but at the situational level. At the same time, the consequence of the legal, including law enforcement, policy that has developed in these conditions has been not only the emergence and development of various conflict situations, but also the resolution of legal problems.

Organizational and tactical features of the interrogation of convicts operational staff of the Federal penitentiary service of Russia

2020 ◽  
pp. 111-122
Author(s):  
Роман Михайлович Морозов ◽  
Дмитрий Юрьевич Волков
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Conflict Situation ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Preparatory Working ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Executive System ◽  
Effective Use

В статье рассматриваются актуальные проблемы производства допроса в учреждениях уголовно-исполнительной системы оперативными сотрудниками исправительных учреждений ФСИН России в рамках поручений, направляемых сотрудниками органов предварительного расследования. В работе авторы рассматривают ряд этапов производства допроса (подготовительный, рабочий и заключительный), в рамках которых осуществляется подготовка и реализация отдельных тактических приемов. В частности, даются рекомендации по изучению личности допрашиваемого осужденного. Авторами сформулированы рекомендации по планированию допроса и его организации в рамках имеющихся процессуальных полномочий оперативных сотрудников территориальных органов ФСИН России. Кроме того, авторы сформулировали определенные рекомендации по установлению психологического контакта с допрашиваемым. На основе материалов правоприменительной практики сформулированы предложения по наиболее эффективному использованию отдельных тактических приемов при производстве допроса, как в конфликтной ситуации, так и в бесконфликтной. В качестве выводов авторы формулируют рекомендации по тактике производства допроса осужденных в исправительных учреждениях с учетом достижений науки и правоприменительной практики. В целях объективности отражения складывающейся правоприменительной практики по теме исследования авторами было проведено интервьюирование оперативных сотрудников ФСИН России в ряде субъектов Российской Федерации. The article deals with the actual problems of interrogation in institutions of the criminal Executive system by operational employees of correctional institutions of the Federal penitentiary service of Russia in the framework of instructions sent by employees of the preliminary investigation bodies. In this paper, the authors consider a number of stages of interrogation (preparatory, working and final), in which the preparation and implementation of individual tactics is carried out. In particular, recommendations are given for studying the identity of the interrogated convict. The authors formulate recommendations for planning the interrogation and its organization within the existing procedural powers of operational employees of the territorial bodies of the Federal penitentiary service of Russia. In addition, the authors formulated certain recommendations for establishing psychological contact with the interrogated person. Based on the materials of law enforcement practice, proposals are formulated for the most effective use of certain tactical techniques during interrogation, both in a conflict situation and in a conflict-free one. As conclusions, the authors formulate recommendations on the tactics of interrogation of convicts in correctional institutions, taking into account the achievements of science and law enforcement practice. In order to objectively reflect the current law enforcement practice on the subject of the study, the authors conducted interviews with operational employees of the Federal penitentiary service of Russia in a number of subjects of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals «Use of office position» when committing fraud: problems of application

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-104
Author(s):  
Valeria V. Zabrodina ◽  
Anna G. Menshikova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Position Errors ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Official Position ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The authors in the article consider the problems of establishing the qualifying feature use of official position when committing fraud. Based on the analysis of the doctrine of criminal law, clarifications of the highest court, materials of specific judicial practice, a circle of subjects related to persons using their official position is determined, as well as the procedure and mechanism for using official position in fraud. According to the results of the study, it is proposed to include in the current resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation On judicial practice in cases of fraud, misappropriation and embezzlement additional clarifications that reveal the understanding of the content of the sign use of official position. The authors propose to expand the understanding of the subject of official fraud. Such provisions will promote uniformity in law enforcement and helpavoid qualifying fraud using official position errors.

scholarly journals Peculiarities associated with police inquiry into administrative violations committed on the Internet

2020 ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Novgorodov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Police Officers ◽  
Case Law ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Proceedings

The object of this research consists in public relations that form in the course of initiation of cases on administrative violations committed on the Internet as part of the duties of law enforcement agencies. The subject of this research is the federal legislation and departmental normative legal acts of the Russian Federation regulating the organization of work of different police units, as well as case law materials. Analysis is conducted on the national legislation, statistical data provided by the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, case law on administrative violations that were committed on the Internet. Having analyzed the materials of cases on administrative violations committed on the Internet, the author concludes that the law enforcement agencies sometimes evade their official duties, and exercise functions not typical of their positions. For example, the district police officers monitor the Internet for prevention and identification of administrative offences in the area served by them; if evidence of an offence is detected, administrative proceedings are initiated. The author offers the ways for solving the indicated problem.

scholarly journals PRESIDENTIAL CONTROL OVER OPERATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITY SERVICE OF RUSSIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
Anatoliy M. Tarasov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Civil Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
State Control ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Criminal Intelligence ◽  
Security Service ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The relevant and innovative character of the subject of Presidential Control over Operations of the Federal Security Service of Russia is confirmed by the absence of separate research on this topic and the status of the Federal Security Service of Russia established to ensure security, carry out various types of law enforcement operations, in particular, such as criminal intelligence and surveillance, pre-trial investigation, interrogation, where human and civil rights and freedoms may be violated, and the guarantor of human and civil rights and freedoms is the President of the Russian Federation pursuant to Article 80 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The relevance of this subject is also proven by the absence of any federal law on the state control over operations of state authorities including law enforcement ones and the failure to establish the limits (scope) of the presidential control over operations of the Federal Security Service of Russia in statutory acts. The fact that the aims of the presidential control are not only identification of deviations in operations of the Federal Security Service but also the prevention of such deviations in the future raises the importance of this issue. In view of the above, the presidential control is a mechanism of positive, preventive and efficient influence on organizational and practical activities of authorities of the Federal Security Service of Russia.

scholarly journals On the property responsibility of genetic parents under the surrogacy agreement: experience of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan

2021 ◽  
pp. 218-227
Author(s):  
Anna Rolandovna Purge
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Main Research ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Genetic Parents

The object of this research is the institution of property responsibility of genetic parents under the surrogacy agreement established in legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan, as well as the problematic of practical implementation of the surrogacy agreement. The subject of this research is the legislative norms that regulate the procedure of bringing genetic parents under the surrogacy agreement to property responsibility in the territory of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Tajikistan; corresponding materials of law enforcement practice; statistical data and reports published in the official mass media. The scientific novelty of consists in analysis of the problems of property responsibility of genetic parents under the surrogacy agreement, which was concluded in the territory of the Republic of Tajikistan. The main research results lies in the development of the original pointwise proposals on the long-term solution to these issues (it is worth noting that such proposals have not been previously expressed in the context of legal experience of the Republic of Tajikistan).

scholarly journals On exemption from criminal liability for unlawful restriction of competition (the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Evgen'evna Derevyagina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The subject of this research is the notes to the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Article 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses; foreign antimonopoly legislation on exemption and mitigation of liability for cartels; decisions of the plenums of higher judicial instances of the Russian Federation regarding the grounds and procedure for exemption from liability for cartel agreements; draft of the federal law on introducing amendments to the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and antimonopoly practice on cartels. The article aims to examine the grounds for exemption from criminal liability for cartel agreements, including in comparative-legal and interdisciplinary aspects. The novelty of this research consists in establishing extension of the grounds for exemption from liability in the Russian legislation to all cartel participants (unlike foreign legislation, according to which the cartel facilitator is not exempt from liability). This article is firs to provide interpretation to scantily studied questions of the procedure for realization of the conditions of exemption from criminal liability: the instance, when the cartel participant is still able to declare the restriction of competition to law enforcement agencies, and other measures of reparation of the inflicted damage. The author proposes a method for unification of the the grounds for exemption from liability stipulated by the Article 178 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the Article 14.32 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses. The acquired results can be applied in the activity of law enforcement agencies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document