Complex Syntactic Whole: the Use of Grammatical Forms of the Predicate for Expressing Communicative Intentions
The article considers the role of the grammatical forms of the predicate in expressing communicative intentions of the speaker within complex syntactic whole. Analyzing the specifics of substitution, the author points out that implicit substitution, or deletion, is made with the help of zero substitute, while explicit substitution or replacement, implies the use of the verb ‘to do’. This type of substitution exists as a separate grammatical phenomenon based on the opposition to the explicit form of the predicate. Auxiliary and modal verbs serve as markers of implicit (zero) substitution of the lexical part of the predicate. The substitute verb ‘to do’, due to its wide semantics, often replaces ‘action verbs’. In most cases, these two types of predicate substitution and the related phenomena are to be considered in a wide context – a complex syntactical whole. An analysis of opposition of grammatical forms of the predicate, with the aim of defining communicative intentions of the speaker or new implications relevant for both communicants and ways of effecting the addressee, shows that such an opposition helps to build the expressive and pragmatic potential of the statement.