scholarly journals KORELASI PERSEPSI TENTANG EFEK SAMPING KEMOTERAPI DENGAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN KANKER PAYUDARA

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Shanti Lesmana Sari ◽  
Rani Lisa Indra ◽  
Raja Fitriana Lestari
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Daily Lives ◽  
Quantitative Correlation ◽  
Cross Section Method

Chemotherapy treatments undergone by breast cancer patient’s have several side effect. From the side effects that, each patient perceives the side effects that will interfere with their daily lives which in turn affect the quality of life. This research was made for showing the correlation of chemotherapy side effect with the quality of life of breast cancer patient’s in Arifin Achmad Hospital in Riau Province. The research was one of quantitative correlation research with cross-section method that had been done to 63 respondents in Arifin Achmad Hospital in Riau Province by using consecutive sampling technique bye used was questionnaire. The test used unpaired t-test. This research result was gotten if Pvalue=0.216 (Pvalue=0.05), which mean is no correlation between chemotherapy side effect perspective and quality of life of breast cancer patient’s. Based on the result, we hope Arifin Achmad Hospital in Riau Province develop more health service to the community to increase positive judgement from chemotherapy treatment and quality of life of breast cancer patient’s.  

scholarly journals Evaluation of Drug Side Effects Chemotherapy on Quality of Life (QOL) Breast Cancer Patients at Hospital X in Jakarta

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Sondang Khairani ◽  
Sesilia A Keban ◽  
Meyke Afrianty
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Drug Side Effects ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Chemotherapy Drugs

Breast cancer is the number one cancer type discovered at women in the world. Most causes are genetic factors and hormonal factors. One cancer treatments with chemotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs active in cells dividing and reproducing, but cells normally to be affected by chemotherapy and side effects from chemotherapy drugs affect quality of life. The aim of the study to evaluate side effects of chemotherapy drugs on the quality of life of breast cancer patients. Sampling technique observational prospective breast cancer patients with completed the chemotherapy cycle from September 2017 to April 2018 with descriptive analysis and statistics by looking correlation between drug side effects and Quality of Life (QoL). Results of the study were side effects of fatigue 100%, nausea 67,5%, vomiting 60%, no appetite 63,75%, fever 42,5%, joint pain 43,75%, diarrhea 16,25%, difficulty swallowing 16,25%, allergies 5%, itching 1,25%, mouth sores 3,75%, swollen right hand 1,25%, constipation 3,75%. QoL results are physical 6,2%; psychology 5,3%; social 4,9%; spiritual 6,8%. Results of Sperman test showed no correlation between the side effects of chemotherapy and QoL P> 0,05. This study shows that there is no relationship between the side effects drug chemotherapy and QoL in breast cancer patients.

Patient perceptions about potential side effects and benefits from chemotherapy agents.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6595-6595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iryna Kuchuk ◽  
Nathaniel Bouganim ◽  
Kathy Beusterien ◽  
Jessica Grinspan ◽  
Lisa Vandermeer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Standard Gamble ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Motor Neuropathy ◽  
Grade Iii

6595 Background: Little is known about how breast cancer patients (pts) perceive the relative side effects and benefits of different chemotherapy (CT) agents. The objective of this study was to better understand these preferences in pts receiving CT at a Canadian cancer center. Methods: Pts completed a Web survey. Grade I/II (mild to moderate) and III/IV (moderate to severe) descriptions of 9 common CT side effects were assigned preferences by: conjoint and standard gamble (SG). Conjoint involved making trade-offs among different risks of side effects, yielding preferences (utilities) for each side effect. SG involved choosing to stay in a selected side effect state or taking a gamble between full health (probability p) or being dead (1-p). For each side effect, p was varied until the patient was indifferent of the side effect. Pts were also asked to rate how much of detriment in quality of life they would endure for benefits in survival. Results: 102 women participated, mean age 54 + 11, stage 1 (21%), 2 (24%), 3 (38%) and 4 (18%). Among the grade I/II side effects, a 5% reduction in risk of sensory neuropathy, nausea, and motor neuropathy had the highest impact on preferences. Among grade III/IV side effects, motor neuropathy, nausea/vomiting, and mucositis made the most difference. SG preferences for side effects were lowest (i.e. least preferred) for grade III/IV nausea (0.624) followed by diarrhea (0.633), hand-foot syndrome (0.681), and highest for grade I/II sensory neuropathy (0.757), mucositis (0.756), and myalgia (0.750). Agree/disagree items revealed patients are willing to endure quality of life detriments for improvement in survival; this willingness increased as disease stage increased (p=0.01). Conclusions: Relatively small changes in the risks of some CT side effects may have substantial impacts on pt treatment preferences. Nevertheless, pts will endure significant toxicity for a potential gain in survival. The standard gamble utilities from this population may also be used to quality-adjust life expectancy in cost-effectiveness evaluations of breast cancer chemotherapies.

Treatment-related side effects and views about dosage assessment to sustain quality of life: Results of an advocate-led survey of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1005-1005
Author(s):  
Anne L Loeser ◽  
Jeffrey M. Peppercorn ◽  
Mark E. Burkard ◽  
Kevin Kalinsky ◽  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Dosage Reduction ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Significant Treatment ◽  
New Treatment

1005 Background: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is generally incurable and the majority of patients with MBC will remain on treatment indefinitely. Patients usually begin each new treatment at the Recommended Starting Dose (RSD) on the FDA-approved label based on results from clinical trials. However, patients’ ability to tolerate the RSD in the real-world may differ from the clinical trial setting. While the importance of patient reported outcomes is recognized, understanding tolerability from the patient’s perspective is lacking and patients’ willingness to discuss individualized doses for MBC therapy has not been evaluated. Methods: Patient advocates from the Patient-Centered Dosing Initiative distributed a confidential online survey to patients with MBC via social media groups, organizational newsletters, and online support forums. The survey was developed by patients and medical oncologists to ascertain the prevalence and impact of patients’ treatment-related side effects, quality of patient-physician communication, management of side effects, and interest in alternative approaches to the RSD when a new treatment is initiated or adverse side effects are experienced. Results: 1,221 patients with MBC completed the survey within 15 days. The median number of lines of MBC therapy was 2.5 (range 1 - ≥5) and 46% (n = 564) of patients received their MBC diagnosis within two years of taking the survey. 86% (n = 1,051) reported experiencing at least one significant treatment-related side effect, and of these, 20% (n = 213) visited the Emergency Room/hospital and 43% (n = 454) missed at least one treatment. 98% (n = 1,026) of patients with side effects discussed them with their doctors and 82% (n = 838) were helped by their physicians. The most common (non-exclusive) mitigation strategies were dosage reductions (66%, n = 556) and prescription medications (59%, n = 494). Of the 556 patients given a dosage reduction, 83% (n = 459) reported feeling better. Notably, 92% (n = 1,127) of patients expressed willingness to discuss alternative dosing options with their physicians based upon their personal characteristics and individual preferences. Conclusions: Given that 86% of patients with MBC experienced at least one significant treatment-related side effect and 83% improved after dosage reduction, innovative dosage-related strategies are warranted to sustain Quality of Life. Patient-physician discussions in which the patient’s physical attributes and circumstances are periodically assessed may determine the right dose for the patient upon treatment initiation and afterwards, and the vast majority of patients would be receptive to such discussions.

scholarly journals Pilates and dance to patients with breast cancer undergoing treatment: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial – MoveMama study

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonessa Boing ◽  
Tatiana do Bem Fretta ◽  
Melissa de Carvalho Souza Vieira ◽  
Gustavo Soares Pereira ◽  
Jéssica Moratelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Body Image ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sleep Quality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Belly Dance ◽  
Belly Dancing

Abstract Background Breast cancer is a global public health issue. The side effects of the clinical treatment can decrease the quality of life of these women. Therefore, a healthy lifestyle is essential to minimize the physical and psychological side effects of treatment. Physical activity has several benefits for women with breast cancer, and Pilates solo and belly dancing can be an enjoyable type of physical activity for women with breast cancer undergoing clinical treatment. The purpose of this study is to provide a Pilates solo and a belly dance protocol (three times per week/16 weeks) for women undergoing breast cancer treatment and compare its effectiveness with that in the control group. Methods The participants will be allocated to either the intervention arm (Pilates solo or belly dance classes three times per week for 16 weeks) or a control group (receipt of a booklet on physical activity for patients with breast cancer and maintenance of habitual physical activity routine). The Pilates solo and belly dance classes will be divided into three stages: warmup and stretching, the main stage, and relaxation. Measurements of the study outcomes will take place at baseline; postintervention; and 6, 12, and 24 months after the end of the intervention (maintenance period). The data collection for both groups will occur with a paper questionnaire and tests covering general and clinical information. The primary outcome will be quality of life (EORT QLQ-C30 and EORT QLQ-BR23), and secondary outcomes will be physical aspects such as cardiorespiratory fitness (6-min walk test and cycle ergometer), lymphedema (sum of arm circumference), physical activity (IPAQ short version), disabilities of the arm (DASH), range of motion (goniometer test), muscular strength (dynamometer test) and flexibility (sit and reach test), and psychological aspects such as depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory), body image (Body Image After Breast Cancer Questionnaire), self-esteem (Rosenberg), fatigue (FACT-F), pain (VAS), sexual function (FSFI), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index). Discussion In view of the high prevalence of breast cancer among women, the implementation of a specific protocol of Pilates solo and belly dancing for patients with breast cancer is important, considering the necessity to improve their physical and psychological quality of life. Pilates solo and belly dancing are two types of physical activity that involve mental and physical concentration, music, upper limb movements, femininity, and social involvement. An intervention with these two physical activities could offer options of supportive care to women with breast cancer undergoing treatment, with the aim being to improve physical and psychological quality of life. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03194997. Registration date 12 August 2017. Universal Trial Number (World Health Organization), U1111-1195-1623.

scholarly journals The impact of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on late radiation toxicity and quality of life in breast cancer patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilot C. T. Batenburg ◽  
Wies Maarse ◽  
Femke van der Leij ◽  
Inge O. Baas ◽  
Onno Boonstra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Radiation Toxicity ◽  
Breast Pain ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Purpose To evaluate symptoms of late radiation toxicity, side effects, and quality of life in breast cancer patients treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). Methods For this cohort study breast cancer patients treated with HBOT in 5 Dutch facilities were eligible for inclusion. Breast cancer patients with late radiation toxicity treated with ≥ 20 HBOT sessions from 2015 to 2019 were included. Breast and arm symptoms, pain, and quality of life were assessed by means of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 before, immediately after, and 3 months after HBOT on a scale of 0–100. Determinants associated with persistent breast pain after HBOT were assessed. Results 1005/1280 patients were included for analysis. Pain scores decreased significantly from 43.4 before HBOT to 29.7 after 3 months (p < 0.001). Breast symptoms decreased significantly from 44.6 at baseline to 28.9 at 3 months follow-up (p < 0.001) and arm symptoms decreased significantly from 38.2 at baseline to 27.4 at 3 months follow-up (p < 0.001). All quality of life domains improved at the end of HBOT and after 3 months follow-up in comparison to baseline scores. Most prevalent side effects of HBOT were myopia (any grade, n = 576, 57.3%) and mild barotrauma (n = 179, 17.8%). Moderate/severe side effects were reported in 3.2% (n = 32) of the patients. Active smoking during HBOT and shorter time (i.e., median 17.5 vs. 22.0 months) since radiotherapy were associated with persistent breast pain after HBOT. Conclusion Breast cancer patients with late radiation toxicity reported reduced pain, breast and arm symptoms, and improved quality of life following treatment with HBOT.

Elucidating the Potential Side Effects of Current Anti- Seizure Drugs for Epilepsy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enes Akyüz ◽  
Mohd. Farooq Shaikh ◽  
Betül Köklü ◽  
Cansu Ozenen ◽  
Alina Arulsamy
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
First Line ◽  
Epileptic Patients ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Visual Problems ◽  
Gaba Transmission

: Over the decades, various interventions have been developed and utilized to treat epilepsy. However, majority of epileptic patients are often first prescribed with anti-epileptic drugs (AED), now known as anti-seizure drugs (ASD), as a first line of defense to suppress their seizures and regain their quality of life. ASDs exert their anti-convulsant effects through various mechanisms of action including regulation of ion channels, blocking of glutamate-mediated stimulating neurotransmitter interaction, and enhancing the inhibitory GABA transmission. About one third of epileptic patients are often resistant to anti-convulsant drugs, while others develop numerous side effects which may lead to treatment discontinuation and further deterioration of quality of life. Common side effects of ASDs include headache, nausea and dizziness. However, more adverse effects such as auditory and visual problems, skin problems, liver dysfunction, pancreatitis and kidney disorders may also be witnessed. Some ASDs may even result in life-threatening conditions as well as serious abnormalities, especially in patients with comorbidities and in pregnant women. Nevertheless, some clinicians had observed a reduction in the development of side effects post individualized ASD treatment. This suggest that a careful and well-informed ASD recommendation to patients may be crucial for an effective and side-effect free control of their seizures. Therefore, this review aimed to elucidate the anticonvulsant effects of ASDs as well as their side effect profile, by discussing their mechanism of action and reported adverse effects based on clinical and preclinical studies, thereby providing clinicians with a greater understanding of the safety of current ASDs.

scholarly journals Hubungan Dukungan Keluarga Terhadap Kualitas Hidup Pasien Kanker Payudara di Rumah Sakit Islam Siti Khodijah Palembang Tahun 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 529
Author(s):  
Yofa Anggriani Utama
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Family Support ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
The World

Cancer is one of the causes of death in both developed and developing countries, cancer is increasing in developing countries due to increasing lifestyle, breast cancer is a cancer that causes death in women in the world, breast cancer is the highest contributor to mortality in women in the world, 43.3 per 100,000. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of family support to the quality of life of breast cancer patients. The research design used was observational analytic with cross sectional approach. The sampling technique used purposive sampling technique, the study sample amounted to 63 breast cancer patients. The results show that there is a relationship between family support and the quality of life of breast cancer patients with a p value of 0.032. shows there is a relationship between family support for the quality of life of patients with breast cancer. Suggestions that nurses can improve the quality of nursing services, and provide motivation to patients and families of breast cancer in carrying out breast cancer treatment.

Determining the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A survey of cancer survivors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24080-e24080
Author(s):  
Eva Battaglini ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
Susanna Park
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Side Effect ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
The Impact

e24080 Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major yet poorly understood side effect of cancer treatment, leading to symptoms including numbness, tingling and pain. It can lead to cessation of effective treatment, long-term functional disability and reduced quality of life. Despite this, there is currently little understanding of its impact. Methods: The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of neurotoxic chemotherapy side effects on the lives of cancer survivors. Data was collected via an online survey covering demographics, cancer diagnosis and treatment, CIPN and other side effects of chemotherapy, using standardised measures to assess comorbidities, quality of life, physical activity, pain and CIPN symptoms. Results: Data was analysed from 986 respondents who were treated with neurotoxic therapies (83% female, 16% male), with mean age 59 years ( SD 10.7 years). A majority of respondents were treated for breast cancer (59%), 14% for colorectal cancer and 11% for multiple myeloma. Chemotherapy types received included paclitaxel (32%), docetaxel (32%) and oxaliplatin (13%), and respondents completed treatment a mean of 3.6 years ago. The majority of respondents (80%) reported experiencing neuropathic symptoms after finishing chemotherapy, with 77% reporting current CIPN. Those with CIPN reported functional impacts, with 23% reporting moderate to severe problems with hand function and 28% reporting moderate to severe walking difficulties. CIPN was second most commonly rated as the treatment side effect having the greatest impact, following fatigue. Respondents with high levels of current CIPN symptoms had poorer quality of life, more comorbid health conditions, higher BMI and more often received multiple neurotoxic chemotherapies than those with low levels of CIPN symptoms. In addition, respondents who reported meeting government physical activity guidelines had lower CIPN and higher quality of life scores than those who did not meet the guidelines. Regression analyses investigating the association between quality of life and clinical and sociodemographic characteristics resulted in a model with comorbid health conditions, CIPN symptoms, years since treatment, age and physical activity as significant predictors of quality of life. Conclusions: These findings suggest that CIPN has a lasting impact on cancer survivors, leading to decreases in quality of life, often occurring alongside poorer general health. This impact supports the need for further research to improve assessment, prevention and treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document