scholarly journals Long-range control of gene expression via RNA-directed DNA methylation

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e1006749 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Jordan Rowley ◽  
M. Hafiz Rothi ◽  
Gudrun Böhmdorfer ◽  
Jan Kuciński ◽  
Andrzej T. Wierzbicki
Author(s):  
Agostino Berio ◽  
Gian Luigi Mariottini ◽  
Marco Frascio ◽  
Enrico Calcagno ◽  
Giacomo Garlaschi ◽  
...  

The authors report on a patient with Chiari I malformation associated to Waardenburg phenotype, multiple malformations, osteochondrodysplasia and microdeletion of 1q21,1 chromosome, of which they underline the rarity. The pathogenesis connected to the features of neural crest cells-derived structures with mesodermal-derived tissues, mainly in the facial and boundary region of malformed posterior cranial fossa, is discussed. The authors hypothesize that chromosomal microdeletion, acting directly or on contiguous gene(s) or by long range control of gene expression, have modified the function of some developmental genes, causing consequently the association of symptoms observed in the patient.


Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1484
Author(s):  
Clémentine Mercé ◽  
Philipp E. Bayer ◽  
Cassandria Tay Fernandez ◽  
Jacqueline Batley ◽  
David Edwards

The methylation of gene promoters is an epigenetic process that can have a major impact on plant phenotypes through its control of gene expression. This phenomenon can be observed as a response to stress, such as drought, cold/heat stress or pathogen infection. The transgenerational heritability of DNA methylation marks could enable breeders to fix beneficial methylation patterns in crops over successive generations. These properties of DNA methylation, its impact on the phenotype and its heritability, could be used to support the accelerated breeding of improved crop varieties. Induced DNA methylation has the potential to complement the existing plant breeding process, supporting the introduction of desirable characteristics in crops within a single generation that persist in its progeny. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms involved in the regulation of gene expression through DNA methylation and to develop methods for precisely modulating methylation patterns for crop improvement. Here we describe the currently available epigenetic editing tools and their advantages and limitations in the domain of crop breeding. Finally, we discuss the biological and legislative limitations currently restricting the development of epigenetic modification as a crop improvement tool.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 251686571881111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud de Dieuleveult ◽  
Benoit Miotto

DNA methylation plays an essential role in the control of gene expression during early stages of development as well as in disease. Although many transcription factors are sensitive to this modification of the DNA, we still do not clearly understand how it contributes to the establishment of proper gene expression patterns. We discuss here the recent findings regarding the biological and molecular function(s) of the transcription factor ZBTB38 that binds methylated DNA sequences in vitro and in cells. We speculate how these findings may help understand the role of DNA methylation and DNA methylation–sensitive transcription factors in mammalian cells.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 649-649
Author(s):  
Xiaotian Zhang ◽  
Margaret Goodell ◽  
Mira Jeong ◽  
Haley Gore ◽  
Wanding Zhou

Abstract DNA methylation Canyons (DMC in short, also referred to as DNA methylation Valleys) are long unmethylated regions (UMR) over 3.5kb, in the mammalian genome. DMCs are associated with homeotic genes and can be classified into active DMCs marked by H3K4me3 and repressive DMCs marked by H3K27me3. We performed high resolution in situ HiC on human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) and differentiated red blood cell (RBC) progenitors derived from HSPC. We found that DMCs over 7.3kb form significant 3D micro-compartment interactions with each other. These interactions are extremely long range and can occur between two loci separated by 60Mb. Thus, we name these DMCs over 7.3kb as Grand DNA methylation Canyon (GDMC). GDMCs are repressive DMCs and bear the highest level of H3K27me3 in the HSPC compared with the remaining UMRs under 7.3kb. Additionally, we found that the interacting GDMCs is organized by Polycomb mediated long range interaction but not cohesion loop extrusion. We also found GDMC interactions disappear in differentiated RBC progenitors derived from HSPC. This suggests a function of GDMC interactions in stem cell maintenance. We thus set out to test the function of GDMC interactions in stem cell self-renewal by deleting GDMC loci. We found one GDMC that lacks genes and transcription activity and enhancer activity marked by H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, is interacting with a repressive part (covered by H3K27me3) of the HOXA cluster only in HSPC. This GDMC is thus named "Geneless Canyon"- GLC in short. By deleting GLC, we found that HSPC self-renewal is impaired significantly. Moreover, expression of active HOXA9 and HOXA10 gene adjacent to the repressive part of HOXA cluster also decreased after deletion. When we checked the 3D genomic interactions around the HOXA region after deletion, we found the long range interactions with GLC disappear, and the enhancer interactions with active HOXA cluster gene promoters are also weakened. This suggests that GDMC interactions can act as the scaffold for the enhancer-promoter interactions to maintain active gene expression.In the detailed examination of regulatory elements in GLC, we found that CTCF binding sites are at the boundary of neighboring Lamin associated domain (LAD) and GLC (Figure 1A). The CTCFs are forming cohesion extrusion loops to include the whole LAD region. Deletion of the CTCF sites also result in the loss of HOXA9 and HOXA10 expression as well as the compromise of self-renewal. Since HOXA9-10 genes are important transcriptional factors for leukemias carrying NPM1c+ and MLL-X mutations. We thus performed CTCF deletions in cell lines with OCI-AML3 and MV4:11 as leukemia cell line models carrying NPM1c+ and MLL-X mutations. We surprisingly found the NPM1c+ cell leukemia cell line display the growth arrest with CTCF deletion, while the MLL-X cell line MV4:11 don't display such effect (Figure 1B). We perform in situ HiC on OCI-AML3 and MV4:11 and found in OCI-AML3 cells GLC forms interaction with HOXA9-HOTTIP regions, while in MV4:11 cells there is no such interaction (Figure 1C).Further examination on epigenomic profiles identified that GLC is activated as super enhancer in OCI-AML3 cells with the loss of Polycomb binding. This indicates that NPM1c+ leukemia may utilize the GLC region as enhancer to boost active gene expression in from HOXA9 to Hottip, with a different mechanism than HSPC. Gene expression analysis after the CTCF deletion further validates that after the CTCF deletion the expression of HOXA9, HOXA10 and HOXA11 is decreased. Interestingly, GLC is also hypermethylated in the OCI_AML3 cells. Thus, we have discovered an important DNA methylation Canyon that regulates the hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal via the structural organization of HOXA region that act as the scaffold for the enhancer-promoter interaction. This Canyon can also act as a super enhancer to activate the HOXA expression in the NPM1c+ leukemia. This suggests the versatile roles of Polycomb targeted Canyon in normal hematopoiesis and leukemia development. Figure. 1 Figure. 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Classical genetics has revealed the mechanisms for the transmission of genes from generation to generation, but the strategy of the genes in unfolding the developmental programme remains obscure. Epigenetics comprises the study of the mechanisms that impart temporal and spatial control on the activities of all those genes required for the development of a complex organism from the zygote to the adult. Epigenetic changes in gene activity can be studied in relation to DNA methylation in cultured mammalian cells and it is also possible to isolate and characterize mutants with altered DNA methylase activity. Although this experimental system is quite far removed from the epigenetic controls acting during development it does provide the means to clarify the rules governing the silencing of genes by specific DNA methylation and their reactivation by demethylation. This in turn will facilitate studies on the control of gene expression in somatic cells of the developing organism or the adult. The general principles of epigenetic mechanisms can be defined. There are extreme contrasts between instability or switches in gene expression, such as those in stem-line cells, and the stable heritability of a specialized pattern of gene activities. In some situations cell lineages are known to be important, whereas in others coordinated changes in groups of cells have been demonstrated. Control of numbers of cell divisions and the size of organisms, or parts of organisms, is also essential. The epigenetic determination of gene expression can be reversed or reprogrammed in the germ line. The extent to which methylation or demethylation of specific DNA sequences can help explain these basic epigenetic mechanisms is briefly reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document