scholarly journals Data-driven methods for dengue prediction and surveillance using real-world and Big Data: A systematic review

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0010056
Author(s):  
Emmanuelle Sylvestre ◽  
Clarisse Joachim ◽  
Elsa Cécilia-Joseph ◽  
Guillaume Bouzillé ◽  
Boris Campillo-Gimenez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Real World ◽  
Data Sources ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Dengue Prediction

Background Traditionally, dengue surveillance is based on case reporting to a central health agency. However, the delay between a case and its notification can limit the system responsiveness. Machine learning methods have been developed to reduce the reporting delays and to predict outbreaks, based on non-traditional and non-clinical data sources. The aim of this systematic review was to identify studies that used real-world data, Big Data and/or machine learning methods to monitor and predict dengue-related outcomes. Methodology/Principal findings We performed a search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2020. The review (ID: CRD42020172472) focused on data-driven studies. Reviews, randomized control trials and descriptive studies were not included. Among the 119 studies included, 67% were published between 2016 and 2020, and 39% used at least one novel data stream. The aim of the included studies was to predict a dengue-related outcome (55%), assess the validity of data sources for dengue surveillance (23%), or both (22%). Most studies (60%) used a machine learning approach. Studies on dengue prediction compared different prediction models, or identified significant predictors among several covariates in a model. The most significant predictors were rainfall (43%), temperature (41%), and humidity (25%). The two models with the highest performances were Neural Networks and Decision Trees (52%), followed by Support Vector Machine (17%). We cannot rule out a selection bias in our study because of our two main limitations: we did not include preprints and could not obtain the opinion of other international experts. Conclusions/Significance Combining real-world data and Big Data with machine learning methods is a promising approach to improve dengue prediction and monitoring. Future studies should focus on how to better integrate all available data sources and methods to improve the response and dengue management by stakeholders.

Identifying Cancer Targets Based on Machine Learning Methods via Chou’s 5-steps Rule and General Pseudo Components

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (25) ◽  
pp. 2301-2317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruirui Liang ◽  
Jiayang Xie ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Mengying Zhang ◽  
Hai Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Human Genome Project ◽  
Genome Project ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Vector Machines

In recent years, the successful implementation of human genome project has made people realize that genetic, environmental and lifestyle factors should be combined together to study cancer due to the complexity and various forms of the disease. The increasing availability and growth rate of ‘big data’ derived from various omics, opens a new window for study and therapy of cancer. In this paper, we will introduce the application of machine learning methods in handling cancer big data including the use of artificial neural networks, support vector machines, ensemble learning and naïve Bayes classifiers.

scholarly journals Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Brnabic ◽  
Lisa M. Hess
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Real World ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

Abstract Background Machine learning is a broad term encompassing a number of methods that allow the investigator to learn from the data. These methods may permit large real-world databases to be more rapidly translated to applications to inform patient-provider decision making. Methods This systematic literature review was conducted to identify published observational research of employed machine learning to inform decision making at the patient-provider level. The search strategy was implemented and studies meeting eligibility criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Relevant data related to study design, statistical methods and strengths and limitations were identified; study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Luo checklist. Results A total of 34 publications from January 2014 to September 2020 were identified and evaluated for this review. There were diverse methods, statistical packages and approaches used across identified studies. The most common methods included decision tree and random forest approaches. Most studies applied internal validation but only two conducted external validation. Most studies utilized one algorithm, and only eight studies applied multiple machine learning algorithms to the data. Seven items on the Luo checklist failed to be met by more than 50% of published studies. Conclusions A wide variety of approaches, algorithms, statistical software, and validation strategies were employed in the application of machine learning methods to inform patient-provider decision making. There is a need to ensure that multiple machine learning approaches are used, the model selection strategy is clearly defined, and both internal and external validation are necessary to be sure that decisions for patient care are being made with the highest quality evidence. Future work should routinely employ ensemble methods incorporating multiple machine learning algorithms.

Estimation of data-driven streamflow predicting models using machine learning methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanveer Ahmed Siddiqi ◽  
Saima Ashraf ◽  
Sadiq Ali Khan ◽  
Muhammad Jawed Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

scholarly journals Accurate Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease for Patients With Hypertension From Electronic Health Records With Big Data and Machine-Learning Methods: Model Development and Performance Evaluation (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenzhen Du ◽  
Yujie Yang ◽  
Jing Zheng ◽  
Qi Li ◽  
Denan Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Big Data ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Large Population ◽  
High Accuracy ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

BACKGROUND Predictions of cardiovascular disease risks based on health records have long attracted broad research interests. Despite extensive efforts, the prediction accuracy has remained unsatisfactory. This raises the question as to whether the data insufficiency, statistical and machine-learning methods, or intrinsic noise have hindered the performance of previous approaches, and how these issues can be alleviated. OBJECTIVE Based on a large population of patients with hypertension in Shenzhen, China, we aimed to establish a high-precision coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction model through big data and machine-learning METHODS Data from a large cohort of 42,676 patients with hypertension, including 20,156 patients with CHD onset, were investigated from electronic health records (EHRs) 1-3 years prior to CHD onset (for CHD-positive cases) or during a disease-free follow-up period of more than 3 years (for CHD-negative cases). The population was divided evenly into independent training and test datasets. Various machine-learning methods were adopted on the training set to achieve high-accuracy prediction models and the results were compared with traditional statistical methods and well-known risk scales. Comparison analyses were performed to investigate the effects of training sample size, factor sets, and modeling approaches on the prediction performance. RESULTS An ensemble method, XGBoost, achieved high accuracy in predicting 3-year CHD onset for the independent test dataset with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.943. Comparison analysis showed that nonlinear models (K-nearest neighbor AUC 0.908, random forest AUC 0.938) outperform linear models (logistic regression AUC 0.865) on the same datasets, and machine-learning methods significantly surpassed traditional risk scales or fixed models (eg, Framingham cardiovascular disease risk models). Further analyses revealed that using time-dependent features obtained from multiple records, including both statistical variables and changing-trend variables, helped to improve the performance compared to using only static features. Subpopulation analysis showed that the impact of feature design had a more significant effect on model accuracy than the population size. Marginal effect analysis showed that both traditional and EHR factors exhibited highly nonlinear characteristics with respect to the risk scores. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that accurate risk prediction of CHD from EHRs is possible given a sufficiently large population of training data. Sophisticated machine-learning methods played an important role in tackling the heterogeneity and nonlinear nature of disease prediction. Moreover, accumulated EHR data over multiple time points provided additional features that were valuable for risk prediction. Our study highlights the importance of accumulating big data from EHRs for accurate disease predictions.

Machine learning methods applied to triage in emergency services: A systematic review

2022 ◽  
Vol 60 ◽  
pp. 101109
Author(s):  
Rocío Sánchez-Salmerón ◽  
José L. Gómez-Urquiza ◽  
Luis Albendín-García ◽  
María Correa-Rodríguez ◽  
María Begoña Martos-Cabrera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Emergency Services ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document