scholarly journals Factors affecting the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy: A single center study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0243575
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Hongwei Zhao ◽  
Yuanxin Li
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Surgical Time ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Wbc Count

Aim This study aimed to explore factors may affect the length of hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods The data of 636 patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy between July 2016 and July 2019 in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into group A (hospital stay ≤3 days, 348 patients) and group B (hospital stay >3 days, 288 patients) according to their hospital stay.Sex, age, disease onset time(time from onset to admission), nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, peritonitis, comorbidities, and history of appendicitis; preoperative body temperature (T), white blood cell (WBC) count, percentage of neutrophilic granulocytes, and preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) level; time from diagnosis to surgery. appendix diameter, appendicolith, and ascites in ultrasound or CT; surgical time(the surgery start time was the time of skin incision, and the end time was the time the anesthesia intubation was removed), intraoperative blood loss (the volume of blood infiltrating into a gauze was calculated by weighing the gauze infiltrated with water and calculating the volume of water), intraoperative adhesions or effusions, and stump closure methods, convert to open appendectomy, appendix pathology(perforated or gangrenous appendicitis were defined as complicated appendicitis and simple or suppurative appendicitis were defined as uncomplicated appendicitis) and antibiotic treatment schemes were analyzed. Results Significant differences were detected between group A and group B in age (37.10 ± 13.52y vs 42.94 ± 15.57y, P<0.01), disease onset time (21.36 ± 16.56 h vs 32.52 ± 27.99 h, P <0.01), time from diagnosis to surgery (8.63 ± 7.29 h vs 10.70 ± 8.47 h, P<0.01); surgical time(64.09 ± 17.24 min vs 86.19 ± 39.96 min, P < 0.01); peritonitis(52.9% vs 74%, P < 0.01), comorbidities (12.4% vs 20.5%, P < 0.01), appendicolith (27.6% vs 41.7%, P < 0.01), ascites before the surgery(13.8% vs 22.9%, P < 0.01), intraoperative adhesions or effusions(56% vs 80.2%, P < 0.01); preoperative temperature (37.11 ± 0.64°C vs 37.54 ± 0.90°C, P < 0.01); preoperative WBC count (13.06 ± 3.39 × 109/L vs 14.21 ± 4.54 × 109/L, P = 0.04);preoperative CRP level(18.99 ± 31.72 mg/L vs 32.46 ± 46.68 mg/L, P < 0.01); appendix diameter(10.22 ± 2.59 mm vs 11.26 ± 3.23 mm, P < 0.01); intraoperative blood loss (9.36 ± 7.29 mL vs 13.74 ± 13.49 mL, P < 0.01); using Hem-o-lok for stump closure(30.7% vs 38.5%, P = 0.04); complicated appendicitis (9.5% vs 45.8%, P < 0.01); and using ertapenem for antibiotic treatment after the surgery(4.3% vs 21.5%, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age (OR = 1.021; 95%CI = 1.007–1.036), peritonitis (OR = 1.603; 95% CI = 1.062–2.419), preoperative WBC count (OR = 1.084; 95% CI = 1.025–1.046), preoperative CRP level (OR = 1.010; 95% CI = 1.005–1.015), time from diagnosis to surgery (OR = 1.043; 95% CI = 1.015–1.072), appendicolith (OR = 1.852; 95% CI = 1.222–2.807), complicated appendicitis (OR = 3.536; 95% CI = 2.132–5.863), surgical time (OR = 1.025; 95% CI = 1.016–1.034), use of Hem-o-lok for stump closure (OR = 1.894; 95% CI = 1.257–2.852), and use of ertapenem for antibiotic treatment (OR = 3.076; 95% CI = 1.483–6.378) were the risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay. Conclusions The patient with appendicitis was older and had peritonitis, higher preoperative WBC count or CRP level, longer time from diagnosis to surgery, appendicolith, and complicated appendicitis, predicting a prolonged hospital stay. Shorter surgical time and the use of silk ligation for stump closure and cephalosporins + metronidazole for antibiotic treatment might be better choices to obtain a shorter hospital stay.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis in Children in Tertiary Care Hospital

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (Number 1) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
Md. Anisuzzaman ◽  
ASM A Kabir ◽  
Md. A R l Sadiq ◽  
Md. A Matin ◽  
I Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
The Mean

Laparoscopic appendectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis is associated with good outcomes but the role of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis is more controversial because of high incidence of infectious complications. The aim of this current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis in children. This interventional study was carried out during the period from January 2015 to May 2018 in Holy Family Red Crescent Medical College Hospital. The study included 43 patients, age ranges from 3 years to 15 years who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis. The following variables were analyzed : age, sex, operative findings, operative time, return of bowel function, resumption of oral feeds, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications such as deur, wound infection and intraabdominal abscess etc. The mean age of studied cases was 7.1 years. In 41 patients (95.3%) the procedure was completed laparoscopically. Two (4.7%) patients required conversion to open appendectomy. The operative time was 83.5+,25.8 minutes. Two patients (4.6%) had post-operative ileus. Four patients (9.7%) developed superficial wound infection. Three patients (7.3%) developed infra-abdominal collections. One (2.4%) patients were readmitted because of recurrent abdominal pain One patients (2.4%) developed postoperative pyrexia due to pneumonitis and Three patients (7.3) developed gastroenteritis. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8±2.1 days. No mortality was recorded.Laparoscopic appendectomy can be the first choice for cases of complicated appendicitis in children. It is a feasible, safe procedure and is associated with acceptable post-operative morbidity with rapid recovery and better cosmetic results.

scholarly journals Primerjava laparoskopske apendektomije pri enostavnem in zapletenem vnetju slepiča

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matjaž Križaj ◽  
Erik Štrumbelj ◽  
Stanislav Mahne
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Early Postoperative Complications ◽  
Stump Closure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diagnostic Modalities

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has been gaining ground as a gold standard for the treatment of acute appendicitis. For complex inflammation there is no common opinion. A higher conversion rate, longer operative time, higher incidence of abscess formation and longer hospitalization are being reported. The aim of our study was to compare the diagnostic modalities, treatment and postoperative complications in uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.Methods: In our institution laparoscopic appendectomy is the method of choice for the treatment of every type of appendicitis. In our retrospective analysis, all patients with acute appendicitis operated on in the years 2013 and 2014 were included. Among 273 patients, 19 were excluded due to primary open procedure and one who underwent revision surgery for other disease and had appendectomy performed. In 253 patients we observed the proportion of the postoperative complications in uncomplicated and complicated cases with respect to patients’ age, period of the year, duration of hospital stay, diagnostic modalities, drainage of the abdominal cavity, conversion rate and stump closure.Results: The analysis showed a steep increase of complicated appendicitis in elderly population, but there were no significant differences regarding period of the year (χ2 test, p = 0.158). The hospital stay was longer in complicated cases (5.94 days v. 3.049 days). When a preoperative CT scan was performed, cases were more often complicated (CT 0.654, no CT 0.229; χ2 test, p < 0.001), as was the proportion of drain insertions during surgery (0.5490 v. 0.065; χ2 test, p < 0.001). The proportion of clips for the stump closure was higher in the uncomplicated group (0.717 v. 0.521; χ2 test, p = 0.005). The rate of early postoperative complications and conversion rate revealed no significant difference.Conclusions: We have found out there is a difference in diagnostic modalities and treatment options in uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, but no significant difference in the conversion rate and early postoperative complications. Our analysis suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe method in all types of appendicitis.

scholarly journals Management of post-operative discitis following discectomy in a tertiary-level hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902098821
Author(s):  
Md Kamrul Ahsan ◽  
Md Sariful Hasan ◽  
Md Shahidul Islam Khan ◽  
Najmus Sakeb
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Tertiary Level ◽  
Disc Space ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Level Hospital

Purpose: To perform retrospective analysis of 75 post-operative disc space infections after open lumbar discectomy (OLD) and to assess the outcome of their medical and surgical management in a tertiary-level hospital. Methods: Records of 50 men and 25 women aged 26–65 (mean, 42.53) years who underwent treatment for post-operative discitis (POD) after single level OLD at L3–4 (n = 8), L4–5 (n = 42), L5–S1 (n = 25) level. The POD was diagnosed according to specific clinical signs, laboratory and radiographic investigations and all of them received initial intravenous antibiotics (IVA) for at least 4–6 weeks followed by oral ones. Successful responders (n = 55) were considered in Group-C and remainder [Group-S (n = 20)] were operated at least after 4 weeks of failure. Demographic data, clinical variables, hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment and post-treatment complications were collected from the hospital record and assessment before and after treatment were done by using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Comprehensive outcome was evaluated by modified criteria of Kirkaldy-Willis. Results: The mean follows up was 36.38 months. Significant improvement of mean VAS and JOA score was achieved in both conservative (76.36% satisfactory) and operative (90% satisfactory) groups although the difference was statistically insignificant. Conclusion: Although insignificant, early surgical intervention provided better results (e.g. functional outcomes, length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic treatment therapy) than conventional conservative treatment in post-operative discitis.

scholarly journals Inappropriate manipulation and drainage exacerbate post-operative pain and prolong the hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy for pediatric complicated appendicitis

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Wen Tsai ◽  
Shin-Yi Lee ◽  
Jyun-Hong Jiang ◽  
Jiin-Haur Chuang
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Postoperative Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital ◽  
Abdominal Abscess ◽  
Penrose Drain ◽  
Drain Group

Abstract Background This study examined whether drain placement or not is associated with the postoperative outcomes of pediatric patients following trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) for complicated appendicitis. Methods The medical records of pediatric patients undergoing TUSPLA for acute complicated appendicitis from January 2012 to September 2018 in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. They were classified according to whether they received passive drainage with a Penrose drain (Penrose group) (19), active drainage with a Jackson-Pratt drain with a vacuum bulb (JP group) (16), or no drain (non-drain group) (86). The postoperative outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results Postoperative visual analog scale pain score was significantly higher in the non-drain group than in either the JP group or Penrose group. Patients in the Penrose group had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay than those in the non-drain group and a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscess, while patients in the JP group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay; moreover, no patient in JP group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Conclusions Compared to passive drainage with a Penrose drain or no drain, active drainage with a JP drain shorter the postoperative hospital stay and decreased the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess.

scholarly journals Milyen hatása van a COVID–19-járványnak a gyermekkori akut appendicitisekre?

2021 ◽  
Vol 162 (16) ◽  
pp. 608-610
Author(s):  
Balázs Fadgyas ◽  
Gábor István Garai ◽  
Zoltán Ringwald
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Histological Findings ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Fisher's Exact Test ◽  
Fisher’S Exact Test

Összefoglaló. Bevezetés: A COVID–19-pandémia miatt a gyermekkori appendicitisek kezelésében számos változás történt (laparoszkópia helyett nyílt műtét, antibiotikumkezelés). Világszerte emelkedett a szövődményes appendicitisek aránya. Célkitűzés: Munkánk során a COVID–19-járványnak a gyermekkori akut appendicitisekre kifejtett hatását szerettük volna vizsgálni: lett-e több perforált eset? Módszerek: A 2012 és 2020 között akut vakbélgyulladás miatt operált gyermekeket vizsgáltuk, külön, havi bontásban a 2020-as eseteket. A szövettani diagnózis alapján perforált és nem perforált appendicitis csoportokat alkottunk. A 2020-ban operált betegek COVID–19-statusát is rögzítettük. Statisztikai analízisre a khi2-próbát (’chi2 test for trend’) és a Fisher-féle egzakt tesztet alkalmaztuk. Eredmények: A vizsgált időszakban 1343 appendectomia történt, többségében nem perforált akut appendicitis miatt (1166/1343). 2015-től kezdődően a perforált esetek aránya szignifikáns emelkedést mutat (p = 0,0002). Az igazoltan COVID–19-pozitív betegek között magasabb volt a perforáltak aránya (5/8), mint az igazoltan negatív betegek között (15/92) (p = 0,0075). Megbeszélés: A nemzetközi trendeknek megfelelően 2020-ban osztályunkon is magasabb volt a perforált appendicitisek aránya, mint a korábbi években. Ez az emelkedés 2015-től tart, a pandémiával nem mutat szoros összefüggést. A perforált appendicitisek COVID–19-pozitív betegek között észlelt magas arányának okát nem ismerjük. Következtetés: További vizsgálat indokolt annak feltárására, hogy mi okozza a perforált appendicitisek COVID–19-pozitív betegek között észlelt magas, illetve 2015 óta emelkedő rátáját. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(16): 608–610. Summary. Introduction: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the management of paediatric appendicitis has changed (open instead of laparoscopic appendectomy, antibiotic treatment). The number of complicated appendicitis cases increased worldwide. Objective: Our aim was to study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric acute appendicitis: has there been more perforated cases? Methods: Children operated because of acute appendicitis between 2012 and 2020 were studied. Cases from the year 2020 were analysed monthly. Patients were divided into perforated and non-perforated appendicitis groups according to their histological findings. COVID-19 status of patients in 2020 was studied. Chi2 test for trend and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results: In the study period, 1343 appendectomies were performed. The majority of our cases were non-perforated (1166/1343). The rate of perforated appendicitis cases has been increasing from 2015 (p = 0.0002). The number of perforated cases was higher in COVID-19 positive patients (5/8) then in negative ones (15/92) (p = 0.0075). Discussion: In line with the international trend, more perforated appendicitis cases were treated in our departement in 2020. However, this increase started in 2015, and there is no correlation with the COVID-19 pandemic. The cause of the increased number of perforated cases in COVID-19 positive appendicitis patients is unknown. Conclusion: The causes of the high proportion of perforated cases in COVID-19 positive patients and the rising rate of perforated appendicitis cases since 2015 need further studies. Orv Hetil. 2021; 162(16): 608–610.

COMPARISION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION BETWEEN OPEN APPENDECTOMY AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
J. Sudhakar ◽  
Manoj Karthik Gera
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
Health Care Associated Infection

Appendectomy is most common surgical procedure in emergency surgery. Inamed appendix can be removed laparoscopically (laparoscopic appendectomy) or openly (open appendectomy). Surgical site infection is representative of health care associated infection in which it may effect on patients' morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to compare laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in terms of surgical site infection. The frequency of 60 patients who underwent appendectomy open appendectomy-40;laparoscopic appendectomy-20 between September 2019- march2020 which were retrospectively reviewed for demographic and pathological characteristic, recovery of bowel movements, length of hospital stay and post-operative complications. The frequency of purulent/gangrenous or perforated appendix were Laparoscopic appendectomy-10% and in open appendectomy 20%. The time of rst atus after surgery were 2.9 days and in open appendectomy were 2.97 days in laparoscopic appendectomy. Length of hospital stay were relatively short in laparoscopic appendectomy group and in open appendectomy group The frequency of overall surgical site infection were not that difference between the two groups laparoscopic appendectomy -15% open appendectomy group were22%But that of supercial surgical site infection was signicantly lower in laparoscopic appendectomy group5% open appendectomy group 15%.

Surgical Diabetic Foot Infections: Is Osteomyelitis Associated With a Worse Prognosis?

2021 ◽  
pp. 153473462098669
Author(s):  
Javier Aragón-Sánchez ◽  
Gerardo Víquez-Molina ◽  
María Eugenia López-Valverde ◽  
José María Rojas-Bonilla ◽  
Christian Murillo-Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Limb Loss ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Hospital Stays ◽  
Hospital Stay Duration ◽  
Worse Prognosis

It has been reported that patients with diabetes and foot ulcers complicated with osteomyelitis (OM) have a worse prognosis than those complicated with soft tissue infections (STI). Our study aimed to determine whether OM is associated with a worse prognosis in cases of moderate and severe diabetic foot infections requiring surgery. A retrospective series consisted of 150 patients who underwent surgery for diabetic foot infections. We studied the differences between OM versus STI. Furthermore, diabetic foot infections were reclassified into four groups: moderate STI (M-STI), moderate OM (M-OM), severe STI (S-STI), and severe OM (S-OM). The variables associated with prognosis were limb loss, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, recurrence of the infection, and time to healing (both the initial ulcer and the postoperative wound). No differences in limb salvage, hospital stay, duration of antibiotic treatment, recurrence of the infection, and time to healing were found when comparing OM with STI. Patients with M-O had a higher rate of recurrences after initial treatment and a longer time to healing when comparing with M-STI. We didn’t find any differences between severe infections with or without OM. In conclusion, we have found in our surgical series of diabetic foot infections that OM is not associated with worse prognosis when comparing with STI regarding limb loss rate, length of hospital stays, duration of antibiotic treatment, recurrence of the infection, and time to healing. The results of the present series should further be confirmed by other authors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document