scholarly journals INSTITUTE OF COMPULSORY INSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY OF LAWYERS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN: COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
pp. 47-50
Author(s):  
O.L. Kazantseva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Professional Liability ◽  
Compulsory Insurance ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic

The article is devoted to the problems of introduction of the institute of compulsory insurance ofprofessional liability of lawyers in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. The authoranalyzes the current legislation of the two states, in terms of mandatory insurance of professional liabilityof lawyers, identifies current problems in this area, justifies ways to solve them. The article has a certainscientific and practical value, since it analyzes the experience of the establishment of the institute ofcompulsory insurance of professional liability of lawyers in Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan, whichwill improve the legislative and law enforcement practice of both states.

scholarly journals On the issue of institutionalization of the structure of constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan: existing models and legal distinctiveness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Т.Ж. Жунусканов
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
State Structure ◽  
Form Of Government ◽  
The Hierarchical Structure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law And Legislation

В статье на основе сравнительно-правового анализа рассматривается структура конституционного законодательства Российской Федерации и Республики Казахстан. Автором выделены актуальные проблемы – вопросы институционализации, анализ действующего права, правоприменительной практики и доктрины названных стран, что позволяет говорить о влиянии формы правления и государственного устройства на структуру и содержание Конституции, конституционного законодательства. Выявлены модельные сходства, присутствие в системе права и системе законодательства исследуемых стран властных отношений, с особым выражением в унитарном государстве, с другой – их концептуальные различия, определяющиеся их отдельным содержанием. Результатом анализа является авторское видение иерархической структуры конституционного законодательства Российской Федерации и Республики Казахстан, в зависимости от государственного устройства. The article deals with the comparative legal analysis of the structure of the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. The author has highlighted one of its topical problems – the issues of institutionalization. Analysis and research of the current law, law enforcement practice and doctrine of the named countries allows talking about the influence of the form of government and state structure on the structure and content of the Constitution, constitutional legislation, in particular, as well as their originality. Their model similarities, the presence of a dictatorship of power in the system of law and legislation of the studied countries, with a special expression in a unitary state, are revealed, on the other, their conceptual differences, determined by its individual elements. The result of the analysis is the author's vision of the hierarchical structure of the constitutional legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, depending on the state structure.

THE PROBLEMS OF CRIMINAL LAW PROTECTION OF THE OIL INDUSTRY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Сергей Иванович Вележев ◽  
Антон Михайлович Седогин
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Oil Industry ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Illegal Activities ◽  
Business Entities ◽  
Criminal Groups

В статье рассмотрены актуальные вопросы уголовно-правовой охраны нефтяной отрасли Российской Федерации от преступных посягательств корыстной направленности. Иллюстрирован существенный ущерб, причиняемый преступными группами охраняемым общественным отношениям на национальном и международном уровнях. Проведен статистический и сравнительно-правовой анализ наиболее эффективных норм законодательства России и Казахстана, применяемых в ходе борьбы с подобной противоправной деятельностью. Предложено направление дальнейшего совершенствования российского уголовного закона. Нефтяная промышленность является одной из ведущих отраслей Российской Федерации, структурными сегментами которой являются в том числе объекты добычи, хранения, переработки и транспортировки нефти, а также объекты транспортировки, хранения и сбыта нефтепродуктов. Данные обстоятельства требуют принятия мер по ее защите от противоправных действий по хищению нефти и нефтепродуктов. Наряду с охранными, режимными и организационными мерами, которые осуществляют хозяйствующие субъекты, немаловажное значение имеет защита отрасли от преступных посягательств уголовно-правовым способом. В статье указывается необходимость совершенствования законодательства по обеспечению безопасности деятельности нефтяной отрасли, учитывая ее значение для экономики страны. Отмечается, что положительные результаты в поиске возможных путей совершенствования законодательства дает применение сравнительно-правового анализа уголовных норм СНГ по борьбе с преступностью в этой сфере деятельности. The article examines current issues of the criminal law protection of the oil industry of the Russian Federation from criminal attacks for mercenary reasons. The considerable damage caused by criminal groups to protected public relations at the national and international levels is illustrated. A statistical and comparative legal analysis of the most effective norms of the legislation of Russia and the Republic of Kazakhstan applied in the fight against such illegal activities has been carried out. The direction of further improvement of the Russian criminal law is proposed. The oil industry is one of the leading industries of the Russian Federation, the structural segments of that are the objects of oil production, storage, refining and transportation, as well as the objects of transportation, storage and marketing of oil product. Under these circumstances it is required totake measures for protection it from unlawful actions connected with stealing of oil and oil products. Along with security, safeguards and organizational measures that are implemented by business entities, protection of the industry from criminal attacks by a criminal law method is of no small importance. The article indicates the need to improve legislation to ensure the safety of the oil industry, based on its importance for the country's economy. It is noted that positive results in the search for possible ways to improve the legislation are provided by the use of a comparative legal analysis of the criminal norms of the CIS in the fight against crime in this area of activity.

To the Question of Private Ownership of Agricultural Land in Russia and Kazakhstan: Comparative and Legal Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Алмагуль Дюсюпова ◽  
Almagul Dyusyupova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Agricultural Land ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Theoretical Understanding ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Economic Perspectives ◽  
The Right

Socio-economic nature and legal content of private ownership of agricultural land in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan have accumulated new features that have not yet received sufficient theoretical understanding, scientific analysis and cross-light. This scientific article deals with the right of private ownership of agricultural land under the laws of Russia and Kazakhstan. The article describes the formation and development of the institution of private ownership of land in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan from the philosophical, historical, legal and economic perspectives. The author determines the legal essence, the characteristics and features of private ownership of agricultural land under the new economic conditions in the competitive environment. The author makes an attempt to understand the formation and development of this institution at the present stage of the development of our society.

scholarly journals The Development of Muslim Community (Ummah) of Republic of Tatarstan in Late 2018–2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 155-172
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Khabutdinov
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Secondary Schools ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Muslim Community ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Radical Organizations ◽  
Traditional Islam

The article is devoted to the development of the Muslim community of the Republic of Tatarstan (RT) at the end of 2018 and 2019. Here the author continues a series of publications exploring the Muslim community of Tatarstan in 2000s and 2010s. The leadership of the Muslim Spiritual Administration of the Republic of Tatarstan (DUM RT) is based on its own version of “traditional Islam”, where Sufism and the Maturidite ‘aqidah of the Hanafi madhhab occupy the principal place. In the Republic of Tatarstan, as well as all in other republics within the Russian Federation, the role of Islam in spiritual, educational and cultural spheres is growing due to the abolition of compulsory studying of titular languages in secondary schools. The spiritual administration of Muslims of the Republic of Tatarstan (DUM RT) continues to maintain a monopoly among Muslim organizations in the Republic of Tatarstan. Nevertheless, the activity of representatives of radical organizations banned in the Russian Federation is still to observe in the Republic. Law enforcement agencies are actively fi ghting with them; it leads to the elimination of their cells in the Republic of Tatarstan, arrests and sentencing with real terms.

scholarly journals ANTI-CORRUPTION IN POLICE BODIES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

2017 ◽  
pp. 122-128
Author(s):  
Денис Печегин ◽  
Denis Pechegin ◽  
Евгения Прохорова ◽  
Evgeniya Prohorova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Federal Republic Of Germany ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Effective System ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Individual

The police as a law enforcement body of a specific state was created to perform a variety of tasks in order to maintain the law and order in society, to ensure the security of the state, its citizens. In accordance with the role of the police in the legal doctrine of different countries (Germany, France, England, etc.), in due time, there were even separate schools to study this institution. The police are also one of the subjects of anti-corruption. Nevertheless, this does not mean that corruption cannot exist in the ranks of the police. Despite the general increase in confidence in the police and their employees, noted by the All-Russia centre of studying of public opinion over the last few years in the Russian Federation, today the efforts to combat corruption need to be undertaken not only outside, but also within the police departments themselves. It is obvious that corrupt law enforcement bodies are not able to perform effectively and qualitatively their tasks, and this fast poses a real threat to the state, society and the individual. Thus, the task of improving the complex of anti-corruption measures in the police bodies is becoming more urgent. The article presents a comparative legal analysis of anti-corruption in the police bodies of Russia and Germany in modern conditions. The measures of influence are defined, as well as the forms of interaction of law enforcement agencies in the fight against this negative social phenomenon. The authors come to conclusion that the effective system of anti-corruption in police facilitates not only by the system of legislative sanctions adopted in the state, but also by the qualitative implementation of the state’s social policy with regard to civil servants.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAWS OF RUSSIA AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN AIMED AT THE SEARCH FOR A WAY TO IMPROVE THE INSTITUTION OF SUSPICION

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Olga S. Polikarpova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Russian Law ◽  
The Republic

The relevance of the article is due to the imperfection of the criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation in terms of the institution of suspicion. The author examines the distinctive features of the provisions of Russian law and the criminal procedure law of the Republic of Kazakhstan relating directly to the institution of suspicion and, in order to minimize permissible for criminal proceedings under Russian law, procedural violations, attention is drawn to the possibility of improving the reporting Institute by reforming criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation as a whole with a focus on the introduced in the criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan the criminal procedural model.

scholarly journals Investigator’s covert-nature procedural activities

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 04011
Author(s):  
Marina Sergeevna Kolosovich ◽  
Lyudmila Vladimirovna Popova ◽  
Anna Fedorovna Zotova ◽  
Maria Mikhailovna Bondar ◽  
Olga Sergeevna Shamshina
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Preliminary Investigation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Intelligence ◽  
The Russian Federation

Over the years, most of the Russian processualists denied the investigator’s right to engage in actions of covert nature and deemed it impossible to integrate the norms of criminal intelligence legislation in the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation adopted on 18.12.2001 No. 174-FZ, rightly referring to the impossibility to vest a single duty-bearer engaged in a preliminary investigation with unprecedented powers. Meanwhile, the latest decades have been marked by active legislative activity in many countries, which in fact has turned covert criminal intelligence and surveillance into a procedural activity. These innovations became specific of a number of countries regardless of their legal system belonging to the Romano-Germanic or Anglo-Saxon legal system, testifying to more profound roots of the problem. The study is also relevant in terms of dissatisfaction, expressed by the Russian law-enforcement authorities, with the crime solvency rate and with the interaction of criminal intelligence detectives and internal affairs investigators. The goal of the study is to identify the procedural provisions governing the investigator’s covert-nature activities and related law enforcement problems. The methodological framework of the research comprises general and particular methods of scientific knowledge: dialectical, systemic, deductive, inductive; synthesis, analysis; comparative legal analysis, statistical and other methods. Results and novelty: it was concluded that the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for the regulation of the investigator’s confidential-nature activities inherent in covert criminal intelligence and surveillance and requiring more detailed elaboration, as concerns the issues of securing the rights of partakers of the said activity; the authors express doubt regarding the justification of the legislator’s differentiation of covert activities under criminal cases into covert investigative actions (Art. 185, 186, 186.1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) and covert operational and investigative operations that are in fact identical to the former (Art. 6, Cl. 9-11 of the Russian Federation Federal Law No. 144-FZ as of 12.08.1995 “On criminal intelligence and surveillance”.

scholarly journals Problems of Protecting the Rights of a Private Prosecutor in Defamation Cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-660
Author(s):  
Natalya Artebyakina ◽  
Tatyana Makarova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Local Governance ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
False Information ◽  
Justices Of The Peace ◽  
The Russian Federation

The growing complexity of public relations creates a need for the criminalization of some acts and de-criminalization of others. Defamation is one of the offenses affected by this trend. Some time after its de-criminalization, the crime of defamation was brought back to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. However, there is no actual legal mechanism in Russia that victims of defamation could use to fully protect their rights. The authors point out a trend for acquittals in criminal proceedings initiated after the complaints of private prosecutors when they concern deliberately false information that besmirches the honor and dignity of other people and harms their reputation, when these complaints are filed with the governmental, including the law enforcement, authorities. They present their research of court statistical data regarding cases heard by Justices of the Peace under Part 1, Art. 128.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation between 2014 and the first half of 2018. The authors have analyzed the practices of Justices of the Peace in Ulyanovsk Region on criminal cases initiated under Part 1, Art. 128.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. They use the examples of specific criminal cases to prove that judges use clauses of Art. 33 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and Art. 6 of the Federal Law «On the Procedure of Handling Applications of Citizens of the Russian Federation» when deciding cases based on Part 1, Art. 128.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and protect the right of citizens to appeal to the governmental (including law enforcement) authorities; they point out that an appeal to governmental or local governance cannot be viewed as spreading deliberately false information. In this case, private prosecutors have no opportunity to protect their rights even if it is proven that the information is deliberately false, and they also have to bear additional expenses connected with the recovery of procedural costs. Besides, the research includes a comparative legal analysis of legislation on defamation in a number of foreign countries (the USA, China, the UAE and others) as well as the historical-legal analysis of the development of Russian legislation on liability for defamation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document