Rapid and simple IgG specific test for the exclusion of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Jürgen Kolde ◽  
Ralf Dostatni ◽  
Susanne Mauracher
Keyword(s):  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Specific Test ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Specific Igg ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Specific Igg Antibodies

AbstractThe exclusion of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is required for selecting the most appropriate anticoagulation therapy in affected patients. It requires the combination of clinical data with the detection of antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4) in complex with polyanions (PA) such as heparin.We developed a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for PF4/PA complex specific IgG antibodies based on gold nanoparticles. Unlike most other assays, the initial immune reaction takes place in the liquid phase. The sensitivity of the assay has been adjusted with clinical samples aiming in the reliable detection of sera which are positive in a functional platelet activation assay.Sera from 60 patients with suspected HIT were investigated. LFIA identified correctly all samples (n=20) which were positive in a functional assay (HIPA) and an IgG specific ELISA. It correlated with ELISA, but false positive results were less frequent (7 samples were negative with LFIA and HIPA but positive with ELISA).The LFIA may be a suitable tool for the rapid exclusion of HIT within 10 min.

Serologic Results in >1000 Patients With Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.

Implementation of a Fully Automated Latex Immunoturbidimetric Assay for the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in a High-Volume University Hospital Laboratory

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S30-S30
Author(s):  
Christina Pierre ◽  
Mary Acker ◽  
Surabhi Palkimas ◽  
Lindsay Bazydlo
Keyword(s):  
High Volume ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Reference Laboratory ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Hospital Laboratory ◽  
Assay Precision ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Interassay Precision

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated, adverse reaction to heparin in which heparin binds platelet factor 4 (PF4), triggering the development of heparin-PF4 antibodies (HITAb). HITAbs bind and activate platelets, causing thrombosis, platelet consumption, and thrombocytopenia. Heparin is replaced with relatively costly nonheparin anticoagulants until HIT can be ruled out. HIT diagnosis consists of a HITAb immunoassay with reflex to a serotonin release assay (SRA) for confirmation of positive results. Recently, a fully automated latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA) for detection of HITAbs received FDA clearance. We sought to verify the performance characteristics of the LIA with the aim of implementing the test in a high-volume university hospital laboratory. Methods The in-house HITAb LIA was performed on the Instrumentation Laboratory TOP700 analyzer using HemosIL HIT-Ab(PF4-H) reagent. The comparator method, a HITAb ELISA, was performed at a reference laboratory with positive results reflexed to SRA. All samples (36 total) sent to the reference laboratory for HIT testing from December 2017 to November 2018 were aliquoted and run in parallel by LIA. Intra-assay precision was assessed by running manufacturer-provided low and high control samples 10 times in succession, while interassay precision was assessed by running low and high samples every day for 10 days. Turnaround time to HITAb result was retrieved from the electronic medical records for HIT testing performed 60 days before and after in-house test implementation. Results The agreement between the LIA and ELISA was 92% (33/36). One discordant sample tested negative by ELISA and was not assessed by SRA. Another tested positive by ELISA and negative by LIA and was confirmed negative by SRA. The final discordant sample tested negative by LIA but positive by ELISA and was confirmed positive by SRA. Thirty-three percent (12/36) of samples tested positive for HITAb by ELISA and were reflexed to SRA. Both the ELISA and LIA showed 83% agreement (10/12) with the SRA. The coefficient of variance (CV) for the intra-assay precision studies was 18% and 5% for the low and high controls, respectively. The CV for the interassay precision studies was 28% and 5% for the low and high controls, respectively. Postimplementation quality control data revealed 61% and 20% imprecision on the low and high level controls, respectively, which declined significantly when reagents were removed from the instrument and refrigerated within 2 hours. The turnaround time for HITAb results was reduced by 74% (10.5 vs 41 hours) after in-house test implementation, significantly reducing the need for administration of nonheparin anticoagulants. Conclusion The LIA and ELISA methods compared favorably, allowing for clinical implementation of the LIA. The shortened turnaround time of the LIA significantly reduced the time to rule out HIT, enhancing patient care and reducing drug costs. The assay imprecision warrants further investigation regarding reagent stability.

Functional Microparticles Are up Regulated in Patients with Anti-Heparin/Platelet Factor 4 Antibodies: A Potential Mechanism of Thrombogenesis in the Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Syndrome.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2105-2105
Author(s):  
Josephine Cunanan ◽  
Michelle Kujawski ◽  
He Zhu ◽  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Jeanine Walenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Annexin V ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Cellular Damage ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia

Abstract Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is one of the most catastrophic adverse effects of heparin therapy, representing a complex syndrome involving immunopathologic and hemostatic disorders. Vascular and blood cellular damage results in the generation of microparticles (MP). These MP are formed from stress conditions/cellular disruption and apoptosis. Cellular MP mediated pathophysiologic responses include platelet activation, up regulation of adhesion molecules, monocyte activation, up regulation of tissue factor and endothelial dysfunction. Several methods based on flow cytometric and other immunologic probes have been used to measure MP in the HIT syndrome. Recently, a functional method based on the complexation of MP with annexin V promoting the generation of factor Xa and thrombin has become available (Hyphen Biomedical, Neuville-Oise, France). To validate the hypothesis that functional MP are elevated in the HIT syndrome, this method was utilized for the quantitation of MP in sera ELISA positive for anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 (HIT) antibodies. Specimens (n = 53) were selected from archived samples that had been referred to Loyola University Medical Center for the laboratory diagnosis of HIT by quantitating anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies by ELISA and by evaluating HIT antibody induced platelet activation using the 14C Serotonin Release Assay (SRA). All selected specimens were positive for HIT antibodies in the GTI PF4 Enhanced ELISA with a broad range of antibody titers (absorbance range of 0.4 – 2.5). Eleven of these specimens were positive in the SRA. In addition, serial samples from HIT patients treated with argatroban (from the ARG-911 clinical study) were included (n = 23). The normal samples represented control sera obtained from healthy human volunteers (n = 25) and processed in the same manner as the clinical samples. Test samples were added to microtiter plates coated with streptavidin and biotinylated annexin V. MP present in the test sample bound to annexin V via exposed surface phospholipids. Following incubation and washing steps, a FXa – FVa mixture containing calcium and prothrombin was added. The assay was optimized so that MP associated phospholipid was the limiting factor for the generation of thrombin. In normal non-HIT sera, the MP levels ranged 5.6 – 10.1 nM (6.1 ± 2.8 nM). The pre-treatment, baseline levels of circulating MP in the suspected HIT patients ranged from 4.2 – 26.8 nM (15.8 ± 7.3 nM). Interestingly, SRA positive/ELISA positive samples had relatively higher levels of MP (19.9 ± 7.7 nM; range 11.5 – 29.8 nM) than SRA negative/ELISA positive samples (14.2± 4.6; range 6.8–21.2). In the ARG-911 study, sequential blood samples exhibited MP levels at the baseline ranging from 8.2 – 38.6 nM (21.8 ± 10.8 nM), whereas after 3 days of argatroban treatment were reduced to 5.1 – 19.2 nM (12.6 ± 6.3). The results of these studies suggest that circulating functional MP are increased in patients with ELISA positive HIT antibodies. Anticoagulation with such direct thrombin agents as argatroban effectively decreases the circulating functional MP levels. Since the elevated MP levels may mediate thrombin and FXa generation, the therapeutic effects of these drugs in HIT may be related to the decreased activation of coagulation and related thrombogenic processes.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Rapid, Reliable and Practical, Functional Flow-Cytometric Assay

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1130-1130
Author(s):  
Varda Deutsch ◽  
Michal Cipok ◽  
Sigi Kay ◽  
Yvette Levy ◽  
Shoshana Bar On ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Relative Sensitivity ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Specific Test ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Laboratory Confirmation ◽  
Relative Specificity ◽  
Biological Probe

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin treatment, associated with morbidity and mortality. HIT is characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombotic complications secondary to the formation of antibodies (Abs) against heparin-platelet-factor 4 (PF4) complexes. The pathologic mechanism involves the binding of the heparin-immune-complex to the platelet-Fc-receptor, resulting in platelet activation, aggregation, and rapid elimination. The diagnosis of HIT requires laboratory confirmation. Common laboratory testing is based on immune detection of antibodies directed against the PF4/heparin complex (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA or ELISA). However, these assays suffer from methodological limitations, especially low specificity, as compared to the platelet functional assays. The “gold standard” functional test for detecting of platelet-activating antibodies is the radioactive [14C] serotonin-release assay (14C-SRA) (Sheridan D, et al, Blood. 1986;67:27-30, Kelton JG, et al.,Blood.1988;72:925-30). However, the assay includes the use of a radiolabeled biological probe and requires considerable expertise to obtain reliable results. Consequently, its use is limited to research laboratories. Aim To overcome the methodological limitations associated with current assays, we modified a functional flow-cytometry assay (FCA), which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity (Tomer, A. Br J Haematol, 1997;98: 648-656 , Tomer, A., et al, Am J Hematol, 1999;61: 53-61). This assay, similar in concept to the 14C-SRA, determines the capacity of the patient's serum to activate platelets in the presence of heparin, using a fluorescent probe. Methods Consecutive samples from 254 patients clinically suspected for HIT were tested. The FCA assay was compared with the standard ID-H/PF4-PaGIA antigenic assay (DiaMed, Switzerland) with two dilutions to assess specificity (Nellen, V., et al.,Haematologica, 2012;97: 89-97). Results Of the total 254 samples tested, 48 (19%) were positive by PaGIA, compared to 13 (5.1%) positive by the functional FCA (Table 1). The number of PaGIA positive samples was reduced to 24 (9.4%) by 1:16 dilution, and to 14 (5.5%) by 1:32 dilution. All FCA positive samples were positive at all PaGIA dilutions (relative sensitivity 93%). Thirty PaGIA negative samples were all negative by the FCA (relative specificity 100%). Conclusion The results suggest that the functional FCA is a practical, sensitive, and highly specific test for the reliable diagnosis of HIT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiovascular surgery

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Allyson M. Pishko ◽  
Adam Cuker
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
History Of ◽  
Postoperative Setting

Abstract Clinicians generally counsel patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid heparin products lifelong. Although there are now many alternative (nonheparin) anticoagulants available, heparin avoidance remains challenging for cardiac surgery. Heparin is often preferred in the cardiac surgery setting based on the vast experience with the agent, ease of monitoring, and reversibility. To “clear” a patient with a history of HIT for cardiac surgery, hematologists must first confirm the diagnosis of HIT, which can be challenging due to the ubiquity of heparin exposure and frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Next, the “phase of HIT” (acute HIT, subacute HIT A/B, or remote HIT) should be established based on platelet count, immunoassay for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, and a functional assay (eg, serotonin release assay). As long as the HIT functional assay remains positive (acute HIT or subacute HIT A), cardiac surgery should be delayed if possible. If surgery cannot be delayed, an alternative anticoagulant (preferably bivalirudin) may be used. Alternatively, heparin may be used with either preoperative/intraoperative plasma exchange or together with a potent antiplatelet agent. The optimal strategy among these options is not known, and the choice depends on institutional experience and availability of alternative anticoagulants. In the later phases of HIT (subacute HIT B or remote HIT), brief intraoperative exposure to heparin followed by an alternative anticoagulant as needed in the postoperative setting is recommended.

Does the Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) ELISA Correlate with the Clinical Diagnosis of Type II Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia?.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2179-2179
Author(s):  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Thomas S. Kickler ◽  
Edward G. Weir
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Patient Âgé

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated complication of heparin therapy that is associated with a consumptive thrombocytopenia and a high risk of thromboembolism. It is now known that antibodies associated with type II HIT recognize sites on PF4 when complexed with heparin. Due to technical challenges associated with the serotonin release assay, most clinicians rely on the PF4 ELISA to establish a laboratory diagnosis of HIT. However, it is unclear whether the ELISA has predictive value in identifying those patients who have clinically apparent disease and whether ELISA optical density (OD) measurements correlate with the development of thrombosis. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 103 sequential patients who tested positive for HIT by a commercial PF4 ELISA from 2000–2002. While blinded to ELISA OD values, we recorded patient age and gender, admission diagnosis, hospital course, type of heparin administered, route of administration, baseline and nadir platelet counts, timing of thrombocytopenia, HIT therapy, clinical thrombotic events within 30 days, and other potential causes of thrombocytopenia to determine the clinical likelihood of HIT. The association between OD values and both the clinical likelihood of HIT and objectively confirmed thrombotic events was analyzed using the Pearson Chi-square test. Median patient age was 62 yrs and 52% of patients were female. Those with cardiac disease, cancer, and venous thromboembolism constituted 44%, 19% and 9% of the study population, respectively. Median platelet count nadir was 40K/mL (range, 2K–90K), and average onset of thrombocytopenia was 6.5 days. Median ELISA OD value was 0.77 (0.40–3.81). The clinical likelihood of HIT was noted in 24/103(23%) patients, and 22(21%) suffered a thrombotic event. An ELISA OD >1.0 was significantly associated with the clinical likelihood of HIT (p=0.03), though OD values ranged from 0.41 to 3.81 among these patients. Neither an OD threshold of 1.0 or 1.5 was associated with thromboembolism (p=0.2 and p=0.1, respectively). In contrast, the clinical likelihood of HIT was significantly associated with subsequent thrombosis (p=0.002). ELISA results were not significantly associated with the extent or onset of thrombocytopenia, type of heparin or route administered, patient age or gender, admission diagnosis, or hospital course. In conclusion, PF4 ELISA OD values are significantly associated with the clinical likelihood of HIT but are not predictive of HIT on an individual patient basis. Clinical judgment but not ELISA OD values is associated with subsequent thromboembolism. In summary, the clinical likelihood of HIT, and not ELISA results, remains the best parameter by which to modify anticoagulation therapy in patients being assessed for HIT. Figure Figure

Prospective Evaluation of Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1051-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Francis ◽  
Alane Drexler ◽  
Mary Kathryn Duncan ◽  
Hina Desai ◽  
Mildred Amaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Probability ◽  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Immunological Methods ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Immunological Assays ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Test Probability

Abstract The laboratory diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) relies on the demonstration of antibodies to the heparin-platelet factor 4 (H-PF4) complex. Assays are based on the functional ability of H-PF4 antibodies to activate platelets, or detect the antibody directly by immunological methods. Multiple assays in each category are currently in clinical use and newer, rapid immunological assays are becoming available. The aim of this study was to compare available methods for detecting H-PF4 antibodies in a prospective study of patients with clinically suspected HIT. Functional assessment included serotonin release assay (SRA) and lumi-aggregometry (LA). Immunological assessment included ELISA (GTI), and particle gel immunoassay (PGIA; Diamed and Akers). Circulating platelet microparticles (PMP) were assessed by flow cytometry. Patients were also assessed for the pre-test probability of HIT using the Warkentin 4-T scoring system. 151 patients were enrolled. 54/151 patients (35.8%) had a positive GTI ELISA, while 53/151 (35.1%) and 39/151 (25.8%), respectively, had positive Akers and Diamed PGAI tests. Only 15/149 (10.1%) patients had a positive SRA, while only 5/150 (3.3%) gave a positive result by lumi-aggregometry. There was a strong correlation between the ELISA OD values obtained in serum and plasma using both fresh (r=0.98) and frozen (r=0.99) samples, although slightly more positive results were obtained using serum. Differences were only seen with OD values around the cut-off of 0.4. The majority (77.8%) of H-PF4 antibodies detected by ELISA were neutralized by heparin in the ‘confirmatory’ procedure. Weak antibodies (OD 0.4–0.5) were more likely to be non-neutralizable (5/12; 42%) than strong antibodies (OD>1.0; 4/23; 17%). 47 patients positive by ELISA were retested to determine the predominant immunoglobulin subclass. 15/47 (32%) were positive (OD>0.4) for IgG; 27/47 (57%) for IgM, and 12/47 (25%) for IgA. The Diamed assay more closely correlated with the GTI ELISA than the Akers test (82.1% vs. 56.7%, respectively). The PGIAs were only moderately correlated with each other (64%) with the Akers assay giving more “false positive” results relative to the ELISA. PMP were higher in patients with a positive ELISA (6.2 vs 4.7 × 106/ml) or positive SRA (5.5 vs. 5.1 ×106/ml) but this was not statistically significant due to the wide range of results. Of 119 patients assessed, 87 had a low pre-test probability of HIT (4-T score 0–3), 27 had an intermediate probability (4–5), and 5 had a high probability (6–8). The GTI ELISA was positive in 24, 56 and 80% of low, intermediate and high probability cases. The Akers PGIA was positive in 39, 41 and 40% respectively; the Diamed assay in 21, 33 and 40%, and the SRA in 7, 11 and 40%, respectively. This study was conducted in a patient population biased towards cardiovascular surgery, and confirms previously reported observations that immunoassays are more frequently positive than functional assays. The ELISA correlated better than the PGIA tests with the pre-test probability of HIT, although the Diamed test showed acceptable correlation with the ELISA. In contrast, the Akers assay correlated poorly with the ELISA, often producing positive results when the latter test was negative. We conclude that while the PGIA tests are rapid and convenient, further studies are needed to determine the basis for disparate results relative to the widely used ELISA.

Comparison of Antigen and Activation Assays with a Probability Scoring Model for the Diagnosis of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3215-3215
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Scarvelis ◽  
Gail Rock
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Platelet Response ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Heparin Anticoagulation

Background: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a syndrome characterized by thrombocytopenia and an elevated risk of thrombosis. In the evaluation of patients with suspected HIT, laboratory testing is used to help differentiate between those patients who have HIT and those who do not and therefore do not require non-heparin anticoagulation. Laboratory tests include activation (serotonin release, heparin-induced platelet aggregation, ATP luminescence) and antigen (enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay (ELISA)) assays directed against the platelet factor 4-heparin or PF4/PVS complex. A pre-test scoring system (Warkentin 4T’s) has been derived to assess the probability of HIT which can be used in conjunction with laboratory testing in the evaluation for HIT. Objectives: To compare the activation assay used at The Ottawa Hospital (ATP luminescence) with the PF4 enhanced® ELISA and correlate results with clinical data. Methods: Patients undergoing HIT testing were identified. ELISA and activation assays were performed. Charts were reviewed in order to derive a 4T’s score and to assess response to therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation (when administered). Correlation between ELISA, activation assay, 4T’s score and platelet response to alternative anticoagulation was determined. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of laboratory tests or 4T’s scores were calculated depending on the measure chosen as the reference standard to diagnose HIT. Results: 111 patients undergoing HIT testing were evaluated. 41 and 43 were positive by ELISA (OD > 0.4) or activation assay respectively. 12 were positive only by ELISA (mean optical density (OD): 1.27) and 10 were positive by both activation assay and ELISA (mean OD: 2.28). Clinical information was available for 70 patients. 26 of these received therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation as treatment for suspected HIT. Reference standard= activation assay: ELISA: Sens 95% (95% CI 73–99%), Spec 80% (66–89%), PPV 66% (46–81%), NPV 98% (86–100%). 4T’s (low vs. high score): Sens 85% (54–97%), Spec 95% (83–99%), PPV 85% (54–97%), NPV 95% (83–99%). ELISA OD > 1.5 + high 4T’s score: Sens 61% (36–82%), Spec 100% (56–100%), PPV 100% (68–100%), NPV 50% (24–76%). Reference standard= 4T’s score (high and low score only, excludes intermediate category): ELISA: Sens 85% (53–97%), Spec 77% (61–88%), PPV 52% (30–74%), NPV 94% (79–99%). Activation: Sens 85% (54–97%), Spec 95% (83–99%), PPV 85% (54–97%), NPV 95% (83–99%). Reference standard= “clear response to non-heparin anticoagulation” defined as significant platelet increase within 48 hours of start of therapy and no other explanation for platelet recovery: ELISA: Sens 100% (72–100%), Spec 54% (26–80%), PPV 68% (43–86%), NPV 100% (56–100%). Activation: Sens 85% (54–97%), Spec 69% (39–90%), PPV 73% (45–91%), NPV 82% (48–97%). 4T’s (low vs. high score): Sens 90% (54–99%), Spec 100% (60–100%), PPV 100% (63–100%), NPV 89% (51–99%). ELISA OD > 1.5 + 4T’s (low vs. high score): Sens 89% (51–99%), Spec 100% (56–100%), PPV 100% (60–100%), NPV 88% (47–99%). Conclusions: A high 4T’s score best predicts a clinical response to non-heparin therapeutic anticoagulation when HIT is suspected. ELISA OD > 1.5 does not add additional information in this respect. A negative ELISA and a low 4T’s score have comparable NPVs when an activation assay is the reference standard. Future trials should employ a clinical reference standard such as “clear response to non-heparin anticoagulation” when evaluating the operator characteristics of HIT assays.

Spontaneous Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Syndrome: Two New Cases and a Proposal For Defining This Disorder

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2328-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore E. Warkentin ◽  
Paul Andrew Basciano ◽  
Richard A. Bernstein
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Left Vertebral Artery ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Activation Assay ◽  
Count Recovery ◽  
Heparin Exposure

Abstract Introduction Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a transient, autoimmune-like, prothrombotic disorder caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating IgG reactive against platelet factor 4/heparin (PF4/H). There is an emerging literature (Am J Med 2008;121:632-6. J Thromb Haemost 2008;6:1598-1600; Thromb Haemost 2013;109:669-75) pointing to rare instances of “spontaneous” HIT in patients without preceding heparin. We report 2 new cases and propose a definition for this controversial disorder. CASE #1. A 62-y.o. man presented with left middle cerebral artery stroke and thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 65×109/L). There was no previous history of thrombocytopenia, surgery, hospitalization, or heparin exposure. Clot extraction performed with heparin was complicated by further platelet count decline to 27 (nadir) and progressive thrombosis of the carotid artery. Aspirin was started, and the platelets recovered to >150 by day 13. CASE #2. A 54-y.o. female developed right leg swelling, left-upper extremity weakness/paresthesias, and thrombocytopenia (61×109/L) 15 days post-shoulder hemiarthroplasty; no intra-/postoperative heparin had been given. Brain MRI demonstrated acute infarct in the left posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory; angiography showed non-visualization of the left vertebral artery. Ultrasound revealed right lower-limb deep-vein thrombosis. Heparin treatment resulted in further platelet count fall to 37 (nadir). Treatment with argatroban, followed by fondaparinux, was associated with platelet count recovery to >150 by day 39. Methods Testing for HIT antibodies was performed by commercial EIA-IgG/A/M (Immucor GTI Diagnostics), in-house EIA-IgG (McMaster), and serotonin-release assay (SRA). Results Both patients’ sera (obtained before any heparin administration) tested strongly positive for HIT antibodies (Table), including strong platelet activation at 0.1 and 0.3 IU/mL heparin, as well as at 0 U/mL heparin, with no platelet activation at 100 IU/mL heparin: these serological features are characteristic of “delayed-onset HIT” (Ann Intern Med 2001;135:502-6). Antibody reactivity declined markedly by 2 to 4 weeks (including loss of platelet-activating properties at 0 IU/mL heparin), in keeping with the usual transience of HIT antibodies (N Engl J Med 2001;344:1286-92), and paralleling both patients’ platelet count recovery. Discussion These cases further support spontaneous HIT as an unusual explanation for acute arterial stroke and thrombocytopenia. One patient had preceding orthopedic surgery, an event previously reported with spontaneous HIT (Thromb Haemost 2013;109:669-75). The strong serum-dependent platelet activation at 0 IU/mL heparin helps to explain how thrombocytopenia and thrombosis can occur in a patient not receiving heparin. RECOMMENDATION. Based on the serological findings of these and previous cases, we propose that a definitive diagnosis of spontaneous HIT syndrome should be based upon all of the following criteria: thrombocytopenia, thrombosis, lack of proximate heparin exposure, strong-positive PF4-dependent immunoassay(s), and a strong-positive platelet activation assay featuring both heparin-dependent (e.g., high heparin neutralization) and heparin-independent platelet activation (at 0 IU/mL heparin). Disclosures: Warkentin: Pfizer Canada: Honoraria; Paringenix: Consultancy; Immucor GTI Diagnostics: Research Funding; WL Gore: Consultancy; GSK: Research Funding.

scholarly journals FcγRIIA H/R131 Polymorphism, Subclass-Specific IgG Anti-Heparin/Platelet Factor 4 Antibodies and Clinical Course in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis

Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 370-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gowthami Arepally ◽  
Steven E. McKenzie ◽  
Xiao-Ming Jiang ◽  
Mortimer Poncz ◽  
Douglas B. Cines
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Disease Susceptibility ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Functional Polymorphism ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Receptor Isoforms ◽  
Specific Igg

Abstract The explanation why only a subset of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) develop clinically apparent thromboses (HITT) remains uncertain. It has been proposed that platelet activation induced by cross-linking of FcγRIIA by anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies is central to the pathogenesis of thrombosis. The observation that a common functional polymorphism of FcγRIIA, involving either an arginine (R) or histidine (H) at amino acid 131, may underlie disease susceptibility prompted us to investigate the prevalence of receptor isoforms in patients with HIT and HITT. Furthermore, because these isoforms reportedly differ in their avidity for immune complexes containing human IgG2 , we also analyzed sera from patients with HIT and HITT for the prevalence of various subclass-specific IgG anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies. No difference in the allele frequency of FcγRIIA-H131 or R131 was identified among 13 patients with HIT or 23 with HITT compared with 102 controls (χ2 = 1.21, P = .8). Furthermore, although most patients had IgG2 antibodies (62%), IgG1 was the predominant subclass in 30 of the 34 patients with IgG anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies and in 12 was the exclusive subclass found. Also, there was no association between the concordance of IgG2 anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies and the expression of FcγRIIA-H131 in patients with HITT compared with patients with thrombocytopenia alone. These results make it unlikely that the FcγRIIA-H131 isoform or IgG2 anti-heparin/PF4 antibodies are required to develop HITT, suggesting that factors in addition to cross-linking of FcγRIIA receptors contribute to the pathogenesis of thrombosis in patients with heparin-dependent antiplatelet antibodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document