scholarly journals Feeling Joint Ownership of Agency: The Normative Aspect of Agency Transformation

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Faria Costa
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Team Reasoning ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
Group Member ◽  
Normative Aspect ◽  
Normative Attitude

Abstract Team reasoning is the idea that we can think as a ‘we’ and this can solve some coordination dilemmas, such as Hi-Lo. However, team reasoning can only solve the dilemmas it is intended to solve if the conditions for team reasoning warrant the belief that others will also perform team reasoning and these conditions cannot render team reasoning otiose. In this paper, I will supplement the theory of team reasoning by explaining how agency transformation also involves a change in the normative attitude. To do this, I will use the theory of affordances, which is the idea that the environment provides ways to interact with it. I will argue that when a person perceives as a group member, she associates herself and the other members with the group’s mosaic of affordances. This triggers a feeling of joint ownership of the agency. It is the feeling that it is up to us to deal with the situation, so we feel entitled to demand each other to cooperate. It warrants the belief that others are team-reasoners without rendering team reasoning otiose. This means that the agency transformation (from I to we) involves a change in the normative attitude.

scholarly journals KONSEP HAK MILIK DALAM EKONOMI ISLAM

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-207
Author(s):  
AN Ras Try Astuti ◽  
Andi Faisal
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Social Justice ◽  
Economic System ◽  
The Other ◽  
Private Ownership ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The World ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
The Rich ◽  
The Individual

Capitalism as an economic system that is implemented by most countries in the world today, in fact it gave birth to injustice and social inequalityare increasingly out of control. Social and economic inequalities are felt both between countries (developed and developing countries) as well as insociety itself (the rich minority and the poor majority). The condition is born from the practice of departing from faulty assumptions about the man. In capitalism the individual to own property released uncontrollably, causing a social imbalance. On the other hand, Islam never given a state model that guarantees fair distribution of ownership for all members of society, ie at the time of the Prophet Muhammad established the Islamic government in Medina. In Islam, the private ownership of property was also recognized but not absolute like capitalism. Islam also recognizes the forms of joint ownership for the benefit of society and acknowledges the ownership of the state that aims to create a balance and social justice.

scholarly journals Stage 2 Registered Report: How responsibility attributions to self and others relate to outcome ownership in group decisions

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 362
Author(s):  
Matt Jaquiery ◽  
Marwa El Zein
Keyword(s):  
Majority Vote ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Society ◽  
Vote Decision ◽  
Responsibility Attributions ◽  
Online Study ◽  
Collective Work ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Study Participants ◽  
Group Member

Background: Responsibility judgements have important consequences in human society. Previous research focused on how someone's responsibility determines the outcome they deserve, for example, whether they are rewarded or punished. Here, in a pre-registered study (Stage 1 Registered Report: https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16480.2), we investigate the opposite link: How outcome ownership influences responsibility attributions in a social context.  Methods: In an online study, participants in a group of three perform a majority vote decision-making task between gambles that can lead to a reward or no reward. Only one group member receives the outcome and participants evaluate their and the other players' responsibility for the obtained outcome. Results: We found that outcome ownership increases responsibility attributions even when the control over an outcome is similar. Moreover, ownership had an effect on the valence bias: participants’ higher responsibility attributions for positive vs negative outcomes was stronger for players who received the outcome. Finally, this effect was more pronounced when people rated their own responsibility as compared to when they were rating another’s player responsibility. Conclusions: The findings of this study reveal how credit attributions can be biased toward particular individuals who receive outcomes as a result of collective work, both when people judge their own and someone else’s responsibility.

Humanizing the Outgroup in Contexts of Protracted Intergroup Conflict

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Ronald Gubler ◽  
Eran Halperin ◽  
Gilad Hirschberger
Keyword(s):  
Random Sample ◽  
The Other ◽  
Intergroup Conflict ◽  
Willingness To Accept ◽  
Unique Approach ◽  
Nationally Diverse ◽  
Group Member ◽  
Reciprocal Empathy

AbstractCurrent approaches to humanizing members of an outgroup in contexts marked by protracted intergroup conflict see mixed success. In both Study 1, conducted on a random sample of Israeli Jews (N = 103), and Study 2, conducted on a nationally diverse sample of Israeli Jews (N = 670), we experimentally test the effect of a unique approach to humanizing the outgroup based on empathy. Instead of requiring individuals to express empathy for outgroup suffering they might have caused, this approach requires an expression of empathy for suffering unrelated to the conflict between the groups. Results suggest that such an expression of empathy from one group member toward the other group can lead to “reciprocal empathy” which facilitates a greater willingness to accept the humanity of all members of the other group.

Paul Ricoeur and International Law: Beyond ‘The End of the Subject’. Towards a Reconceptualization of International Legal Personality

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
JANNE E. NIJMAN
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
International Institutions ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Personality ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The One ◽  
The Individual ◽  
International Legal Personality ◽  
Normative Aspect

The enquiry into international legal personality in the following article is both descriptive and prescriptive in nature. On the one hand, the phenomenon of the (legal) subject is described and explained, in order to offer a better reflection on, and analysis of, its existence. This holds for both the individual and the (so central to international law) collective subject. On the other hand, our attempt at reconceptualization has a clear normative aspect. Reconstructing (international) legal personality on the basis of anthropology and ethics as an inextricable part of the identity of a person results in a conception of (international) law as justice. And this means that international legal personality reconceptualized along the lines suggested in this paper functions to develop just international institutions and just international law.

scholarly journals Applied Technique of Acting in the Role of Teaching

2018 ◽  
pp. 14-24
Author(s):  
Cong Hao
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
The Other ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Initial Idea ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Group Member

In the short speech, the content of the lesson will be presented to the students in front of the students, so the students will get an initial idea about the content. The formation of the team after the tearing of the teachers and the students will divide one or the other character of the team members. Students will discuss the role of this character among themselves or by grouping themselves and try to understand. The teachers will ask each group member to think about their character. The character of the subject matter of the subject will be presented through acting or dialogue.

scholarly journals Corporate submissiveness

Temida ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-96
Author(s):  
Vesna Baltezarevic ◽  
Radoslav Baltezarevic
Keyword(s):  
Aggressive Behavior ◽  
Social Isolation ◽  
Frequent Occurrence ◽  
The Other ◽  
Group Member

The appeal of an organization, or belonging to a certain group depends upon the satisfaction each group member derives from his function within the greater system. In contrast to that, a frequent occurrence is the incidence of aggressive behavior within the organization system, motivated by the need to impose power. Individuals who refuse to comply with such a model of managing others, become themselves the victims and subjects to actions aimed at their social isolation. This paper aspires to identify the reason why majority of employees tends to accept the imposed subordinating position at the working place without complaint. The other issue the author is addressing is the drive behind individual solidarity with the leader, especially in cases when the leader in question demonstrates unjustified aggression towards certain employee(s).

scholarly journals DIVISION III WORKING GROUP on PLANETARY SYSTEM NOMENCLATURE

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (T27B) ◽  
pp. 186-187
Author(s):  
Rita Schulz ◽  
K. Aksnes ◽  
J. Blue ◽  
E. Bowell ◽  
G. A. Burba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Group ◽  
Planetary System ◽  
Majority Vote ◽  
The Other ◽  
Task Group ◽  
Division Iii ◽  
Group Member

The meeting was attended by 5 members of the WG (E. Bowell, G. Consolmagno, R. Courtain, R. Lopez, R. Schulz) one Task Group member (J. Watanabe), and several guests from the CSBN and CBAT. It was decided at the beginning of the meeting that the attending members of the WGPSN would discuss matters, provide their opinion or vote, and then ask the other 8 formal members to do the same via email. As a consequence the following discussed items have been agreed by majority vote of the WG members.

An Information Propagation Model for Instant Messaging with Group

2014 ◽  
Vol 556-562 ◽  
pp. 5436-5441
Author(s):  
Feng Ding ◽  
Zhi Han Yu ◽  
Cui Cui Hao ◽  
Zhi Jun Li
Keyword(s):  
Instant Messaging ◽  
Propagation Model ◽  
The Other ◽  
Information Propagation ◽  
Group Influence ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Group Member

In this article, an information propagation model for instant messaging with group is constructed to research the group influence on information propagation in instant messaging network. The feature of group is if a group member propagates a message in a group, the other members in the same group will have a chance to receive this message. There are 4 kinds of nodes in instant messaging network: 1, N0, hasn’t received the message; 2, N1, has received the message, but hasn’t opened it yet; 3, N2, has opened the message, but hasn’t retransmitted it yet; 4,N3, has already opened the message and has retransmitted the message. When a message is propagated into the network, the group influence on information propagation in instant messaging network is revealed by changing the size of each group and the number of groups. The conclusion: the information propagation efficiency of instant messaging network with group is much higher than normal instant messaging network. When the size of each group is very small and the number of groups is very little, the influence of them on information propagation is not very obvious. With the growth of the size of each group and the number of groups, the information propagation is more and more widely and quickly.

scholarly journals Stage 1 Registered Report: How responsibility attributions to self and others relate to outcome ownership in group decisions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Matt Jaquiery ◽  
Marwa El Zein
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Context ◽  
Majority Vote ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Society ◽  
Vote Decision ◽  
Responsibility Attributions ◽  
Collective Work ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Group Member

Responsibility judgements have important consequences in human society. Previous research focused on how someone's responsibility determines the outcome they deserve, for example, whether they are rewarded or punished. Here, we investigate the opposite link: How outcome ownership influences responsibility attributions in a social context. Participants in a group of three perform a majority vote decision-making task between gambles that can lead to a reward or no reward. Only one group member receives the outcome and participants evaluate their and the other players' responsibility for the obtained outcome. Two hypotheses are tested: 1) Whether outcome ownership increases responsibility attributions even when the control over an outcome is similar. 2) Whether people's tendency to attribute higher responsibility for positive vs negative outcomes will be stronger for players who received the outcome. The findings of this study may help reveal how credit attributions can be biased toward particular individuals who receive outcomes as a result of collective work.

Implications of Joint Ownership of Patents in the USA

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen R. Terry
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Research Institutions ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Joint Ownership ◽  
Joint Patent

As collaboration between companies and research institutions increases, joint ownership of patents resulting from collaboration also increases. The agreement to own patents jointly is often entered into casually by parties who are unaware of the implications of joint ownership. Those implications are far from casual. It has been said that ‘joint owners of patents are at the mercy of each other’. Before agreeing to joint ownership, companies and research institutions should be aware of the procedural difficulties in obtaining a joint patent and that each owner is free to use or license the patent without consulting with or sharing the proceeds with the other owners.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document