scholarly journals Authenticity in the Perspective of Sport Tourism: Some Selected Examples

2017 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Hurych
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Sport Tourism ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Fundamental Ontology ◽  
Outer World ◽  
Strongly Connected ◽  
Group Perception

Abstract Authenticity is usually understood as something similar to truth, or as a kind of ability of one “to be oneself”. However, for the philosophical approach, authenticity presents a more complex and complicated term. This conception has been followed in existentialism and fundamental ontology, where it has been examined and analyzed in depth (especially by Martin Heidegger). This paper deals with the search for some potentiality of the authentic modus of being through the practice of some forms of sport tourism. We selected and described four model types of sport tourism activities. Then, we designed and selected some factors of authenticity. The evaluation of authenticity within the selected activities according to the factors was applied in a two-round process of evaluation. The results of the process are explained and discussed. In conclusion, authenticity is presented as a concept that is not strongly influenced by outer settings, but is rather strongly connected with personal attunement and individual (or group) perception of the outer world.

Problematization and modification of phenomenological concept of experience in Martin Heidegger`s fundamental ontology

2021 ◽  
Vol - (3) ◽  
pp. 138-148
Author(s):  
Vlada Anuchina
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Fundamental Ontology ◽  
The Subject

The aim of the paper is to justify the view of Martin Heidegger’s concept of Dasein as a recon- ceptualization and modification of Edmund Husserl’s concept of experience (Erfahrung). The subject of analysis is Heidegger's concept “Dasein”, which is one of the most problematic concepts of the entire Heidegger's legacy due to ambiguity of its meaning and the resulting variability of possible interpretations. Specific attention is paid to examining the ontological reading of Heidegger's philosophy as opposed to both existentialist and anthropological ones; the author also textually argues for its legitimacy. Author textually proves that Dasein indeed is a modification of Husserl`s concept of experience. Moreover, she claims that not only the concept of Dasein but fundamental ontology itself may be seen to some extent as an original modification of Husserl’s phenomenology. For not only one of the key phenomenological concepts gets modified, but also its method of exploration and some crucial topics (e. g. the temporality of consciousness) get modified and incorporated in Heidegger’s fundamental ontology project.

Was heißt es: Einen philosophischen Text historisch lesen?

1996 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Kurt Flasch
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
History Of Philosophy ◽  
Historical Knowledge ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Philosophical Position ◽  
Philosophical Orientation ◽  
Historical School ◽  
Historical Investigation ◽  
History Of

Abstract In his later thought, Martin Heidegger disclaimed the possibility of a philosophical history of philosophy. In his view, the history of philosophy tends to remain bound to a specißc philosophical orientation and offer merely a philosophical position, not philosophy itself, presenting at best nothing more than an assemblage of doctrinal positions. In contrast, Heidegger developed in his early Freiburg lectures of 1919-1923 an historical-phenomenological program of philosophical history directed against the historical school of Dilthey, whose objekthi-storisch perspective he meant to replace with his own vollzugshistorisch method. For Heidegger, there is no perfected subject at the basis of historical investigation, but rather it is the temporality of the observer which makes possible historical knowledge in the ßrst place. Heidegger's later abandonment of this notion is a significant reason for the lack of a philosophical approach to writing the history of philosophy after 1945 in Germany.

scholarly journals FREEDOM AS THE MAIN PROBLEM OF PHILOSOPHY GÜNTHER NEUMANN DER FREIHEITSBEGRIFF BEI GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ UND MARTIN HEIDEGGER. PHILOSOPHISCHE SCHRIFTEN, BAND 9. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 2019 ISBN 978-3-428-15537-8 HEIDEGGER UND LEIBNIZ. MIT EINEM GELEITWORT VON FRIEDRICH-WILHELM VON HERRMANN (DAS DENKEN MARTIN HEIDEGGERS II 2 HRSG. VON HANS-CHRISTIAN GÜNTHER). Traugott Bautz Verlag, Nordhausen, 2020 ISBN 978-3-95948-493-0

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 305-311
Author(s):  
◽  
VALTERS ZARIŅŠ ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz ◽  
The Other ◽  
Being And Time ◽  
Close Reading ◽  
Human Being ◽  
Fundamental Ontology ◽  
Freedom Of Will ◽  
History Of

Book review focuses on two books by Gunther Neumann, dedicated to the thought of Heidegger and Leibniz. If one of the books deals specifically with the understanding of freedom in both of the two philosophers, then the other one deals more with Heidegger’s three approaches to Leibniz’s thought: (1) Interpretation of Leibniz in the context of the making of fundamental ontology and in Being and Time, as well as the reading of Leibniz after Being and Time; (2) Interpretation of Leibniz during the transition to Ereignis thought; (3) Interpetation of Leibniz in the framework of Ereignis thought. Author’s scrupulous close reading approach allows to show the changes in Heidegger’s approach to Leibniz’s philosophy, as well as sketch out the placement of Leibniz’s great themes on the horizon of Heidegger’s history of the truth of being. Author also shows that from metaphysics there stems a certain view in the modern philosophical discussions oriented on neurosciences—a certain view on the human being and on the freedom of will. On this background Heidegger appears as a thinker who has looked beyond the alloy of metaphysics and sciences, in which the concept of freedom has been greatly restricted. Heidegger manages (thanks to the radical questioning of Being) to turn the view on the problem of freedom, which appears in G. Neumann’s books as the main problem of philosophy—through the contact of Leibniz’s thought and Heidegger’s.

In Heidegger's Shadow: Hannah Arendt's Phenomenological Humanism

1984 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis P. Hinchman ◽  
Sandra K. Hinchman
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Political Theory ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Core Values ◽  
Public Affairs ◽  
Public Realm ◽  
The Public ◽  
Fundamental Ontology ◽  
The Core

Hannah Arendt's political theory gains in clarity and resonance when it is placed in the context of German phenomenology and Existenz philosophy. In this essay, the authors examine the points of contact (on the level of ideas rather than personal ties) between Arendt and Martin Heidegger. The argument holds that Arendt followed Heidegger in grafting traditional humanism onto an untraditional, self-consciously antimetaphysical body of thought. Yet almost from the beginning, she struck out in a direction peculiarly her own, seeking to escape a certain contemplative aloofness and remoteness from public affairs which she sensed in Heidegger's fundamental ontology. Against Heidegger, Arendt tried to show that the core values of human rights and dignity cannot be sustained unless one explicitly recognizes the “plurality” of human life and the importance of the public realm in revealing who we are as individuals.

Lao-Zhuang and Heidegger on Nature and Technology

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 112-133
Author(s):  
Graham Parkes
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Environmental Problems ◽  
Natural World ◽  
Human Flourishing ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Disruptive Technologies ◽  
Modern Technologies

Many of our current environmental problems stem from damage to the natural world through excessive use of modern technologies. Since these problems are now global in scope, it is helpful to take a comparative philosophical approach—in this case by way of Laozi, Zhuangzi, and Martin Heidegger. Heidegger’s thoughts on these topics are quite consonant with classical Daoist thinking, in part because he was influenced by it. Although Zhuangzi and Heidegger warn against the ways technology can impair rather than promote human flourishing, they are not simply anti-technological in their thinking. Both rather recommend a critical stance that would allow us to shift to a more reflective employment of less disruptive technologies.

scholarly journals Natural science assessment of postmodern approach to linguistics and literary creativity

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.G. Antipenko
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Natural Science ◽  
Jacques Derrida ◽  
Science Assessment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Fundamental Ontology

There are two lines of ascent to understanding the essence of the word and language. One line is gnoseological, it can be represented as a line that goes from the sensual perception to the representation, from the representation to the concept, from the concept to the idea. It has been brilliantly designed by the outstanding Russian linguist A. A. Potebnya. The second line leads from top to bottom, the beginning of it is to be just Platonic idea. This line could now be called an ontological line, taking into account its explication by Martin Heidegger΄s fundamental ontology. The article shows how the synthesis of these two lines allows to confront the postmodern doctrine of arbitrariness (F. Saussur, Jacques Derrida) in the solution of the question of relationship between the signifier and signified, the sign (word) and thing (object).

scholarly journals From ontology to poetry: the essence of Martin Heidegger's thought

2021 ◽  
pp. 93-106
Author(s):  
Bruno MOTANDI
Keyword(s):  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Speculative Philosophy ◽  
Fundamental Ontology ◽  
History Of

How does the concept of being come to our mind? Where does the verb “to be” originate from the origins of speculative philosophy? Such questions raise problems about the conditions for the emergence of ontology in the history of the speculative sciences. It is historically known that the return to fundamental ontology as a science or primary philosophy in contemporary times, with Martin Heidegger, takes place under the banner of poetry. The objective of this article is to show that with Heidegger, it is certainly the being that is at the center of ontology, but this being is essentially linked to verbal and nominal poetry. From modernity, it is a question of understanding with Heidegger, that the essence of thought, beyond the representation given to it by the Moderns, is inscribed in the collecting donation of being. Hence the need to welcome the being in a thought that becomes poetry.

Åbningen af et filosofisk rum – Interview med Slavoj Žižek

2018 ◽  
pp. 15-32
Author(s):  
Glyn Daly
Keyword(s):  
Immanuel Kant ◽  
Martin Heidegger ◽  
Communist Party ◽  
Jacques Derrida ◽  
Jacques Lacan ◽  
Personal Relationship ◽  
Philosophical Approach ◽  
Slavoj Zizek ◽  
Slavoj Žižek ◽  
Long Day

In this interview with Glyn Daly, Slavoj Žižek talks about the birth of ‘The Society for Theoretical Psychoanalysis’, and his own overall philosophical approach. He touches upon his intellectual relationship to thinkers such as Martin Heidegger, Jacques Derrida, Immanuel Kant and of course Jacques Lacan. His sources of inspiration are not only these great theorists, but also his four year long day job as a minute taker for the Yugoslavian communist party, and his personal relationship to Jacques-Alain Miller who gives him his psychoanalytical upbringing.Oversat af Nicklas Weis Damkjær

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document